Top Government Insider: Bin Laden Died In 2001, 9/11 A False Flag

America was warned of embassy attack but did nothing’

KIM SENGUPTA
Invalid Link Removed
Sept 14, 2012

The killings of the US ambassador to Libya and three of his staff were likely to have been the result of a serious and continuing security breach, The Independent can reveal.

Invalid Link Removed

American officials believe the attack was planned, but Chris Stevens had been back in the country only a short while and the details of his visit to Benghazi, where he and his staff died, were meant to be confidential.

The US administration is now facing a crisis in Libya. Sensitive documents have gone missing from the consulate in Benghazi and the supposedly secret location of the “safe house” in the city, where the staff had retreated, came under sustained mortar attack. Other such refuges across the country are no longer deemed “safe”.

Some of the missing papers from the consulate are said to list names of Libyans who are working with Americans, putting them potentially at risk from extremist groups, while some of the other documents are said to relate to oil contracts.

According to senior diplomatic sources, the US State Department had credible information 48 hours before mobs charged the consulate in Benghazi, and the embassy in Cairo, that American missions may be targeted, but no warnings were given for diplomats to go on high alert and “lockdown”, under which movement is severely restricted.

Invalid Link Removed
 
they didn't do nothing, they made sure the marines had no ammunition for their rifles so they'd have a good excuse to stay in war mode.
 
true...but if there is not someones head rolling....people here are going to be pissed. He cant come off weak
 
AE14 said:
true...but if there is not someones head rolling....people here are going to be pissed. He cant come off weak
Click to expand...

if the libyan government makes some signs they are doing something, arrests some random people and puts them in jail, finds them guilty and sentences them to death it will be enough, regardless of who they are. perfect opportunity for the new dictators to get rid of some trouble for them
 
AE14 said:
agreed....someones head has to roll
Click to expand...

Although we'll never know, given what i've heard about the new regime from people actually in libya or with relatives there, it will be whatever set of heads they'd like to have roll, with no regard for actual guilt.
 
AE14 said:
it will be interesting to see how this affects november
Click to expand...

Its not going to effect it at all, either of the two puppets will take the Muppet show stage and continue on with the show for another 4 years.

Oh yes, Obama supporters and Romney supporters will argue about everything except how we should not be in any of these countries in the first place, but the comical reality is that both supporters are in total unity and they dont even know it.
 
Well, I just heard CNN and Wolf Blitzer stating the FBI is warning that the Mid East violence could strike on our homeland, I wonder what rights they want to take from us now thats left?

So we went there because they want to strike our homeland, and now they are saying they want to strike our homeland...or was it they want to strike our homeland?
 
October surprise to Carterize Obama

Webster Griffin Tarpley
September 16, 2012

Demonstrations have occurred in the past few days at US embassies in more than 20 cities across the world to protest the scurrilous California film originally entitled “Desert Warrior” and then “The Innocence of Moslims.”

Invalid Link Removed
In an attack designed to coincide with the protests, a Libyan death squad has assassinated the US ambassador to Libya and three of his associates. The US State Department has set up a crisis management center to monitor developments 24 hours a day.

The film in question was obviously designed as a provocation and nothing else. But was this film, as the US media claim, the work of the isolated Cerrito, California resident and Egyptian-American Nakoula Bassely Nakoula. aka Abanob Bassely aka Israeli citizen Sam Bacile, an ex-convict with a drug problem, and a few actors he hired? Persuasive evidence suggests that this is not the case.

Instead, we are dealing with an ambitious international intelligence operation aimed at creating an October Surprise (a few weeks early) to shock world and US public opinion for the purpose of discrediting and “Carterizing” the current tenant of the White House, and installing Netanyahu’s friend Mitt Romney in his place. Since the US public identifies Obama as the patron of the color revolutions and military interventions of the “Arab Spring,” attacks on US diplomats, assassinations, and possible hostage taking can be expected to weaken his case for reelection. If Romney prevails, control over US foreign policy would pass to the group of incorrigible warmonger neocons who are the Romney’s handlers for international affairs. The current crisis is a sign that the neocons and their friends are attempting a comeback.

The networks involved in this operation appear to be these:


The CIA Mormon Mafia, featuring top officials across the US intelligence community who are members of Romney’s tightly-knit sect. This group can also be referred to as the Brent Scowcroft faction. Scowcroft, Henry Kissinger’s right-hand man, used his entrenched bureaucratic position over decades to help promote many of his co-religionists. This group wants Romney in the White House because Romney and his transition team boss Mike Leavitt, also a Mormon, are visibly embarked on a policy of favoring Mormons for top positions.


On Sept. 14, Google rejected an appeal by the Obama White House to remove the controversial film worldwide. As Wired magazine noted on May 11, 2012, “former National Security Agency chief Mike McConnell told the Washington Post that collaboration between the NSA and private companies like Google was ‘inevitable,’” and has been widely reported since January 2010. So Google’s refusal to cooperate with Obama tells us about the views of the NSA, and speaks volumes about which presidential candidate the intelligence community is backing.


​
The Netanyahu Likud

During the past week, the reactionary Israeli Prime Minister has intervened blatantly and outrageously in US election-year politics in the attempt to secure the election of Mitt Romney, with whom he has been joined at the hip since the two worked together at the Boston Consulting Group in 1976.

About a week ago, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that the United States has no “red lines” in regard to the Iranian nuclear program. Netanyahu replied with an angry outburst, raving that those who have no red lines have “no moral right” to give Israel a red light when it comes to starting a catastrophic aggressive war against Iran. This was interpreted in Washington as a call to vote for Romney. To underline the message, the deputy speaker of the Israeli Knesset appeared on MSNBC cable news one morning to demand immediate US war with Iran. Republican candidates are using this material for their campaigns.

Some observers have pointed out that, while Netanyahu demands that the US specify some future set of circumstances under which war must begin, the Israeli government has never specified any red lines of its own, meaning that Bibi wants Washington to be more Israeli than the Israelis. These brazen actions by Netanyahu have evoked a wave of American resentment and hostility, even in circles which are usually prepared to go along with the Israelis.


Some have also speculated that, since Romney has shown repeatedly that he has no knowledge of world affairs, Netanyahu believes that he would be able to dictate US foreign policy through his friendship with Romney. During the Republican presidential debates, Romney promised to get Netanyahu’s approval for every US action in the Middle East.


​
US Neocons

The pro-Israeli neocons of the Bush-Cheney era have attached themselves to Romney as their main hope of getting back into power. This group includes John Bolton (the likely Secretary of State if Romney wins), Eliot Cohen, Robert Kagan, Robert Joseph, and Dan Senor (who now tells vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan what to say about foreign policy).

Prince Bandar bin Sultan and the Saudi Arabian royal family would likely prefer Romney to Obama. Since the Saudi royals are the paymasters for the majority of the death squads now operating in the Middle East, including Libya and Syria, their support would be valuable in organizing operations like the attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens.

The French imperialist ideologue Bernard-Henri Lévy, who had strongly advised President Sarkozy to start bombing Libya, is praising Stevens as a “secret craftsman of [Libyan] liberation.”

BHL says Stevens had accompanied Hillary Clinton to a meeting with Libyan rebel chief Mahmoud Jebril on March 14, 2011, and had later helped convince Hillary to call Obama and recommend that he order an immediate start to the bombing. (Le Monde, Sept. 12) Given the Arabic and French language skills of Stevens, he was then well qualified to serve as contact man with the pro-al-Qaeda militant groups of the Benghazi-Derna-Tobruk extremist axis which did much of the fighting against Qaddafi. Many of these armed groups have been transferred by NATO into Syria to fight against President Assad, raising the question of Ambassador Stevens’ role in these currently ongoing operations.

Less clear is why he should be singled out at this time. Perhaps he was a witness whose testimony could have proved embarrassing later.
On Tuesday evening, Stevens had left the US consular compound and taken refuge in a secret safe house nearby. Somehow, the well-trained attackers knew of the existence of this safe house and directed professionally accurate mortar fire against these premises. How did they know where Ambassador Stevens was hiding? We would need to ask the CIA and the Saudis.


Nakoula/Bacile served almost two years in jail after conviction for identity theft and bank fraud involving credit cards. He is currently out on parole, and one of the conditions is that he not use a computer. If authorities can prove he posted the incendiary video, they can immediately revoke his parole and send him back to prison for four years. Nakoula/Bacile looks like a patsy – specifically a drug informant.

(Peliske and Daly, Daily Beast, Sept. 14)

As for the film, it would appear to be the handiwork of a well-known Islamophobic network reputedly inspired by US intelligence. According to the Los Angeles Times, the permit for the film originally called “Desert Warrior” was requested by a “Christian nonprofit” calling itself Media For Christ of Duarte, California. The blogger Panglozz of The Daily Kos reports that Media For Christ is owned by Joseph Nasrallah Abdelmasih, an Egyptian-born Coptic Christian activist and anti-Moslim firebrand. Nasrallah was prominent in the summer 2010 campaign to prevent the building of a mosque and Islamic community center not far from the site of the former World Trade Center in lower Manhattan. Nasrallah was a speaker at a rally held at Ground Zero on September 11, 2010, to protest the mosque. This rally was organized by a well-connected Islamophobic organization known as Stop the Islamization of America (SIOA).

The main spokesperson and organizer for SIOA is Pamela Geller, a notorious professional Islamophobe and the hostess of the Atlas Shrugs blog. Geller, despite her venom, enjoys access to the US mainstream media. The SIOA rally just mentioned was also addressed via video link by Ambassador John Bolton, a top neocon, close adviser to Romney, and widely touted as a possible Secretary of State in a future Romney regime. Another speaker at this rally was the Netherlands xenophobic politician Geert Wilders, who also wanted to block the mosque. Wilders’ party has just suffered heavy losses in the Netherlands elections earlier this week.

Bolton took a leading role in trying to turn the Stevens assassination against Obama this past week. Bolton told a Washington, DC radio station: “I’ve said for 3½ years the President doesn’t care about national security. He doesn’t think the world is terribly threatening. I think a weak reaction, a failure to demonstrate American power and resolve, will help see this stretched throughout the region.” Bolton warned particularly that a new hostage crisis would replay the “destruction of the Jimmy Carter administration,” this time at Obama’s expense. (Politico, Sept. 13)

See Invalid Link Removed for more geopolitical reports and commentary.

Webster Griffin Tarpley (Pittsfield, Massachusetts, 1946) is a philosopher of history who seeks to provide the programs and strategies needed to overcome the current world crisis. As an activist historian he first became widely known for his book Invalid Link Removed (1992), a masterpiece of research which is still a must read. AB Princeton 1966, summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa; Fulbright Scholar at University of Turin, Italy; MA in humanities from Skidmore College; and Ph.D. in early modern history from the Catholic University of America with emphasis on the role of Venice in the origins of the Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648). He has addressed audiences in Italian, German, and French. A decades-long expert on international terrorism, his 1978 study commissioned by an Italian government minister and entitled “Chi ha ucciso Aldo Moro?” (Who Killed Aldo Moro?) broke open the ownership of the Red Brigades by NATO’s clandestine networks.

During 2008, he warned of the dangers of an Obama presidency controlled by Wall Street with Invalid Link Removed and Invalid Link Removed. His interest in economics is reflected in Invalid Link Removed. He is currently completing a study of Pearl Harbor as an episode in Wall Street’s war against President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the New Deal, and FDR’s economic bill of rights. His books have appeared in Japanese, German, Italian, French, and Spanish.
 
China to cripple Japan with financial war over isles row?

RT
Published: 19 September, 2012, 15:19


Invalid Link Removed



A Chinese demonstrator shouts slogans during a protest against Japan's "nationalizing" of Diaoyu Islands, also known as Senkaku in Japan, in Hangzhou, east China's Zhejiang province, on Septermber 18, 2012. (AFP Photo)

China may introduce economic measures to cripple Japan in order to gain the upper hand in a territorial row. Following violent anti-Japanese protests and increasingly bellicose rhetoric, Beijing could employ sanctions to subdue its neighbor.

State newspaper China Daily wrote that China should take “strong countermeasures” in light of the “ridiculous” Japanese nationalization of the isles, called the Diaoyu by the Chinese.

The paper suggests that while open war should a last resort the country should be pursuing sanctions to respond to what it sees as Japanese “provocation.”

Citing the freeze on banana imports when the Philippines contested the Huangyan Islands in April, the publication said “it is important for China to devise a sanction plan against Japan that would cause minimum loss to Chinese enterprises.”

“Japanese companies earn huge profits from their exports to China. That means China is in a lot better position to afford a loss in exports,” wrote Jin Baisong from the Chinese Academy of International Trade. In this way he stipulated that China could deal a heavy blow to the Japanese economy without doing significant damage to its own.

“Japan should reconsider its financial health. In other words, with Japan's national debt at stake… And China can use it to find ways to impose sanctions on Japan in the most effective manner,” said the article.

Tensions have reached boiling point over the territorial disputes that triggered the outbreak of mass anti-Japanese riots throughout China over the last week. Japan provoked Chinese ire when it announced a plan to buy the contested islands from their private Japanese owner last Tuesday.

"The farce of buying the Diaoyu Islands seriously violates China's territorial sovereignty and severely hurts the feelings of the Chinese people, which have aroused strong indignation and opposition across the nation," said a spokesman from the Chinese Ministry of Commerce.

Japan has already felt some financial backlash from the riots that have gripped China over the last few days. Attacks on Japanese brands like Panasonic and Toyota have caused some companies to cease operations until further notice.

US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta is currently in China to discuss the escalating dispute between the Asian nations. He met with China’s leader-in-waiting Xi Jinping, agreeing to strengthen military ties between the two countries.

Following the meeting Panetta emphasized the fact the US military’s planned shift into the Pacific was not a threat to China.

"Our rebalance to the Asia-Pacific region is not an attempt to contain China. It is an attempt to engage China and expand its role in the Pacific," Panetta said in a speech at the Engineering Academy of PLA.

Broaching the subject of the US-Japanese missile signed on Monday, Panetta said that the new defense radar to be built on Japanese territory was aimed specifically at North Korea and is “designed to foster peace and stability in the region."

In spite of the US’s claim to neutrality in the conflict between China and Japan, the Japanese government said it had been “mutually agreed” that the islands came under the US-Japanese security pact.

But Professor Shujie Yao, an economics professor at Nottingham University in the UK, told RT that most Chinese people will not trust the US promise that the Japanese missile deal is of no threat to China.

“I think the Americans have lost the trust of the Chinese mind, most Chinese people consider that America might be a fairly good economic ally, but not a political or diplomatic one, and the ideological differences between China and the United States make the Chinese believe that all America is trying to do is make trouble for China,” he said.

Author and analyst Ryan Dawson told RT the conflict was unlikely to resolve itself soon given that China “have a lot of other reasons to flog this issue and draw it out.”

Addressing the claims made on the islands by both nations, he said they “have nothing to do with land or ancient maps, it’s because oil and natural gas have been discovered under the islands.”

“They are not going to go to war; there is no other result than Senkaku [the Japanese name for the islands] is going to be Japanese and people in China are going to be really angry,” concluded Dawson.

Invalid Link Removed

Other Anti-Japanese protests around the net...

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
 
EasyEJL said:
How do you financially cripple an already financially crippled Japan?
Click to expand...

It can be worse...people are still buying and spending money on irrelevant crap so there are plenty to suppress. I think its all talk, at least with the near future but I want people to be aware of China's moves and their increasing financial muscle, there is so much going on which Im not going to get into this post.

I find the anti-Japanese protests hilarious...there is alot of hatred towards the Japanese because they never apologized for what they did during WWII and the fact that todays Japanese politicians still go to worship their warriors of the past. Yet...the Chinese have killed by far, far more Chinese than the Japanese killed Chinese and the Chinese havent apologized for anything for what they did (and still continue today even) to their own people and they always worship their master murderers of the past and get their children to worship them too.

Then there is the issue of how about you treat others the way you want to be treated...as far as I know, the Chinese are doing to the Tibetans currently the same thing the Japanese did to them 70+ years ago so how about you act righteous now first before asking others to apologize for what others did to you in the past.

Anyways, I think China loves this anti-Japanese crap and they are only fueling into it because it distracts the Chinese people from their true enemy, which is the Chinese government.
 
Big Sis: Obama Ready to Sign Surveillance Grid Executive Order

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
September 20, 2012

Homeland Security boss Invalid Link Removed told a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on Wednesday that a blatantly unconstitutional Obama administrationInvalid Link Removed is “still being drafted in the inter-agency process” and “is close to completion depending on a few issues that need to be resolved at the highest levels.”

Invalid Link Removed
Obama will implement crucial element of the surveillance state by executive fiat.

The latest Obama EO – he has Invalid Link Removed thus far – is a response to the failure of a cybersecurity bill to pass in the Senate. The Invalid Link Removed failed 52-46. Following the vote, Obama’s press secretary, Jay Carney, said “the President is determined to do absolutely everything we can to better protect our nation against today’s cyber threats and we will do that” despite the will of the American people.

So-called cybersecurity is a crucial element of the surveillance state. “Cyber will overtake terrorism as the persistent, gnawing, constantly-at-us kind of threat and danger,” said Invalid Link Removed, deputy secretary of Defense, at a conference held in San Francisco in February.

Carter’s prediction fell on the heels of a long and drawn out propaganda campaign by the government warning that hackers and other shadowy miscreants would take down “America’s financial systems, water treatment plants, or the electrical grid that keeps lights on and homes heated,” as the Christian Science Monitor put it.

As Invalid Link Removed on numerous occasions, cyber attacks do not threaten the power grid in the United States. Critical infrastructure in the U.S. is rarely connected directly to the public internet. “The fact of the matter is that it isn’t easy to do any of these things. Your average power grid or drinking-water system isn’t analogous to a PC or even to a corporate network,” writes Invalid Link Removed for Wired.

Instead of protecting Americans, Obama’s unconstitutional EO will allow the NSA and the Department of Homeland Security to extend their surveillance capability. The Senate “bill specifically authorizes companies to use cybersecurity as an excuse for engaging in nearly unlimited monitoring of user data or countermeasures” like blocking targeted internet traffic, the Invalid Link Removed noted in July.

Transnational telecoms invariably cooperate with the government. Under the NSA’s Invalid Link Removed in the early 1950s, the CIA worked with the NSA and ITT World Communications, Western Union International, and RCA Global to illegally intercept telegrams. In 2004, a veteran AT&T communications technician, Invalid Link Removed, discovered that telecom was diverting massive amounts of internet traffic to the NSA.

EFF argues Invalid Link Removed:
Data collected under the Cybersecurity Act can be shared with law enforcement for non-cybersecurity purposes if it “appears to relate to a crime” either past, present, or near future. This is overboard and contrary to the spirit of our Constitution. Senator Wyden, talking about a similar provision in CISPA, noted “They would allow law enforcement to look for evidence of future crimes, opening the door to a dystopian world where law enforcement evaluates your Internet activity for the potential that you might commit a crime.” The CSA suffers the same “future crime” flaw.
​
In short, if enacted or pushed through by executive mandate, the legislation would nullify the Fourth Amendment.

The Pentagon, the NSA and the military-industrial-intelligence complex tried to shove this monstrosity down our throats by ramming it through Congress, but now that the legislative effort and months of scary propaganda have failed they will resort to the tried and true practice of having their selected teleprompter reader issue an executive fiat.

One of the authors of the Senate bill, Joe Lieberman, said he “was encouraged to hear that the administration was close to wrapping up work” on the unconstitutional order. He urged the White House to “move forward on implementing the executive order and not wait to see if Congress passes cybersecurity legislation during the lame-duck session after the election.”

=====================================================================================================
Obama Plans Executive Order to Force Cybersecurity Boondoggle On America

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
September 9, 2012

Invalid Link Removed
Power grid not at risk from cyber attack despite scary government propaganda.


Obama plans to violate the Constitution again and issue yet another executive order.

The latest EO would create a government program protecting vital computer networks from cyber attacks, according to Invalid Link Removed. The Department of Homeland Security would establish cybersecurity standards that companies could “voluntarily adopt to better protect banks, telecommunication networks and the U.S. power grid from electronic attacks.”

As Invalid Link Removed on numerous occasions, cyber attacks do not threaten the power grid in the United States. Critical infrastructure in the U.S. is rarely connected directly to the public internet. “The fact of the matter is that it isn’t easy to do any of these things. Your average power grid or drinking-water system isn’t analogous to a PC or even to a corporate network,” writes Invalid Link Removed for Wired.

Despite this, the government has perpetuated propaganda designed to scare average Americans into backing cyber security legislation. In July, the Invalid Link Removed said companies controlling the country’s power grid, water filtration facilities and a nuclear facility have come under hacker attack.

Regardless of the sustained propaganda effort, the public has not demanded lawmakers pass legislation allowing government to impose cybersecurity measures on public and private infrastructure companies.

In August, despite the best efforts of “top military and national security officials,” a much-anticipated (by government) cybersecurity bill went down in the flames in the Senate. A Republican filibuster killed “years of bipartisan efforts to establish stricter security standards and, some experts say, could leave the nation vulnerable to widespread hacking or a serious cyberattack,” the Invalid Link Removed reported.

Obama’s latest EO was contrived after the failure to push through legislation in the Senate. “The administration is contemplating using an executive order because it isn’t clear Congress would pass a cybersecurity bill,” reports Bloomberg.

In other words, the imperial presidency controlled by Obama’s globalist handlers will once again violate the Constitution, specifically Invalid Link Removed, that states: “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” The Constitution does not say that if Congress fails to pass legislation, the president can then implement it by executive fiat. Specific bills must originate in the House and Senate and then go to the president for signature in order to become law.

“An executive order is one of a number of measures we’re considering as we look to implement the president’s direction to do absolutely everything we can to better protect our nation against today’s cyberthreats,” said White House spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden. “We are not going to comment on ongoing internal deliberations.”

Invalid Link Removed noted last year that cybersecurity is a big and booming industry. “The U.S. government is expected to spend $10.5 billion a year on information security by 2015, and analysts have estimated the worldwide market to be as much as $140 billion a year. The Defense Department has said it is seeking more than $3.2 billion in cybersecurity funding for 2012,” they wrote in August/September issue of Reason magazine.

The military-industrial complex is the tip of the spear of the national security state. Cybersecurity supposedly protecting against exaggerated and phantom threats is a key element of the public-private partnership takeover of industry:

Traditional defense contractors, both to hedge against hardware cutbacks and get in on the ground floor of a booming new sector, have been emphasizing cybersecurity in their competition for government business. Lockheed Martin, Boeing, L-3 Communications, SAIC, and BAE Systems have all launched cybersecurity divisions in recent years. Other defense contractors, such as Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, and ManTech International, have also invested in information security products and services.
​


As Invalid Link Removed and others have noted, it is also a key element of corporatist fascism. “Public-private partnerships are the embodiment of what Mussolini dubbed ‘corporatism;’ that is the ‘merger of state and corporate power.’ Under corporatism, the ruling class is able to expand unbeknownst to the Boobus Americanus and its equivalent in other countries,” Miller writes.
 
Its all going to Hell in a handbasket. Stock up on guns and ammo my friends! Maybe there should be some more contributors to my Zombie Apocalypse Training Program thread... :)
 
TruthWalker said:
Its all going to Hell in a handbasket. Stock up on guns and ammo my friends! Maybe there should be some more contributors to my Zombie Apocalypse Training Program thread... :)
Click to expand...

stock up on food too.
 
carpee said:
stock up on food too.
Click to expand...

Wont help, Obama's executive order allows the military to kick your door down, take all your food and natural resources and subdue you to labor. This is freedom.

For those of you who dont know, especially if you watch only mainstream television which only covers minor issues as the most relevant, and think this is just another "conspiracy theory" here is the Whitehouse link to the Executive Order National Defense Resources Preparadness, Invalid Link Removed
 
ax1 said:
Wont help, Obama's executive order allows the military to kick your door down, take all your food and natural resources and subdue you to labor. This is freedom.

For those of you who dont know, especially if you watch only mainstream television which only covers minor issues as the most relevant, and think this is just another "conspiracy theory" here is the Whitehouse link to the Executive Order National Defense Resources Preparadness, Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...


I know I know but...


I'm still stockin up on food for the meantime.
 
gregg1494 said:
And buy gold. Global currencies are going crash.
Click to expand...

This is a good idea as well, but dont be so sure your safe if you do.

Check out the "Presidential Executive Order number 6102" when they criminalized gold. It was perhaps the biggest official heist of wealth (unlike the digital stuff the private Federal Reserve is dealing with) in modern history, and its all done by government.

A judge on September 6, 2012 ordered $80 million of gold to be taken by the treasury, if you think 1933 was a long time ago its not,
Invalid Link Removed

When it comes to "National Security" nobody has any rights in this country. The problem too is that "National Security" is really undefined and can be created at the will and pleasure of goverment, nothing can protect us.
 
Court Rules Motorists Can Be Detained For Paying By Cash at Toll Booths

Using cash increasingly seen as suspicious activity

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
September 24, 2012

The Eleventh Circuit US Court of Appeals has ruled that private contractors operating toll roads on behalf of the state have the power to detain and store records on motorists who pay by cash at toll booths – another example of how using cash is increasingly being treated as a suspicious activity.

​
Invalid Link Removed

Having been held hostage by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and the private contractor in charge of the state’s toll road, Faneuil, Inc. at a toll booth last year for paying cash and refusing to have a report filled out on them and their vehicle, Joel, Deborah and Robert Chandler filed suit.

​
“Under FDOT policies in place at the time, motorists who paid with $50 bills, and occasionally even $5 bills, were not given permission to proceed until the toll collector filled out a “Bill Detection Report” with data about the motorist’s vehicle and details from his driver’s license. Many of those who chose to pay cash did so to avoid the privacy implications of installing a SunPass transponder that recorded their driving habits,” Invalid Link Removed
​
“They were likewise unwilling to provide personal information to the toll collector, but they had no alternative because the toll barrier would not be raised without compliance. FDOT policy does not allow passengers to exit their vehicle, and backing up is illegal and usually impossible while other cars wait behind.”

​
The three-judge panel dismissed the suit, ruling that detaining motorists in order to record details about people who paid by cash was not a constitutional violation and that the state and the contractor could subject motorists to such treatment because, “In Florida, a person’s right and liberty to use a highway is not absolute.”

​
This is merely the latest example in a growing trend of authorities treating people who use cash to pay for goods, bills or services as suspicious. Given that the use of cash cannot be used to track purchases or movements of individuals, extra layers of bureaucracy and intimidation are becoming institutionalized in order to dissuade people from using hard currency as part of the move towards a cashless society.​

Invalid Link Removed on how the FBI was telling businesses to treat people who use cash to pay for a cup of coffee as potential terrorists.

​
The flyer, issued under the FBI’s Communities Against Terrorism (CAT) program, lists examples of “suspicious activity” and then encourages businesses to gather information about individuals and report them to the authorities.

​
The flyer aimed at Internet Cafe owners characterizes customers who “always pay cash” as potential terrorists. Given that some retail outlets don’t even accept card payments for amounts lower than $10 dollars, this would put millions of innocent people under the spotlight.

​
We also recently highlighted Invalid Link Removed, who was falsely imprisoned and harassed by Wal-Mart employees for attempting to buy goods with a $100 dollar bill the Wal-Mart cashiers erroneously claimed was fake.

​
The Wal-Mart cashier ripped the $100 dollar bill in half before taking another in Garcia’s possession and doing the same. Despite a counterfeit detection test proving the bills were genuine, the Wal-Mart employees tried to hide the fact and told Garcia they were keeping the money.

Only after police were called was the Wal-Mart store ordered to replace the stolen bills.

​
Wal-Mart is part of the Department of Homeland Security’s See Something Say Something campaign, which encourages shoppers and Wal-Mart employees to report suspicious activity. Invalid Link Removed, the DHS characterizes using cash as a suspicious activity and a potential indication of terrorism.

​
Invalid Link Removedwas charged and jailed by police after using an old $50 bill to pay for goods at a Quik Mart store. Two banks analyzed the bill and confirmed it was genuine. Police apologized to Lorenzo Gaspar and he was subsequently released from prison.​
 
ax1 said:
This is a good idea as well, but dont be so sure your safe if you do.

Check out the "Presidential Executive Order number 6102" when they criminalized gold. It was perhaps the biggest official heist of wealth (unlike the digital stuff the private Federal Reserve is dealing with) in modern history, and its all done by government.

A judge on September 6, 2012 ordered $80 million of gold to be taken by the treasury, if you think 1933 was a long time ago its not,
Invalid Link Removed

When it comes to "National Security" nobody has any rights in this country. The problem too is that "National Security" is really undefined and can be created at the will and pleasure of goverment, nothing can protect us.
Click to expand...

Good post
 
WARNING: This Post contains graphic images, do not scroll down if sensitive.











So... Obama going to take another "Kinetic Action" and get NATO to bomb the Crap out of China in the name of Humanitarian wars? Nah...business as usual, business is good and booming, and more bowing down to Master Hu Jintao in the future.

Man Crushed by Road Flattening Truck On Orders of Chinese Officials

Villager attempted to resist forced government relocation

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
September 25, 2012

A villager in northern China attempting to resist a forced government relocation by remaining on his land was brutally crushed to death by a road flattening truck on the orders of a Chinese government official.

​
Invalid Link Removed

​
The story, which was censored in China’s state controlled media, has caused outrage amongst users of Weibo, the Chinese version of Twitter, given it’s horrifying similarity to what happened to student protesters who were crushed to death by tanks during the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989.

​
The victim, He Zhi Hua, refused to accept a paltry payment from the government which has forcefully evicted Changsha Village locals in order to re-appropriate their land for commercial use.

​
When Hua began a protest by lying down on the spot through which construction vehicles had to pass, the local Vice Mayor ordered workers for the state-owned company to murder Hua by driving over his body with a huge road-flattening truck.

​
Shocking images show Hua’s pulverized brains and his mangled body in the aftermath of the state-sponsored execution.

​
Fearing unrest if the story got out to a wider audience, the government sent in 200 men to keep angry locals at bay and hide the remains of the body. The man’s family was offered a sum of money in order to keep quiet about the incident.

​
Invalid Link Removed

​
Invalid Link Removed furious at the arbitrary theft of their land by the state, which under the Communist system claims that the government owns all land and that private property rights are non-existent. However, the state-owned media ensures that news of the protests does not reach a national audience.

​
In another similar case in Pan Jin City, when villager Wang Shi Jie tried to prevent workers hired by local government officials destroying his crops and confiscating his land before harvest, he was shot dead. When Jie’s father attempted to rush to his son’s aid, he was shot in the leg twice.

​
After the incident, hundreds of police officers were sent to dispose of the body and beat up villagers who complained about the man’s murder. The dispute started after it emerged that the agricultural land was being sold by the government to developers without the villagers having been notified.

​
Hua’s and Jie’s brave efforts in standing up to the savage Communist Party officials also brings to mind the courageous actions of Wang Weilin – otherwise known as ‘Tank Man’ or ‘The Unknown Rebel’. Weilin blocked the path of a column of Chinese tanks the morning after the Tiananmen Square massacre – footage that has become an iconic representation of the individual standing up against an oppressive state.

1989 Tiananmen Square Protests



​
 
Lobbyist: Launch Staged Provocation To Start War With Iran


“We are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians”

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
September 26, 2012

A member of the influential pro-Israel Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) think tank has brazenly suggested that the United States should launch a false flag provocation in order to start a war with Iran.



Speaking at a Washington Institute for Near East Policy policy forum luncheon on “How to Build US-Israeli Coordination on Preventing an Iranian Nuclear Breakout,” WINEP director of research Patrick Clawson listed a raft of historical examples of where governments have either staged or exploited attacks in order to become embroiled in war.

Clawson is also a former senior economist with the IMF and the World Bank.

​
Lamenting how it is “Very hard for me to see how the United States President can get us to war with Iran,” Clawson added, “the traditional way [that] America gets to war is what would be best for U.S. interests.”

​
By the “traditional way,” Clawson clearly intimated that he thinks the U.S. should stage or provoke an attack in order to create a manufactured casus belli for striking Iran.​
“We can do a variety of things to increase the pressure,” said Clawson as fellow attendees at the luncheon snickered, adding that sanctions are not the only option and that “we are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians, we could get nastier about it.”

​
“So, if in fact the Iranians aren’t going to compromise, it would be best if somebody else started the war,” Clawson said.

​
Mentioning an incident on August 17 when power cables serving the Fordow Enrichment Plant were severed by an explosion, Clawson stated, “Iranian submarines periodically go down, someday one of them might not come up – who would know why? – clearly hinting that the U.S. should attack Iranian ships in order to provoke a response.

​
Reeling off a number of incidents that the U.S. President “had to wait for” before taking America to war, Clawson mentioned the Gulf of Tonkin, the Lusitania, the attack on the USS Maine, Pearl Harbor, as well as the attack on Fort Sumter during Abraham Lincoln’s tenure.

​
Every one of those events is historically recognized to have been staged to some degree or at least known ahead of time and exploited.

​
The Invalid Link Removedon 15 February 1898 and drove the United States into a war with Spain was most likely an accident. However, an aggressive propaganda campaign run by the king of yellow journalism William Randolph Hearst ensured that Americans were hoodwinked into blaming Spain and throwing their support behind the war.

​
The sinking of the Lusitania, which helped bring America into World War One, was also a planned provocation. In September 2008, Invalid Link Removed that had raged for decades – the ship was carrying a huge amount of munitions and was a legitimate target for German U-boats. Before the ship sailed, Invalid Link Removed and would target the Lusitania.

​
The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was known ahead of time and allowed to happen. Invalid Link Removed, written on October 7, 1940, by Lieutenant Commander Arthur H. McCollum of the Office of Naval Intelligence, detailed eight actions that could be used to provoke Japan into attacking the United States. Invalid Link Removed that that United States had intercepted Admiral Yamamoto’s radio messages sent weeks before December 7 1941, one of which made it clear that the Japanese would attack Pearl Harbor.

​
Invalid Link Removed, the supposed second attack by the North Vietnamese which the White House cited in sending troops to Vietnam did not take place. In an interview for a documentary called The Fog of War, then Defense Secretary Invalid Link Removed
​
In listing these examples, Clawson is shamelessly calling for the United States to stage or provoke an incident as a means of manufacturing a pretext to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities.
​
 
I love info wars. Thousands of predictions where 99% dont ever come true. But that 1% is proof of accuracy.

Gotta love it.

On a serious note...Ax, what were your thoughts on the UN speeches?
 
AE14 said:
I love info wars. Thousands of predictions where 99% dont ever come true. But that 1% is proof of accuracy.Gotta love it.On a serious note...Ax, what were your thoughts on the UN speeches?
Click to expand...

A lot of political theater, propaganda and mumbojumbo as it is every year. Another example of how Obama is just another war bully and is no different than Bush.

On another note I have started a "Just Say No" campaign in my community to boycott the vote and I'm a little surprised at the support I'm getting, although I still get it from Obama supporters the most. They think not voting is a vote for Romney when my argument is that a vote for Obama IS a vote for Romney.On the phone right now so ill be back a bit later for any more responses.
 
AE14 said:
I love info wars. Thousands of predictions where 99% dont ever come true. But that 1% is proof of accuracy.

Gotta love it.

On a serious note...Ax, what were your thoughts on the UN speeches?
Click to expand...

What did you think?
 
Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski (Invalid Link Removed: Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzeziński, pronounced Invalid Link Removed; born March 28, 1928) is a Invalid Link Removed Invalid Link Removed, Invalid Link Removed, and Invalid Link Removed who served as Invalid Link Removed to Invalid Link Removed Invalid Link Removed from 1977 to 1981

Brzezinski is currently Robert E. Osgood Professor of American Foreign Policy at Invalid Link Removed's Invalid Link Removed, a scholar at the Invalid Link Removed, and a member of various boards and councils. He appears frequently as an expert on the Invalid Link Removed program Invalid Link Removed, Invalid Link Removed' Invalid Link Removed, and on Invalid Link Removed's Invalid Link Removed, where his daughter, Invalid Link Removed, is co-anchor. In recent years, he has been a supporter of the Invalid Link Removed.[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP]

In August 2007, Brzezinski endorsed Democratic presidential candidate Invalid Link Removed. He stated that Obama "recognizes that the challenge is a new face, a new sense of direction, a new definition of America's role in the world."[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP] – also saying, "What makes Obama attractive to me is that he understands that we live in a very different world where we have to relate to a variety of cultures and people."[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP] In September 2007 during a speech on the Iraq war, Obama introduced Brzezinski as "one of our most outstanding thinkers," but some pro-Israel commentators questioned his criticism of the Invalid Link Removed.[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP] In a September 2009 interview with Invalid Link Removed, Brzezinski replied to a question about how aggressive President Obama should be in insisting Israel not conduct an air strike on Iran, saying: "We are not exactly impotent little babies. They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch?"[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP] This was interpreted by some supporters of Israel as supporting the downing of Israeli jets by the United States in order to prevent an attack on Iran.[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP][SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP] In 2011, Brzezinski supported the Invalid Link Removed against the forces of Invalid Link Removed in the Invalid Link Removed, calling non-intervention "morally dubious" and "politically questionable".[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP]

Invalid Link Removed

Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski with Osama Bin Laden

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
 
Forget Your Free Phone, Obama Has Screwed The Poor

“Everybody got Obama phone!”

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
September 28, 2012

A video clip posted by the Drudge Report that has since gone viral which shows an Obama supporter semi-incoherently blathering about how she is voting for Obama because the government gave her a free phone tragically underscores how the state exploits dependency by offering poor people trinkets while simultaneously stealing their entire economic future.



Once you have recovered from the hilarity of the video clip, the awful truth behind it begins to sink in. While this Obama voter screeches about her government-provided cellphone, Obama has been busy screwing the poor at every turn.

To clarify, the “Obama Cell Phone” program has provided 269,000 poor Americans with free phones and monthly service Invalid Link Removed, a figure that keeps rising every year.

The video harks back to a 2008 clip during which an Obama voter gushed about how Obama’s election victory meant she no longer had to worry about paying her mortgage or filling her car with gas.



The delusion that these people are living under knows no bounds.

Under Obama that the poor have got poorer. Invalid Link Removed to levels approaching the 1960′s.

​
Obama didn’t pay for your mortgage, he Invalid Link Removed, the predatory lenders, the big banks, and then the Invalid Link Removed.

​
Obama didn’t pay for your gas, but he did pay for Invalid Link Removed.

​
Obama gave the green light for Ben Bernanke to engage in QE Infinity - Invalid Link Removed. Under Obama, the Invalid Link Removed has soared.

​
The only people benefiting from Obama and the Fed’s economic holocaust are the super rich who are invested in the casino stock market.

​
The Invalid Link Removed has never been greater than under Obama. The fraction of growth for the top one percent grew at 95 per cent under Obama compared to 65 per cent under Bush.

​
Obama has screwed the poor.

​
But forget all that – “Everybody got Obama phone!”

​
While their entire economic future has been sold down the river, these people have allowed their votes to be bought by a free phone.​
 
I saw the phone video....damn near peed myself laughing

"Romney sucks....sucks bad"

Too funny
 
Former Reporter Amber Lyon Exposes Massive Censorship At CNN

Michael Krieger
Invalid Link Removed
Sept 10, 2012

I saw first-hand that these regime claims were lies, and I couldn’t believe CNN was making me put what I knew to be government lies into my reporting.
- Amber Lyon

Invalid Link Removed

The Amber Lyon story is just the latest in a series of articles that expose the total Joseph Goebbels like censorship rampant in mainstream media today. The first one I posted several weeks ago exposed how Invalid Link Removed, while the other showcased how an Invalid Link Removed. This is precisely why alternative media sites are taking off. They provide the only outlets left for genuine journalism.

So back to Amber. Back in March 2011, CNN sent a four person team to Bahrain to cover the Arab Spring. Once there, the crew was the subject of extreme intimidation amongst other things, but they were able to record some fantastic footage. As Glenn Greenwald of the UK’s Guardian writes in his blockbuster article from today:

“In the segment, Lyon interviewed activists as they explicitly described their torture at the hands of government forces, while family members recounted their relatives’ abrupt disappearances. She spoke with government officials justifying the imprisonment of activists. And the segment featured harrowing video footage of regime forces shooting unarmed demonstrators, along with the mass arrests of peaceful protesters. In sum, the early 2011 CNN segment on Bahrain presented one of the starkest reports to date of the brutal repression embraced by the US-backed regime.

Despite these accolades, and despite the dangers their own journalists and their sources endured to produce it, CNN International (CNNi) never broadcast the documentary. Even in the face of numerous inquiries and complaints from their own employees inside CNN, it continued to refuse to broadcast the program or even provide any explanation for the decision. To date, this documentary has never aired on CNNi.
Having just returned from Bahrain, Lyon says she “saw first-hand that these regime claims were lies, and I couldn’t believe CNN was making me put what I knew to be government lies into my reporting.”

After Lyon’s crew returned from Bahrain, CNN had no correspondents regularly reporting on the escalating violence. In emails to her producers and executives, Lyon repeatedly asked to return to Bahrain. Her requests were denied, and she was never sent back. She thus resorted to improvising coverage by interviewing activists via Skype in an attempt, she said, “to keep Bahrain in the news”.

In March 2012, Lyon was laid off from CNN as part of an unrelated move by the network to outsource its investigative documentaries.
“At this point,” Lyon said, “I look at those payments as dirty money to stay silent. I got into journalism to expose, not help conceal, wrongdoing, and I’m not willing to keep quiet about this any longer, even if it means I’ll lose those payments.”

Amber Lyon, I salute you.

Please forward this post to everyone you know. I for one want to live in a country with some real and free press. Not some CIA propaganda arm that pretends to be a reliable source of news.

Read Greenwald’s excellent article Invalid Link Removed.

This article was written by Michael Krieger and published at Invalid Link Removed
 
Member of 'Obama Boyz' gang charged in St. Louis shootings

Invalid Link Removed

St. Lous Post Dispach

September 28, 2012 5:03 pm • Invalid Link Removed
ST. LOUIS • A St. Louis teen who authorities say is a member of a gang called the "Obama Boyz" has been charged with two shootings on Saturday.

Anthony Jamal Lee, 18, fired at a group of people from the window of a Grand Prix at 2:17 p.m., according to charges. A 13-year-old boy was struck in the side of his body and had to be hospitalized; a 17-year-old boy was grazed by bullets on his face and arm.

Lee, according to authorities, then fired from his car at two passengers in another Grand Prix, grazing one of them in the back.
One shooting occurred at the 3200 block of Oriole Avenue, and the other nearby at Harney and Beacon avenues.

Lee, who was charged Friday in St. Louis Circuit Court, faces a mix of 10 felony counts of first-degree assault, armed criminal action and firing shots from a vehicle. Judge Theresa Burke set $100,000 cash bail.

Authorities said Lee is a documented member of the "Obama Boyz" gang, but did not elaborate.

Invalid Link Removed

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
US military death toll in Afghanistan hits 2,000

Invalid Link Removed
Sept 30, 2012

A member of Nato’s Afghan force and a civilian contractor have been killed in the latest so-called insider attack by a member of the country’s security forces, bringing the US death toll in the conflict up to 2,000.

Invalid Link Removed

The attack in eastern Afghanistan on Saturday came after the United States said joint operations with Afghan forces were returning to normal.

Joint operations were halted two weeks ago after a surge of attacks by Afghan allies. At least 52 members of the Nato force have been killed this year in so-called green-on-blue attacks.

It was too early to say what impact the latest incident would have on plans to restore joint-operations with Afghan forces to normal, a spokesman for NATO’s International Security Assistance Force said.
 
Your Right to Know: More Racy Photos of Obama’s Mother Discovered (Video)

Jim Hoft
The Gateway Pundit

GP Alert: This post is for informational purposes only.

Obviously, this is something you would never see in the mainstream media.

More racy photos of Barack Obama’s mother were recently discovered. The photos were apparently taken at Frank Marshall Davis’s home in Honolulu. The photos reveal an intimate relationship between Obama’s mother and his childhood mentor.
(Warning on content)



Posted by Jim Hoft on Tuesday, June 19, 2012, 11:59 PM

GP Alert: This post is for informational purposes only.
Obviously, this is something you would never see in the mainstream media.

More racy photos of Barack Obama’s mother were recently discovered. The photos were apparently taken at Frank Marshall Davis’s home in Honolulu. The photos reveal an intimate relationship between Obama’s mother and his childhood mentor.

(Warning on content)

From the video:
Racy photos of Barack Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, have recently surfaced in vintage fetish and bondage magazines. The photos, taken at Frank Marshall Davis’ house in Honolulu, appeared in Bizarre Life, Exotique, Secret Pleasures, and Battling Babes. They help illustrate the intimate relationship between Dunham and Davis. “My father was from Kenya, he grew up herding goats,” Barack Obama told the cheering crowds. Did Obama build his political career upon a fairy tale? Was Obama misdirecting Americans away from a deeply disturbing family background and a Marxist political foundation?

Obama’s version of his early childhood is false — the family did not split up when the Kenyan Obama went to Harvard as he claimed. In fact, Ann Dunham, took “Barry” to Seattle a few weeks after his birth, in late August 1961, and began studies at the University of Washington, while the Kenyan remained in Hawaii. All evidence points to a “sham” marriage to cover up an illicit affair. Barack Obama began regular visits to Frank Marshall Davis’ house at the age of 10, and Obama refers to Frank Marshall Davis throughout his autobiography as his childhood “mentor.”

[h=1]Dreams from My Real Father: A Story of Reds and Deception[/h]

​
 
Ross Perot Warns: "America Is Ripe For A Hostile Takeover"


Former presidential contender and billionaire Ross Perot is worried that America is a sitting duck for an unnamed foreign invader. In an interview for his new autobiography, Perot said the nation's weak economy has left us open for a hostile takeover—and neither presidential candidate is the man to save the country.

Citing an impending fiscal cliff, Perot warned of disaster. "If we are that weak, just think of who wants to come here first and take us over," the former CEO of info-tech company Perot Systems told USA Today on Monday.

"The last thing I ever want to see is our country taken over because we're so financially weak, we can't do anything," Perot says.

When asked for his take on the presidential race, Perot added, "Nobody that's running really talks about it, about what we have to do and why we have to do it. They would prefer not to have it discussed."

However cryptic he may be, this is the first political reckoning by Perot in years, ever since he withdrew from the political landscape after the fall of his Reform Party in the 2000 election. The man who ran the most successful third-party campaigns in contemporary American politics also expressed optimism about the current tea party activism and its efforts to "wake up" both Washington and the electorate.

Still, he thinks that even the fresh voices in the populist, small-government tea party movement aren't focusing on the real doomsday issue: the deficit. Comparing the Washington establishment to a bunch of fiscal drunks, Perot is still waiting for America to undergo an intervention, before it finds itself owned by a new global power. "It's like the guy who's drinking—sooner or later, he's got to put a cork on the bottle, right?"
 
The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder: The Movie



Invalid Link Removed

A new movie has just been released based on Vincent Bugliosi’s book “The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder.” Bugliosi, of course, prosecuted Charles Manson and authored best sellers about Manson’s guilt, O.J. Simpson’s guilt, and Lee Harvey Oswald’s guilt. Whether we all agree with all of those conclusions, it is worth noting that each book was reviewed and considered by the biggest U.S. newspapers and television networks. When Bugliosi wrote a book about George W. Bush’s guilt, something we’re almost all united on, the corporate media shut it out. Will the same fate greet this movie?

I hope not. In the book, and in this new movie, Bugliosi makes a devastating, well documented case that President George W. Bush is guilty of the murder of U.S. soldiers as a result of the lies he told to justify the invasion of Iraq, and can be prosecuted by any state attorney general in the country, or by any county prosecutor from a jurisdiction where a U.S. soldier lived prior to being killed in Iraq.

In the movie, we watch Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz remark that if presidents had to live in fear of their actions being scrutinized for criminality that would have a huge impact on their behavior. Dershowitz means this as somehow a negative thing. Bugliosi points out that that is exactly the point: we ought to deter criminal behavior in presidents.

Bugliosi’s argument for prosecution is simple. Bush wanted a war with Iraq. He had to show that a preemptive invasion of Iraq was justified. To do this Iraq had to be an imminent threat to the United States. There were two major problems. Bush couldn’t prove any connection between Saddam Hussein and 9/11. More importantly, Bush’s own 2002 classified intelligence estimate found that Saddam was not an imminent threat to the United States. Bush simply reversed the findings of the National Intelligence Estimate of 2002, and sent men and women off to fight a fraudulent and unnecessary war, knowing full well that some of them would come home in boxes.

The facts are not in dispute. Bush chose to send US troops into Iraq. He did not do so in self-defense or as a last resort or under an international mandate, but rather went out of his way to concoct false motives for war and to rush its launching. By sending troops into war, Bush was knowingly and needlessly but certainly condemning some of them to death. The Iraqis who killed those soldiers in predictable and legally justifiable defense of their country fall into the legal category of “third-party innocent agent.” This does not mean they are innocent, but rather that their actions do nothing to lessen the guilt of George W. Bush as murderer of those soldiers. Bugliosi calls this the “vicarious liability rule of conspiracy.”

Bugliosi explains:
“In other words, if Bush personally killed an American soldier, he would be guilty of murder. Under the law, he cannot immunize himself from his criminal responsibility by causing a third party to do the killing. He’s still responsible. George Bush cannot sit safely in his Oval Office in Washington, D.C., while young American soldiers fighting his war are being blown to pieces by roadside bombs in Iraq, and wash his hands of all culpability. It’s not quite that easy. He could only do this if he did not take this nation into war under false pretenses. If he did, which the evidence overwhelmingly shows, he is criminally responsible for the thousands of American deaths in Iraq.”


​
In addition, Bugliosi argues, Bush could be found guilty of murder under the rule of “aiding and abetting,” because he instigated the killing of American soldiers by ordering the invasion of Iraq.

Did Bush have “malice aforethought”? Yes, according to Bugliosi. We convict people of murder for driving 100 mph through a school zone and hitting a child, or for blowing up a building while unaware that someone is inside. These are cases where the murderer does not know he is committing murder but where he is reckless enough to take an unreasonable risk of doing so. In Bush’s case, he absolutely knew that invading Iraq would involve U.S. casualties, and yet he ordered the invasion, thereby acting with the intent that American soldiers be killed.

Bugliosi strengthens this argument by pointing out that we often convict people of murder for accidental killings that occur in the act of committing other felonies:
“A robber, for instance, was convicted of first degree murder under the felony-murder rule where, as he was leaving the store in which he had robbed the owner, he told the owner not to say a word or he’d be harmed, and fired into the ceiling to scare the owner. The shot, after two or three ricochets, pierced the head of the owner, killing him. In fact, the felony-murder rule applies even where the defendant is not the killer! There have been cases where the proprietor of the store fired at a robber, missed him and hit and killed a customer. And the robber was convicted of first degree murder of the customer.”


​
Bugliosi missed an opportunity here to further strengthen his case by noting that in the act of ordering the invasion of Iraq, Bush was committing a number of felonies. When Bush submitted his March 18, 2003, letter and report to the United States Congress providing reasons for attacking Iraq, he violated the federal anti-conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. – 371, which makes it a felony “to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose…”; and The False Statements Accountability Act of 1996, 18 U.S.C. – 1001, which makes it a felony to issue knowingly and willfully false statements to the United States Congress. Bush also committed a felony by misappropriating funds to secretly begin the invasion prior to this date.

Bugliosi notes that there is no statute of limitations for murder. Bush could be prosecuted by any future federal prosecutor who had the nerve to do so and could do so while keeping his or her job. But Bugliosi writes that a state attorney general or any district attorney in any city or county could bring a murder charge against Bush for any soldiers from that state or county who lost their lives in Iraq. And not just Bush, but Cheney, Rice, et alia.


Bugliosi provides some truly talented proposals for questioning Bush in court and adds:
“I would be more than happy, if requested, to consult with any prosecutor who decides to prosecute Bush in preparation of additional cross-examination questions for him to face on the witness stand. I believe the cross-examination would be such that they’d have to carry the arrogant son of privilege off the stand on a stretcher.”


​
I know the same offer to assist stands from former federal prosecutor Elizabeth de la Vega, author of “United States versus George W. Bush et al.,” who also appears in the film.

Bugliosi believes he’s found the one true way to bring Bush to justice. I think numerous avenues lie open, and that what is lacking is the will. But the statutes of limitations are running out on many crimes, narrowing the field for prosecution. Only those torture cases that resulted in death, for example, can now be prosecuted without running up against the statutes of limitations.

The root of warfare, I believe, is the valuing of U.S. lives over the lives of others. So it is unfortunate that Bugliosi’s approach encourages that, even if unintentionally. Bugliosi does not see any legal case to try Bush for the murders of Iraqis, but he also openly admits that he cares more about the deaths of Americans. Bugliosi repeatedly cites the figure 100,000, or “over 100,000″ as the number of Iraqi deaths, but never indicates where he came up with that number or how he ignores the fact that every serious study has placed the count above a million. Even if Bugliosi sees no way to prosecute Bush for the murder of Iraqis, he does not seem to have considered the possibility that U.S. troops are guilty of those murders. The U.S. troops in this story (and, sadly, it is thus far just a story, not a prosecution) play exclusively the role of victim. The legal and moral reality assigns them multiple roles.

I don’t think it hurts Bugliosi’s legal case, but I doubt that most Congress members believed Bush’s lies about Iraq. At the very least, they were as reckless as he was. And I think there is a fundamental problem with Bugliosi’s belief that there was something unique about Bush lying us into a war in Iraq. It has been firmly established that the U.S. invaded Mexico, that there was no evidence to tie Spain to the sinking of the Maine, that the troops and weapons on the Lusitania were public knowledge, that FDR told numerous lies about Japan and Germany, that the Gulf of Tonkin incident never happened, that the Taliban was willing to hand bin Laden over to a third nation to be tried, etc. The belief that Iraq was a first led me to correct the record with a book called Invalid Link Removed.

Because I know war lies are not unusual, I may value deterrence more highly. I also do not thirst, as Bugliosi does, for anger and vengeance against “evil monsters.” But Bugliosi, too, argues for deterrence as a central motivation, so it’s interesting to see what the lack of deterrence has already wrought. President Obama continued Bush’s wars, including the one in Iraq. President Obama has an open policy of murder including weekly Tuesday reviews of the names of victims. The Invalid Link Removed is Invalid Link Removed. Bugliosi promises in the movie that he would treat a Democrat exactly the same way he treats Bush. I sure hope so.

Here’s a Invalid Link Removed I did with Bugliosi.

Here’s a preview of the movie:



David Swanson’s books include “Invalid Link Removed.” He blogs at Invalid Link Removed and Invalid Link Removed and works as Campaign Coordinator for the online activist organization Invalid Link Removed. He hosts Invalid Link Removed. Follow him on Twitter: Invalid Link Removed and Invalid Link Removed.
 
FEMA To Mobilize For “Mass Fatality Planning”


Bill mandates federal agency to respond to “funeral homes, cemeteries, and mortuaries” being “overwhelmed”

Invalid Link Removed

H.R. 6566: To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency ...

HR 6566 IH
112th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 6566


To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to provide guidance and coordination for mass fatality planning, and for other purposes.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
September 28, 2012

Ms. RICHARDSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to provide guidance and coordination for mass fatality planning, and for other purposes.

  • Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.


  • This Act may be cited as the ‘Mass Fatality Planning and Religious Considerations Act’.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.


  • Congress finds the following:
    • (1) Emergency preparedness often plans for how to prepare and provide for survivors of a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster, but fails to plan for how to prepare for and respond to mass fatalities that result from such an incident.
      (2) Funeral homes, cemeteries, and mortuaries could be overwhelmed should mass fatalities arise from a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster.
      (3) Different religions have different customs surrounding death; for example, the Jewish and Muslim religions call for burial of the deceased not later than 48 hours after death.
SEC. 3. PREPAREDNESS FOR MASS FATALITIES RESULTING FROM A NATURAL DISASTER, ACT OF TERRORISM, OR OTHER MAN-MADE DISASTER.


  • Section 504 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 314) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ‘(c) Preparedness for Mass Fatalities- In carrying out this section, the Administrator shall provide guidance to and coordinate with appropriate individuals, including representatives from different communities, private sector businesses, non-profit organizations, and religious organizations, to prepare for and respond to a natural disaster, act of terrorism, or other man-made disaster that results in mass fatalities.’.

    Full Bill PDF Here: Invalid Link Removed
    ​
 
ax1 said:
Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski (Invalid Link Removed: Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzeziński, pronounced Invalid Link Removed; born March 28, 1928) is a Invalid Link Removed Invalid Link Removed, Invalid Link Removed, and Invalid Link Removed who served as Invalid Link Removed to Invalid Link Removed Invalid Link Removed from 1977 to 1981

Brzezinski is currently Robert E. Osgood Professor of American Foreign Policy at Invalid Link Removed's Invalid Link Removed, a scholar at the Invalid Link Removed, and a member of various boards and councils. He appears frequently as an expert on the Invalid Link Removed program Invalid Link Removed, Invalid Link Removed' Invalid Link Removed, and on Invalid Link Removed's Invalid Link Removed, where his daughter, Invalid Link Removed, is co-anchor. In recent years, he has been a supporter of the Invalid Link Removed.[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP]

In August 2007, Brzezinski endorsed Democratic presidential candidate Invalid Link Removed. He stated that Obama "recognizes that the challenge is a new face, a new sense of direction, a new definition of America's role in the world."[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP] – also saying, "What makes Obama attractive to me is that he understands that we live in a very different world where we have to relate to a variety of cultures and people."[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP] In September 2007 during a speech on the Iraq war, Obama introduced Brzezinski as "one of our most outstanding thinkers," but some pro-Israel commentators questioned his criticism of the Invalid Link Removed.[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP] In a September 2009 interview with Invalid Link Removed, Brzezinski replied to a question about how aggressive President Obama should be in insisting Israel not conduct an air strike on Iran, saying: "We are not exactly impotent little babies. They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch?"[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP] This was interpreted by some supporters of Israel as supporting the downing of Israeli jets by the United States in order to prevent an attack on Iran.[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP][SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP] In 2011, Brzezinski supported the Invalid Link Removed against the forces of Invalid Link Removed in the Invalid Link Removed, calling non-intervention "morally dubious" and "politically questionable".[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP]

Invalid Link Removed

Zbigniew Kazimierz Brzezinski with Osama Bin Laden

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...


There is so much more to this evil man that people don't even know about.

I wish I had the time to do some more research and show his involvement in the recent toppling of Ghadafi and Mubarak in order to implement Islamist states through the uprising of the Muslim Brotherhood.
 
Clemenza said:
There is so much more to this evil man that people don't even know about.

I wish I had the time to do some more research and show his involvement in the recent toppling of Ghadafi and Mubarak in order to implement Islamist states through the uprising of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Click to expand...

pretty scary trend to see the Muslim brotherhood in the Oval Office and us kissing Islamist's asses in the Middle East after we are attacked
 
Spiraling Gasoline Prices are Impoverishing Americans

By Invalid Link Removed
Global Research, October 08, 2012



Invalid Link Removed

Together with draconian austerity measures, home foreclosures, layoffs and the phasing out of social programs, the dramatic hike in gasoline prices constitutes yet another economic mechanism which contributes to the impoverishment of millions of people across the land.

Gasoline prices have skyrocketed overnight in California, with prices at the pump exceeding $5 a gallon.
Across America, the increase in gasoline prices has contributed to compressing purchasing power. It has a devastating impact on suburban families. It compresses the levels of household consumption. It contributes to lowering the standard of living.

The hike in gasoline prices constitutes a mechanism whereby money income is routinely appropriated and transferred from households and consumers into the coffers of oil companies and financial institutions. The price hikes result in windfall corporate profits, while contributing to expanding levels of household debt.

The hikes in fuel and gasoline prices across the US (and Worldwide) also contribute to precipitating small and medium sized businesses into bankruptcy.

Invalid Link Removed

Crude Oil and Commodity Prices
This rise in gas prices is the result of a deliberate manipulation in the oil and energy markets. The speculative onslaught has pushed the price of crude oil to more than 100 dollars a barrel.

This movement in the price of crude oil on the New York mercantile exchange bears no relationship to the costs of producing oil.

The spiraling price of crude oil is not the result of a shortage of oil. It is estimated that the cost of a barrel of oil in the Middle East does not exceed 15 dollars. The costs of a barrel of oil extracted from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada, is of the order of $30 a barrel.

With low production costs and abysmally high prices of crude oil, the oil market is a source of significant corporate enrichment.

The price of crude oil is hovering around $100 a barrel. This market price is largely the result of speculative trade in index funds, futures and options on major commodity markets including the London ICE, the New York and Chicago mercantile exchanges. It is also the consequence of the total absence of government regulation pertaining to the energy market as well as the retail price of gasoline.

Brent Crude oil prices are now in excess of 100 dollars a barrel. (see below)

[TD="colspan: 4, align: center"]WTI Crude Oil
$89.92▲0.040.04%

[TD="colspan: 2"]20:15 PM EDT – 2012.10.07

[TD="colspan: 4, align: center"]Brent Crude Oil
$111.84▼0.180.16%

[TD="colspan: 2"]20:15 PM EDT – 2012.10.07

[TD="align: center"] Invalid Link Removed
[/TD]
Invalid Link RemovedInvalid Link RemovedInvalid Link RemovedInvalid Link Removed
[/TD]
[/TD]

[TD="align: center"] Invalid Link Removed
[/TD]
Invalid Link RemovedInvalid Link RemovedInvalid Link RemovedInvalid Link Removed
[/TD]
[/TD]

[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]

[TD="colspan: 2"][/TD]
According to the Business Insider, the price of West Texas Intermediate crude oil (see above), which “has been used as the principal price benchmark” at which producers sell to refiners, is no longer relevant. WTI hinges upon oil futures contracts on the New York mercantile exchange. Instead, Brent prices — which is sourced to prices received by refiners in Europe’s North Sea — has become the new standard.” (Invalid Link Removed)

Impacts on Local Economy
Fuel enters into the production of virtually all areas of manufacturing, agriculture and the services economy. The hikes in fuel and gasoline prices across the US (and Worldwide) contribute to precipitating small and medium sized businesses into bankruptcy.

The increased cost of gasoline at the retail level is leading to the demise of local level economies, increased industrial concentration and a massive centralization of economic power in the hands of a small number of global corporations. In turn, the hikes in gasoline prices backlash on the urban transit system, schools and hospitals, the trucking industry, intercontinental shipping, airline transportation, tourism, recreation and most public services.
 
EasyEJL said:
its kind of funny, the constant increase in national debt means we have to stay at least slightly pro-inflation
Click to expand...

The Federal Reserve started that unlimited and indefinite bailout (which they dont even call bailouts anymore) so there is no way out of inflation.

The Fed printing 80 Billion a month (or not even going through the trouble, its all digital bull****) out of thin air indefinitely without even a mention of the word "Federal Reserve" in our Presidential Economy Debate shows what a gangsta banksta criminal government we have and will continue to have.
 
New Threats to Riot if Obama Loses Election

Buzz explodes across web

Paul Joseph Watson
October 15, 2012

Despite the issue receiving national media attention, Obama supporters continue to threaten to riot if Mitt Romney wins the presidential election, raising the prospect of civil unrest if Obama fails to secure a second term.

​
Invalid Link Removed

The new threats continue to dominate Twitter and the vast majority make no reference to the media’s coverage of the issue over the last week, illustrating the fact that they are a legitimate expression of how many Obama voters plan to respond if Romney comes out on top.​
Invalid Link Removed which was picked up by the Drudge Report over the weekend and has since gone viral documented how Twitter was flooded with messages from Obama supporters threatening to riot, a sign that “whichever side loses this election will accuse the other side of stealing the election.”

​
The story was subsequently picked up by innumerable media outlets. Highly respected economist and authorInvalid Link Removed if Obama is not re-elected.

​
Checking Twitter feeds this morning, we discovered that threats to riot on behalf of Obama supporters are still flooding in, with the users seemingly unaware of the fact that the media has now picked up on the buzz.

​
We checked the Twitter accounts and virtually all of them are owned by people who have made hundreds or thousands of previous tweets, proving they are genuine accounts and not fakes.

​
Examples of what people are saying include the following;

​
“If obama dont get re-elected & romney wins .. on life every white persons getting pistol whipped and im startin a riot.” (Invalid Link Removed)

​
“If Obama don’t win lets start a riot so Romney know what he’s getting himself into.” (Invalid Link Removed)

​
“You know you ain’t **** if you gotta “MAKE” Mafukas vote for ROMNEY ! …. Mannnn OBAMA better get back in office . Or BLACK FOLKS will riot.” (Invalid Link Removed)

​
“If Romney wins im goin on a rampage.” (Invalid Link Removed)

​
“If Mitt Romney wins the election I think its our duties as Black folks to riot and **** **** up.” (Invalid Link Removed)

​
“If every action IS met with an equal and opposite reaction ..what should workers do to employers if Romney’s elected? #Riot in the streets!!” (Invalid Link Removed)

​
“If Romney becomes president let’s all start a riot.” (Invalid Link Removed)

​
“I Heard Mitt Romney , Tryna Take Away Food Stamps , If He Do .”IMA START A RIOT , IMA START A RIOT.” (Invalid Link Removed)

​
“If romney wins, imma start a mf’n riot! Rns.” (Invalid Link Removed)

​
Although most of the individuals posting the messages don’t even attempt to justify why they plan to riot, others have pointed to fears about a Romney administration withdrawing or limiting government handouts.

​
You can check out some of the screenshots from these Twitter users below. We didn’t even include all of the messages because there are simply too many to track.

​
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed​

Give the fact that Americans routinely riot in response to results of sporting events that don’t go their way, the notion that civil unrest could ensue if Obama is defeated is perfectly plausible.

​
Only this weekend, Invalid Link Removed because they were unable to attend a movie premiere in Hollywood because the theater only holds 600 people.

​
Racial attacks carried out by mobs of black youths have also gone underreported in the media, most notably in places like Invalid Link Removed and Invalid Link Removed, as well as Invalid Link Removed in Wisconsin.

​
Over the past two years, both Europe and the Middle East have been rocked by riots, but America has yet to witness domestic disorder on any significant scale. Invalid Link Removed for a massive social dislocation.

​
However, the federal government has clearly been preparing for such a fallout, withInvalid Link Removed. Police departments across the country are also getting ready for unrest.

​
Are Obama supporters serious when they threaten to riot if Romney wins, or are they just full of hot air?
​
 
Threats to Assassinate Romney Explode After Debate

Obama supporters voice desire to kill Romney over fears food stamps will be taken away

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
October 17, 2012

Despite numerous media outlets attempting to downplay the issue, Twitter exploded last night following the debate with new threats from Obama supporters to assassinate Mitt Romney if he defeats Obama in the presidential race.

​
Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed, in addition to Invalid Link Removed, innumerable Twitter users are also making direct death threats against Romney.

​
The primary reason given for Obama supporters wanting to see Romney dead is the fear that he will take away food stamps.​
If the tables were turned and conservatives were making death threats against Obama in these numbers, it would be a national news story.

Indeed, the mere act of hanging empty chairs from trees as a reference to Clint Eastwood’s RNC speech Invalid Link Removed as a deadly sign that conservatives were out to lynch black people if Obama won.

​
However, the major networks have remained completely silent on the disturbing trend of Obama supporters threatening to resort to violence if their candidate fails to secure a second term.

​
Invalid Link Removed of assassination threats by Obama supporters made during and after the debate, and more continued to flood in this morning, including the following;

​
Invalid Link Removed​
Invalid Link Removed

​
The death threats are being made by both black and white people, emphasizing that merely drawing attention to the issue has nothing to do with “race-baiting,” as the Obama front group Invalid Link Removed.

​
It is important to stress that these Twitter accounts are genuine, they are not fakes. Many of them have thousands of previous tweets.

​
The following Tweets are just some of the ones compiled by Twitchy during and after the debate;

​
- “If Romney win this election, he might as well wear a shirt that says “Assassinate Me Bitch”.​
- “Yall ready to assasinate romney?”​
- “Somebody needs to asassinate This mofo Romney.”​
- “Romney make me wanna hop through the tv & just assasinate his ass.”​
- “I aint gone lie… Food stamps the ****! I mite assasinate romney my damn self if he get elected!”​
- “If romney get elected i hope a nigga assasinate his bitchass.​
- “No birth control???? Lol rlly Romney the american population is going to overflow and then we’ll have to resort to murder and you’ll be #1.”​
- “At this point in time I am completely prepared to MURDER ROMNEY MYSELF!”​
- “If Romney win, IM GOING TO JAIL FOR MURDER cuz imma whack his bitch ass ASAP.”
​
- “If Mitt Romney wins, which I doubt, someone should assassinate him before he ruins the lives of our generation & our children.”​
- “IF ROMNEY GETS ELECTED AND TAKES AWAY MY FOOD STAMPS IMA SEND SOMEONE TO MURDER HIS ASS.”

​
It is important to emphasize that these are just a selection of scores and scores of threats to assassinate Romney that have exploded on Twitter over the last 12 hours. We didn’t even have time to check Facebook or any other social networks.

​
As Infowars has stressed, we are non-partisan and have encouraged people to vote for neither candidate. However, the hypocrisy of leftists in trying to either downplay or deny this issue altogether is jaw-dropping given how they routinely try to portray conservatives as violent and extremist by pointing to angry comments made online.​
 
If Obama wins: We are all ****ed.

If Romney wins: We are all ****ed.

It's good to know we have choices!
 
Why Are We Still in Afghanistan?

Melissa Melton
October 20, 2012

Invalid Link Removed

The war in Afghanistan, also known by the upbeat, patriotic moniker Operation Enduring Freedom, has officially been going on for over a decade now.

Invalid Link Removed back in 2009 declaring that our troops would begin to withdraw from Afghanistan before his presidential term was up, one more promise on the never ending list of them he has failed to keep. In 2010, the Afghan war overtook the Vietnam war to officially become Invalid Link Removed. The government and its propaganda machine otherwise known as the mainstream media spent countless hours the following year apprising us of the fact that Osama bin Laden, the supposed architect of the 9/11 fable that was blamed for landing our troops in Afghanistan to begin with, was taken out (Invalid Link Removed). This is regardless of the fact that Invalid Link Removedwhich funded him and created his Al Qaeda terrorist network, and plans have surfaced confirming the war in Afghanistan was Invalid Link Removed.

Earlier this year, Invalid Link Removed the War on Terror — something that has been used to murder our republic, take apart our constitution and repeatedly suck away our rights like a vacuum ever since George W. Bush declared it — is now officially over. The announcement was delivered with all the fervent emotion of someone half-asleep describing paint dry. Even as NATO claims they plan to begin planning to withdraw from Afghanistan, Invalid Link Removed to the country starting this fall and continuing through next spring.

Invalid Link Removed just last month. If the War on Terror has truly ended and Osama bin Laden is no more, the obvious question remains: Why are we still in Afghanistan?

The Real Reasons

“To Protect the Afghan People”

Invalid Link Removed from an Army Colonel addressed to the Secretary of the Army surfaced revealing the fact that when soldiers arrive in Afghanistan, they are told they are “fighting for the Afghan people.”

Most young men and women join our nation’s military with a heartfelt ambition to protect America and serve their fellow citizens. After all, the department which oversees our armed forces is named the “Department of Defense,” not the Department of Offense. However, let’s review the Invalid Link Removed:
“The Army’s mission is to fight and win our Nation’s wars by providing prompt, sustained land dominance across the full range of military operations and spectrum of conflict in support of combatant commanders.”


​
Notice it says the purpose is straight up “to fight and win our nation’s wars” regardless of constitutionality or cause, followed by the word “dominance” without any mention of defensive measures.

American troops are dying in Afghanistan every day. The number of dead and wounded is only increasing. Our media completely ignores the fact that Invalid Link Removed in his four years in office than in all eight years of Bush Jr.’s presidency. In fact, Invalid Link Removed over 400 percent, wounded numbers are up 1200 percent, and soldier suicide rates are unprecedented under Obama in this somehow-suddenly-over-yet-never-ending War on Terror.

As an American, nothing about this makes me feel any safer from terrorists.

Opium and the Drug Trade

Our soldiers aren’t only told to protect the Afghan people when they arrive, they are also told they have to protect Afghanistan’s opium trade. The Taliban, whom we are supposedly fighting in Afghanistan, actually put a ban on the Afghani opium trade, collapsing 90 percent of it; America swooped in to protect and restore it through support of the Northern Alliance.

In a shocking 2010 spin piece, Fox News’ Invalid Link Removed.

Opium fields guarded by U.S. troops in Afghanistan



“We are tolerating the cultivation of the opium because we know that if we were to destroy it now, the population would turn against the marines and it would be a real security risk,” Geraldo says before turning to a Lieutenant Colonel who then admits America provides Afghanistani people security and resources to continue growing opium.

Well at least Afghanistan’s President Hamid Karzai was gracious enough to thank Obama for all our money to help do so:
“I’m bringing to you and to the people of the United States the gratitude of the Afghan people for the support that your taxpayers’ money has provided Afghanistan over the past decade and for the difference that it has made to the well-being of the Afghan people,” Invalid Link Removed in Chicago.


​
The Afghan Minister of Counter Narcotics has also stated publicly that NATO is taxing opium production in Afghani regions it controls. The drugs these poppy fields produce are being protected and paid for with our taxpayer money and our soldiers’ lives every day, but if an American attempts to secure said drugs for recreational use and is caught with them here, he or she will get arrested and thrown in prison.

Invalid Link Removed that Pat Tillman, the famous football star turned soldier, was murdered because he threatened to go public with this lucrative poppy protection operation and expose Operation Enduring Freedom for what it really is.

Lithium and Rare Earth Minerals

Our mainstream media has dubbed Afghanistan as “Invalid Link Removed” in reference to a coveted element in rising demand ever since World War II. Lithium is used in everything from batteries and electronic components, to nuclear fusion processes, to alloys and military applications. The mainstream media cranked up the spin cycle on the U.S.’s pointless occupation of Afghanistan another notch in 2010 when a story in the New York Times Invalid Link Removed there. This timely announcement came Invalid Link Removed supplemental war bill. Pointing to a Pentagon memo, the story also asserted the country was just found to be filled with huge veins of untouched copper, iron, cobalt, and gold.

It wasn’t long, though, before retired U.S. officials were coming forward to remind everyone of the fact that these “newly discovered” deposits had been well known to not only the U.S. but the UN, Russia and the World Bank as far back as the 1970s, maybe longer. The truth is inconsequential when propaganda sells the day.

Pipelineistan

As mentioned earlier, a war in Afghanistan was planned well before 9/11 ever happened. The U.S. had important plans for the country, plans that involved isolating Iran and bypassing Russia to run an Invalid Link Removed right through Afghanistan that our government could control to bring out Central Asian oil more easily and cheaply down through the Pakistan coast. To this end, U.S. officials delivered the Taliban an ultimatum: they could either “Invalid Link Removed,” depending on whether or not they stepped and fetched.

The threat of terrorism? What does that matter when there’s such a financial and political treasure to loot.
So what’s next?

Syria is the newest kid on the chopping block, largely due to it Invalid Link Removed. Syria’s regime change, like Libya and others, was planned decades ago as well.

The rest of what the mainstream media sells us is just more bread and circuses off the usual menu. A U.S. Security Adviser has gone on record that our government plans to continue using our soldiers to “defend” Afghanistan Invalid Link Removed. Nothing will change if Mitt Romney wins the election either, considering just weeks ago during a foreign policy speech Invalid Link Removed as well.

The globe has truly been reduced to one giant game of Risk.

One last question: would anyone still enlist in the U.S. military today if they were told they were fighting for the United States of Empire that was once the United States of America?
 
I bet you wont see this story have 1 hour specials and discussions on cia/whitehouse run tyrannical "liberal" MSNBC TV

12-Year-Old Exercises Second Amendment: “When I Saw the Door Handle Turn, I Shot Him”


Mac Slavo
Invalid Link Removed
Oct 22, 2012

It’s never too early to learn to defend yourself, and 12-year-old Kendra St. Clair from Durant, Oklahoma did just that when a man broke through her back door during a home invasion.

The man, identified as 32-year-old Stacey Jones, had previously been charged for the abduction of a 17 year old girl last year. According to Ms. St. Clair, Jones first rang the doorbell, and when no one answered, went to the backdoor and attempted to break in.
“He opened the screen door and started pounded on the door. So I didn’t answer it. And I called my mom. She said to go get the gun and hide in the closet.”

Kendra St. Clair says she stayed in the closet until she thought the coast was clear. So she went to check the back door.
And he was standing there trying to open it. So I got really scared and I called 911.”

She went back to the closet. That’s when she heard the man in the house.

“When I was back there on the phone with 911, I heard the bathroom light turn on that was leading to the closet. And when I saw the door handle turn, I shot him. I guess it went through the door, went through him, and went through the wall.”

St. Clair thanks her mom for teaching her how to keep her calm and protect herself.

Invalid Link Removed

Twelve-Year-Old Girl Shoots Home Intruder



The only downside to this story is that Stacy Jones is still breathing. He is reportedly recovering from his wounds in a Texas hospital, soon to burden taxpayers with tens of thousands of dollars in yearly maintenance costs as a prisoner for up to 20 years.

When police were minutes away and Ms. St. Clair had just seconds before being face-to-face with a would-be abductor, rapist or murderer, she took matters into her own hands and took care of business.

Had this young lady been in New York, Chicago or any number of other cities that restrict the ownership and carrying of handguns, she may not be alive today.

Everyday we are reminded of why our founders made sure to include the right to bear arms as a fundamental Constitutional protection.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Declaration of Independence
July 4, 1776
​


​
 
Could ‘Frankenstorm’ Delay Presidential Election?

Postponement would work in Obama’s favor

Paul Joseph Watson
October 26, 2012

The huge ‘Frankenstorm’ set to hit the northeast coast before Halloween threatens to cause widespread disruption – but could it serve to delay the election and stall Mitt Romney’s momentum going into the final days of the presidential campaign?




Hurricane Sandy was recently downgraded to a category one, however, Invalid Link Removed, “Computer models are predicting that Hurricane Sandy will meet up with another storm system, which could produce the grave “perfect storm” that could potentially devastate the North East Coast.”

​
Invalid Link Removed that the “Frankenstorm” could “become the worst to hit the U.S. Northeast in 100 years if current forecasts are correct.”

​
On the face of it, Hurricane Sandy is likely to be more of a concern amongst the Obama camp. For a start, if it does make landfall it’s almost guaranteed to hit areas on the coast where Obama is dominant.

​
Furthermore, a recent poll Invalid Link Removed found that Mitt Romney supporters are more likely to vote in bad weather.

​
“Among registered voters, those who plan to vote for Obama are more likely than Romney voters to say that bad weather conditions would have a significant or moderate impact on their getting to the polls (28 percent vs. 19 percent),” the survey found.

​
However, the hurricane is also set to impact key swing states where Romney is seen as having momentum.

​
Due to Obama’s greater focus on having his supporters vote early, others have pointed out that bad weather on election day could be disastrous for Romney.

​
“Obama has been effective at getting voters to vote early, so anything affecting turnout on Election Day is likely to be bad news for Romney,” John Hudak, a governance studies fellow at Brookings, Invalid Link Removed. “It would certainly set up a benefit to the president if a natural disaster did interrupt voting.”

​
If the storm is anywhere near the scale of Hurricane Katrina, the presidential election would almost certainly have to be postponed, which would only work in Obama’s favor given that Romney is currently riding high in the polls.

​
If the hurricane brings destruction and devastation, Obama will undoubtedly seek to exploit the opportunity to grandstand as a leader and protector, affording him the at least a taste of the kind of revered status enjoyed by President Bush in the aftermath of 9/11.

​
Invalid Link Removed ”power outages and flooding” as a worst case scenario that could disrupt early voting in some states.

​
“That could have an impact even a week later depending on how bad the storm is,” Rayno added.

​
Invalid Link Removed that the hurricane could be the “October surprise” many have been waiting for – an unforeseen event could provide an election twist because “some power outages could last into Election Day.”

​
“The storm is so wide that it will likely bring severe conditions to an area inhabited by 66 million people, including parts of North Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, the District of Columbia, New York, and Connecticut,” writes Scott Bomboy.

​
Invalid Link Removed and Invalid Link Removed are also suggesting Hurricane Sandy could represent the October surprise.

​
Some are even speculating that the hurricane could be artificially steered in order to impact the election.

​
The fact that weather weapons are used to manipulate meteorological conditions for public events is now common knowledge.

​
As far back as the 1960′s, the U.S. government had the technology to steer hurricanes, according to weather modification expert Ben Livingston, who briefed President Lyndon B. Johnson on the effectiveness of weather control activities and helped oversee their use during the Vietnam war.

​
“In the 1960s, a national priority of our government was hurricane control,” Livingston told the Invalid Link Removed. “Silver iodide is used as a nuclei that causes raindrops to form. The original hypothesis is that if you get enough rain or cool air into a hurricane you can diminish its velocity and strength. When I left the military in the 1960s, we had the ability to do that, and reduce wind velocity in hurricanes by 25 percent and damage caused by a hurricane by 63 percent.”

​
Watch a documentary below in which Ben Livingston talks about his top secret work to weaponize the weather.

Dr. Ben Livingston : The Father Of Weaponized Weather (Full-Length HQ)




Veteran weather modification expert Ben Livingston is a former Navy Physicist who briefed President Lyndon B. Johnson on the effectiveness of weather control back in the 1960's during the Vietnam era, when he was involved in cloud seeding programs that worked to slow down the advance of Vietnamese and Korean troops. Livingston asserts that asserts that hurricane control was a national priority of the government more than 40 years ago and that the technology was fully operational to control the weather at the time

​
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top