Best athlete in the world!
- 01-26-2006, 05:50 PM
Originally Posted by Pioneer
- 01-26-2006, 05:50 PM
Look, I was joking around in response to your lance is not an athlete argument, which is as ludricrous as saying all tennis players are gay. That was my point. You may have been riding a bike since you were a kid, but not at an elite level, which is different and requires different skills. Alot of guys have been playing tennis since they were kids. By your logic that makes them on par with Federer?
01-26-2006, 05:51 PM
01-26-2006, 05:55 PM
Please be honest with yourselves. You could rationalize that anything takes SOME amount of athleticism, but cycling is just an endurance sport, period. Oh someone has neg repped me, and that hurts me.
01-26-2006, 06:02 PM
I don't think Lance is not an athlete, hes just not even remotely close to being one of the top athletes. I did'nt say I rode at an elite level, I'm just saying I have a pretty damn good idea what cycling is about, I do. As well as a pretty good idea of what tennis is about(played throughout HS, won states twice). I was'nt saying I'm on par with Lance at all, I was saying I know what the sport entails. So not really a good comparison.Originally Posted by jarhead
01-26-2006, 06:04 PM
he worked his ass off, but had amazing talent to go with it. (holds 400 record and 200) the 200 record 19.32 and a 400 of 43.18....i wish i could have seen these races. No other sprinter has done well in both the 400 and 200 like he has...
i think lance is amazing. he has 0! fast twitch fibers (which helps endurence) but he has worked his butt off like no other, and has, in my mind been blessed. he was not Always that great. but than again no one is when they start something.
01-26-2006, 06:08 PM
Its not bad, whats it like living in fantasyland where Lance Armstrong is the best athlete, and 5 time marathon runner bogatu modishu is a close second(marathon guy is fictional). The sport is just too one dimensional to have the best athlete come out of it.Originally Posted by jarhead
01-26-2006, 06:15 PM
"I don't think Lance is not an athlete, hes just not even remotely close to being one of the top athletes. I did'nt say I rode at an elite level, I'm just saying I have a pretty damn good idea what cycling is about, I do. As well as a pretty good idea of what tennis is about(played throughout HS, won states twice). I was'nt saying I'm on par with Lance at all, I was saying I know what the sport entails. So not really a good comparison."
You did say this b.s. above correct? You're just contradicting yourself over and over. I'm done with this. Besides I'm sure you probably have to polish your high school state champ trophies.Originally Posted by Alexander
01-26-2006, 06:18 PM
tj duckett is the best athlete in the world - if you say otherwise then u soft
actually I think Julius Peppers might be the best in the world.. I know, hes not even the best at his sport or position but he'd beat Lance Armstrong in basketball. otherwise I'll take Lance as best athlete - he's pretty good at cycling
lance is the best in his sport, whether he's a true athlete well thats up to you..
My Little Site about Hair Loss & Anabolics-
hair loss from steroids dot com
01-26-2006, 06:21 PM
01-26-2006, 06:29 PM
01-26-2006, 06:32 PM
01-26-2006, 06:41 PM
hahah Duckett playing tennisOriginally Posted by jarhead
My Little Site about Hair Loss & Anabolics-
hair loss from steroids dot com
01-26-2006, 07:06 PM
Hey 400runner I see you reading this thread. I would have to say if biking takes no skills or athleticism then heck running the 400 has to be even easier and running the 800 pft you can call that one in via cel phone I mean come on all you are doing is running. BWAHAHAHAHA j/k but am trying to make a point.
Well I guess Alexander knows better than the rest of us AND the Associated Press AND ESPN they too are confused what it mens to be an athlete
Associated Press Male Athlete of the Year for 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005
ESPN's ESPY Award for Best Male Athlete in 2003, 2004, and 2005
Heck Federer isn't even the best tennis player ever how the heck can he be the best overall athlete lol
Last edited by CROWLER; 01-26-2006 at 07:24 PM.
Sleep Supplement 3Z BCAA: Red Raspberry and Lemon flavors
HGH/sleep enhancer: HGHpro
Test Booster: TestoPRO and STOKED!
Preworkout: MANIAC Fruit Punch and Pink Lemonade
01-26-2006, 07:34 PM
YOu do make a good point, Has anyone heard of joe eigo hes CRAZY, check it out not athlete of the year tho sry.
Originally Posted by CROWLER
01-26-2006, 07:54 PM
You clearly don't understand much. Your putting words into my mouth, and not comprehending my comparisons whatsoever. Or, you decided it was time for another kindygarten joke that makes no sense. Above you said I contradicted myself, not at all. I'm giving somewhat logical reasons as to why cycling is not that athletic of a sport(mainly that its one dimensional). All your saying is riding up a hill takes a lot of strength, and taking the curves takes agility. And it does, but its not a high level of agility. Its difficult to argue the exact amount of agility something takes, but certainly the side to side movement, quickness, hand eye coordination, reflexes, timing, etc that it takes to take part in a baseline rally in pro tennis takes much more agility then any part of cycling. To me the agility contest between cycling and tennis is very obviously lopsided. Tennis players are'nt strong, but they have good power. To be able to hit a serve 140 mph you've got power. Tennis players have the edge on speed too. If you had a cyclist race a tennis player in the 40, the cyclist would get dusted. They're all slow twitch, they have no speed. And of course the endurance goes to cycling, although tennis takes a huge amount of endurance as well, playing 3 hours of tennis every other day for 2 weeks during a grand slam is rigorous. Although cycling clearly takes a lot more endurance, cycling kills pretty much any sport in endurance. So, thats how I rationalize to myself that Federer(and Fedor)is a far better ATHLETE then Lance. A lot of it may also be that I don't find cycling impressive. Its all a matter of opinion I suppose, I will agree to disagee.Originally Posted by jarhead
01-26-2006, 08:03 PM
id just like to add i was only stating that lance is an athlete, though i dont think he is the best.
i dont think anyone can be the best since there are way to many things to factor in to just pick one.
01-26-2006, 08:05 PM
Absolutley agree. Karelin was truly the Beast from the East, he dominated Greco-Roman Superheavy from age 17 to 35, i think, never beaten in that time. Yes, he lost to Gardener at the end, but it was him fouling out, not Gardner beating him. Alexander "the Great" he truly was.Originally Posted by fbxdan
The other aspects of Lance Armstrong is the mental power required to sustain focus for hours continously. It is extremeley difficult to watch the road and keep one's heart rate in exactly the proper zone in varying terrain. Tennis, football, wrestling, etc. all get time off between activity, a cyclist does not, and the ability to withstand pain and keep's one's gameplan, world class endurance activities, cycling, running, triathlon, etc. are bouts of sustained pain.
01-26-2006, 08:15 PM
i believe that each and every person has talents. one person who is good at one thing might suck at another...example Michael Jorden...(great at basketball, but a not so great baseball player) enough said....
and anyways, for someone to say a sport is not a sport has a closed minded view on life. each sport is different and gets different recognition. for one to say what lance does is not a sport than i guess its ok for me to say bodybuilding is not one...i mean all you do is lift weights.? wrong! you see its competition. and there are people better than one another and it IS a sport too! and running track...Yes, its a sport and the few ppl in the world who know what its all truly understand what they go through as well.
01-26-2006, 10:35 PM
I didn't put words in your mouth, I quoted you. Your basing your comparisons on the skills required to play tennis being the rule as to what defines athletic competition and you don't even see it. Sure Federer is a better athlete IN HIS SPORT, than Lance, but you have repeatedly reduced the entire sport of cycling to an endurance test. (Reread your posts) This entire argument is subjective. EVERY sport requires different skills. Personally I'm not fond of either sport, but I can give credit where credit is due-Lance is a dominant athlete in his sport. To say what you just said-that cycling is not that athletic a sport, is just silly. Agree to disagree it is.Originally Posted by Alexander
01-26-2006, 11:03 PM
Okay, define your version of an "athlete" for me.Originally Posted by Alexander
Yeah, I know nothing of athletics. You never learn anything of the sort in the wrestling room.
01-26-2006, 11:08 PM
Cycling is boring as hell, but requires plenty of athletic ability.
Sprinting on a bike, uphill, requires power.
Stamina is a given.
Having to weave in and out of tightly packed crowds at high speeds and accelarating around corners at high speeds requires responsiveness and agility.
I could go on forever, and I'm definitely not, nor have I ever been, a cyclist. Its boring as death to me.
I just don't see how you turned this whole thread into a "cyclists aren't atheletes" thread.
01-26-2006, 11:11 PM
01-26-2006, 11:24 PM
Gotta give Lebron a vote as well. For as young as he is, he's done some amazing things in his career already. (Plus he gives my hometown a respectable sports team that is desperately needed). Youngest player to reach 5000 points in NBA history.
01-27-2006, 12:15 AM
You put words into my mouth by saying "Duckett can't be the best athlete, he cant hit around with Federer", when I never implied whatsoever that you had to be able to hit around with Federer in order to be the best athlete. What I was clearly saying is that plenty of people have the speed, power, and agility to ride with Lance, its just that he does'nt get tired(he has the best endurance of anyone). And that no one has the speed, power, and agility to be able to hit around competitively with Federer, making him the more impressive athlete in my eyes. Athletically Federer has more weapons. I'm not basing my concept of athleticism on the skills it takes to play tennis. I'm going off of Speed, Strength, Agility, and Endurance. Then I'm comparing the two sports. I will continue to 'reduce' the sport of cycling to an endurance contest, because it is. I'd say its 90% endurance. Lance is an amazing sportsman, not so much an amazing athlete, in the true definition. If you wanna get real mad at me, let me help you out. I definitely don't think bodybuilding is a very athletic sport at all. I am a bodybuilder/powerlifter, but I don't think either are very athletic, especially the former. That one is actually for Crowler I believe. Oh, and Lebron James, now your talking. He's definitely high up on my list of best athletes.Originally Posted by jarhead
Similar Forum Threads
- By DocOptimzed in forum General ChatReplies: 0Last Post: 08-14-2016, 12:05 AM
- By cmc in forum RecipesReplies: 5Last Post: 03-04-2009, 07:44 PM
- By robdog in forum MMAReplies: 21Last Post: 12-26-2008, 05:46 PM
- By drummaboyzl in forum Nutrition / HealthReplies: 7Last Post: 09-24-2008, 05:58 PM
- By somewhatgifted in forum General ChatReplies: 9Last Post: 09-27-2006, 01:43 PM