RobDyson said:In high school, I was 155-160, and I maxed out at 375, w/ respectable deads and squats(thats all my coach made us do).
ICEBERG said:and feet must be on the bench.
Sunder said:OK, that impresses me. :bruce1:
If you add the spotter 'tea-bag factor' that's extremely nuts.guyfromkop2 said:ICEBERG said:and feet must be on the bench.
that's about as unsafe as you can get
phillyb said:On a side-note...what would you consider "respectable" Max Squats and Deads for a 6'2 185 pound guy?
ICEBERG said:IMO someone who is just starting out should keep feet on the bench and concentrate on proper form. If you are able to kee your feet on the floor and use proper form-then keep doing it. People who start out with bad form don't ever build that foundation that is so pertinent for true progress and strength increases. Benchpress by and large is everyone's first real gym exercise and so many novices use bad form, build false security, and create perpetual bad habits in other exercises. That is why I am so against about- "keeping feet on the floor" I ask you all - Would you build a house foundation with balsa wood?I see so many people excited about benchpressing "impresssive amounts" in the gym but when you really stop and look at how it was done you have to question the form and execution when it is done with feet on the floor. You lie down the bench and place your feet on the floor and use them and your lower back for balance. You feel secure that you you canknow push against the floor which is not moving anywhere. Thus you inadvertently use momentum, your lower back, and legs to push the weight. When your feet are up- the chest area is isolated and you are forced to use more coordination and balance to execute the press. Now, I am not trying to be "the almighty know it all" but again IMO why would you want to take credit for benching weight using legs, lower back, momentum, etc, when you can get more out of less weight and really isolate the pec region. I always see guys that move a lot of weight but their asses come off the bench inadvertently with the legs pushing against the floor and/or I see the bounce off the chest where now moving the weight is done by momentum. There is no control of the weight coming down. If you dare attempt to do that when your feet are up on the bench- you will either fall off because the weight forced you to lean too far in one direction or you will crack your sternum or a rib. See what I mean? The legs, and lowr back with feet on the floor allows for that poor form to exist. But don't be fooled. You are not doing a proper bench press. In fact your form will result in sore shoulders, lower back, calves, abs, but hey your ego is intact. DO THE EXERCISE RIGHT AND YOU WILL SEE MORE RESULTS ON YOUR BODY THAN IN YOUR MIND.
ICEBERG said:IMO someone who is just starting out should keep feet on the bench and concentrate on proper form. If you are able to kee your feet on the floor and use proper form-then keep doing it. People who start out with bad form don't ever build that foundation that is so pertinent for true progress and strength increases. Benchpress by and large is everyone's first real gym exercise and so many novices use bad form, build false security, and create perpetual bad habits in other exercises. That is why I am so against about- "keeping feet on the floor" I ask you all - Would you build a house foundation with balsa wood?I see so many people excited about benchpressing "impresssive amounts" in the gym but when you really stop and look at how it was done you have to question the form and execution when it is done with feet on the floor. You lie down the bench and place your feet on the floor and use them and your lower back for balance. You feel secure that you you canknow push against the floor which is not moving anywhere. Thus you inadvertently use momentum, your lower back, and legs to push the weight. When your feet are up- the chest area is isolated and you are forced to use more coordination and balance to execute the press. Now, I am not trying to be "the almighty know it all" but again IMO why would you want to take credit for benching weight using legs, lower back, momentum, etc, when you can get more out of less weight and really isolate the pec region. I always see guys that move a lot of weight but their asses come off the bench inadvertently with the legs pushing against the floor and/or I see the bounce off the chest where now moving the weight is done by momentum. There is no control of the weight coming down. If you dare attempt to do that when your feet are up on the bench- you will either fall off because the weight forced you to lean too far in one direction or you will crack your sternum or a rib. See what I mean? The legs, and lowr back with feet on the floor allows for that poor form to exist. But don't be fooled. You are not doing a proper bench press. In fact your form will result in sore shoulders, lower back, calves, abs, but hey your ego is intact. DO THE EXERCISE RIGHT AND YOU WILL SEE MORE RESULTS ON YOUR BODY THAN IN YOUR MIND.
ICEBERG said:I would say 1.5-1.75 times bodyweight is respectable and more than likely the weight is lifted with good form - no bouncing off the chest, and feet must be on the bench. Benchpress has never been my specialty either but like Dead-lifts, squats, it is a must exercise. I prefer dumbbell presses because they hit the all the pectoral muscle areas while the flatbench tends to tire the shoulders and triceps quicker thus negating any explosive power for quality reps. I do love close-grip benchpress and my chest gets a better pump with those. To shake things up I have been doing flat dumbbell presses on a ball and I have felt different muscle groups being hit as well as the abdominal region being worked by trying to balance on the ball. I also have been doing arnold presses on the ball and 35 lbs feels like 70 lbs. If you guys try the "ball" exercises let me know what you think. Lastly, (yeah I know I sure can talk,..) I see a lot of workout logs that indicate low reps 4-6 reps on exercises that are more conducive for 10-12 or maybe even 15 reps. I keep the core exercises Squats, Dead Lifts, Benchpress, etc, at the 10-12 rep range and never go lower than 8 if I can help it. Once a month I will do high reps of 15-30 to shock the fast twitch fibers and give the slow twitch a break. This routine has worked out real well and my strength has shot through the roof. Have any of you guys shocked your bodies like that? Any other ideas?
ICEBERG said:I was afraid of this... I did not want to come off sounding as my method or technique was the sure-fire way. It's just that I saw better results with my chest workouts with feet-up. As Power-lifters go I understand that the focus is on strength, mass, and power. I do not advise Powerlifters to change their methods- it's obvious that you know the right form and technique, however, as a bodybuilder who is always looking to shock my muscles and weight amounts don't matter to me just as long as I am getting quality 10-15 reps for most exercises excluding Benchpress, Squats, Deadlifts, where I look to hit 8-10 reps. If I had to estimate what my benchpress max would be - I would say 350 lbs. How about yourself?
*355 medium wellJayhawkk said:410 raw but ugly![]()
Jstrong20 said:315 is respectable. Its more than most cats in the gym will ever be able to do but should be attainalbe for most that are patient and train and eat properly. Anybody that can bench 2X their bodyweight is impressive. Its really all opinion though and my ultimate goal is 600lbs.
RobDyson said:It all depends on your goal. In high school, I was 155-160, and I maxed out at 375, w/ respectable deads and squats(thats all my coach made us do). I needed alot of raw power for the sports I was in. Now, I'm 185-190, and I never max out, because I never grew much when training like that, and I have a more bodybuilding type mindset. In order for me to grow, I need to switch up the reps, form, speed, weight etc, in order to get the most growth; not to mention I don't just do 1 exercise for chest. So, yeah 1.25-1.75 is good, but it's not a standard and it only matters if you use perfect form, as with any/every exercise.
New York, but I go to college now in DC (and we don't have any barbells here, only db and smith-machine.somewhatgifted said:where you from rob?
CHAPS said:I don't do flat, i do incline and i can do 340lbs for 8 reps, but i care more about squats and deads then bench press, i mainly use dumbbells for chest anyway. Oh and my inclines are done super strict, nice n slow with a pause at the bottom and they are in the smith machine, 340lbs is weight on the bar, i don't count the bar. I expect this and all my weights to go up quite a bit now that i'm training DC style. Flat bench has never agreed with my shoulders and i think it's overrated. I haven't done maxes in a longtime but i just typed in my weight into a 1 rep max calculator and it says i should be able to incline 422lbs for 1 rep, that's cool.
CHAPS said:I don't do flat, i do incline and i can do 340lbs for 8 reps, but i care more about squats and deads then bench press, i mainly use dumbbells for chest anyway. Oh and my inclines are done super strict, nice n slow with a pause at the bottom and they are in the smith machine, 340lbs is weight on the bar, i don't count the bar. I expect this and all my weights to go up quite a bit now that i'm training DC style. Flat bench has never agreed with my shoulders and i think it's overrated. I haven't done maxes in a longtime but i just typed in my weight into a 1 rep max calculator and it says i should be able to incline 422lbs for 1 rep, that's cool.
guyfromkop2 said:but that's on a smith machine, it's completely different than free weights
Jayhawkk said:Hell, variables are there for any lift. You just pick the exercise/lift for the strength or endurance and body part you want.
Basso said:AAAH, Smith Machine, man I need to read better, dude get out of that death trap!
guyfromkop2 said:the only thing that thing is good for is wrapping the straps of my squat and deadlift suits around to help jack them up
guyfromkop2 said:raw? only a couple people in the world have ever done that, if you can more power to you, with a shirt? will take a lot of work but definately possible
Yeah...I'd say that once you get up to the 3 plate range, most smiths are about 30-40lbs shy.guyfromkop2 said:but that's on a smith machine, it's completely different than free weights
ICEBERG said:Basso, I extend my thumbs out away from my fingers and never ever use a fist grip unless I am doing pull-ups or dips.