Best athlete in the world!

Page 2 of 8 First 1234 ... Last

  1. Michael Johnson...
    he worked his ass off, but had amazing talent to go with it. (holds 400 record and 200) the 200 record 19.32 and a 400 of 43.18....i wish i could have seen these races. No other sprinter has done well in both the 400 and 200 like he has...


    i think lance is amazing. he has 0! fast twitch fibers (which helps endurence) but he has worked his butt off like no other, and has, in my mind been blessed. he was not Always that great. but than again no one is when they start something.


  2. Quote Originally Posted by jarhead
    So how is the weather in Bizarro world?
    Its not bad, whats it like living in fantasyland where Lance Armstrong is the best athlete, and 5 time marathon runner bogatu modishu is a close second(marathon guy is fictional). The sport is just too one dimensional to have the best athlete come out of it.
    •   
       


  3. "I don't think Lance is not an athlete, hes just not even remotely close to being one of the top athletes. I did'nt say I rode at an elite level, I'm just saying I have a pretty damn good idea what cycling is about, I do. As well as a pretty good idea of what tennis is about(played throughout HS, won states twice). I was'nt saying I'm on par with Lance at all, I was saying I know what the sport entails. So not really a good comparison."


    Quote Originally Posted by Alexander
    I feel there is a good chance most, not all, of the people in this thread saying cycling takes strenght and agility are piss poor athletes themselves. And no, I don't think riding a bike up a hill takes strength, or going around a sharp turn takes agility. Hell no. Just about anyone could ride up those hills and around the turns, its just that everyone would gas before Lance. Now I'd really like to see your average joe try to hit around with Federer.
    You did say this b.s. above correct? You're just contradicting yourself over and over. I'm done with this. Besides I'm sure you probably have to polish your high school state champ trophies.

  4. tj duckett is the best athlete in the world - if you say otherwise then u soft



    actually I think Julius Peppers might be the best in the world.. I know, hes not even the best at his sport or position but he'd beat Lance Armstrong in basketball. otherwise I'll take Lance as best athlete - he's pretty good at cycling

    lance is the best in his sport, whether he's a true athlete well thats up to you..
    My Little Site about Hair Loss & Anabolics-
    hair loss from steroids dot com

  5. T.J. Duckett could not hit around Federer, he can't be the best athlete.
    •   
       


  6. mariuz pudzianowski (Spelling?) Just to diver attention from lance and federer

  7. Quote Originally Posted by somewhatgifted
    mariuz pudzianowski (Spelling?) Just to diver attention from lance and federer
    Yeah he is an absolute freak! Definitely dominating his sport.

  8. Quote Originally Posted by jarhead
    T.J. Duckett could not hit around Federer, he can't be the best athlete.
    hahah Duckett playing tennis
    My Little Site about Hair Loss & Anabolics-
    hair loss from steroids dot com

  9. Hey 400runner I see you reading this thread. I would have to say if biking takes no skills or athleticism then heck running the 400 has to be even easier and running the 800 pft you can call that one in via cel phone I mean come on all you are doing is running. BWAHAHAHAHA j/k but am trying to make a point.

    Well I guess Alexander knows better than the rest of us AND the Associated Press AND ESPN they too are confused what it mens to be an athlete

    Associated Press Male Athlete of the Year for 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005
    ESPN's ESPY Award for Best Male Athlete in 2003, 2004, and 2005

    Heck Federer isn't even the best tennis player ever how the heck can he be the best overall athlete lol


    CROWELR
    Last edited by CROWLER; 01-26-2006 at 08:24 PM.
    Sleep Supplement 3Z BCAA: Red Raspberry and Lemon flavors
    HGH/sleep enhancer: HGHpro
    Test Booster: TestoPRO and STOKED!
    Preworkout: MANIAC Fruit Punch and Pink Lemonade

  10. YOu do make a good point, Has anyone heard of joe eigo hes CRAZY, check it out not athlete of the year tho sry.

    Quote Originally Posted by CROWLER
    Hey 400runner I see you reading this thread. I would have to say if biking takes no skills or athleticism then heck running the 400 has to be even easier and running the 800 pft you can call that one in via cel phone I mean come on all you are doing is running. BWAHAHAHAHA j/k but am trying to make a point.

    Well I guess Alexander knows better than the rest of us AND the Associated Press AND ESPN they too are confused what it mens to be an athlete

    Associated Press Male Athlete of the Year for 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005
    ESPN's ESPY Award for Best Male Athlete in 2003, 2004, and 2005

    Heck Federer isn't even the best tennis player ever how the heck can he be the best overall athlete lol


    CROWELR

  11. Quote Originally Posted by jarhead
    T.J. Duckett could not hit around Federer, he can't be the best athlete.
    You clearly don't understand much. Your putting words into my mouth, and not comprehending my comparisons whatsoever. Or, you decided it was time for another kindygarten joke that makes no sense. Above you said I contradicted myself, not at all. I'm giving somewhat logical reasons as to why cycling is not that athletic of a sport(mainly that its one dimensional). All your saying is riding up a hill takes a lot of strength, and taking the curves takes agility. And it does, but its not a high level of agility. Its difficult to argue the exact amount of agility something takes, but certainly the side to side movement, quickness, hand eye coordination, reflexes, timing, etc that it takes to take part in a baseline rally in pro tennis takes much more agility then any part of cycling. To me the agility contest between cycling and tennis is very obviously lopsided. Tennis players are'nt strong, but they have good power. To be able to hit a serve 140 mph you've got power. Tennis players have the edge on speed too. If you had a cyclist race a tennis player in the 40, the cyclist would get dusted. They're all slow twitch, they have no speed. And of course the endurance goes to cycling, although tennis takes a huge amount of endurance as well, playing 3 hours of tennis every other day for 2 weeks during a grand slam is rigorous. Although cycling clearly takes a lot more endurance, cycling kills pretty much any sport in endurance. So, thats how I rationalize to myself that Federer(and Fedor)is a far better ATHLETE then Lance. A lot of it may also be that I don't find cycling impressive. Its all a matter of opinion I suppose, I will agree to disagee.

  12. id just like to add i was only stating that lance is an athlete, though i dont think he is the best.

    i dont think anyone can be the best since there are way to many things to factor in to just pick one.

  13. Quote Originally Posted by fbxdan
    A couple years ago I would have said Alexander Karelin. I believe he is one of the greatest athletes of the last century.
    Absolutley agree. Karelin was truly the Beast from the East, he dominated Greco-Roman Superheavy from age 17 to 35, i think, never beaten in that time. Yes, he lost to Gardener at the end, but it was him fouling out, not Gardner beating him. Alexander "the Great" he truly was.

    The other aspects of Lance Armstrong is the mental power required to sustain focus for hours continously. It is extremeley difficult to watch the road and keep one's heart rate in exactly the proper zone in varying terrain. Tennis, football, wrestling, etc. all get time off between activity, a cyclist does not, and the ability to withstand pain and keep's one's gameplan, world class endurance activities, cycling, running, triathlon, etc. are bouts of sustained pain.

  14. i believe that each and every person has talents. one person who is good at one thing might suck at another...example Michael Jorden...(great at basketball, but a not so great baseball player) enough said....

    and anyways, for someone to say a sport is not a sport has a closed minded view on life. each sport is different and gets different recognition. for one to say what lance does is not a sport than i guess its ok for me to say bodybuilding is not one...i mean all you do is lift weights.? wrong! you see its competition. and there are people better than one another and it IS a sport too! and running track...Yes, its a sport and the few ppl in the world who know what its all truly understand what they go through as well.

    trey

  15. Quote Originally Posted by Alexander
    You clearly don't understand much. Your putting words into my mouth, and not comprehending my comparisons whatsoever. Or, you decided it was time for another kindygarten joke that makes no sense. Above you said I contradicted myself, not at all. I'm giving somewhat logical reasons as to why cycling is not that athletic of a sport(mainly that its one dimensional). All your saying is riding up a hill takes a lot of strength, and taking the curves takes agility. And it does, but its not a high level of agility. Its difficult to argue the exact amount of agility something takes, but certainly the side to side movement, quickness, hand eye coordination, reflexes, timing, etc that it takes to take part in a baseline rally in pro tennis takes much more agility then any part of cycling. To me the agility contest between cycling and tennis is very obviously lopsided. Tennis players are'nt strong, but they have good power. To be able to hit a serve 140 mph you've got power. Tennis players have the edge on speed too. If you had a cyclist race a tennis player in the 40, the cyclist would get dusted. They're all slow twitch, they have no speed. And of course the endurance goes to cycling, although tennis takes a huge amount of endurance as well, playing 3 hours of tennis every other day for 2 weeks during a grand slam is rigorous. Although cycling clearly takes a lot more endurance, cycling kills pretty much any sport in endurance. So, thats how I rationalize to myself that Federer(and Fedor)is a far better ATHLETE then Lance. A lot of it may also be that I don't find cycling impressive. Its all a matter of opinion I suppose, I will agree to disagee.
    I didn't put words in your mouth, I quoted you. Your basing your comparisons on the skills required to play tennis being the rule as to what defines athletic competition and you don't even see it. Sure Federer is a better athlete IN HIS SPORT, than Lance, but you have repeatedly reduced the entire sport of cycling to an endurance test. (Reread your posts) This entire argument is subjective. EVERY sport requires different skills. Personally I'm not fond of either sport, but I can give credit where credit is due-Lance is a dominant athlete in his sport. To say what you just said-that cycling is not that athletic a sport, is just silly. Agree to disagree it is.

  16. Quote Originally Posted by Alexander
    Please don't come at me like that. You obviously know nothing about athletics, if you think Lance is one of the best athletes. Please tell me what about riding a bicycle is athletic?
    Okay, define your version of an "athlete" for me.

    Yeah, I know nothing of athletics. You never learn anything of the sort in the wrestling room.

  17. Cycling is boring as hell, but requires plenty of athletic ability.

    Sprinting on a bike, uphill, requires power.
    Stamina is a given.
    Having to weave in and out of tightly packed crowds at high speeds and accelarating around corners at high speeds requires responsiveness and agility.
    I could go on forever, and I'm definitely not, nor have I ever been, a cyclist. Its boring as death to me.

    I just don't see how you turned this whole thread into a "cyclists aren't atheletes" thread.

  18. yeah, anyways. whats everyone elses thoughts about the "best"

  19. Gotta give Lebron a vote as well. For as young as he is, he's done some amazing things in his career already. (Plus he gives my hometown a respectable sports team that is desperately needed). Youngest player to reach 5000 points in NBA history.

  20. Quote Originally Posted by jarhead
    I didn't put words in your mouth, I quoted you. Your basing your comparisons on the skills required to play tennis being the rule as to what defines athletic competition and you don't even see it. Sure Federer is a better athlete IN HIS SPORT, than Lance, but you have repeatedly reduced the entire sport of cycling to an endurance test. (Reread your posts) This entire argument is subjective. EVERY sport requires different skills. Personally I'm not fond of either sport, but I can give credit where credit is due-Lance is a dominant athlete in his sport. To say what you just said-that cycling is not that athletic a sport, is just silly. Agree to disagree it is.
    You put words into my mouth by saying "Duckett can't be the best athlete, he cant hit around with Federer", when I never implied whatsoever that you had to be able to hit around with Federer in order to be the best athlete. What I was clearly saying is that plenty of people have the speed, power, and agility to ride with Lance, its just that he does'nt get tired(he has the best endurance of anyone). And that no one has the speed, power, and agility to be able to hit around competitively with Federer, making him the more impressive athlete in my eyes. Athletically Federer has more weapons. I'm not basing my concept of athleticism on the skills it takes to play tennis. I'm going off of Speed, Strength, Agility, and Endurance. Then I'm comparing the two sports. I will continue to 'reduce' the sport of cycling to an endurance contest, because it is. I'd say its 90% endurance. Lance is an amazing sportsman, not so much an amazing athlete, in the true definition. If you wanna get real mad at me, let me help you out. I definitely don't think bodybuilding is a very athletic sport at all. I am a bodybuilder/powerlifter, but I don't think either are very athletic, especially the former. That one is actually for Crowler I believe. Oh, and Lebron James, now your talking. He's definitely high up on my list of best athletes.

  21. Quote Originally Posted by kwyckemynd00
    Okay, define your version of an "athlete" for me.

    Yeah, I know nothing of athletics. You never learn anything of the sort in the wrestling room.
    Speed, Strength, Endurance, and Agility. Wrestlers are very athletic, they possess all of those qualities. I just really don't think cycling requires much of the first 3, just lots of endurance. You've got to draw the line somewhere, do you think Marathon runners are athletic?

  22. Who took all my rep? I was stating my opinion, which is a very reasonable one. I guess I should've just bowed down, and let everyone think they're right.

  23. The TJ Duckett thing was what we on earth here call a JOKE. It was not intended to imply.. ahh screw it.

  24. Quote Originally Posted by jarhead
    T.J. Duckett could not hit around Federer, he can't be the best athlete.
    but but at that same time, Roger Federer isn't stuffing TJ Duckett on the goalline or beating him in a 40yard sprint. Federer can't bench 185 for 1 but duckett could do that for 40 I'd guess. it's really not comparable - although it's a highly funny comparsion..

    When we talk about the 'best athlete' in the NFL - I'm saying it's more impressive for Julius Peppers (6-6 290lbs guy) to run 40yards in 4.42seconds than Michael Vick (6-1 205lbs guy) to run it in 4.31. A lot of people straight up disagree with me here - and that's fine.

    If speed on a track or record on a tennis court is the only measuring stick for being a good athlete than a lot of big names are off the list. I'm taking Deion Sanders, Bo Jackson, Reggie Bush and Donovan McNabb over Roger Federer.. call me crazy

    By definition:
    An athlete is a person possessing above average physical skills (strength, agility, and endurance) and thus seen suitable for physical activities, in particular, contests.
    My Little Site about Hair Loss & Anabolics-
    hair loss from steroids dot com

  25. Quote Originally Posted by jarhead
    The TJ Duckett thing was what we on earth here call a JOKE. It was not intended to imply.. ahh screw it.
    haha don't worry.. I knew that anyway
    it's all good
    My Little Site about Hair Loss & Anabolics-
    hair loss from steroids dot com

  26. Quote Originally Posted by Alexander
    Speed, Strength, Endurance, and Agility. Wrestlers are very athletic, they possess all of those qualities. I just really don't think cycling requires much of the first 3, just lots of endurance. You've got to draw the line somewhere, do you think Marathon runners are athletic?
    by definition that is correct.

    i think an athlete is also defined by how much success he/she could have playing ALL sports - not just their specialty
    My Little Site about Hair Loss & Anabolics-
    hair loss from steroids dot com

  27. Quote Originally Posted by fbxdan
    It's Fedor Emelianenko IMHO. He participates in one of the toughest (if not the toughest) sport in the world, is one of the most dominant athletes around at the moment. A couple years ago I would have said Alexander Karelin. I believe he is one of the greatest athletes of the last century.
    Hell yeah bro, that man is unstoppable.

  28. Quote Originally Posted by CEDeoudes59
    but but at that same time, Roger Federer isn't stuffing TJ Duckett on the goalline or beating him in a 40yard sprint. Federer can't bench 185 for 1 but duckett could do that for 40 I'd guess. it's really not comparable - although it's a highly funny comparsion..

    When we talk about the 'best athlete' in the NFL - I'm saying it's more impressive for Julius Peppers (6-6 290lbs guy) to run 40yards in 4.42seconds than Michael Vick (6-1 205lbs guy) to run it in 4.31. A lot of people straight up disagree with me here - and that's fine.

    If speed on a track or record on a tennis court is the only measuring stick for being a good athlete than a lot of big names are off the list. I'm taking Deion Sanders, Bo Jackson, Reggie Bush and Donovan McNabb over Roger Federer.. call me crazy

    By definition:
    An athlete is a person possessing above average physical skills (strength, agility, and endurance) and thus seen suitable for physical activities, in particular, contests.
    All those guys you listed minus Mcnabb might be better athletes then Federer. Federer has so much on them skillwise, but they're all definitely much stronger, and faster. Bo Jackson IMO probably the most talented athlete ever, but an underachiever. Julius Peppers is an incredible athlete as well. IMO most people are tremendous followers, and see Lance winning ESPY awards for being the best athlete, so they assume he must be the best athlete. To me those awards don't mean much. I mean Eminem wins rapper of the year by the most credible rap magazine(source), do you think that makes him the best rapper in the world? Hell no. Think for yourself. He's so far from being the best rapper, not even close to the top 10. I guarantee most of the people that think Lance is the best athlete also would've thought the world was flat. There are plenty of guys out their that might be better athletes then Federer, I just think its funny that you guys picked a guy who is pretty much strictly endurance to be the best athlete. Sorry to post this all on your quote Deoudes it is not directed at you.

  29. Quote Originally Posted by jarhead
    The TJ Duckett thing was what we on earth here call a JOKE. It was not intended to imply.. ahh screw it.
    Oh, thanks for filling me in, great joke too. No **** its a joke, a joke that was intended to mock me, when I never said anything to imply anything close to that. Glad your banging your head on the wall, must be a real pain in the ass to deal with someone with an opinion of their own, who makes sense, and will call you on your BS attempts to insult. I mean its not really a bid deal, I just thought I'd call you on it, it was an attempted cheap shot that did'nt make sense because I never said you'd have to be able to hit around with Federer in order to be the best athlete. You may not have intended to imply, but you implied. Now that I've had time to seriously think about it, Federer probably isn't the best athlete, but he is WAY higher up on the list then Lance. Just face it riding a bike is pretty cake, does'nt take a ton of talent, just a ton of endurance. Nobody's answered my Marathon runner question, hmmmm?

  30. Quote Originally Posted by Alexander
    Oh, thanks for filling me in, great joke too. No **** its a joke, a joke that was intended to mock me, when I never said anything to imply anything close to that. Glad your banging your head on the wall, must be a real pain in the ass to deal with someone with an opinion of their own, who makes sense, and will call you on your BS attempts to insult. I mean its not really a bid deal, I just thought I'd call you on it, it was an attempted cheap shot that did'nt make sense because I never said you'd have to be able to hit around with Federer in order to be the best athlete. You may not have intended to imply, but you implied. Now that I've had time to seriously think about it, Federer probably isn't the best athlete, but he is WAY higher up on the list then Lance. Just face it riding a bike is pretty cake, does'nt take a ton of talent, just a ton of endurance. Nobody's answered my Marathon runner question, hmmmm?
    Hey genius, that joke wasn't even directed at you. You're entitled to your opinion, noone ever questioned that. You on the other hand has repeatedly argued with anyone even suggesting that lance is indeed an athlete, which is flat out stupid. It's a sport, he's an athlete, get over it. Or maybe the general population is stupid and you am smart. The way you're pimpin federer so hard, I hope that bitch has yo money. Either way, this is pointless and I'm done with it. Peace.
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Orotine - The Best Tested Creatine in the World!!
    By Clickster in forum Company Promotions
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-06-2010, 02:49 PM
  2. THE BEST FRENCH TOAST IN THE WORLD
    By cmc in forum Recipes
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-04-2009, 08:44 PM
  3. The best fighter in the world
    By robdog in forum MMA
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-26-2008, 06:46 PM
  4. best addition in the world (shakes)
    By drummaboyzl in forum Nutrition / Health
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-24-2008, 06:58 PM
  5. BEST jobs in the world, post your fav.
    By somewhatgifted in forum General Chat
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 09-27-2006, 02:43 PM
Log in
Log in