I haven’t read anyone on most things honestly, I usually put two and two together, sometimes I’m right and sometimes I’m wrong, and most the time I use google lmao but yes that’s what I was saying. I never would call myself a non dualist but when speaking logically I use non duality as my basis for truth since being a Christian is a Yang element where Islam would be the Yin and the middle would be Satanism. What little I read about Taoism says it’s best to be in the middle of the Tao(the line separating Yin and Yang) to reach immortality(true enlightenment) but now the middle is Satanism and Christian is the Yang(anarcho tyranny) and Islam is the Yin(esoteric Nazism). The truth doesn’t matter, I’m not trying finding the truth, I’m trying to find a positive(esoteric) truth to guide my life. Now that I have one I’m just traveling my open mind to immortality(enlightenment).
I'm not quite sure if your characterization of the parts of the yin/yang is accurate, but I'm a little hesitant to ask what your reasoning is for this. If we must use the yin/yang analogy, I think it may be worth mentioning that many (including Bruce Lee) believe that the yin and yang are two parts of the same whole, and should not be viewed as two separate entities. It's not so much picking one or the other, or even trying to find a "middle ground" between the two, but allowing the two to cooperate and alternate as the situation suits it, allowing a natural flow of the two; like water. As Bruce Lee says, "notice that the stiffest tree is most easily cracked, while the bamboo or willow survive by bending with the wind." I would say that the Tao, or the Way, isn't so much always trying to walk the line in the middle of the yin/yang, but in flowing naturally with it, with the two parts of the same whole, flowing naturally, not opposing this flow. Ironically, trying too hard to stay exactly in the middle of this balance is itself resisting natural flow and movement. Taoism seems to tell us to stay in tune with nature, to be like water. I don't think your characterization of yin as Islam and yang as Christianity and the middle as Satanism is accurate at all, if I can be honest with you. I don't really even know where to begin explaining this, but I do think that my above thoughts touch on it a little.
How well versed in Taoism (and Christianity and Islam for that matter) are you? I'd definitely suggest reading the Tao Te Ching if you haven't to learn about Taoism (it's a short but deep read). The Warrior Within: The Philosophies of Bruce Lee is also a great read that talks about Taoism, duality, and yin/yang.
I'm not sure exactly what you meant in your post, but, a logical reading of your post (wanting to stay in the middle of the Tao/yin/yang) suggests that you think that Taoism says it's best to adhere to Satanism (since you said Satanism is the middle). But Taoism does not say this in any way, so I'm not sure if I'm misunderstanding what you're trying to say, or if your understanding of Taoism isn't complete enough.
Edit: Also, by viewing the concept of yin/yang in terms of Christianity, Islam, and Satanism, I can't help but find it odd that you use only the faiths that stemmed from Judaism, but then try to look at them in the lens of Taoism. As I'm sure you know, Christianity and Islam both developed out of Judaism, which one can argue Satanism also does. I would not say that Christianity and Islam are opposites though, or even two halves of the same whole, and Satanism certainly is not the line between (connecting) the two of them. One could make a better argument that Judaism would be the middle/line between the two, but even then, I don't think that's really accurate, as painting some line between the two may itself be losing the meaning of the yin/yang, as we should allow a constant and natural flow between the two, not seek to stay in some middle ground at all times; that is itself limiting and restricting natural flow, which we can say is perhaps what Lao Tzu means by the Tao/Way.