As someone who knows the pricing for real material on this, I would be very skeptical of any brand that offers it with any claim of there being enough active in it to matter unless the price is insane.
perhaps you may want to find actual russian (not chinese) - maral root extract (rhaponticum) - wonder what the ecdy % is. I see some on etsyafter i saw mpmd i thought about buying some but he is out of stock any other good place to buy from?
new member trying to sell on ebay not fishy at all lol
Uzbekistan is not the easiest place in the world to reliably source ingredients from.
And there isn't enough demand or cultivation knowledge behind it to setup a farm op somewhere else and see returns within a decade.
And there isn't enough clinical research momentum/drive behind the ingredient to fund further research.
Turkesterone is probably dead in the water unless someone with a lot of money decides to take it on as a passion project.
Did you run a log for abolic-4?Abolic-4, made by Dante Trudel who I trust.
Abolic-4, made by Dante Trudel who I trust.
Did you run a log for abolic-4?
If you notice on the label of that though, it doesn't claim to provide any active constituents. It says: Arjuna Turkestanica Powder Extract (Stems and Leaves). (And credit to them for labeling it correctly and not lying about active content like some brands are).
There's no doubt that companies can buy the powder. The issue is that the raw materials aren't available for the active constituents at anywhere near a price that would make it economically feasible for it to be effective.
The apigenin and quercifit alone are worth it and the product does seem effective. I know he has discussed replacing the turk since people are very opinionated on the ingredient one way or another.
I have no opinion on his product one way or the other. My only purpose in replying is to help people on the ingredient. From a marketing standpoint, by using Turkesterone, companies will attract and get sales from people that just hear about it and don't know the details on the raw materials; but then they will also get a backlash from people that do. At least in the case of the one you're talking about, they don't make specific extract claims so they aren't outright lying on the labels like some companies are.
Some companies are making content claims based on supplier COA's. In these cases, they companies are either completely uninformed (doubtful), just lying to themselves, or just wanting to capitalize on the popularity.
People can be opinionated on whether Turkesterone works or not.
But there are facts when it comes to the raw material supply chain and that is that a Chinese vendor can put whatever they want on a COA but there is no way that a company can offer a higher percentage extract of an ingredient not native to there than companies/suppliers that specialize in it in its native region.
^^^ Interesting note - I've looked into this ingredient for years including speaking with Uzbekistan suppliers. We deal with Chinese vendors on some things and when I inquired again recently on Turkesterone, EVERY single one that I trust told me that they wouldn't sell it because it wouldn't test out properly under the right testing methods and cautioned us against buying it.
Now keep in mind, I'm talking about active content. I'm not saying you can't buy the powder/raw material from China because you absolutely can. I'm just saying that you aren't going to get a high yield extract with the constituents that line up with any of the studies. (Which is why I complemented the product you mentioned - at least they are saying its powder and not claiming it to be std. to any certain percentages).
what about tonvara, seem legit
after i saw mpmd i thought about buying some but he is out of stock any other good place to buy from?
I have used Abolic-4, I had 4 bottles didn't notice anything from it at more then the recommended dose
Plus a-bolic4 is really pricey, if it worked it would be worth it. I think Dante said he was taking 4 caps a day. And the recommended dose on the bottle was 2 caps a day. Now this was the old bottle of a-bolic4. The newer bottles have double the doses. But I took 4 caps cause that's what he said he took but I didn't see anything. I'm not sure if he's on trt, but I don't think he built all that size on A-bolic4.I like Dante but I’m not surprised that supplement is weak sauce.
Legit Turkesterone was being offered by a company in that thread that @sns8778 had posted. According to the few studies on it , it was the most anabolic of the ecdysteroids but other studies said the anabolic effect was greater with a combination of ecdysteroids. I think Dante is even considering removing the turkesterone in his product in favor of a full spectrum rhapticom/leuza extract. I think the best ecdysterone product on the market right now is Mass Pro Synthagen X2. Even though they don't list how much ecdysterone is in the product per serving which I definitely don't like because the formula is proprietary but you really notice an effect from a recovery standpoint. Muscle mass gains come much later. I was impressed after a 3 month run of the product.
how about massmax xt
@barische that same company in that thread that offered legit turk supposedly tested Massmax XT and found it did not meet label claims(take that for what it is worth). Some guys that used it really liked it but I have never tried it.how about massmax xt
Legit Turkesterone was being offered by a company in that thread that @sns8778 had posted. According to the few studies on it , it was the most anabolic of the ecdysteroids but other studies said the anabolic effect was greater with a combination of ecdysteroids. I think Dante is even considering removing the turkesterone in his product in favor of a full spectrum rhapticom/leuza extract. I think the best ecdysterone product on the market right now is Mass Pro Synthagen X2. Even though they don't list how much ecdysterone is in the product per serving which I definitely don't like because the formula is proprietary but you really notice an effect from a recovery standpoint. Muscle mass gains come much later. I was impressed after a 3 month run of the product.
@barische that same company in that thread that offered legit turk supposedly tested Massmax XT and found it did not meet label claims(take that for what it is worth). Some guys that used it really liked it but I have never tried it.
One more note - for some of this stuff, there can be multiple testing methods. I've seen in cases of that with some ingredients where this is sometimes used to trick consumers but most of the time its used to trick companies.
What about the bulkpowder that Sportpowders sell? They at quite reasonable prices €145.95kg they claim Ajuga Turkestanica extract 2%If you notice on the label of that though, it doesn't claim to provide any active constituents. It says: Arjuna Turkestanica Powder Extract (Stems and Leaves). (And credit to them for labeling it correctly and not lying about active content like some brands are).
There's no doubt that companies can buy the powder. The issue is that the raw materials aren't available for the active constituents at anywhere near a price that would make it economically feasible for it to be effective.
What about the bulkpowder that Sportpowders sell? They at quite reasonable prices €145.95kg they claim Ajuga Turkestanica extract 2%
I am not affiliated or anyhting and don´t know if it is okay to put up a link or not? Anyhow I do and if it is against any rules remove it or I will remove it.
Invalid Link Removed
Ok thanks deleted, didn´t know about that but makes sense otherwise so many people on here being affiliated would be posting links I guessIt is against the rules so you may want to delete it.