Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Aspire36 Voluntary Recall

This is a sad day..... (welll the other day when this article was written...)

I have like 4-5 bottles lying around that i've never even opened! The stuff works wonders, and i always have some on hand when/if i get shutdown pretty bad...

(dont ask why i have 5 bottles... LOL.. i didnt realize that they keep sending it, and i had ordered one for my buddy and one for me... so there was 2 bottles a month coming in every month for a few months till i caught on....)

Either way... you seem VERY upfront with your customers and that not common in the supplement industry. I'm sure there will be plenty of unhappy men around... but while it lasted... let me be the millionth person to tell you.... WOW, that stuff worked great! Great porduct and great company!

(P.S..... i think someone said it a few posts ahead.... about the FDA being bought out by Big Pharma companies... i am really starting to question that myself....)
 
Insidious1 said:
This is a sad day..... (welll the other day when this article was written...)

I have like 4-5 bottles lying around that i've never even opened! The stuff works wonders, and i always have some on hand when/if i get shutdown pretty bad...

(dont ask why i have 5 bottles... LOL.. i didnt realize that they keep sending it, and i had ordered one for my buddy and one for me... so there was 2 bottles a month coming in every month for a few months till i caught on....)

Either way... you seem VERY upfront with your customers and that not common in the supplement industry. I'm sure there will be plenty of unhappy men around... but while it lasted... let me be the millionth person to tell you.... WOW, that stuff worked great! Great porduct and great company!

(P.S..... i think someone said it a few posts ahead.... about the FDA being bought out by Big Pharma companies... i am really starting to question that myself....)
Click to expand...

thanks for the kind words and support my friend. We have always been upfront with our customers and will continue to be. Glad you stocked up bro, ive gotta few for a rainy day too:cheers:
 
Well, now that production is coming to a halt, this is going to greatly reduce the supply, which I'm sure there is plenty of demand. On top of that since the product is a diminishing supply (since it is eaten), the demand curve will stay the same, and the supply curve will shift to the left, gradually as time progresses (the supply continues to diminish). Quantity will diminish, Price will increase.
 
gee thanks for the macroeconomics lesson ;)

I try and hammer into my 11 year olds head the idea of supply vs demand being what rules the world.
 
EasyEJL said:
gee thanks for the macroeconomics lesson ;)

I try and hammer into my 11 year olds head the idea of supply vs demand being what rules the world.
Click to expand...


Once you get micro/macro economics down really good, you can exploit your fellow man for mucho dollaz :head:
 
Invalid Link Removed


Less Quantity, Higher Prices.

Shift in demand curve: when any other factor that influences demand changes (i.e. income, tastes, etc.)

Movement along demand curve: the change in quantity demanded brought about by change in price.
 
Wow, I'm not sure how much Aspire 36 nutraplanet had in stock, but from what I noticed, everything was out of stock in 12 minutes. Impressive.
 
i was shopping last night. I was only nice enough to leave one bottle left for grabs :D

I kinda figured that with the bottles that I ordered, and the demand for them going up and the quantity going down, I could at least make a few bucks on them puppies. No way in HELL i could use all the supply that I bought :rofl:
 
Cellardude said:
i was shopping last night. I was only nice enough to leave one bottle left for grabs :D

I kinda figured that with the bottles that I ordered, and the demand for them going up and the quantity going down, I could at least make a few bucks on them puppies. No way in HELL i could use all the supply that I bought :rofl:
Click to expand...

As far as I understand, it is not 'offically' banned yet right ?


I was going to buy some bottles, but I decided not to b/c:


1. I don't actually like the product at all. The side effects are horrible and not worth it. My penls is not flaccid by any means.

2. If it does become banned, and you sell it, you are committing an illegal activity over a few bucks. To some people that may be worth it, but not to me. Esp, with all this attention lately, the last thing I need is to be 'checked out' by the DEA.

3. Since I don't intend on selling it or using it as I don't like it, there's no point for me anyway.
 
There is a higher profit margin to be made off illegal anabolic hormones vs. herbal sexual aids, IMO.
 
ReaperX said:
There is a higher profit margin to be made off illegal anabolic hormones vs. herbal sexual aids, IMO.
Click to expand...

And therein a higher profit margin to be made of Narcotics, depending on how direct-from-port you can pick up, the income of your target demographic, and how pure the product is.

28g to an oz
16oz to a lb
36oz to a kilo
kilo can be bought for $16, 000 at direct ports
1oz in grams sells for $10/point @ 90% purity (street price) for an average net of 2,240 (adjusted for price flucuations and market saturation) for a gross of 1,795.56

But the larger question is: "who the fvck cares?"
 
However, for the most part, Macroeconomic predictors lack the language to adequately describe the Microeconomic phenomena involved in peer-to-peer narcotic purchasing.

Scarcity in this context is too much of an inconstant variable due to the irrational nature of the junky.

Larger scale productions more closely follow laws of scarcity, however.
 
ReaperX said:
As far as I understand, it is not 'offically' banned yet right ?


I was going to buy some bottles, but I decided not to b/c:


1. I don't actually like the product at all. The side effects are horrible and not worth it. My penls is not flaccid by any means.

2. If it does become banned, and you sell it, you are committing an illegal activity over a few bucks. To some people that may be worth it, but not to me. Esp, with all this attention lately, the last thing I need is to be 'checked out' by the DEA.

3. Since I don't intend on selling it or using it as I don't like it, there's no point for me anyway.
Click to expand...

Sell it outside the US, no worries.
 
Except you are talking about the behaviour of macroeconomic phenomena/aggregates, demand and supply as concepts belong squarely in the microeconomic realm.
 
thumbs up to PAL for the voluntary recall, although sorry to hear about it as it will set you back a bit financially (I'm assuming)

Anyway Aspire is unreal, I havent used viagra or cialis but I can't imagine anything more powerful than Aspire36 was/is.
 
strategicmove said:
Except you are talking about the behaviour of macroeconomic phenomena/aggregates, demand and supply as concepts belong squarely in the microeconomic realm.
Click to expand...

Which is why classical economics are inept at predicting market behaviour in a consumption, as opposed to production based, economies. Well, inept is a strong word, limited is better verbiage.

The law of diminishing returns seems archaic when the unsteady equilibrium between 'wants' and 'needs' has been fundamentally altered in the segment of the population with purchasing power.
 
Mulletsoldier said:
Which is why classical economics are inept at predicting market behaviour in a consumption, as opposed to production based, economies. Well, inept is a strong word, limited is better verbiage.

The law of diminishing returns seems archaic when the unsteady equilibrium between 'wants' and 'needs' has been fundamentally altered in the segment of the population with purchasing power.
Click to expand...

classical economics are outdated. the majority of the decisions made today are more applicable to Keynes aka new economics.
 
ReaperX said:
classical economics are outdated. the majority of the decisions made today are more applicable to Keynes aka new economics.
Click to expand...

*ugh*

Keynesian Welfare States have been out of favour for some time as well. Even John Maynard is slightly inept in contemporary economics (deindustrialization made sure of that).

EDIT:

Ugh because I hate Keynes.
 
Mulletsoldier said:
*ugh*

Keynesian Welfare States have been out of favour for some time as well. Even John Maynard is slightly inept in contemporary economics (deindustrialization made sure of that).

EDIT:

Ugh because I hate Keynes.
Click to expand...
Neo-Keynesian economics is still influential.
 
strategicmove said:
Neo-Keynesian economics is still influential.
Click to expand...

And still influences 'stagflation' models because it is, once again, inept in contemporary economics. Neo-Keynesian syntheses look beautiful on paper but pan out quite poorly in actuality.

I was speaking more about classical Keynesian Welfare States, however.
 
That's basically what we use is Keynes theories.


Probably one of the worst ideas that classical economics offers is that supply drives demand instead of vice versa.
 
ReaperX said:
classical economics are outdated. the majority of the decisions made today are more applicable to Keynes aka new economics.
Click to expand...
Without getting too far off the original Aspire36 theme, I just wanted to mention there was, in fact, a Neoclassical-Keynesian Synthesis, championed by John R. Hicks (via the famous "IS-LM" model), and refined by Franco Modigliani. The Neo-Keynesians went ahead to develop the concept of a Phillips Curve, to improve on the results of the model in terms of inflation; extended the system to explain international trade via the Mundell-Fleming model; and straightened out the "microfoundstions" of the model (James Tobin and others). Model-building by Jan Tinbergen (who actually coined the word "Macroeconomics") and others followed. Theoretical and empirical difficulties led to the development of a so-called "Walrasian-Keynesian" synthesis (Leon Walras was one of the first to construct a full general-equilibruim model of the economy involving n x n markets and agents in an auction-type convergence to equilibrium). Growth models and models of the business cycle emerged, leading ultimately to the so-called "New Classical (Macro)Economics" (starting from the monetarist school and leading to rational-expectations-type modelling).

Correction: The term "macroeconomics" was coined by the Norwegian economist Ragnar Frisch in 1933, and not by Jan Tinbergen.
 
Last edited:
strategicmove said:
Without getting too far off the original Aspire36 theme, I just wanted to mention there was, in fact, a Neoclassical-Keynesian Synthesis, championed by John R. Hicks (via the famous "IS-LM" model), and refined by Franco Modigliani. The Neo-Keynesians went ahead to develop the concept of a Phillips Curve, to improve on the results of the model in terms of inflation; extended the system to explain international trade via the Mundell-Fleming model; and straightened out the "microfoundstions" of the model (James Tobin and others). Model-building by Jan Tinbergen (who actually coined the word "Macroeconomics") and others followed. Theoretical and empirical difficulties led to the development of a so-called "Walrasian-Keynesian" synthesis (Leon Walras was one of the first to construct a full general-equilibruim model of the economy involving n x n markets and agents in an auction-type convergence to equilibrium). Growth models and models of the business cycle emerged, leading ultimately to the so-called "New Classical (Macro)Economics" (starting from the monetarist school and leading to rational-expectations-type modelling).
Click to expand...

I only know about Voodoo Economics....anyone.....anyone....
 
The only thing people need to know is Reaper's Theorm.

It basically states that 'Stupidity=profitability'
 
strategicmove said:
Without getting too far off the original Aspire36 theme, I just wanted to mention there was, in fact, a Neoclassical-Keynesian Synthesis, championed by John R. Hicks (via the famous "IS-LM" model), and refined by Franco Modigliani. The Neo-Keynesians went ahead to develop the concept of a Phillips Curve, to improve on the results of the model in terms of inflation; extended the system to explain international trade via the Mundell-Fleming model; and straightened out the "microfoundstions" of the model (James Tobin and others). Model-building by Jan Tinbergen (who actually coined the word "Macroeconomics") and others followed. Theoretical and empirical difficulties led to the development of a so-called "Walrasian-Keynesian" synthesis (Leon Walras was one of the first to construct a full general-equilibruim model of the economy involving n x n markets and agents in an auction-type convergence to equilibrium). Growth models and models of the business cycle emerged, leading ultimately to the so-called "New Classical (Macro)Economics" (starting from the monetarist school and leading to rational-expectations-type modelling).
Click to expand...

What does this have to do with pills that make my d1ck hard?
 
Aspire36 - out of stock until April

Palo Alto Labs has temporarily stopped making Aspire36 and
Aspire Lite, but expects to resume production in April.

To learn more, visit the Palo Alto Labs website
(Invalid Link Removed) or click on this link:

Invalid Link Removed



TRUE?
 
AdelV said:
Aspire36 - out of stock until April

Palo Alto Labs has temporarily stopped making Aspire36 and
Aspire Lite, but expects to resume production in April.

To learn more, visit the Palo Alto Labs website
(Invalid Link Removed) or click on this link:

Invalid Link Removed



TRUE?
Click to expand...
Whats your source on this?

Not sure who has started the "April" rumor.. but we definitely have no set date to when/if this could ever return
 
this has made my day, i just got some of my stuff :D
 

Attachments

  • asp.JPG
    asp.JPG
    97.3 KB · Views: 453
jaydesiel4651 said:
it would be funny if this whole thing is a marketing scam just so everyone on the board buys like 10 botles.
Click to expand...

Exactly what I was thinking. Sites are running out of this stuff. And while I am not one of the conspiracy theorist I must say that in the end the joke would be on FDA, if they had actually banned the stuff.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top