What's worst case in ordering from online

Wreckosaurus

New member
Awards
0
In a legal sense, what's the worst that can happen?
 

cstallion

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
I have no earthly idea, but Im in for the responses as I'm curious too.
 
DemntedCowboy

DemntedCowboy

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • Established
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
You get a letter in the mail asking you to prove you have a script for it. Otherwise they confiscate it, and you have to reorder
 
Audioph1x

Audioph1x

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Worst case scenario? A 3 letter agency starts building a case
 
Audioph1x

Audioph1x

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Will that 3 letter agency go to lengths to bust and prosecute if we are talking about 2-3 bottles?
No brother I'm not saying they would, but in my mind that's the worst case scenario
 
tyga tyga

tyga tyga

Legend
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Legend!
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
1. Feds kick your door in
2. 5yr bid
3. Your celly makes you sleep with your boxers on backwards
4. Tossin salad and butt stuff happens on the reg
5. Get out early on go behavior cuz you hate the butt stuff
6. Commit a crime cuz you can't get a job cuz you're a felon now. So you go back to the joint and get the same celly
7. See step two

Vicious cycle fam.
 

Dholmes90

New member
Awards
0
More than likely customs will seize the said product, and as Demntedcowboy said, will ask you to prove you have a script. I believe a buddy of mine had ordered something years ago, and when the mailman knocked on his door and asked for a signature, he refused to sign unless the mailman could validate that he indeed worked for the post office. Turned out he refused to show his ID and my friend wouldn't sign for it. It's too tricky of a situation to be in and not something I ever want to go though personally.
 
Audioph1x

Audioph1x

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
1. Feds kick your door in
2. 5yr bid
3. Your celly makes you sleep with your boxers on backwards
4. Tossin salad and butt stuff happens on the reg
5. Get out early on go behavior cuz you hate the butt stuff
6. Commit a crime cuz you can't get a job cuz you're a felon now. So you go back to the joint and get the same celly
7. See step two

Vicious cycle fam.
Read my mind. Forced butt play on the reg, getting denied parole and serving every day to the door cuz you joined up with a white gang and got prison tattoos with a walkman and a sharpened ink pen on the reg
 

cstallion

Member
Awards
1
  • Established
1. Feds kick your door in
2. 5yr bid
3. Your celly makes you sleep with your boxers on backwards
4. Tossin salad and butt stuff happens on the reg
5. Get out early on go behavior cuz you hate the butt stuff
6. Commit a crime cuz you can't get a job cuz you're a felon now. So you go back to the joint and get the same celly
7. See step two

Vicious cycle fam.

Step 4 lol!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ARFRYPcbYKg
 
Audioph1x

Audioph1x

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Roger that, I got ya now!
Right on brother. I mean legally it's not outside the realm of possibility. All it takes is a new prosecutor and a curious post master to make an example out of you. You knowwhatimseeein
 
Nac

Nac

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
1. Feds kick your door in
2. 5yr bid
3. Your celly makes you sleep with your boxers on backwards
4. Tossin salad and butt stuff happens on the reg
5. Get out early on go behavior cuz you hate the butt stuff
6. Commit a crime cuz you can't get a job cuz you're a felon now. So you go back to the joint and get the same celly
7. See step two

Vicious cycle fam.
This^.

Youre asking the wrong question, OP. What you should be wondering, is not what is the worse that could happen (youll get aidz and die!) but whats likely to happen.

Answer to that is, statistically speaking: nothing.
 
Nac

Nac

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
More than likely customs will seize the said product, and as Demntedcowboy said, will ask you to prove you have a script. I believe a buddy of mine had ordered something years ago, and when the mailman knocked on his door and asked for a signature, he refused to sign unless the mailman could validate that he indeed worked for the post office. Turned out he refused to show his ID and my friend wouldn't sign for it. It's too tricky of a situation to be in and not something I ever want to go though personally.
Your friend is a retard.
 
brofessorx

brofessorx

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
1. Feds kick your door in
2. 5yr bid
3. Your celly makes you sleep with your boxers on backwards
4. Tossin salad and butt stuff happens on the reg
5. Get out early on go behavior cuz you hate the butt stuff
6. Commit a crime cuz you can't get a job cuz you're a felon now. So you go back to the joint and get the same celly
7. See step two

Vicious cycle fam.
Beat me too it.
:gay: :booty: :banana:
 
The_Old_Guy

The_Old_Guy

Well-known member
Awards
0
There are vendors who offer a "Domestic Line", where it ships from inside the country - so no Customs... BUT you are still at risk for some Federal Employee wondering what that oil is, leaking out of the pkg, in a worst case scenario. Not worth the risk to me - I don't make tons (any) of money off of my muscle mass, and Jail ain't worth a pot metal trophy.
 
fueledpassion

fueledpassion

Well-known member
Awards
2
  • RockStar
  • Established
You get a letter in the mail asking you to prove you have a script for it. Otherwise they confiscate it, and you have to reorder
This.

However, if you get flagged by DEA and your quantities were high, ain't no telling what they track after that. Probably nothing to worry about but if they thought you were distributing product and you had lots, they might build a record against you. Who knows.

But the law is strictly for mfg, selling or that creative overstep phrase "intent to distribute". Actually juicing yourself up is 100% legal, lol. If it wasn't, all the folks getting caught on drugs for competitions would also be incarcerated. But they aren't. Because it's legal to use.

Also, so you know, exception to the "individual mandate" in Obamacare and tax laws, there is no other federal law that applies directly to the individual. Not a single one. If they are gonna get you, it's either by state law or the feds will convince the judge that you as an individual are acting like a business with your gear.

So buy in personal use quantities. I think my state defines that as having a total amount 25g or less in possession, which is a good bit and plenty for any one cycle.

Know your laws. Know your rights. One of the biggest lies of our time (unfortunately, there are other big lies) is that we aren't as free as our Constitution would have us be. A good attorney that is eager to slap the court system down for their misuse of power can easily get you out of stuff like this.
 
DemntedCowboy

DemntedCowboy

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • Established
  • RockStar
  • First Up Vote
This.

However, if you get flagged by DEA and your quantities were high, ain't no telling what they track after that. Probably nothing to worry about but if they thought you were distributing product and you had lots, they might build a record against you. Who knows.

But the law is strictly for mfg, selling or that creative overstep phrase "intent to distribute". Actually juicing yourself up is 100% legal, lol. If it wasn't, all the folks getting caught on drugs for competitions would also be incarcerated. But they aren't. Because it's legal to use.

Also, so you know, exception to the "individual mandate" in Obamacare and tax laws, there is no other federal law that applies directly to the individual. Not a single one. If they are gonna get you, it's either by state law or the feds will convince the judge that you as an individual are acting like a business with your gear.

So buy in personal use quantities. I think my state defines that as having a total amount 25g or less in possession, which is a good bit and plenty for any one cycle.

Know your laws. Know your rights. One of the biggest lies of our time (unfortunately, there are other big lies) is that we aren't as free as our Constitution would have us be. A good attorney that is eager to slap the court system down for their misuse of power can easily get you out of stuff like this.
^^^^This is why I buy in small quantities, and never do big orders all at one time
 
Bgproudfew

Bgproudfew

New member
Awards
0
Thing about gear is low quantities in our eyes are distribution amounts by law. I can't remember but I'm almost positive that they rate it at 1ml=1 unit where as with other scheduled drugs, the amounts deemed for personal use= 1 unit. Problem is gear users get 8-15 weeks worth all at once. 1-2 vials is enough to be charged with felony and face serious time. If a recreational drug user had 8-15 weeks worth of daily use then they to would have what is considered a very high amount of that substance. It isn't customs I worry about. It's locally that I am concerned. Customs has bigger fish to fry, local law enforcement will bust your a$$
 

Chasingtails

Member
Awards
0
This.

However, if you get flagged by DEA and your quantities were high, ain't no telling what they track after that. Probably nothing to worry about but if they thought you were distributing product and you had lots, they might build a record against you. Who knows.

But the law is strictly for mfg, selling or that creative overstep phrase "intent to distribute". Actually juicing yourself up is 100% legal, lol. If it wasn't, all the folks getting caught on drugs for competitions would also be incarcerated. But they aren't. Because it's legal to use.

Also, so you know, exception to the "individual mandate" in Obamacare and tax laws, there is no other federal law that applies directly to the individual. Not a single one. If they are gonna get you, it's either by state law or the feds will convince the judge that you as an individual are acting like a business with your gear.

So buy in personal use quantities. I think my state defines that as having a total amount 25g or less in possession, which is a good bit and plenty for any one cycle.

Know your laws. Know your rights. One of the biggest lies of our time (unfortunately, there are other big lies) is that we aren't as free as our Constitution would have us be. A good attorney that is eager to slap the court system down for their misuse of power can easily get you out of stuff like this.
What exactly do you mean when you say that there are no federal laws other than the ACA and tax laws that apply to the individual? Although the vast majority of criminal law is left to the police power of the states, there's a substantial body of federal criminal law out there. The first that comes to mind is 18 USC 922 (felon in possession of a firearm), but that's only the tip of the iceberg. Wire fraud is used to persecute people all the time. Possession/distribution of child pornography is a federal offense. As are possession and distribution of controlled substances in certain circumstances.

I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying that I don't exactly understand what you mean.
 
Nac

Nac

Well-known member
Awards
3
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • RockStar
Haha he's easily impressionable to say the least.
I see guys get paranoid over this sh1t regularly.

When ordering, your name and address is right there in black & white. If LE wanted to bust you, why would they bother with sending an undercover agent posing as the local delivery guy. Lol the logic is ridiculous. If you want to be paranoid, at least be consistent: use a fake name, dont deliver to home or work.
 
rascal14

rascal14

Well-known member
Awards
2
  • Established
  • RockStar
You risk more speeding than you do ordering gear for personal use. Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nac
justhere4comm

justhere4comm

Banned
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
You risk more speeding than you do ordering gear for personal use. Lol
Never speed in Florida. They'll lock you in a cell with your future boyfriend... what thread is this again? Oh, never mind. It was a friend of mine. Nothing happened... they dropped the charges. Carry on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nac

Dholmes90

New member
Awards
0
I see guys get paranoid over this sh1t regularly.

When ordering, your name and address is right there in black & white. If LE wanted to bust you, why would they bother with sending an undercover agent posing as the local delivery guy. Lol the logic is ridiculous. If you want to be paranoid, at least be consistent: use a fake name, dont deliver to home or work.
Haha what can I say, common sense just isn't that common these days. I agree with you though. If I know him though, he'll probably try it again but I hope he's smarter this time around.

What boggles me is that he would rather order online from shady sites instead of just trying to find a source in a gym. He can be a bit clueless at times, not discreet at all.. like he might literally approach the biggest guy in the gym while he's working out and ask him directly where he can get gear in front of everyone. I kind of want to see it happen haha, but for his sake, I hope he doesn't actually do that.
 
yates84

yates84

Well-known member
Awards
2
  • RockStar
  • Established
Send it to your girlfriends house. If she gets pinched then she wasn't the one.
 
The_Old_Guy

The_Old_Guy

Well-known member
Awards
0
Thing about gear is low quantities in our eyes are distribution amounts by law. I can't remember but I'm almost positive that they rate it at 1ml=1 unit where as with other scheduled drugs, the amounts deemed for personal use= 1 unit. Problem is gear users get 8-15 weeks worth all at once. 1-2 vials is enough to be charged with felony and face serious time. If a recreational drug user had 8-15 weeks worth of daily use then they to would have what is considered a very high amount of that substance. It isn't customs I worry about. It's locally that I am concerned. Customs has bigger fish to fry, local law enforcement will bust your a$$
Ken "Skip" Hill has a good story to tell about this - he's relayed it on some podcasts. Even if the stuff is fake, you can get screwed, believe it or not.

Also - anything that comes to you via the US Post Office, is scanned and kept in a database - forever:

https://www.google.com/search?********hp&q=Mail+Isolation+Control+and+Tracking&oq=Mail+Isolation+Control+and+Tracking&gs_l=psy-ab.13..0.2424.2424.0.3995.1.1.0.0.0.0.69.69.1.1.0.foo,nso-ehuqi=1,nso-ehuui=1,ewh=0,nso-mplt=2,nso-enksa=0,nso-enfk=1,nso-usnt=1,nso-qnt-npqp=0-1633,nso-qnt-npdq=0-5608,nso-qnt-npt=0-1229,nso-qnt-ndc=2051,cspa-dspm-nm-mnp=0-06145,cspa-dspm-nm-mxp=0-153625,nso-unt-npqp=0-1506,nso-unt-npdq=0-4694,nso-unt-npt=0-061,nso-unt-ndc=300,cspa-uipm-nm-mnp=0-007625,cspa-uipm-nm-mxp=0-053375,cfro=1...0...1.2.64.psy-ab..0.1.69....0.64ABLXRUriE

https://www.google.com/search?q=Mail+Cover+Tracking&oq=Mail+Cover+Tracking&gs_l=psy-ab.3...35747.39403.0.39633.14.14.0.0.0.0.86.1011.14.14.0.foo,nso-ehuqi=1,nso-ehuui=1,ewh=0,nso-mplt=2,nso-enksa=0,nso-enfk=1,nso-usnt=1,nso-qnt-npqp=0-1633,nso-qnt-npdq=0-5608,nso-qnt-npt=0-1229,nso-qnt-ndc=2051,cspa-dspm-nm-mnp=0-06145,cspa-dspm-nm-mxp=0-153625,nso-unt-npqp=0-1506,nso-unt-npdq=0-4694,nso-unt-npt=0-061,nso-unt-ndc=300,cspa-uipm-nm-mnp=0-007625,cspa-uipm-nm-mxp=0-053375,cfro=1...0...1.1.64.psy-ab..0.13.947...0j0i10k1j0i131k1j0i22i30k1j33i160k1j33i21k1.0.vnmGo6uCXCc

If those links get broken, Google -> Mail Isolation Control and Tracking ....and Mail Covers
 

mike33511

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Haha what can I say, common sense just isn't that common these days. I agree with you though. If I know him though, he'll probably try it again but I hope he's smarter this time around.

What boggles me is that he would rather order online from shady sites instead of just trying to find a source in a gym. He can be a bit clueless at times, not discreet at all.. like he might literally approach the biggest guy in the gym while he's working out and ask him directly where he can get gear in front of everyone. I kind of want to see it happen haha, but for his sake, I hope he doesn't actually do that.
Good luck getting decent gear from some dude at the gym. $70 for an underdosed vial of test... Not for me, bro.
 

Dholmes90

New member
Awards
0
Good luck getting decent gear from some dude at the gym. $70 for an underdosed vial of test... Not for me, bro.
That's fair, I agree with that bro. Never said it was the ideal way to go about obtaining gear. But obviously some people do it that way since they don't want to go through the process of ordering online, sweating bullets hoping their stuff gets through customs and then it gets seized and they've lost money as a result. But then again, if you buy gear in the gym, and it's bunk, you're gonna lose money regardless haha.
 

mike33511

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
That's fair, I agree with that bro. Never said it was the ideal way to go about obtaining gear. But obviously some people do it that way since they don't want to go through the process of ordering online, sweating bullets hoping their stuff gets through customs and then it gets seized and they've lost money as a result. But then again, if you buy gear in the gym, and it's bunk, you're gonna lose money regardless haha.
I order domestic, so I don't have to worry about customs. If packed properly, there is as much a chance of someone opening a domestic order as there is someone opening a package from your grandmother containing a sweater that she knit for you.
 

Dholmes90

New member
Awards
0
I order domestic, so I don't have to worry about customs. If packed properly, there is as much a chance of someone opening a domestic order as there is someone opening a package from your grandmother containing a sweater that she knit for you.
Makes sense. Stupid question to ask and I apologize for it, but if one chooses to order online, do you think it's just as possible the gear could be underdosed as well? Obviously if purchasing from the said site has a good reputation, then I'd imagine the chances of their products being bunk are lower, yes?
 

mike33511

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Makes sense. Stupid question to ask and I apologize for it, but if one chooses to order online, do you think it's just as possible the gear could be underdosed as well? Obviously if purchasing from the said site has a good reputation, then I'd imagine the chances of their products being bunk are lower, yes?
I would say the possibility is less because you have more options. There are many, many labs from which you can order online. You can read reviews and get a good idea of which may be legitimate. Any lab can turn bad at any time though, so there is always a risk.
 

Dholmes90

New member
Awards
0
I would say the possibility is less because you have more options. There are many, many labs from which you can order online. You can read reviews and get a good idea of which may be legitimate. Any lab can turn bad at any time though, so there is always a risk.
Good to know. Seriously, thank you for shedding light on this as I'm still learning more about this stuff myself. I may have found a source in a gym I train at, but since dealers tend to be hit or miss, ordering online through a reputable lab may be the way to go instead. I'll keep doing my research.

Appreciate the help, bro :)
 

mike33511

Well-known member
Awards
1
  • Established
Good to know. Seriously, thank you for shedding light on this as I'm still learning more about this stuff myself. I may have found a source in a gym I train at, but since dealers tend to be hit or miss, ordering online through a reputable lab may be the way to go instead. I'll keep doing my research.

Appreciate the help, bro :)
The guy at the gym could have amazing stuff, and the stuff you could get from the "reputable lab" could be complete crap. The only way to know is to try it. Just the way it is.
 
justhere4comm

justhere4comm

Banned
Awards
4
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
RV.jpg

Season_2_promo_pic_4.jpg


He delivers, and makes the best pre-workout too..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nac
fueledpassion

fueledpassion

Well-known member
Awards
2
  • RockStar
  • Established
What exactly do you mean when you say that there are no federal laws other than the ACA and tax laws that apply to the individual? Although the vast majority of criminal law is left to the police power of the states, there's a substantial body of federal criminal law out there. The first that comes to mind is 18 USC 922 (felon in possession of a firearm), but that's only the tip of the iceberg. Wire fraud is used to persecute people all the time. Possession/distribution of child pornography is a federal offense. As are possession and distribution of controlled substances in certain circumstances.

I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying that I don't exactly understand what you mean.
I can't speak for child pornogrpahy, as it might be another example of individual mandated laws, but otherwise you resd correctly - no federal law applies to the individual. Go murder someone and you'll be charged for 'crimes against the state'. It is the state that you offended, not the individual.

What I saying, as the Constitution spells out ever so clearly, is that federal laws are not laws that individuals regard as legitimate because congress never had the power nor will ever to create laws for people. If the feds could create laws for individuals, then what point is there to have States?

That being said, state laws DO apply to you personally. You'll never see an actual federal bill say "it is ilegal for individuals to do this and te punishment is that for such an offense". Instead, they word is as if implied so you think it is illegal, but in reality is it not.

image.jpg


image.jpg


image.jpg


The expect us to be fools and not read their "acts". In fact, any time you see an "act", you should know it is an attempt st congress to more or less "react" to a situation and appear as if they are doing something about it because our lazy @$$ society wants the government to deal with EVERYTHING.

The only way congress can get to you is through regulating what you buy, but not what you consume. They don't want you to know this.

ICC of 1887 is what congress uses to justify controlling the movement of goods across state lines. It was the first and only real overstep to control the private industry.

image.jpg


Why do you think the "Individual Mandate" was so damn important to us conservatives when Obamacare was passing thru congress?!? It has set a precedent for future supreme court judges to say it is lawful to pass laws concerning individuals which really is unconstitutional as &$!@.
 
fueledpassion

fueledpassion

Well-known member
Awards
2
  • RockStar
  • Established
What exactly do you mean when you say that there are no federal laws other than the ACA and tax laws that apply to the individual? Although the vast majority of criminal law is left to the police power of the states, there's a substantial body of federal criminal law out there. The first that comes to mind is 18 USC 922 (felon in possession of a firearm), but that's only the tip of the iceberg. Wire fraud is used to persecute people all the time. Possession/distribution of child pornography is a federal offense. As are possession and distribution of controlled substances in certain circumstances.

I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying that I don't exactly understand what you mean.
Also,

Go back and see Article I section 8 of the Constitution to see what Congress can and cannot regulate. The ICC is actually unconstitutional but society turns the other way on stuff like this for whatever reason.

Your example of child pornography is not protected under the first amendment, which is unique but understood. For instance, you are bringing unwillful harm onto another (and minor whcih makes it worse). Did you also know that if you say something in public that puts someone in imminent danger of being hurt that your right to "free speech" is null and void? So child pornography is viewed the same.

As for wire transfers.. Well, the article I sec 8 allows congress to regulate money so this shouldn't be a problem.

As for steroid use, all 10 amendments are still very intact and applicable to such behavior. You do not null and void those amendments when you stick a needle in your butt.
 

Chasingtails

Member
Awards
0
I can't speak for child pornogrpahy, as it might be another example of individual mandated laws, but otherwise you resd correctly - no federal law applies to the individual. Go murder someone and you'll be charged for 'crimes against the state'. It is the state that you offended, not the individual.

What I saying, as the Constitution spells out ever so clearly, is that federal laws are not laws that individuals regard as legitimate because congress never had the power nor will ever to create laws for people. If the feds could create laws for individuals, then what point is there to have States?

That being said, state laws DO apply to you personally. You'll never see an actual federal bill say "it is ilegal for individuals to do this and te punishment is that for such an offense". Instead, they word is as if implied so you think it is illegal, but in reality is it not.

View attachment 155269

View attachment 155270

View attachment 155271

The expect us to be fools and not read their "acts". In fact, any time you see an "act", you should know it is an attempt st congress to more or less "react" to a situation and appear as if they are doing something about it because our lazy @$$ society wants the government to deal with EVERYTHING.

The only way congress can get to you is through regulating what you buy, but not what you consume. They don't want you to know this.

ICC of 1887 is what congress uses to justify controlling the movement of goods across state lines. It was the first and only real overstep to control the private industry.

View attachment 155272

Why do you think the "Individual Mandate" was so damn important to us conservatives when Obamacare was passing thru congress?!? It has set a precedent for future supreme court judges to say it is lawful to pass laws concerning individuals which really is unconstitutional as &$!@.
In no way am I disputing that the federal government is unlikely to prosecute an individual for possessing a personal use amount.

But you may want to familiarize yourself with Title 18 of the US Code as it contains no less that 120 distinct crimes under federal law that the government can prosecute an individual person for violating
 

Chasingtails

Member
Awards
0
The ICC is unconstitutional according to what? To be sure, the federal government only has jurisdiction over certain areas under the constitution. But the commerce clause is the single largest grant of congressional authority under the constitution. According to that clause, congress has the power to pass laws affecting the channels and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, in addition to local activities that in the aggregate have an affect on interstate commerce. I won't dispute that this is a ridiculously vague grant of authority, but courts uphold laws passed pursuant to it all the time.
 
fueledpassion

fueledpassion

Well-known member
Awards
2
  • RockStar
  • Established
In no way am I disputing that the federal government is unlikely to prosecute an individual for possessing a personal use amount.

But you may want to familiarize yourself with Title 18 of the US Code as it contains no less that 120 distinct crimes under federal law that the government can prosecute an individual person for violating
Perhaps, but with no constitutional backing. A good attorney would know this. That said, if in the district of Columbia, well then yes, congress rules that area exclusively.

I also believe title 18 to be addressing crimes in jurisdictions that the federal government has, which is border control and interstate commerce which also includes the air of the United States. Read the crimes carefully and they all appear to explicitly or implicitly mention one of these two as part of the crime.
 
fueledpassion

fueledpassion

Well-known member
Awards
2
  • RockStar
  • Established
The ICC is unconstitutional according to what? To be sure, the federal government only has jurisdiction over certain areas under the constitution. But the commerce clause is the single largest grant of congressional authority under the constitution. According to that clause, congress has the power to pass laws affecting the channels and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, in addition to local activities that in the aggregate have an affect on interstate commerce. I won't dispute that this is a ridiculously vague grant of authority, but courts uphold laws passed pursuant to it all the time.
Federal power is spelled out in the constitution. It is so limited it all fits on ONE page. Just because consensus doesn't agree with me doesn't change what the constitution says the government can and cannot do.
 
fueledpassion

fueledpassion

Well-known member
Awards
2
  • RockStar
  • Established
The ICC is unconstitutional according to what? To be sure, the federal government only has jurisdiction over certain areas under the constitution. But the commerce clause is the single largest grant of congressional authority under the constitution. According to that clause, congress has the power to pass laws affecting the channels and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, in addition to local activities that in the aggregate have an affect on interstate commerce. I won't dispute that this is a ridiculously vague grant of authority, but courts uphold laws passed pursuant to it all the time.
Federal power is spelled out in the constitution. It is so limited it all fits on one page. Just because consensus doesn't agree with me doesn't change what the constitution says the government can and cannot do.
 

Chasingtails

Member
Awards
0
So now an entire title of the code is unconstitutional except when applied to the District of Columbia? There must be a metric **** ton of awful attorneys out there then because I've never once seen this argument raised in a case
 
TheBigJS

TheBigJS

Member
Awards
2
  • First Up Vote
  • Best Answer
You Yanks have got it rough. There is no possession or use offence in the UK. You could pin in the street in theory although realistically you should expect to get arrested and the contents of that syringe to be tested!
On line sourcing them from within the UK is not illegal either although those doing the actual manufacturing and/or supplying are breaking the law.
You can also travel to somewhere legal to buy and bring them back for personal use through customs with zero concern. You are not breaking the law.

Steroids as a drug to get bust for just really are not on the police/govts radar here at all.

Ya see, the US is far from the most free place on the planet ;)
 
Godstrength

Godstrength

Board Sponsor
Awards
3
  • RockStar
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
You Yanks have got it rough. There is no possession or use offence in the UK. You could pin in the street in theory although realistically you should expect to get arrested and the contents of that syringe to be tested!
On line sourcing them from within the UK is not illegal either although those doing the actual manufacturing and/or supplying are breaking the law.
You can also travel to somewhere legal to buy and bring them back for personal use through customs with zero concern. You are not breaking the law.

Steroids as a drug to get bust for just really are not on the police/govts radar here at all.

Ya see, the US is far from the most free place on the planet ;)
Sadly the US is not the country she once was
 

2kvette

Active member
Awards
2
  • Established
  • First Up Vote
You Yanks have got it rough. There is no possession or use offence in the UK. You could pin in the street in theory although realistically you should expect to get arrested and the contents of that syringe to be tested!
On line sourcing them from within the UK is not illegal either although those doing the actual manufacturing and/or supplying are breaking the law.
You can also travel to somewhere legal to buy and bring them back for personal use through customs with zero concern. You are not breaking the law.

Steroids as a drug to get bust for just really are not on the police/govts radar here at all.

Ya see, the US is far from the most free place on the planet ;)
But I can still walk down main street with a machine gun in each hand. Believe it or not, we can even buy everything from grenade launchers to tanks, and even fighter jets. The only weapons absolutely 100% outlawed at the federal level are surface to air missile designed to take down aircraft, and atomic weapons.

Even an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile can be registered legally as a Title 2 weapon with the ATF. All it takes is 200$ for a tax stamp, two sets of finger prints, photograph, and a clean background.
 
The_Old_Guy

The_Old_Guy

Well-known member
Awards
0
While I love discussions of what the Bill of Rights *should* vs mean vs reality, and the various weapons people can own (Robbie Dillon had a Mini-Gun mounted on a Hughes 500) - I would go read everything ever posted by Rick Collins if you want to get an idea of what could happen with PEDs.

http://rickcollins.com/rick-collins-attorney/
 

Top