Iron Warrior
Registered User
And the 49ers almost traded for him at one point, they would have really kicked ass.CEDeoudes59 said:totally agree.
Barry Sanders would have 5 rings if a single player could dominate football like say, basketball.
And the 49ers almost traded for him at one point, they would have really kicked ass.CEDeoudes59 said:totally agree.
Barry Sanders would have 5 rings if a single player could dominate football like say, basketball.
Iron Warrior said:Favre won a Super Bowl w/out a 1,000 yard rusher, Elway didn't until he got TD though. Favre is not the most mobile guy, but he has escapibility and great pocket prescence. Too bad he tends to make some wild throws from time to time though. I'd say Favre is on the same level as Elway.
i forgot about warner awsome qb. man were the rams stupid for getting rid of him so soon he still had at least another season or two.oswizzle said:The one year Kurt Warner won the Super Bowl was some amazing **** too.....that one year was one of the best years EVER by a QB.
yeah marino was the fucking team. we really didnt have any star players except for him. im not being biased becuse im a dolphins fan but for a man to accomplish so much practically by himself is amazing. the only other good dlphin around that time had to be olindo mare.Iron Warrior said:No doubt about it. His only flaw IMO was that he had too many picks, but than again, what can you do when you have no running game and the defense is only worried about you.
Yea, if the niners pick up Sanders in 95 then Young has at least two more rings. On the same note, why is he not being considered more? He has the best lifetime rating for any QB ever, which is by FAR the most important stat. He was an excellent team leader, and he came up big in big games. He would have thrown for over 10 touchdowns in the 95 SB if they didn't call off the dogs IN THE THIRD QUARTER.Iron Warrior said:And the 49ers almost traded for him at one point, they would have really kicked ass.
Ok, this is gonna hurt... cause I HATED the Cowboys for yearsssss....BMW said:aikman should never be mention in a great quaterback thread. he was only good becuase of his recivers rice, smith, irving the o line and cunningham jeez i could put my little 13yr old brother out there and turn him into a qb star with those guys on his team.
Well, first off, yeah... I know that. I never saw any of those 'further back' guys play in my lifetime either. But, I never saw Jim Brown, and still, I know he was one of the, if not the greatest RB.natedogg said:You have to consider the average age of those participating in this thread. These guys were playing before I was even born. Besides, I don't think they could hold a candle to most of today's current QB's. QB's today have become smarter, bigger, quicker and more agile.
That would be sweet!CEDeoudes59 said:Hey SMA - superbowl2006
Ravens and Panthers.
Steve Young doesn't get as much credit because he won 1 Super Bowl and Joe won 4. It's unfair, especially when you consider that the only reason the 49ers traded Montana was because he wasn't better than Young after 1990. Montana did suffer a horrible injury which set him back a lot. I would personally pick Joe over Steve because he played better in clutch games. Their ratings aren't that different, but Young is definitely a much more dangerous running threat. Everyone should get a chance to see his game winning 50 yard run against the Vikings in 1988, that was one of the greatest plays ever, in any sport.doggzj said:Yea, if the niners pick up Sanders in 95 then Young has at least two more rings. On the same note, why is he not being considered more? He has the best lifetime rating for any QB ever, which is by FAR the most important stat. He was an excellent team leader, and he came up big in big games. He would have thrown for over 10 touchdowns in the 95 SB if they didn't call off the dogs IN THE THIRD QUARTER.
Unlike players like Elway, he was also personable and didn't bitch and whine to be traded...
And, which is not even noted here, He was the FIRST MODERN QB. Young was throwing up huge yards rushing when Vick was in grade school.
Edit: If this us about who was the best pure passer/thrower of a football, then obviously Marino wins no contest...
Saints will win the NFC South. Take it and get $$$.shootmeagain said:NFC South should be fun this year. NO will be tough and Tampa ought to be better, but I think it will come down to ATL and The Panthers.
and he didn't win in the 80's either. He won with TD and Sharpe. My point was people kept saying elway had no help and he did it by himself and thats not true.Iron Warrior said:Elway didn't have Sharpe in the 80's though
I don't know what stats you have been looking at.BingeAndPurge said:The hands down debate is between Marino and Montana.
And (3 Time NFL MVP) Randall Cunningham was the first great running QB (record 942 yards rushing in 1990), not Steve Young. Imagine being a RB and making the top ten for leading rushers in a season only to know that the guy in front of you at the 9 slot is a QB. How crappy would that feel. I'm not a Cunningham freak, but I know as a kid it was Cunningham mania for a while there and to win his THIRD MVP some ten years after his first is a great achievement. Still, he's not in the Hall and he's not on my list.
This is exactly why Barry Sanders will most likely forever be the best RB ever. No debate needed.CEDeoudes59 said:its all about the Oline.
In Dallas
In Denver
yankees3 said:Denver's D was decent during their SB years (off the top of my head I know Steve Atwater was a beast, Tom Jackson and Karl mecklenberg (sp?) were pro bowlers)when Elway was going to the SB and didn't Elway also have the best possibly the best TE to ever play the game? (Shannon Sharpe)
They didn't have to throw those numbers because they had a TEAM backing them up.Iron Warrior said:Here's my issue with rating a QB based on stats alone. Let's take Jeff George or others like him with great stats and shitty records for example. They get 300+ passing yards many games because they're was in such bad shape that they got lots of garbage yards towards the end of the game when the opposing defense was in prevent mode. They can end up with 4,000+ yards and 25-30TD's a season and look like All-Pro's on paper but a lot of those stats are deceiving because they were piled up in garbage time.
Now take a look at Joe Montana, Tom Brady, hell even Troy Aikman. These guys did not have great stats because they didn't have to throw for 300-400 yards a game, they were efficient and clutch WHEN IT MATTERED.
IMO, QB rating, TD:INT, & completion percentage are the key stats if you want to throw away winning altogether. In that case, Joe Montana STILL DOMINATES.
You are right that teams need more than 1 great QB to win, but winning record matters as long as the guy has played 10+ years. And Montana did nearly take the Chiefs to Super Bowl with an aging Marcus Allen and mediocre receivers at the end of his career too, granted their defense was good.
You're canadian eh, what do you know, eh. Go watch some CFL and shutup.houseman said:They didn't have to throw those numbers because they had a TEAM backing them up.
That's what happens when you are left with no choice but to throw the ball over and over and over again because your A) D sucks; or B) Receivers suck; C) Backs suck; or D) all of the above![]()
I'll agree with your thoughts on Young. I really enjoyed watching him play.natedogg said:You're canadian eh, what do you know, eh. Go watch some CFL and shutup.![]()
But really, If I were to choose, my top three would have to be based on mobility, accuracy, arm strength, durability, pocket presence, performance in the clutch, and intestinal fortitude among others. I would also include intangibles such as character, personality and unselfishness. Basically someone who has the whole package. Based on these characteristics my three would be Steve Young, John Elway and Brett Farve. Quite frankly these are the guys I grew up watching. There are others that are good as well, but I really didn't start watching football until the early ninties. Of course being a Niners fan, Steve Young is by far my favorite quarterback. Not only for his all out throwing ability, but for his balls. If you ever watched this dude play, he had balls the size of coconuts. He didn't give a ****, if he couldn't beat you with his arm, he could beat you with his feet. Sometimes he scared me though, especially when he got knocked the **** out on more than one occasion. You don't see guys like this come around too often.
Hey, is the NFL big in Canada? How about the CFL? I'm guessing Hockey is still Canada's sport.houseman said:I'll agree with your thoughts on Young. I really enjoyed watching him play.
I'd have to say (minus the speed factor) Young and Favre are similar players. Both will do whatever they need to do get the job done and not afraid of a few bumps if it needs be.
Hell yeah. Me and JR go way back. I really wish the Niners would have taken him back just so he could have retired in a Niners uniform. He asked for it in the offseason, but Mike Nolan told him that they were going in a different direction.CEDeoudes59 said:I hope we don't forget a guy named Jerry Rice. The greatest Football Player ever.
Unless i'm missing some people Favre's D was basically Butler, sharper and White on his last legs and who did he have on offense that was great? Maybe I'm missing the point but I don't see how Favre's supporting cast was so much better than Elway's during his losing years and there's no question Elway definitely had a better supporting cast the years he won.Sir Foxx said:Tom Jackson was only on the first SuperBowl team that Elway went to(He was on the 1977 Denver team, that went to the SB, which had one of the best Defenses ever).
Mecklenberg was a great LB, but that doesn't mean a whole lot when you have no pass rush or not so good corners.
Atwater came in for the last SB route that Denver was in(against SF). Great, great player, but only one player who along with Mecklenberg, didn't have any other help on the D-Side.
Sharpe came in the 90's when Denver started to put together a solid Offense. But in the 80's Denver had nothing, no running game, no receivers, no TE, no line and still made it to 3 SB's.
yankees3 said:Unless i'm missing some people Favre's D was basically Butler, sharper and White on his last legs and who did he have on offense that was great? Maybe I'm missing the point but I don't see how Favre's supporting cast was so much better than Elway's during his losing years and there's no question Elway definitely had a better supporting cast the years he won.
Steve Young was in Tampa Bay in 85 and started in 86 before SF.... While Randall was the 3rd down QB for Buddy Ryans Birds and avg. 7 yds per rush in 85doggzj said:I don't know what stats you have been looking at.
Steve Young was drafted in 1984
Randall Cunningham was drafted in 1985
84 is definately before 85. Sure, Cunningham was a starter before Young, but he also didn't have a guy named Joe in front of him.
CEDeoudes59 said:its all about the Oline.
In Dallas
In Denver
because Favre's team was loaded with.....um......who the hell did he have on offense again? Remember, we're talking supporting casts here. Wasn't elway handing off to a 2000 yd back who would be a league MVP, and throwing to a Hall of famer in sharpe and one of the top WR in the league at the time in Rod Smith? Favre on the other hand had Levens, Chmura and Freeman. As far as the D, I said earlier that I might have missed people but what dominant players were on that side of the ball? I know I could name quite a few good ones on Denver's D that year. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that Elway isn't one of the greatest ever and I'm not trying to put him down in any way. I said that in my opinion Favre was the greatest and someone responded with elway was because he had less around him then Favre. I'm still waiting to see who these amazing offensive (or defensive besides the ones I named ) players Favre had on his teams that helped his numbers or the success he had in the league. With just about every other QB there are HOF'ers around them but with Favre there are just a bunch of guys that fed off him. Look at guys like Freeman, Robert brooks, Corey Bradford, etc. that weren't high picks yet went to Pro bowls or had big seasons with him, then left and couldn't even start on other teams.Sir Foxx said:You do remember that the Packers were a 3 touchdown favorite going into that SuperBowl against Denver don't you?
Young did spend a year in the USFL though before the league went bankrupt. They both broke in the NFL in 1985. Their rushing stats are almost identical but Young has a way higher rating, TD:INT ratio, & completion percent.doggzj said:I don't know what stats you have been looking at.
Steve Young was drafted in 1984
Randall Cunningham was drafted in 1985
84 is definately before 85. Sure, Cunningham was a starter before Young, but he also didn't have a guy named Joe in front of him.
That is true. The Pack rolled over everybody that year. They bitch slapped the Niners in the title game 23-10 and the Niners whooped Denver late in the season that year so everyone had the Pack heavily favored.Sir Foxx said:You do remember that the Packers were a 3 touchdown favorite going into that SuperBowl against Denver don't you?
LMAO, Barlow's a puss, Lloyd wants to be a rapper, and Woods is still a big uncertainty. It looks like the wrong direction if you ask me but they say they know what they're doing LOLCEDeoudes59 said:sad, a different direction. Rashaun Woods, Kevan Barlow and Brandon Lloyd's direction. Rice could have every seat in the house filled if he was just the 3rd reciever.
Iron Warrior said:Young did spend a year in the USFL though before the league went bankrupt. They both broke in the NFL in 1985. Their rushing stats are almost identical but Young has a way higher rating, TD:INT ratio, & completion percent.
Yup LA Xpress, they made him the $40 million dollar man but he didn't get much of that moneyEEmain said:I forgot about that... LA Express wasn`t it?
That's what separates the great ones from the greatest. Kelly was a maniac. I remeber watching the 49ers vs Bills game in which neither team punted the entire day, there were like 1,100 yards of offense. That was insane, he brought them back from a 31-17 deficit in the 4th quarter to win 34-31. The best 49ers game I ever saw in a losing effort.mtruther said:Young was just such a class act all around. Thing is, Montana just made sooooo many clutch throws.