Topic of the Week: Is Cardio necessary when dieting?
- Thread starter Admin
- Start date
avega17
Member
It is not, but you may reach a point when reducing calories is no longer practical or may be extreme, in which case adding in cardio and maintaining or adding back a bit of calories will be better.
Moreover, there are much more benefits of cardio than just caloric expenditure, such as increased metabolic rate, improved nutrient partitioning, and increased work capacity.
It is smart to start off conservatively, with minimal amounts weekly. As fat loss begins to plateau, additional sessions should be added and so forth. Variety is key as well, not allowing the body to become adapter to any one protocol.
I know from personal experience, I have much better results during a cut when I do have some form cardio in my routine.
Moreover, there are much more benefits of cardio than just caloric expenditure, such as increased metabolic rate, improved nutrient partitioning, and increased work capacity.
It is smart to start off conservatively, with minimal amounts weekly. As fat loss begins to plateau, additional sessions should be added and so forth. Variety is key as well, not allowing the body to become adapter to any one protocol.
I know from personal experience, I have much better results during a cut when I do have some form cardio in my routine.
Jebrook
Well-known member
I've gotten down to 7-8% just from weight training and high protein/low carb diet. Granted that was early 30's. Now at 36 it doesn't seem to work quite as quickly. If cutting is the main goal rather than preserving muscle then I think cardio is a must for speeding up the process.
Quads_of_Stee
Well-known member
Don't think it is necessary but it does definitely help. I like to eat a lot of food and would offset it with cardio just to get more meals in me
NewAgeMayan
Well-known member
im the same, Id rather eat more and do cardio than forgo cardio and eat less
I agree cardio is not necessary, but Ive kind of moved on from the Aragon philosophy of saving cardio as a 'trump card' when dieting, to a do-cardio-regularly-regardless approach because of the wider health benefits (and, again, the capacity to eat more)
asooneyeonig
Well-known member
i assume you mean dieting to shed fat.
if so, then no. it is not necessary.
if so, then no. it is not necessary.
choccyswag
Active member
well I like to eat. if I do cardio when doing cutting it means i can eat more. This makes me happy to follow my diet plan better and less chance to stuff up and 'cheat' so my answer is yes.
john.patterson
Well-known member
Cardio is a great tool to add in when plateaus are hit, but it isn't necessary for fat/weight loss. I think everyone can benefit from some form of cardio throughout the week, whether it be walking the dog or playing a recreational sport, but in terms of weight loss it isn't necessary.
I am 8-10% BF and a rarely do cardio. If your diet and weight training is consistent, you don't need cardio. It can help speed up weight loss, but it isn't going to make or break your progress.
I am 8-10% BF and a rarely do cardio. If your diet and weight training is consistent, you don't need cardio. It can help speed up weight loss, but it isn't going to make or break your progress.
vujade
Well-known member
it probably isnt necessary for weight loss, but it sure does help alot. Especially as you get older (im 46)
and your metabolism isnt quite as fast as it used to be. Plus it lets you eat more while cutting.
When I was in my 20's, I could drop 20lbs in a month, just by adjusting my diet and taking Ephredrine.
Now Im lucky to get 8lbs in a month with cardio 4-5 times a week and a calorie deficit.
and your metabolism isnt quite as fast as it used to be. Plus it lets you eat more while cutting.
When I was in my 20's, I could drop 20lbs in a month, just by adjusting my diet and taking Ephredrine.
Now Im lucky to get 8lbs in a month with cardio 4-5 times a week and a calorie deficit.
cbsharpe
Well-known member
IMO...no, it's not needed but it is beneficial in other ways.
I do my cardio after my weight training sessions and it varies from treadmill to doing kettle bell swings with little rest in between. Every now and then, I'd do some fasted cardio in the mornings. That really helped shed the fat. But again, everyone is different.
I do my cardio after my weight training sessions and it varies from treadmill to doing kettle bell swings with little rest in between. Every now and then, I'd do some fasted cardio in the mornings. That really helped shed the fat. But again, everyone is different.
choccyswag
Active member
Why anyone want to be walking on a treddy 45 min is crazy to me. How insanely BORING.
Cardio can be any activity, just be outside and do something fun.. play frisbee, skate, .. or a game of volley
Actually now that i think of it even sexy time is cardio lol
Cardio can be any activity, just be outside and do something fun.. play frisbee, skate, .. or a game of volley
Actually now that i think of it even sexy time is cardio lol
hewhoisripped
Active member
Not necessary but can be beneficial, especially in the long term. That said, my preferred form of cardio is to do high intensity circuit training. For example, set up a bench/dead/squat/OHP/pullup circuit and run each for 15+ reps, not taken to failure. Keep short rest periods (<=45s) and repeat 10-12 times.
hewhoisripped
Active member
Another great for of cardio is to do sports or something outdoors: play some ball, go golfing, hiking, swimming, surfing... Whatever you ENJOY and helps you get moving.
MidwestBeast
Legend
Necessary for...?
For weight loss, no. For overall health; technically not a have to be yes, but yes.
We tend to view it as just a means to lose weight, but the benefits of endurance, heart health, etc. are all there.
I can lose fat without dedicated cardio, but my overall athleticism suffers when I step foot back onto a court or field again.
But in the realm of black and white, weight loss can most certainly occur without cardio.
For weight loss, no. For overall health; technically not a have to be yes, but yes.
We tend to view it as just a means to lose weight, but the benefits of endurance, heart health, etc. are all there.
I can lose fat without dedicated cardio, but my overall athleticism suffers when I step foot back onto a court or field again.
But in the realm of black and white, weight loss can most certainly occur without cardio.
Matthew1237
Well-known member
What they said.
booneman77
Legend
Not necessary at all. I used to think it was but last summer I made it to my leanest ever (~7%) and had a torn hamstring that barely allowed me to walk. Light biking was about all I could do for two months.
EMPIREMIND
Well-known member
It is not neccessary.
KilaCali
Banned
i think it all depends on the person, metabolism/thyroid function etc...
some people can diet just on nutrition alone and get where they need to be, others may need that cardio to speed up their bodies natural functions...
digitalpimp
Member
I quit doing cardio during my diets/recomps about 5 years ago. At 42 years old I'm the leanest I've ever been now.
That being said I've read that even pro bodybuilders do cardio the last few weeks before a competition.
That being said I've read that even pro bodybuilders do cardio the last few weeks before a competition.
Aleksandar37
Well-known member
At the end of the day it's calories in vs. calories out, but like many others in this thread, I would rather do cardio so that I can enjoy more calories in.