TST and TRN Metabolites

Page 1 of 9 123 ... Last
  1. TST and TRN Metabolites


    What are the metabolites of TRN and TST?


  2. bump, anyone?
    •   
       


  3. I don't think anyone (who's talking) even knows (definitively) what TST and TRN are, let alone their metabolites.

  4. But what is actually in these products? Are we sure they are legal? What is the "trade name"?

  5. I would be interested in running these but want to make sure they are not on the Steriod Act of 2004
    •   
       


  6. The silence on this thread is disturbing, isn't it?

  7. ummm yes

  8. All I know is that I handle any AAS well. Do not ever have gyno problems, hair loss problems, prostatic hypertrophy problems, and no acne problems. I do get agression.

    After 7 days on TST, my body broke out like I have never in all my life seen. It literally looked like I had the chicken pox. Small bumps EVERYWHERE on my back, sides, arms, etc. Yes, it was acne. It still has not completely gone away after a little over a week.

    I am VERY curious to know what exactly TST is..... and why it had such a profound effect on me..

  9. One has to wonder why, since most if not all of these products will be discontinued, no one who knows is willing to give up the active. It's not like it's going to be a money maker, I think there was one run only of TST with no others planned. So what's the big deal and why will no one (manufacturers) give the active? I think I've seen copycats of TRN already, so the active is apparently out. I know people want to protect their profit potential for as long as possible, but I think these two are at the point where someone should let us know just what the hell is in them. At this point more information probably wouldn't hurt sales. Hell, might help sales if people knew what the hell it was.

  10. bump I'll keep trying

  11. TST/TRN from my understanding is a derivative of Tren, but not methylated that's as far as I know.

  12. Sh1t I just want confirmation it is not a scheduled drug. Is that so hard to ask?

    MH

  13. where is yeahright at? he's got the know how on this stuff... also, could someone, say, sue one of these companies for selling "steroids". just wondering?

  14. Quote Originally Posted by dmilhouse
    Sh1t I just want confirmation it is not a scheduled drug. Is that so hard to ask?

    MH
    It is.
    The Anabolic Steroid Control Act now states, in part...
    "(A) The term 'anabolic steroid' means any drug or hormonal substance, chemically and pharmacologically related to testosterone (other than estrogens, progestins, corticosteroids, and dehydroepiandrosterone), and includes... “

    If I read this TRN/TST is toeing the line of the gray area and of course since supp companies aren't as big as Big Tobacco they don't have the Lobbist dollars to through around and thus I think they (supp companies) they're folding under pressure of the FDA.

    So I don't think it is, but yes it could be if they don't stop selling it per the FDA. They could sue yes, but you would be safe as long as they are not found Illegal.

  15. but at least it is not called out specifically like M1T of 1-AD, etc???

  16. Well you could run it and get tested and see

    But more than likely, no one will say anything so their ass is covered, and rightfully so. If your in doubt, then don't use it.

  17. M-trn is a progestin so therefore it is excluded from the ban substances list as of right now,as for tst most people are up in the air as to what is in it.

  18. Quote Originally Posted by ripped218
    M-trn is a progestin so therefore it is excluded from the ban substances list as of right now,as for tst most people are up in the air as to what is in it.
    17b-methoxymethyloxyestra-4,9,11-trien-3-one

    http://www.musclegurus.com/forum/vie...=asc&start=165

    bump

  19. Quote Originally Posted by 400runner
    where is yeahright at? he's got the know how on this stuff... also, could someone, say, sue one of these companies for selling "steroids". just wondering?
    LOL, my ears were burning. What's the question I'm supposed to be able to answer?

    As to someone filing suit against a company for selling "steroids", that depends.

    One wouldn't likely have a private cause of action to enforce a controlled substance law (however, there might be some obscure state statute somewhere I'm unaware of). There are some weird circumstance where private citizens can enforce laws but I don't think any are applicable here.

    Nonetheless, filing a private tort suit would be easy. If one suffered measurable harm due to the ingestion of one of these substances, then a suit against the manufacturer, distributer and retail agent for distribution of an inherantly dangerous product would be pretty easy to make.....especially if one could show the jury that the manufacturer was deliberately flouting the law by distributing a product that was (1) a molecule or two away from an already illegal substance; (2) untested for safety or efficacy; and (3) sold without reasonable safety warnings to the end user. My hunch is that it would be easy for a grieving parent to convince a jury that the evil company killed little Johnny by selling him a dietary supplement that was really just a disguised evil steroid.

  20. All I want to know is if M-TRN (TST) are all ready on the bill from 2004?

  21. Quote Originally Posted by dmilhouse
    All I want to know is if M-TRN (TST) are all ready on the bill from 2004?
    We don't know. I would imagine that TRN isn't but it's got to be awfully close because ALRI pulled it from the market almost as soon as it was released. As to TST, there's a reason ALRI abandoned it before full-scale production.

    People tend to think of the law as absolute black and white, yes and no answers.....but there is a reason that every lawyer answers a question by saying "it depends." The law is all shades of gray....which is why there is a class of experts called lawyers whose job it is to navigate and interpret those shades of gray.

    My guess (and it is only a guess) is that it is a reasonable judgment call as to whether these compounds break the law or just barely circumvent it. When the enforcement environment was lax, ALRI (their lawyers) were willing to take a liberal interpretation of that judgment call. When the enforcement environment turned harsh, they erred on the side of a conservative judgement call and decided to abandon these two products rather than face years of possible litigation.

    Other companies appear to be willing to take a more liberal interpretation and thus are releasing limited runs of these products banking on the fact that they will be sold and out of distribution before any agency looks into what they are. If you cannot take the chance of consuming something which MAY be just over the line, then don't. 99% of the progress you're going to make building your body is exercise and nutrition anyway. Focus on those things rather than the extra little help that these supplements can provide. Those who can take the chance, should be thankful for these companies who are willing to put the compounds out. JUST MY OPINION.
    Last edited by yeahright; 05-07-2006 at 01:28 PM.

  22. It IS NOT explicitly mentioned as banned.

    There is no trenbolone molecule on the list save for methyl-tren and tren itself.

    There you go Milhouse.

  23. Quote Originally Posted by jmh80
    It IS NOT explicitly mentioned as banned.

    There is no trenbolone molecule on the list save for methyl-tren and tren itself.

    There you go Milhouse.
    Well, since we don't actually know exactly what M-TRN and M-TST are, I'd be hesitant to actually make this statement.

    If the compounds are close enough, a reasonable law enforcement argument could be made that they are functional equivalents of banned substances (the chemical differences merely being cosmetic changes).

    For example, you couldn't simply attach an inert molecule to cocaine and suddenly sell it like it's legal (if cocaine wasn't specifically scheduled, it would probably fit the description of a "supplement" given the traditional food and medicinal uses of the coca plant).

    Like I said, if this guy can't take the chance that one of these substances might trip him up with an employer/athletic governing body, he should just skip them IMO.
    Last edited by yeahright; 02-03-2007 at 10:56 AM.

  24. Assuming TRN is what it says on my bottle - it's not specifically mentioned.

    Unless the gov. misspelled the name - which they've done before.

  25. Quote Originally Posted by yeahright
    If the compounds are close enough, a reasonable law enforcement argument could be made that they are functional equivalents of banned substances (the chemical differences merely being cosmetic changes).
    As a lawyer, I would love for any prosecutor to use this argument.... I'm not necessarily sure there are any possible "cosmetic chemical changes" as the placement of one additional carbon or hydrogen, or adding a double bond rather than a single, or adding a methyl groupd, methoxy, acetyl, or whatever group, will cause not a cosmetic change, but a functional change in the product's chemical makeup.
  •   

      
     

Similar Forum Threads

  1. Methoxy tst/ Mega trn and training
    By burymestanding in forum Training Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-15-2009, 10:08 AM
  2. Methoxy tst/ Mega-trn cycle and prednisone
    By PlateStacker in forum Anabolics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-14-2007, 11:41 AM
  3. Methoxy TST/ Mega TRN log!!
    By anabolicandre in forum Supplement Logs
    Replies: 80
    Last Post: 07-07-2006, 06:30 PM
  4. M-TST/M-Trn/M-zol/T3/Clen cycle
    By hamper19 in forum Cycle Logs
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-27-2006, 10:13 PM
Log in
Log in