the major reason alone I think it isn't is the body count is too low, and he was armed with a single semi auto pistol. It doesn't fit the profile of what the government would hope to accomplish with false flags. Even with the claim of multiple shooters, I mean seriously, in a room with a couple hundred people, even one shooter only managing 9 injuries (including casualties) is pretty low. I'm glad thats all there was, but it doesn't fit the "evil gun" false flag ops for gun control. If it had been an ak47 or ar15, then maybe.
There was also known tear gas...Ill post more as more info comes out.
Here is the thing though, the small body count as it is works. Your typical liberal (I know liberals in person who are totally different by the way, so Im not referring to all) thinks 7 dead equates to 4,534,432,255,558,888 deaths and is enough to let goverment (let the UN do it!) conquer all powers over gun rights, lol
If it wasnt for the media (which seems very prepared for this and very well choreographed) this shooting really wouldnt be a big deal people get shot all the time. They are feeding hate and pushing gun control staged or not (I know you know this, just public statement).
He already started after the Colorado shooting, saying AK47's only belongs to the hands of soldiers and that regular citizens should only have guns enough for hunting. Although Obama is a constitutional lawyer he clearly is covering up the fact that the 2nd amendment isnt about hunting, rather its about fighting government tyranny.
He already started after the Colorado shooting, saying AK47's only belongs to the hands of soldiers and that regular citizens should only have guns enough for hunting. Although Obama is a constitutional lawyer he clearly is covering up the fact that the 2nd amendment isnt about hunting, rather its about fighting government tyranny.
The UN treaty wants to rid of all semi-automatic weapons and narrow it down to single shot.
Not using that as evidence to false flag or not....but if the shooter only used a hand pistol its still a crisis that wouldnt go to waste by the politicians.
Another point...I gotta find out how many people did got shot. Im trained in martial arts (not extensively) by a former NYC homicide detective (and overseas middle east bodyguard) and he always stated most people who get shot survive.
Its certainly valid to global governance in terms of significance since its on the UN treaty to ban those too, but it doesnt exactly answer definitively if this was a false flag operation or not.
Its certainly valid to global governance in terms of significance since its on the UN treaty to ban those too, but it doesnt exactly answer definitively if this was a false flag operation or not.
Just a few days ago 65 year old woman chased 5 armed robbers out of her Jewlery store with a gun...but this doesnt get national attention. The corporate controlled mainstream national media doesnt want to promote to the country that self defense is good and a natural part of being human.
AMAZING: 65 Year Old CA Woman Shoots and Fights Off FIVE Armed Robbers (Local News)
Just a few days ago 65 year old woman chased 5 armed robbers out of her Jewlery store with a gun...but this doesnt get national attention. The corporate controlled mainstream national media doesnt want to promote to the country that self defense is good and a natural part of being human.
AMAZING: 65 Year Old CA Woman Shoots and Fights Off FIVE Armed Robbers (Local News)
So the kid happens to be a Neo Nazi according to reports. Neo Nazi's of America are usually directly linked to the FBI starting back in the 60's with COINTELPRO (where the FBI also protected, financed and armed the KKK and other "extreme" groups.) Add in that he is a well trained and experienced Psycho Opps operative for the Military it definitely smells like lard up in the mug.
So the kid happens to be a Neo Nazi according to reports. Neo Nazi's of America are usually directly linked to the FBI starting back in the 60's with COINTELPRO (where the FBI also protected, financed and armed the KKK and other "extreme" groups.) Add in that he is a well trained and experienced Psycho Opps operative for the Military it definitely smells like lard up in the mug.
Al Qaeda: Pride of The Council on Foreign Relations
CFR Strategist Praises Al-Qaeda Bombings In Syria
Winston, we were never at war with Eurasia!
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Senior Council on Foreign Relations fellow Ed Husain has hailed the presence of Al-Qaeda terrorists in Syria, praising their fighting prowess in aid of FSA rebels while also lauding the increasing number of successful bombings carried out by Al-Qaeda fighters.
Invalid Link Removed
In case you didn’t get the memo – Al-Qaeda – the same group the United States accuses of carrying out the most devastating terrorist attack on U.S. soil in history, is now our ally in Syria.
Terrorist attacks carried out by Al-Qaeda in Syria are inherently moral and good. Down is the new up.
Winston, we were never at war with Eurasia!
“The Syrian rebels would be immeasurably weaker today without al-Qaeda in their ranks. By and large, Free Syrian Army (FSA) battalions are tired, divided, chaotic, and ineffective. Feeling abandoned by the West, rebel forces are increasingly demoralized as they square off with the Assad regime’s superior weaponry and professional army,”Invalid Link Removed, a Senior Fellow for Middle Eastern Studies with the CFR.
“Al-Qaeda fighters, however, may help improve morale. The influx of jihadis brings discipline, religious fervor, battle experience from Iraq, funding from Sunni sympathizers in the Gulf, and most importantly, deadly results. In short, the FSA needs al-Qaeda now,” he adds.
The Council on Foreign Relations is considered to be America’s “most influential foreign-policy think tank” and has deep connections with the U.S. State Department. In 2009, Invalid Link Removed that the CFR had set up an outpost down the street from the State Department in Washington DC, because it meant “I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing.”
Husain goes on to celebrate the fact that Al-Qaeda’s role in carrying out terrorist bombings in cities like Damascus and Aleppo has intensified, writing that “The group’s strength and acceptance by the FSA are demonstrated by their increasing activity on the ground –from seven attacks in March to sixty-six “operations” in June.”
His fervor for Al-Qaeda terrorist attacks – which have included targets such as Invalid Link Removed and Invalid Link Removed - is matched Invalid Link Removed as well as Invalid Link Removed, who have applauded terror bombings as a useful tool in destabilizing Bashar Assad’s government.
However, by the end of his article Husain is using the presence of Al-Qaeda fighters in Syria - Invalid Link Removed - as another reason for military intervention in Syria.
“The planning to minimize al-Qaeda’s likely hold over Syrian tribes and fighters must begin now as the Obama administration ramps up its support to rebel groups,” he writes.
Husain strikes a similar tone to a Invalid Link Removed which also cites the presence of Al-Qaeda fighters in Syria as justification to “Conduct a covert campaign against al Qaeda and other extremist groups gaining a presence in the country.”
Invalid Link Removed (in glowing terms), far from there being a distinction between the FSA rebels and Al-Qaeda terrorists, the Al-Qaeda fighters, along with hordes of foreign fighters including many veterans of NATO’s previous act of regime change in Libya, are now commanding the rebels.
“We have clear instructions from our [al-Qaida] leadership that if the FSA need our help we should give it. We help them with IEDs and car bombs. Our main talent is in the bombing operations,” said former FSA rebel turned Al-Qaeda commander Abu Khuder, adding that Al-Qaeda fighters meet “every day” with Syrian rebels.
In addition, Invalid Link Removed wearing the Al-Qaeda motif. There are also innumerable You Tube videos that show Invalid Link Removed.
It’s astounding to witness the mainstream media and the establishment now admitting what for months they denied – that Al-Qaeda is not only present in Syria but actually leading the uprising against the Syrian government.
It’s also jaw-dropping to witness the lashings of praise being heaped upon Al-Qaeda for their efforts in carrying out terrorist attacks to precipitate a NATO-backed regime change, while those very same people simultaneously cite Al-Qaeda’s presence as a justification for U.S. and NATO military involvement in Syria.
The Secret History of Western Education-The Scientific Destruction of Minds
Charlotte Thompson Iserbyt served as the head of policy at the Department of Education during the first administration of Ronald Reagan. While working there she discovered a long term strategic plan by the tax exempt foundations to transform America from a nation of rugged individualists and problem solvers to a country of servile, brainwashed minions who simply regurgitate whatever they're told.
Part one of our exclusive interview with Iserbyt breaks down how conditioning/training under a corporate agenda has replaced traditional education, leading to a deliberate dumbing down of Americans. Iserbyt further explains how Reagan signed agreements merging the U.S. and Soviet systems under the United Nations banner, turning over education and many other areas of public policy to global control.
This 74 minute exposé is a must see for anyone who wants to truly know why the education system is deliberately crafted to produce human drones with no critical thinking whose only skills are to be subservient, trust authority and follow orders.
Her book,'The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America' is free at Invalid Link Removed
Charlotte Iserbyt: The Miseducation of America Part 1-Full
The Secret History of Western Education -The Scientific Destruction of Minds
Charlotte Thompson Iserbyt served as the head of policy at the Department of Education during the first administration of Ronald Reagan. While working there she discovered a long term strategic plan by the tax exempt foundations to transform America from a nation of rugged individualists and problem solvers to a country of servile, brainwashed minions who simply regurgitate whatever they're told.
Part one of our exclusive interview with Iserbyt breaks down how conditioning/training under a corporate agenda has replaced traditional education, leading to a deliberate dumbing down of Americans. Iserbyt further explains how Reagan signed agreements merging the U.S. and Soviet systems under the United Nations banner, turning over education and many other areas of public policy to global control.
This 74 minute exposé is a must see for anyone who wants to truly know why the education system is deliberately crafted to produce human drones with no critical thinking whose only skills are to be subservient, trust authority and follow orders.
Her book,'The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America' is free at Invalid Link Removed
Charlotte Iserbyt: The Miseducation of America Part 1-Full
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezTIYd5UFRY">YouTube Link</a>
Surveillance Cameras Turned Off During Sikh Temple Shooting
Questions over eyewitness reports of multiple shooters buried
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Friday, August 10, 2012
Questions as to whether there were multiple shooters involved in the Sikh temple massacre are likely to remain unanswered given the fact that surveillance cameras covering the property were turned off at the time of the incident.
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed, who spoke with FBI Special Agent Teresa Carlson, “There was no video in the temple itself. Apparently, their surveillance camera wasn’t on.”
Why the camera was turned off during what one would expect to be the temple’s busiest time, a religious service on a Sunday, has not been explained.
The absence of video footage of the event makes it impossible to corroborate multiple eyewitness accounts attesting to the fact that more than one individual carried out the shootings.
Invalid Link Removed, an eyewitness stated, “Between ten and ten-thirty, four white males who were dressed darkly, dressed in all black clothing, came in and opened fire on our congregation.”
Temple member Amardeep Kaleka, whose mother and father were injured victims in the shooting, also told WISN that his parents Invalid Link Removed and that the attack was “very well coordinated.” Invalid Link Removed that his father saw “multiple shooters of caucasian descent.”
Invalid Link Removed also quoted the niece of one of the temple members who said, “An unknown number of gunmen had walked into the kitchen of the Sikh temple and opened fire.”
Another man at the scene Invalid Link Removed, “I think they had multiple shooters.”
In addition, Invalid Link Removed that the day before the attack there were a “few suspicious men seen on Temple premises,” again clearly suggesting the involvement of more than one person.
Although speculation has centered around alleged shooter Wade Michael Page’s ties to white supremacists, a definitive motive for the massacre has yet to be established. After initially claiming Page was killed by a police officer, authorities now assert that he shot himself in the head.
Page’s racist views were likely developed during his stint in the Invalid Link Removed, during which time he was a member of the psychological operations unit.
The Next Election: High Stake Outcomes Based on Non-issues
Paul Craig Roberts
Institute For Political Economy
Aug 12, 2012
The election of the next puppet president of the “world’s only superpower” is about two and one-half months off, and what are the campaign issues? There aren’t any worthy of the name.
Invalid Link Removed
Romney won’t release his tax returns, despite the fact that release is a customary and expected act. Either the non-release is a strategy to suck in Democrats to make the election issue allegations that Romney is another mega-rich guy who doesn’t pay taxes, only to have the issue collapse with a late release that shows enormous taxes paid, or Romney’s tax returns, as a candidate who advocates lower taxes for the rich, don’t bear scrutiny.
What are Romney’s issues? The candidate says that his first act will be to repeal Obamacare, a program that Romney himself first enacted as governor of Massachusetts. This will cost Romney political contributions from the insurance industry, which is thankful for the 50 million new private insurance policies that Obamacare, written not by Obama but by the private insurance companies, provides at public expense. It is not to the insurance industry’s benefit to have a single payer system like other western countries.
Romney’s other issue is to blame Obama for America’s unemployment caused by the offshoring of the US economy by Republican corporate CEOs. In order to enhance their compensation packages, the Republican CEOs sent millions of America’s best jobs to India, China and elsewhere. The lower cost of labor in these offshore sites means much higher earnings, which drives up share prices for shareholders and drives up performance bonuses for management, while wrecking US employment, GDP growth and tax base and driving up the deficit in the balance of payments.
America’s main economic problem–the relocation of the US economy offshore–is not a campaign issue. Therefore, the US economy’s main problem will remain unaddressed.
(Invalid Link Removed)
The real issues can nowhere be found in the campaigns or in the media. There is no mention of the Bush/Obama destruction of the US Constitution and its legal protections of citizens from arbitrary government power. Due process no longer exists for anyone who the executive branch suspects of being connected in any way to Washington’s chosen enemies. US citizens can be thrown into dungeons for life on suspicion alone without any evidence ever being presented to a court, and they can be executed any place on earth, along with whoever happens to be with them at the time, on suspicion alone.
Last May federal district court judge Katherine Forrest ruled that indefinite detention of US citizens is unconstitutional and issued an injunction against the Obama regime using this police state measure in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The Obama regime gave the federal judge the finger. During the week of August 6-10 the Justice (sic) Department’s Brownshirt lawyers refused to tell Judge Forrest if the Obama regime is complying with the injunction. The position of the Obama regime is: “we are above the law and do not answer to federal courts.” One would think that Romney would be all over this, but he isn’t because he wants the power himself. (Invalid Link Removed)
The Obama police state will shop around and find a federal appeals court dominated by Republican Brownshirt judges and get Judge Forrest’s ruling overturned. All those Republican federal judges we had to have to save us from liberal Democrats will now complete our deliverance to a total police state where all power rests in an unaccountable executive branch.This is what the Republican Federalist Society has wanted for years, and they are on the verge of obtaining it.
That the United States has degenerated into a police state in the short period of ten years should be the campaign issue. Who would ever have thought such a thing possible. Yet, there is no mention of the destruction of the rule of law in the name of a hoax “war on terror.”
The Bush regime created the propaganda that “they (Muslims) hate us for our freedom and democracy,” but how can Muslims hate us for what does not exist? The arbitrary unaccountable power asserted by the executive branch is totally incompatible with freedom and democracy. Yet, neither Obama nor Romney makes this an issue. And neither does the media.
There is no war on terror. There is war on countries that are not Washington’s puppet states. Unaccountable Washington is currently slaughtering thousands of Muslims in a variety of countries and is preparing Syria as its next holocaust. Washington, taking advantage of the splits between Sunnis and Shi’ites and between Islamists and secular Muslims, has organized a rebellion in Syria in order to overthrow a government that is not a puppet of Washington and Israel.
Among the foreigners streaming into Syria to overthrow the secular state in which Sunni and Shia Arabs have lived peacefully, are the Islamist extremists that Washington has squandered $6 trillion fighting for 11 years. The extremists are on Washington’s side. They want the secular Syrian government overthrown, because it is not an Islamic government.
This suits Washington’s policy, so now the taxes extracted from hard-pressed Americans are flowing to the Islamists that Americans have been fighting.
Speaking before the Council on Foreign Relations on August 8, Obama’s national security aid John Brennan defended the diversion of American taxpayers’ money to the outside forces Washington has organized, financed and provided with military weapons to overthrow the government of Syria. John Brennan said, with a straight face, that the Obama administration is careful that the financial and military aid does not go to the rebels affiliated with al Qaeda. Brennan has to make this claim, because the Obama regime, being in cahoots with al Qaeda, is in violation of its own NDAA and is subject to arrest and indefinite detention.
Does anyone believe that Washington, determined to overthrow the Syrian government, is refusing to arm the most effective part of the fighting force that is involved? Is there anyone so naive not to know that military aid to “rebels” is fungible?
Having suffered damage to its superpower reputation by being fought to a standoff by a few thousand al Qaeda in Iraq and Afghanistan, Washington learned that the trick was to employ al Qaeda not as an enemy but as an ally.
The test case was in Libya, where the US-al Qaeda alliance worked to overthrow the Libyan government. The advantage for Washington is that Libya is now beset by warring factions and is no longer a country that could get in Washington’s way.
Libya is the roadmap for Syria.
Syria made its mistake when it thought it could pacify Washington by taking Washington’s side in the first war against Iraq, thus confirming for Washington that Arabs are incapable of sticking together and thus are an easy mark to be overthrown.
If Syria falls, Washington will have murdered yet another nation. But this is not a part of the presidential debate. Both candidates agree that Washington should prevail in establishing a puppet state in Syria. Even Amnesty International has been suborned and lends its influence to the demonization of the Syrian government. Only the US is moral, indispensable, virtuous, humane, a light upon mankind. By definition, any opponent chosen by Washington is debauched, evil, sinful, a country that suppresses dissent and tortures its opponents, something Washington would never do, being, of course, the “light unto the world.”
Unlike the 1957 plot by British Prime Minister Harald Macmillan and US President Dwight Eisenhower to foment an “uprising” in Syria and assassinate the Syrian leadership (seeInvalid Link Removed), the Obama administration cloaks its intervention in humanitarian language, as do the rebels while they murder and execute civilians who support the Assad government. The presstitute western media describes the mayhem and murder as “humanitarian intervention,” and the brainwashed western public reposes in its moral superiority.
After Syria is destroyed, the last independent country in the region is Iran. Iran has also been weakened, not by Washington’s embargo, an act of war in itself, but by Washington’s financing of the “Green Revolution.” Iran now has a fifth column within itself.
Iran, the second oldest country after China, is now surrounded by 40 or more US military bases and is confronted by four US fleets in its own Persian Gulf.
There is a large number of nominal Muslims interested only in money and power who are working with Washington to overthrow the Syrian and Iranian governments.
If Iran falls, with both Russia and China surrounded by US missiles and military bases, the world as we know it will enter its final stage. Will Russia and China, having sacrificed all their buffers without a fight, surrender and be content to be ruled by puppet governments, or will they resist?
Don’t expect the packaged political campaign of the next couple of months to deal with any significant issue. Americans are oblivious of their fate, and so apparently is the rest of the world.
The selection of the next president of the US will depend on one thing alone–which of the two candidates financed by the ruling private oligarchy has the most effective propaganda.
Whether you vote Republican or Democrat, the oligarchs will win.
DHS To Purchase Another 750 Million Rounds Of Ammo
Second massive ammunition buy this year fuels fears of civil unrest
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, August 13, 2012
Fears that federal authorities are preparing for mass civil unrest have increased after it was revealed that the Department of Homeland Security is planning to buy a further 750 million rounds of ammo in addition to the 450 million rounds of hollow point bullets already purchased earlier this year.
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed originally issued by the DHS in April but updated on Friday calls on suppliers to provide a plethora of different types of ammunition, including 357 mag rounds that are able to penetrate walls.
Invalid Link Removed for the solicitation lists the different units of ammo required by the thousand, with the total ammo purchase exceeding 750 million rounds.
“The Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC), Glynco, Georgia anticipates awarding multiple award indefinite delivery and indefinite quantity (IDIQ) firm fixed price (FFP) contracts for commercial leaded training ammunition (CLTA) of various calibers for law enforcement officer firearms training courses at the following FLETC facilities Glynco, GA, Artesia, NM, Cheltenham, MD and Charleston, SC and to other Department of Homeland Security (DHS) agencies. The Government guarantees a minimum of 1,000 rounds per year on each resultant contract. Contracts will be for a base year and four (4) 12 month option periods,” states the synopsis.
Potential suppliers are required to respond to the solicitation before August 20.
The purchase comes in addition to an order for 450 million rounds of .40-caliber hollow point bullets which wasInvalid Link Removed back in March, news greeted by some Invalid Link Removed that the DHS was arming itself in preparation to go to war with the American
Although the ammo purchases are ostensibly earmarked for training purposes, Invalid Link Removedwhy such an unusually large amount of rounds are necessary and why such powerful bullets are required merely for training drills.
This has led to speculation that the purchases are connected to confirmed preparations for civil unrest in the United States.
The DHS Invalid Link Removed in preparation for the upcoming DNC, RNC and presidential inauguration. The U.S. Army Invalid Link Removed buying similar equipment.
Invalid Link Removedl for “Civil Disturbance Operations” outlines how military assets are to be used domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.
On page 20 of the manual, rules regarding the use of “deadly force” in confronting “dissidents” are made disturbingly clear with the directive that a, “Warning shot will not be fired.”
The manual includes lists of weapons to be used against “rioters” or “demonstrators,” including “antiriot grenades.” It also advises troops to carry their guns in the “safe port arms” stance, a psychological tactic aimed at “making a show of force before rioters.” Non-lethal weapons and water cannons are also included.
The increasing likelihood of a Invalid Link Removed has also spurred federal agencies and the U.S. Army to hone their preparations for domestic disorder on a scale greater than riots witnessed in Europe over the past two years.
Invalid Link Removed produced by the U.S. Army War College’s Strategic Institute warned that the United States may experience massive civil unrest in the wake of a series of crises which it termed “strategic shock.”
“Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security,” stated the report, authored by [Ret.] Lt. Col. Nathan Freir, adding that the military may be needed to quell “purposeful domestic resistance”.
Last year, Invalid Link Removed to prepare for a mass influx of immigrants into the United States, calling for the plan to deal with the “shelter” and “processing” of large numbers of people.
Watch a video analysis by Madison Ruppert below.
Invalid Link Removed -- Support us! Invalid Link Removed --
The federal government, specifically the Department of Homeland Security, is buying up huge amounts of ammunition and there seems to be no end in sight.
Again, this is nothing new as the DHS has refused to explain their purchase of 450 million hollow points ( Invalid Link Removed )
and has ordered "up to" 650-750 million rounds of ammo ( Invalid Link Removed )
and also seems to be looking for more weapons as well ( Invalid Link Removed ).
What do you make of this? Leave your comments below! ---- Solicitation: Invalid Link Removed
The U.S. government’s coming war with the American people
Insane quantities of govt. ammo purchases point to only one purpose
Mike Adams Invalid Link Removed
August 15, 2012
At the same time politicians in Washington are openly talking about banning online ammo sales to American citizens, the government itself is arming to the teeth.
Invalid Link Removed
And not in a military sense, either: The Department of Homeland Security is stockpiling insane quantities of anti-personnel “hollow-point” ammo of all calibers, including #00 tactical shotgun ammo, anti-personnel pistol rounds and match-grade .308 sniper rounds. As the DHS fights no foreign wars and only has jurisdiction in the United States, the only purpose of this ammo can be for use against the American people.
The most recent DHS solicitation contract is seeking massive quantities of anti-personnel ammunition for the “DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRNG CTR.” The PDF document showing this is available at:
https://Invalid Link Removed
We have made a backup copy on NaturalNews at: Invalid Link Removed
There’s good coverage of this story, by the way, at: Invalid Link Removed
As you can see for yourself, this DHS contract requests huge quantities of all the following ammunition (and much more):
• Over one million rounds of hollow-point .223 rifle ammo
• Over half a million rounds of non-hollow-point .223 rifle ammo
• 220,000 rounds of 12 gauge shotgun #7 ammo (target ammo)
• Over 200,000 rounds of 12 gauge shotgun #00 buckshot ammo (tactical anti-personnel ammo)
• 66,000 rounds of 12 gauge shotgun slugs (tactical anti-personnel, anti-vehicle rounds)
• Over two million rounds of hollow-point .357 Sig JPH (hollow-point) pistol ammo (anti-personnel)
• Over four million rounds of .40 S&W JPH (hollow-point) pistol ammo (anti-personnel)
• Over 60,000 rounds of .308 match grade anti-personnel sniper rounds (BTHP)
• Plus, hundreds of thousands of additional rounds of .38 special, .45 auto, 9mm, 7.62×39 (AK rifle) ammo, and others.
This is on top of the massive 450 million .40 S&W hollow point rounds the DHS has already requisitioned (Invalid Link Removed).
The only rational conclusion: DHS is training a domestic army for war with the American people
There is only one rational conclusion to all this: The Department of Homeland Security is training a domestic army — an army of pedophiles, perverts, child porn distributors and drug dealers — to wage a shooting war with the American people.
I have warned about the rise of the Nazi-like power of the DHS (Invalid Link Removed), and now we’re seeing the result of a runaway power grab that will, before very long, be used to engage in mass shootings of American protestors.
What protestors, you ask? The protestors who will take to the streets immediately following the collapse of the global banking fraud, of course. And if that’s new information to you, you need to get ahead of the curve on real-time history in the making. The global banking cartel is based on a pyramid of total financial fraud, and it’s going to come crashing down within the next 24 months, according to some estimates (see Keiser, below). Imagine Chase, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs all bankrupt, their stock worth zero. Suffocated under endless trillions of fraudulent derivatives. That’s what’s coming, it seems, and if you want the hard-hitting analysis of this situation, listen to this recent interview between Max Keiser and Alex Jones entitled, “We’re in A Financial Holocaust” Invalid Link Removed
Ron Paul warns about all this in his own video released on May 10, 2012, which describes the coming financial collapse and martial law: Invalid Link Removed
I also highly recommend this interview between James Wesley Rawles and Alex Jones:
https://Invalid Link Removed
The U.S. government clearly sees the writing on the wall. What lays ahead for America is a day of unbearable reckoning. The financial collapse will wipe out savings accounts, pensions, investment funds and equities of the working class, all across the nation. Imagine bank accounts being reset to zero, “bank holidays” enforced at gunpoint. That will unleash a wave of violent protests, social chaos and even talk of revolution. The government will almost certainly respond with a declaration of Martial Law, the rolling out of highway checkpoints, and before long, the use of live ammo on unruly protesters.
What is about to unfold in America will make the Kent State incident of 1970 look like a peace rally. (Invalid Link Removed)
As the government stockpiles ammo, so do the citizens
What’s happening behind the scenes in America right now is a massive armament build-up of epic proportions. The government itself is arming to the teeth, but at the same time, sales of guns and ammo to private citizens have smashed through all historical records. Ammunition prices are rising steadily and rifles, handguns and shotguns are out of stock everywhere. Gun manufacturers are running double and triple shifts in their own factories, trying to keep up with demand, and some have simply cancelled all new orders for the next few months until they get caught up.
I’ve even noticed myself getting caught up in the rush. Every time there’s another shooting in the USA, people like Obama, Bloomberg and Schumer call for gun restrictions, and I find myself immediately buying another firearm. Why? Because people want what they perceive will soon be unavailable. It’s basic human psychology. That’s why many gun shops in the USA credit Obama as being “salesperson of the year.” Nobody has caused more guns to be sold to more U.S. citizens than President Obama. His power to cause citizens to arm themselves at breakneck speed is legendary. Every time he opens his mouth, it seems, citizens flood the gun shops with cash at the ready.
The result of all this is a massive nationwide escalation of firepower, and the potential for serious conflict on the issue of liberty versus government power. The government, of course, wants to control everything and turn citizens into obedient minions. Many citizens have a problem with that, and they demand a restoration of Constitutional liberties (which have been stripped away by nearly everyone in Washington, including Bush, Obama and yes, even the new VP candidate Paul Ryan, who voted for the NDAA). (Invalid Link Removed)
At this point, my personal belief is that we’re sadly already past the point of no return. I see the very high possibility of the U.S. government engaging in a shooting war with the U.S. population within the next 24 months. Obviously, my wish is that no such acts of violence take place, but history has shown that when the population wakes up and realizes how royally they’ve all been ripped off, deceived and enslaved, it results in a spontaneous outburst of rage against the system. History has shown this is the stuff of revolutions, and revolutions are rarely peaceful.
My advice to NaturalNews readers? As I’ve said for years, don’t join in angry protests because from here forward, they are likely to be very, very violent. We are going to see literal blood in the streets, and I don’t want you anywhere near that.
Hunker down at your home, farm or apartment. Defend yourself, support the effort to keep the peace in your local community, and at every opportunity work to de-escalate violence and seek the restoration of liberty through peaceful means. Fight with words, not guns, wherever possible.
If you want even more details about what I see coming, listen to this Coast to Coast AM show from last Saturday night, where I was recently interviewed by John B Wells.
I love the people who say, "yes the second amendment was written in order to allow the citizens to protect themselves from a tyrannical government. So we are entitled to owning assault weapons with drum rounds etc etc."
Yes, written two hundred years ago. But do people honestly believe their assault rifles will stand a chance in fighting a tyrannical government with drones, air craft, unlimited resources, and tanks? Or should be allow citizens to purchase tanks as well? After all we have the right to bare arms.
And I am a gun owner and member if the NRA. But I cannot stand the ignorance of absolutists.
I love the people who say, "yes the second amendment was written in order to allow the citizens to protect themselves from a tyrannical government. So we are entitled to owning assault weapons with drum rounds etc etc."
Yes, written two hundred years ago. But do people honestly believe their assault rifles will stand a chance in fighting a tyrannical government with drones, air craft, unlimited resources, and tanks? Or should be allow citizens to purchase tanks as well? After all we have the right to bare arms.
And I am a gun owner and member if the NRA. But I cannot stand the ignorance of absolutists.
why shouldn't we be able to buy tanks if we can afford them? You are charged with a crime once you commit it, not beforehand. Outlawing an item because "if its used in a crime it could be really deadly" is ridiculous and has no rational grounding.
I love the people who say, "yes the second amendment was written in order to allow the citizens to protect themselves from a tyrannical government. So we are entitled to owning assault weapons with drum rounds etc etc."
Yes, written two hundred years ago. But do people honestly believe their assault rifles will stand a chance in fighting a tyrannical government with drones, air craft, unlimited resources, and tanks? Or should be allow citizens to purchase tanks as well? After all we have the right to bare arms.
And I am a gun owner and member if the NRA. But I cannot stand the ignorance of absolutists.
It's not just about fighting government tyranny (self defense against crime imo is more realistic). You do make a point there, especially in the position the civilian population is left at the moment.
Its all about organizing Civilian Militia's (independent from the fed, not like Obama's government funded civilian militia) and having our force be up to 300,000,000 million people.
All kinds of things can happen in a act of the Fed launching a war on the American people. First of all every general and every soldier took an oath to protect the Constitution. Lets not assume they will all go with the flow, and I trust there is alot of military that would refuse to attack the American people. Its possible states choose to recede and local National Guards to join up with law enforcement, local task force and the large civilian militia to fight Federal Tyranny.
There has to be a balance of power between government and the civilians, so yes we should own our own tanks and drones. Of course the government (well, the United Nations, banks and corporations that run the country now) have taken all the proper steps to further solidify and maintain permanent power and weaken the general population. The only scenario left is National Guard and law enforcement fighting the wars and letting civilians join them in time of civil war.
why shouldn't we be able to buy tanks if we can afford them? You are charged with a crime once you commit it, not beforehand. Outlawing an item because "if its used in a crime it could be really deadly" is ridiculous and has no rational grounding.
It's not just about fighting government tyranny (self defense against crime imo is more realistic). You do make a point there, especially in the position the civilian population is left at the moment.
Its all about organizing Civilian Militia's (independent from the fed, not like Obama's government funded civilian militia) and having our force be up to 300,000,000 million people.
All kinds of things can happen in a act of the Fed launching a war on the American people. First of all every general and every soldier took an oath to protect the Constitution. Lets not assume they will all go with the flow, and I trust there is alot of military that would refuse to attack the American people. Its possible states choose to recede and local National Guards to join up with law enforcement, local task force and the large civilian militia to fight Federal Tyranny.
There has to be a balance of power between government and the civilians, so yes we should own our own tanks and drones. Of course the government (well, the United Nations, banks and corporations that run the country now) have taken all the proper steps to further solidify and maintain permanent power and weaken the general population. The only scenario left is National Guard and law enforcement fighting the wars and letting civilians join them in time of civil war.
I'm on the fence with this issue. Yes it scares me that the government has drones and all this artiliary that we do not have, especially in the event of a war against its citizens. However I would feel even more uncomfortable with half the people I know owning tanks, drones and shoulder rocket fire missiles.
I'm on the fence with this issue. Yes it scares me that the government has drones and all this artiliary that we do not have, especially in the event of a war against its citizens. However I would feel even more uncomfortable with half the people I know owning tanks, drones and shoulder rocket fire missiles.
I understand both sides of it. I personally hate guns and dont even own or care to own one, though its ironic how I want to protect the 2nd Amendment as Im aware of the dangers of government tyranny.
Just think of this, the same government that wants to disarm us in the defense of halting domestic violence and terrorism (why the call every crime terrorism these days?) was just caught smuggling hundreds of thousands of guns into Mexico arming drug cartels and Obama is protecting Eric Holdren even though American border agents perished in the process. Question to start is, what is the government true motive in disarming Americans? Another important question is why would our "American" government consider handing over our own regulations to foreign interests and powers (through the UN treaty.)
I understand both sides of it. I personally hate guns and dont even own or care to own one, though its ironic how I want to protect the 2nd Amendment as Im aware of the dangers of government tyranny.
Just think of this, the same government that wants to disarm us in the defense of halting domestic violence and terrorism (why the call every crime terrorism these days?) was just caught smuggling hundreds of thousands of guns into Mexico arming drug cartels and Obama is protecting Eric Holdren even though American border agents perished in the process. Question to start is, what is the government true motive in disarming Americans? Another important question is why would our "American" government consider handing over our own regulations to foreign interests and powers (through the UN treaty.)
I agree. I know their intentions for disarming us. That video of Archie was from the 1960's and first thing his said "First thing the commies did was disarm the public".
But in reality, the government has unlimitted resources... they LITERALLY can print money. No matter what type of assault weapons, tanks, etc. civilians would have, they will never be able to defeat the government in a war. It would be impossible. Which is why I don't think the "We need the 2nd ammendment in order to protect ourselves from the government", is really an argument that's going to get us anywhere in terms of protecting our gun rights.
If the government declares war on its citizens, it's over. We're done. No chance.
WHEN I WAS IN THE NAVY IN THE LATE 70'S-thru mid 8o's i got to visit over 40 different countries...at that time it meant something good to be an american. people of most of the countries i visited actually seemed to like americans.
I agree. I know their intentions for disarming us. That video of Archie was from the 1960's and first thing his said "First thing the commies did was disarm the public".
But in reality, the government has unlimitted resources... they LITERALLY can print money. No matter what type of assault weapons, tanks, etc. civilians would have, they will never be able to defeat the government in a war. It would be impossible. Which is why I don't think the "We need the 2nd ammendment in order to protect ourselves from the government", is really an argument that's going to get us anywhere in terms of protecting our gun rights.
If the government declares war on its citizens, it's over. We're done. No chance.
The government doesn't print our money, and the government has no authority to even audit whats printed. Its all done by a private banking cartel. Most politicians are infiltrated by the banks unfortunately.
Like I suggested though, and think about this.... My hope is our good military and law enforcement waking up to government tyranny and working along side us to restore the Constitution. I know for a fact many of them are waking up to whats going on.
If government declares war on us (which they already have to some extent) that does not mean all our Military will all go along with it.
Like I suggested though, and think about this.... My hope is our good military and law enforcement waking up to government tyranny and working along side us to restore the Constitution. I know for a fact many of them are waking up to whats going on.
If government declares war on us (which they already have to some extent) that does not mean our Military will all go along with it.
The government doesn't print our money, and the government has no authority to even audit whats printed. Its all done by a private banking cartel. Most politicians are infiltrated by the banks unfortunately.
Like I suggested though, and think about this.... My hope is our good military and law enforcement waking up to government tyranny and working along side us to restore the Constitution. I know for a fact many of them are waking up to whats going on.
If government declares war on us (which they already have to some extent) that does not mean our Military will all go along with it.
If 100 million of us were armed like we should be thats alot of instant armed troops. Thats where Im getting at and how the 2nd Amendment can truly be relevant...thats what big bro doesnt want. Of course...government has successfully made well armed citizens a minority and made more people's priorites Kim Kardashian and the next Iphone, lol
The domestic homeland was made officially the battlefront in 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA Act).
By the way, did you know that Obama's recent Executive Order the "National Defense Resource Preparedness Act" re-enlists you (yes you, no age limitation) to the draft? The military officially has the right to take your property, your garden, water, etc, as well as you and force you to labor for them. By draft I mean in a sense, you dont get put on a draft they just take you.
You have to look at who is signing all the police state bills and who is financing the politicians doing so. Thats a basic start.
Now I dont want you to believe because I say this, I prefer you not and do your own research but it all comes down to the global elite which some can be found in the Bilderberg group and Trilateral Commission to name a couple examples.
I'm on the fence with this issue. Yes it scares me that the government has drones and all this artiliary that we do not have, especially in the event of a war against its citizens. However I would feel even more uncomfortable with half the people I know owning tanks, drones and shoulder rocket fire missiles.
The way i see it, most of those things are pretty expensive. The people who are dangerous with weapons are those who feel they have nothing to lose. Those aren't the people who could afford an Apache fighter copter
You have to look at who is signing all the police state bills and who is financing the politicians doing so. Thats a basic start.
Now I dont want you to believe because I say this, I prefer you not and do your own research but it all comes down to the global elite which some can be found in the Bilderberg group and Trilateral Commission to name a couple examples.
But what would be their reasoning? If you shut down the economic engine of the world (USA), you shut down massive consumer spending. Which in turn would financially disable the businesses that are connected with the bilderbergs. That's one of the reasons I don't see this happening. The special interest groups and massive corporations would have their income and cash flow halted in the occurrance of a domestic war/civilian round up.
But what would be their reasoning? If you shut down the economic engine of the world (USA), you shut down massive consumer spending. Which in turn would financially disable the businesses that are connected with the bilderbergs. That's one of the reasons I don't see this happening. The special interest groups and massive corporations would have their income and cash flow halted in the occurrance of a domestic war/civilian round up.
Its a complex issue, there is too much to post and so much more for myself to pick up and learn, I know so little but Ill try to post some minor random thoughts.
We can go by the current trends and laws, we have that...its not good (duh, lol)
We can see they are establishing banking and corporate powers over society and monopolizing just about everything.
The Federal Reserve was audited to transferring 23 trillion dollars to overseas banks and interests. It may be the biggest know bank heist in modern history. Nothing is being done about it.
China is becoming the next America and the next economic engine of the world (to a big extent it already is.) America can turn to Cambodia and the economic engine will only transfer to somewhere else with due time. The elite may do just do fine even if there was a temporary global collapse. If there is famine, they will still eat.
The domestic war is not in a conventional sense, its not going to be the way it was in the 1860's and I do not see any large clashes on our domestic soil. Chances are we will just continue with the police state trend and a majority of the people will take it, we can see how the airports did just fine. The conditioning there will be easily (and is in fact) expanded and people will just submit to it.
Power is not about money, the US dollar is printed on thin air. Real money, real power comes from conquering natural resources such as gold, oil and most importantly water.
We can look at history such as Nazi Germany and see how there can be war on the homeland and the country develop and prosper.
But what would be their reasoning? If you shut down the economic engine of the world (USA), you shut down massive consumer spending. Which in turn would financially disable the businesses that are connected with the bilderbergs. That's one of the reasons I don't see this happening. The special interest groups and massive corporations would have their income and cash flow halted in the occurrance of a domestic war/civilian round up.
Much of these preparations of domestic war for is if there is a real total economic collapse, which is possible. There would be a wave of mass chaos especially in our society that in large part do not have the skills our grandparents have for survival.That is the one scenario that is reasonable that they would round up large quantities of civilians and put them in the Fema camps.
The whole issue with the elite is if will they really pull the trigger on the economy or not. I really dunno. We can get into how money is manipulated and stolen with large corporate/banking ponzi schemes with some of the groups I was referring to contributing to the collapse and why they may finance/lobby all the preparations for civil unrest.
9/11 Attacks: Criminal Foreknowledge and Insider Trading lead directly to the CIA's Highest Ranks
CIA Executive Director "Buzzy" Krongard managed Firm that handled "Put" Options on UAL
by Michael C. Ruppert
Invalid Link Removed
Global Research Editor's note: As September approaches, we are reminded that the anniversary of the tragic events of 9/11 will soon be upon us once again. 11 years later, are we any closerto the truth about what really happened on that fateful day?
For the next month until September 11, 2012, we will be posting on a daily basis important articles from our early archives pertaining to the tragic events of 9/11. The following text by Michael C. Ruppert published in October 2001 brings to the forefront the issue of foreknowledge and insider trading pertaining to airline listings on the Chicago Board Options Exchange including United Airlines and American Airlines.
Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, August 13, 2012
Suppressed Details of 9/11 Criminal Insider Trading lead directly into the CIA`s Highest Ranks
CIA Executive Director "Buzzy" Krongard managed Firm that handled "put" Options on UAL
by Michael C. Ruppert
FTW Publications, 9 October 2001, Centre for Research on Globalisation, Invalid Link Removed, 20 October 2001
Although uniformly ignored by the mainstream U.S. media, there is abundant and clear evidence that a number of transactions in financial markets indicated specific (criminal) foreknowledge of the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. That evidence also demonstrates that, in the case of at least one of these trades -- which has left a $2.5 million prize unclaimed -- the firm used to place the "put options" on United Airlines stock was, until 1998, managed by the man who is now in the number three Executive Director position at the Central Intelligence Agency. Until 1997 A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard had been Chairman of the investment bank A.B. Brown. A.B. Brown was acquired by Banker's Trust in 1997. Krongard then became, as part of the merger, Vice Chairman of Banker's Trust-AB Brown, one of 20 major U.S. banks named by Senator Carl Levin this year as being connected to money laundering. Krongard's last position at Banker's Trust (BT) was to oversee "private client relations." In this capacity he had direct hands-on relations with some of the wealthiest people in the world in a kind of specialized banking operation that has been identified by the U.S. Senate and other investigators as being closely connected to the laundering of drug money.
Krongard (re?) joined the CIA in 1998 as counsel to CIA Director George Tenet. He was promoted to CIA Executive Director by President Bush in March of this year. BT was acquired by Deutsche Bank in 1999. The combined firm is the single largest bank in Europe. And, as we shall see, Deutsche Bank played several key roles in events connected to the September 11 attacks.
The Scope of Known Insider Trading
Before looking further into these relationships it is necessary to look at the insider trading information that is being ignored by Reuters, The New York Times and other mass media. It is well documented that the CIA has long monitored such trades - in real time - as potential warnings of terrorist attacks and other economic moves contrary to U.S. interests. Previous stories in FTW have specifically highlighted the use of Promis software to monitor such trades.
It is necessary to understand only two key financial terms to understand the significance of these trades. "Selling Short" is the borrowing of stock, selling it at current market prices, but not being required to actually produce the stock for some time. If the stock falls precipitously after the short contract is entered, the seller can then fulfill the contract by buying the stock after the price has fallen and complete the contract at the pre-crash price. These contracts often have a window of as long as four months. "Put Options," purchased at nominal prices of, for example, $1.00 per share, are sold in blocks of 100 shares. If exercised, they give the holder the option of selling selected stocks at a future date at a price set when the contract is issued. Thus, for an investment of $10,000 it might be possible to tie up 10,000 shares of United or American Airlines at $100 per share, and the seller of the option is then obligated to buy them if the option is executed. If the stock has fallen to $50 when the contract matures, the holder of the option can purchase the shares for $50 and immediately sell them for $100 - regardless of where the market then stands.
A "call option" is the reverse of a put option, which is, in effect, a derivatives bet that the stock price will go up.
A September 21 story by the Israeli Herzliyya International Policy Institute for Counterterrorism, entitled "Black Tuesday: The World's Largest Insider Trading Scam?" documented the following trades connected to the September 11 attacks:
Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but only 396 call options... Assuming that 4,000 of the options were bought by people with advance knowledge of the imminent attacks, these "insiders" would have profited by almost $5 million.
On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls. Again, there was no news at that point to justify this imbalance;... Again, assuming that 4,000 of these options trades represent "insiders," they would represent a gain of about $4 million.
[The levels of put options purchased above were more than six times higher than normal.]
No similar trading in other airlines occurred on the Chicago exchange in the days immediately preceding Black Tuesday.
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., which occupied 22 floors of the World Trade Center, saw 2,157 of its October $45 put options bought in the three trading days before Black Tuesday; this compares to an average of 27 contracts per day before September 6. Morgan Stanley's share price fell from $48.90 to $42.50 in the aftermath of the attacks. Assuming that 2,000 of these options contracts were bought based upon knowledge of the approaching attacks, their purchasers could have profited by at least $1.2 million.
Merrill Lynch & Co., which occupied 22 floors of the World Trade Center, saw 12,215 October $45 put options bought in the four trading days before the attacks; the previous average volume in those shares had been 252 contracts per day [a 1200% increase!]. When trading resumed, Merrill's shares fell from $46.88 to $41.50; assuming that 11,000 option contracts were bought by "insiders," their profit would have been about $5.5 million.
European regulators are examining trades in Germany's Munich Re, Switzerland's Swiss Re, and AXA of France, all major reinsurers with exposure to the Black Tuesday disaster. [FTW Note: AXA also owns more than 25% of American Airlines stock making the attacks a "double whammy" for them.]
On September 29, 2001 - in a vital story that has gone unnoticed by the major media - the San Francisco Chronicle reported, "Investors have yet to collect more than $2.5 million in profits they made trading options in the stock of United Airlines before the Sept. 11, terrorist attacks, according to a source familiar with the trades and market data.
"The uncollected money raises suspicions that the investors - whose identities and nationalities have not been made public - had advance knowledge of the strikes." They don't dare show up now. The suspension of trading for four days after the attacks made it impossible to cash-out quickly and claim the prize before investigators started looking.
"... October series options for UAL Corp. were purchased in highly unusual volumes three trading days before the terrorist attacks for a total outlay of $2,070; investors bought the option contracts, each representing 100 shares, for 90 cents each. [This represents 230,000 shares]. Those options are now selling at more than $12 each. There are still 2,313 so-called "put" options outstanding [valued at $2.77 million and representing 231,300 shares] according to the Options Clearinghouse Corp."
"...The source familiar with the United trades identified Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, the American investment banking arm of German giant Deutsche Bank, as the investment bank used to purchase at least some of these options..."
As reported in other news stories, Deutsche Bank was also the hub of insider trading activity connected to Munich Re. just before the attacks.
CIA, the Banks and the Brokers
Understanding the interrelationships between CIA and the banking and brokerage world is critical to grasping the already frightening implications of the above revelations. Let's look at the history of CIA, Wall Street and the big banks by looking at some of the key players in CIA's history. Clark Clifford - The National Security Act of 1947 was written by Clark Clifford, a Democratic Party powerhouse, former Secretary of Defense, and one-time advisor to President Harry Truman. In the 1980s, as Chairman of First American Bancshares, Clifford was instrumental in getting the corrupt CIA drug bank BCCI a license to operate on American shores. His profession: Wall Street lawyer and banker.
John Foster and Allen Dulles - These two brothers "designed" the CIA for Clifford. Both were active in intelligence operations during WW II. Allen Dulles was the U.S. Ambassador to Switzerland where he met frequently with Nazi leaders and looked after U.S. investments in Germany. John Foster went on to become Secretary of State under Dwight Eisenhower and Allen went on to serve as CIA Director under Eisenhower and was later fired by JFK. Their professions: partners in the most powerful - to this day - Wall Street law firm of Sullivan, Cromwell.
Bill Casey - Ronald Reagan's CIA Director and OSS veteran who served as chief wrangler during the Iran-Contra years was, under President Richard Nixon, Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission. His profession: Wall Street lawyer and stockbroker.
David Doherty - The current Vice President of the New York Stock Exchange for enforcement is the retired General Counsel of the Central Intelligence Agency.
George Herbert Walker Bush - President from 1989 to January 1993, also served as CIA Director for 13 months from 1976-7. He is now a paid consultant to the Carlyle Group, the 11th largest defense contractor in the nation, and which shares joint investments with the bin Laden family.
A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard - The current Executive Director of the Central Intelligence Agency is the former Chairman of the investment bank A.B. Brown and former Vice Chairman of Banker's Trust.
John Deutch - This retired CIA Director from the Clinton Administration currently sits on the board at Citigroup, the nation's second largest bank, which has been repeatedly and overtly involved in the documented laundering drug money. This includes Citigroup's 2001 purchase of a Mexican bank known to launder drug money, Banamex.
Nora Slatkin - This retired CIA Executive Director also sits on Citibank's board.
Maurice "Hank" Greenburg - The CEO of AIG insurance, manager of the third largest capital investment pool in the world, was floated as a possible CIA Director in 1995. FTW exposed Greenberg's and AIG's long connection to CIA drug trafficking and covert operations in a two-part series that was interrupted just prior to the attacks of September 11. AIG's stock has bounced back remarkably well since the attacks. To read that story, please go to Invalid Link Removed.
One wonders how much damning evidence is necessary to respond to what is now irrefutable proof that CIA knew about the attacks and did not stop them. Whatever our government is doing, whatever the CIA is doing, it is clearly NOT in the interests of the American people, especially those who died on September 11. The original URL of this article is: Invalid Link Removed
Copyright, 2001, Michael C. Ruppert and FTW Publications at Invalid Link Removed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help put TV Ads like these on the air -- Go to RememberBuilding7.org
As Commissioned and Non-commissioned Officers in the U.S. military, we took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same."
Regardless of our current status -- active duty, reserves, retired, or civilian -- that oath remains in force. Therefore it is not just our responsibility as citizens, it is our duty as officers to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, how much we have to suffer, or where it leads us.
We believe the official account of 9/11 as defined in the 9/11 Commission Report is grossly inaccurate and fatally flawed.
It is imperative that we have an accurate understanding of 9/11 so that those responsible can be identified and brought to justice in order that they and similarly-minded people never again commit such heinous crimes.
It is also imperative that we have an accurate understanding of 9/11 so that governmental policies and military actions resulting from 9/11 are based on truth rather than deception.
We join with others, such as Invalid Link Removed, Invalid Link Removed, Invalid Link Removed, Invalid Link Removed, Invalid Link Removed, and Invalid Link Removed, and millions of individual citizens in demanding a thorough, impartial, open and transparent reinvestigation of the terrorist acts of 9/11.
PETITION:
We, the undersigned current and former Commissioned and Non-commissioned U.S. Military Officers, believe that whereas:
[*=left]There is incontrovertible publicly available evidence since 9/11/01 that the official account of the events of that day is incomplete and fraught with errors;
[*=left]The 9/11 Commission Report inadequately answered, and in numerous cases even failed to address, many of the most important questions that were called to its attention;
[*=left] The blatant disregard of extensive compelling evidence that clearly refutes the official account raises rational suspicion of intentional deception by agents of the U.S. Government;
[*=left]U.S. Government policies and military actions have been, and continue to be, founded upon assumptions about the events of 9/11 that are likely to be erroneous;
[*=left]As a result of U.S. military action based on the official account of 9/11, thousands of U.S. servicemen and women and hundreds of thousands of civilians have lost their lives; and
[*=left]The perpetrators of the heinous crimes against humanity that were committed on 9/11 have still not been brought to justice.
Therefore, we petition the Congress of the United States for a new and independent investigation into the events of 9/11/01 by a duly constituted legal body with the authority to subpoena and require testimony under oath, and with authority to prosecute if criminal activity is discovered, so that the perpetrators of these crimes against humanity can at last be brought to justice.
Signed by the following currently serving and former U.S. Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Coast Guard Commissioned and Non-Commissioned Officers:
For list and more info please visit main web page: Invalid Link Removed
General of all American Intelligence: 911 was a fraud!
Albert "Bert" N. Stubblebine III is a retired Invalid Link Removed in the Invalid Link Removed. He was the commanding general of the Invalid Link Removed from 1981 to 1984, when he retired from the Army. He is also known for his interest in Invalid Link Removed.
Biography
Stubblebine graduated from the Invalid Link Removed and received a Invalid Link Removed in Invalid Link Removed from Invalid Link Removed.[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP] His active duty career spanned 32 years, and he is credited with redesigning the U.S. Army Invalid Link Removed architecture during his command of the Invalid Link Removed from 1981 to 1984.
Other U.S. Army commands that he led included the Invalid Link Removed (ERADCOM) and the Invalid Link Removed (INSCOM).[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP] Stubblebine was a key person in the U.S. military invasions of Panama and Grenada and was, according to a report published by the Invalid Link Removed, "at the heart of America's military machine".[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP] He is a member of the Invalid Link Removed.[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP]
After Stubblebine retired from the Army in 1984 he worked for BDM Corporation.[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP] He also acted as a part-time consultant to two government contractors, Invalid Link Removed and Space Applications Corporation.[SUP]Invalid Link Removed[/SUP]
Major General Albert "Bert" N. Stubblebine III, head of all intelligence says:
Pentagon NOT hit by a plane
WTC 7 brought down by explosives
Media in America is controlled U.S. MILITARY OFFICERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH
This Former Marine Was Picked Up By The FBI Over Facebook Posts About 9/11
Michael Kelley Invalid Link Removed
Aug 19, 2012
A former U.S. Marine whoInvalid Link Removed on Invalid Link Removed was detained on Friday night, reports Renee Nal of Gather.
According to Invalid Link Removed, authorities from the FBI, Secret Service and Chesterfield County PD came to their door, questioned Raub about his Invalid Link Removed – which are critical of the official story regarding 9/11 and refer to “starting a revolution” – then handcuffed him and placed him in a Chesterfield PD squad car before taking him directly to John Randolph Psychiatric Hospital in Hopewell, Va.
[...]
Here is the video of the arrest: Marine Vet detained for FB posts - Brandon J Raub being "arrested"
The most recent posts by Invalid Link Removed – as opposed to Invalid Link Removed – include “AND THEY WILL SAY HE SAID IT TO THE NSA FIRST.” on August 16 and “Feelin like Pac all Eyes on me.” on August 15 and “The Revolution will come for me. Men will be at my door soon to pick me up to lead it. Invalid Link Removed ” on August 14.
Also on August 14, he posted this video:
9/11 Eyewitnesses to Explosive WTC Demolition (This video was held by NIST for almost a decade, released after long fight with freedom of information act)
And this:
Invalid Link Removed Invalid Link Removed
A post on August 12 said: “There has been an overwhelming amount of evil enacted and planned against you, your children, and your
countrymen. It is great in scope. Your government evil. It is as simple as that. And the calvary is coming.”
Aurora Eyewitness: Alarm Announced “Murder In The Theater”
Another bizarre twist in the ‘Batman’ massacre case
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, August 20, 2012
Another bizarre piece of eyewitness testimony has emerged out of the Aurora massacre, with a woman claiming that an alarm was repeatedly played shortly after the shooting began announcing “murder in the theater”.
Speaking to the Denver Post, Salina Jordan, who was situated in the theater next door to where the shootings took place, stated, “15-20 minutes into the movie that’s when you start hearing the….gunshots, the bullets start coming over into my theater and about six people got shot.”
“Five minutes after the guy comes running in and tells them that they’re shooting outside, you hear the alarm go off, it says ‘murder in the theater’ – like it’s just going off ‘murder in the theater’, ‘murder in the theater’ – it’s crazy that they got an alarm saying that there’s murder in the theater,” she added.
Why the cinema would have a pre-recorded alarm that sounded the words “murder in the theater” is both baffling and disturbing. Any emergency alarm would surely be expected to use generic words and not make reference to “murder,” which would only panic people more.
In a related story, a nurse who “saw everything” while treating victims of the shooting at the University of Colorado Hospital (UCH), Invalid Link Removed while swimming in Okoboji Lake, Iowa, after being reported missing by her family.
46-year-old Jenny Gallagher was pictured with President Obama and praised for her “extraordinary efforts” in helping to save lives of injured victims.
Invalid Link Removed surrounding Gallagher’s death and the case remains under investigation by the Dickinson County Sheriff’s Office.
At the very least, the full story behind the Aurora massacre has not been told. Police audio, eyewitness testimony and other material evidence clearly suggests that alleged Colorado shooter James Holmes had an accomplice.
Invalid Link Removed, noting that one of the gas canisters was thrown from the opposite side of the theater to where the killer was standing. Eyewitnesses also described the killer talking on a cellphone before the shooting and then standing in the emergency exit and beckoning someone else over.
More than an hour after Holmes was detained, Invalid Link Removed, having been told by eyewitnesses that there was more than one shooter.
At 1:16am on the police audio recording from the scene, an officer states, “Talking to people making statements, sounds like we have possibly 2 shooters, one that was in Theater 8 seated, another one that came in from the outside into Theater 9. Sounds like it was a coordinated attack.”
“Every unit, possible 2nd shooter still at large… Keep the media away from them,” said another officer.
A second gas mask different to the one Holmes was wearing was also found hundreds of feet from where Holmes was arrested at the opposite end of the theater car park, along with additional items.
Other questions surrounding the circumstances behind the attack remain unanswered, such as why Holmes went to the effort to booby-trapping his apartment with sophisticated explosives yet told the police about them immediately after his arrest.
Holmes’ behavior in court appearances since the massacre Invalid Link Removed. The alleged shooter has repeatedly told prison officials he cannot remember playing any role in the shootings.
Last week, Invalid Link Removed by the media for questioning the official narrative behind both the ‘Batman’ massacre and the Sikh temple shooting.
This Former Marine Was Picked Up By The FBI Over Facebook Posts About 9/11
Michael Kelley Invalid Link Removed
Aug 19, 2012
A former U.S. Marine whoInvalid Link Removed on Invalid Link Removed was detained on Friday night, reports Renee Nal of Gather.
According to Invalid Link Removed, authorities from the FBI, Secret Service and Chesterfield County PD came to their door, questioned Raub about his Invalid Link Removed – which are critical of the official story regarding 9/11 and refer to “starting a revolution” – then handcuffed him and placed him in a Chesterfield PD squad car before taking him directly to John Randolph Psychiatric Hospital in Hopewell, Va.
[...]
Here is the video of the arrest: Marine Vet detained for FB posts - Brandon J Raub being "arrested"
The most recent posts by Invalid Link Removed – as opposed to Invalid Link Removed – include “AND THEY WILL SAY HE SAID IT TO THE NSA FIRST.” on August 16 and “Feelin like Pac all Eyes on me.” on August 15 and “The Revolution will come for me. Men will be at my door soon to pick me up to lead it. Invalid Link Removed ” on August 14.
Also on August 14, he posted this video:
9/11 Eyewitnesses to Explosive WTC Demolition (This video was held by NIST for almost a decade, released after long fight with freedom of information act)
And this:
Invalid Link Removed Invalid Link Removed
A post on August 12 said: “There has been an overwhelming amount of evil enacted and planned against you, your children, and your
countrymen. It is great in scope. Your government evil. It is as simple as that. And the calvary is coming.”
Former Marine Indefinitely Detained In Psychiatric Ward Over 9/11 Facebook Posts
Invalid Link Removed
Aug 21, 2012
Former marine Brandon Raub was Invalid Link Removed and Invalid Link Removed.
Invalid Link Removed
Raub isn’t the first person who has suffered this fate. Claire Swinney was also Invalid Link Removed for claiming government liability for 9/11. Invalid Link Removed have been committed for the same reason over the last decade.
Surely the Feds are right … that kind of talk is crazy, right?
Maybe. But many of the 9/11 Commissioners themselves Invalid Link Removed, they say that the government has Invalid Link Removed the Invalid Link Removed of the 9/11 hijackers, and Invalid Link Removed.
Indeed, while they obviously haven’t said that the government was involved, 9/11 Commissioners have said we need further investigation and that the Invalid Link Removed. Does that mean they should they be committed to the same psych ward which Mr. Raub and Ms. Swinney enjoyed? Of course not.
Some people believe that 9/11 was wholly unforeseeable. Others believe that government personnel were criminally negligent in letting 9/11 happen, and then obstructed justice to cover it up. See Invalid Link Removed, Invalid Link Removed,Invalid Link Removed, Invalid Link Removed, and Invalid Link Removed. Still others believe that rogue government personnel allowed 9/11 to happen, or even played a role in the attacks themselves.
Whatever one believes about 9/11, isn’t our society built on freedom of speech? And if someone has kooky theories, won’t the scientific method and free debate defeat the baseless theories? Isn’t that what modern society is all about?
Raub’s attorney – the head of the Invalid Link Removed The Rutherford Institute – Invalid Link Removedthat Raub is being indefinitely detained, and says:
For government officials to not only arrest Brandon Raub for doing nothing more than exercising his First Amendment rights but to actually force him to undergo psychological evaluations and detain him against his will goes against every constitutional principle this country was founded upon. This should be a wake-up call to Americans that the police state is here.”
What Do Mental Health Professionals Say About Those Who Question 9/11?
Many sociologists and mental health professionals say that those who believe the official version without any questioning are the ones suffering from psychological defense mechanisms.
Psychologists help 9/11 truth deniers Psychologists help out the conspiracy theorists that won't let go of the official conspiracy theory.
Sociologists say that fear of terrorism has made people Invalid Link Removed (when even the 9/11 Commission says he didn’t).
And the following mental health professionals say that questioning the government’s cut-and-dried version of 9/11 is the sane thing to do:
Associate Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Invalid Link Removed
Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, as well as Radiology, at Duke University Medical Center Invalid Link Removed
Board of Governors Distinguished Service Professor of Psychology and Associate Dean of the Graduate School at Rutgers University Invalid Link Removed
Distinguished Professor in the Department of Mental Health Law and Policy, Professor of Medicine in the Department of Internal Medicine and Distinguished Professor of Global Health in the College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Invalid Link Removed
Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey Invalid Link Removed
Professor of Psychology, Rutgers University Invalid Link Removed
Professor Emeritus, Psychology and Neuroscience, Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Invalid Link Removed
Former Chief Mental Health Coordinator and Director of Manpower Development and Training, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, and Lecturer in Psychology, Boston University Invalid Link Removed
Professor of Psychology, University of Chicago and Northwestern University Invalid Link Removed
Professor of Psychology at University of New Hampshire Invalid Link Removed
Professor of Psychology at University of Essex Invalid Link Removed
Professor of Psychology at Goddard College Invalid Link Removed
Professor Emeritus of Psychology at California Institute of Integral Studies Invalid Link Removed
Professor of Psychology at Rhodes University Invalid Link Removed
Professor of Psychology at Oxford University Invalid Link Removed
Professor Emeritus, Psychology, University of Marburg Invalid Link Removed
Professor of Psychology, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Invalid Link Removed
Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Jefferson Medical College. Former Major, U.S. Army Medical Corps, Vietnam Veteran 7 years service, Invalid Link Removed
Ph.D. Clinical Neuropsychologist Invalid Link Removed
Trauma specialist Invalid Link Removed
Psychiatrist Invalid Link Removed
Psychiatrist Invalid Link Removed
Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Nebraska and licensed Psychologist Invalid Link Removed
PhD in clinical psychology from Texas Tech Invalid Link Removed
PhD in educational psychology Invalid Link Removed
PhD psychologist Invalid Link Removed
PhD psychologist Invalid Link Removed
PhD psychologist Invalid Link Removed
Ph.D Psychologist Invalid Link Removed
Psychologist Invalid Link Removed
There are many other mental health professionals who agree.
Why Are Some Psychologists So Dogmatic?
Russian psychiatrists famously aided Stalin in Invalid Link Removed.
Similarly, American apologists for the powers-that-be are eager to Invalid Link Removed anyone “taking a cynical stance toward politics, mistrusting authority, endorsing democratic practices, … and displaying an inquisitive, imaginative outlook” as worthy of a trip to the insane asylum. (Those traits may also get one Invalid Link Removed.)
But most mental health professionals who assume that those who question 9/11 are crazy are simply victims of the the “Invalid Link Removed”:
The process by which a psychiatrist, psychologist, or other mental health clinician mistakes the patient’s perception of real events as delusional and misdiagnoses accordingly.
The authors of a paper on this phenomenon (Bell, V., Halligan, P.W., Ellis, H.D. (2003) Beliefs About Delusions. The Psychologist, 6 (8), 418-422) conclude:
Sometimes, improbable reports are erroneously assumed to be symptoms of mental illness [due to a] failure or inability to verify whether the events have actually taken place, no matter how improbable intuitively they might appear to the busy clinician.
In other words, psychologists who haven’t taken the time to examine for themselves the claims of their patients will tend to label as delusional anything which they “intuitively” feel is improbable.
As such, psychologists and psychiatrists are just as prone to acting out their irrational prejudices as anyone else … unless they take the time to investigate and educate themselves.
Postscript: We do not condone violence. Virtually all those who question the government’s version of 9/11 are peaceful, non-violent folks.
The government PR machine has swung into high gear promoting West Nile disease. It’s a “national outbreak.” 1138 cases in 38 states. 41 deaths. Planes are spraying toxic aerial pesticides.
Invalid Link Removed
Never mind that the US Centers for Disease Control claims 36,000 people die every year from ordinary seasonal flu—and there are no announcements of an “epidemic” or an “outbreak.”
Never mind that the World Health Organization (WHO) claims between 250,000 and 500,000 people die every year from ordinary seasonal flu—and this isn’t called an “epidemic” or an “outbreak.”
If you added up the death count from all the hyped and predicted epidemics of the last decade, including West Nile, SARS, bird flu, weaponized smallpox, and Swine Flu, the total would come to about one year of deaths in the US from ordinary flu.
But who cares about facts? What’s important is how much fear can be generated. That’s the statistic that counts, when you’re talking about the CDC or WHO.
And when it comes to the public, it seems that some people feel a morbid attraction for viruses. Every time a new one is announced, they rub their hands together and say, “This is the big one! It’s going to spread like wildfire!”
Other people, involved in natural health, who reject huge amounts conventional medical wisdom, nonetheless make the mistake of buying the virus of the moment. They automatically accept it as real and then figure out how to treat it naturally. That can be a big mistake.
Have researchers ever actually isolated (found) the West Nile virus? You should be asking that question.
You should always question what the CDC tells you.
The deepest form of medical-research chicanery comes when scientists claim they’ve found a new virus and they haven’t. They haven’t nailed it down. They say they have, but that’s not true.
People have a hard time fathoming this. They will accept the fact that a medical drug touted as miraculous really causes heart attacks, strokes, and death, but for some reason The Virus is sacred territory. “Scientists would never lie about that.” Really? Why not?
Do you think discovering a new virus is like dipping a tweezer into a dish of liquid and picking out a little critter who is shaking his legs? And therefore, nobody can lie about it, because it’s either there or not? No, that’s not the way it works.
A new virus is discovered by taking a tissue sample suspected of harboring it; then that sample must be transferred to a fine filter that will trap the virus. That’s how the initial all-important isolation process is begun.
In the case of West Nile, this was attempted in 1999. It was called a success, but there was a major problem. As I stated in a previous article:
Researchers claim the West Nile virus is 0.04 micrometers. At the same time, they admit that the original fishing expedition for the virus employed filters that were 0.22 micrometers. The obvious conclusion? The filter was too porous. It was nearly six times larger than the virus.
Invalid Link Removed
In fact, Robert McLean, director of the National Wildlife Center of the US Geological Survey, told ABC’s Nick Regush, “We don’t have a purified form of the [West Nile] virus.”
A stunning admission.
The late ABC reporter, Regush, followed up on McLean’s pronouncement with this: “I find no evidence anywhere in the scientific literature that the rules of virus purification and isolation were thoroughly followed [in the case of the West Nile virus].”
People respond to these assertions with an accusatory tone: “Then what’s making people sick? Why are people dying?”
People getting sick and dying doesn’t necessarily have a connection to why health authorities are telling you they’re dying.
If a newspaper reported that a hurricane in Missouri killed 12 people, and then you discovered there had been no hurricane, would you insist on pretending there was, because 12 people died? No, of course not. You would assume the people died for other reasons.
It’s the same situation with West Nile. People get sick and die all the time. If the virus that supposedly is causing an outbreak of illness has never been found, you look for other causes.
Again, from my previous article:
There are some good reasons people in the Dallas area are getting sick. These reasons have nothing to do with “West Nile.”
A decade ago, independent journalist, Jim West, launched an original investigation into the so-called “West Nile epidemic” in New York City.
Invalid Link Removed
West correlated clusters of human and bird “West Nile” cases with several factors; among them, nearby polluting oil refineries, other air pollution (certainly exacerbated by hot summer weather), and the presence of toxic MTBE, an additive that makes gasoline in cars burn cleaner.
There are listings for at least eight refineries in the Dallas area. There are also reports of increased air pollution coming from natural gas production in the Barnett Shale. The 2012 summer has been hot. As of of the year 2000, Texas refineries were producing 75% of all the MTBE in the United States.
And since this has been a very hot and dry summer in other areas of the US, high-air-pollution locales have intensified.
Am I saying that the never-isolated “West Nile virus” might be functioning as a cover story, to conceal what is really making people sick? Absolutely.
As an illustration, the medical history of the African continent is replete with such cover stories. Over and over, germs have been heralded as the cause of people dying in great numbers.
Centuries-old causes of ongoing death in Africa were intentionally overlooked: contaminated water supplies; horrible sanitation; overcrowding; generation-to-generation malnutrition and starvation; stolen farm land.
Most Americans automatically assume the ar***** of western doctors with drugs and vaccines is a good sign for Africa. Nothing could be further from the truth. The doctors are sent there to cover up the truth.
Why? Because many interested parties, powerful players inside and outside of Africa, want the true and persisting causes of illness and death to remain, in order to keep the population weak and controllable. It’s easy to hide this agenda by advertising a fake disease-cause and a fake medical remedy. Medical intervention will never cure what’s ailing Africa. If you walked through a swamp of filthy contaminated water every day on your way to work, do you think a course of antibiotics would keep you healthy?
Here in America, when various toxic environmental causes of illness bring people down, there needs to be a cover story as well. The most believable cover is The Virus. It works. People stand up and salute it. They’re saluting it now in Dallas and other places.
I don’t care how many pictures of how many mosquitoes are adorning television screens and newspapers. “Oh, the mosquito carries the West Nile virus!” Really? Even if no one ever found such a virus?
Buy the virus story if you want to. Everyone has that freedom. But science is supposed to be about proof, and in the case of West Nile, it’s all supposition and presumption and lying.
The medical PR machine will grind on. New stories will appear. “The worst summer ever.” “New deaths from West Nile.” “More mosquitoes carrying the deadly West Nile virus found.” “The very young and elderly at greatest risk.” “Medical experts try to discover why West Nile returned with a fury.”
How many people will give in at each new barrage of propaganda and accept the virus story?
Remember Swine Flu? The whole planet was going to go down. In the end, WHO announced the total global death figure as 20,000. Then, in a mindless burst of revisionism this year, the total was changed to 580,000.
Here’s a number for you. Three maniacal spokespeople from the CDC, backed by five major television networks, can brainwash the public about a virus in seven days.
The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
Will the military do door to door gun confiscation again this time around?
Will you be able to defend your home? The answer is NO...conspiracy theory? The answer is NO! See video below for mainstream news reporting on door to door firearms confiscation in good communities.
Hurricane Katrina Door to Door Firearms Confiscation
Visit link to view Army Course Manual that trains our Soldier to confiscate Constitutionally protected firearms.
CIVIL DISTURBANCE OPERATIONS
Subcourse Number MP 1005
EDITION C
United States Army Military Police School
Fort McClellan, Alabama 36205-5030
6 Credit Hours
Edition Date: April 2006 Invalid Link Removed
Al-Qaeda Leader Strikes Deal With U.S., Saudis To Send 5,000 Fighters to Syria
Yemeni Jihadist personally trained by Bin Laden
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, September 3, 2012
A militant who fought alongside Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan and is now the leader of a group affiliated with Al-Qaeda in South Yemen has struck a deal with the United States and Saudi Arabia to send 5,000 Al-Qaeda fighters into Syria according to reports out of the Middle East.
Invalid Link Removed
Tariq al-Fadhli, jihadist leader of the Southern Yemen insurgency and a man personally trained by Bin Laden, has successfully negotiated with U.S. and Saudi officials to send 5,000 jihadist fighters via Turkey to aid Syrian rebels in the attempted overthrow of President Bashar Al-Assad, Invalid Link Removed The report was also Invalid Link Removed
In a newspaper interview, al-Fadhli revealed that he had agreed to transfer 5,000 militants from the southern Yemen cities of Zanzibar and Jaar “to Syria in order to fight in war being waged by armed groups, including the Al Qaeda-linked groups against the Syrian regime.”
The militants, who refer to themselves as “supporters of Shariah,” will join other bands of Al-Qaeda fighters who have swarmed into Syria from Libya, Iraq and Turkey with the aid of NATO powers and Gulf states. Invalid Link Removed, the London Guardian admitted that Al-Qaeda fighters were commanding Syrian rebels and teaching them how to build bombs.
The Council on Foreign Relations, America’s most influential foreign policy think tank and a close ally of the U.S. State Department, Invalid Link Removedof Al-Qaeda fighters in Syria, while the Invalid Link Removedthat the terrorist group had been responsible for suicide attacks and car bombings that have caused more than 200 deaths and 1,000 injuries.
President Barack Obama Invalid Link Removedthat he would use taxpayer money to support Syrian rebels with “non-lethal aid”. However, Invalid Link Removed that the CIA is helping steer heavy weaponry to the rebels on the Turkish border paid for by Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
Indicating his willingness to begin a new alliance with Saudi Arabia, which helped train him during his mujahideen years, Sheikh Fadhli announced “a regional deal for the transfer of al-Qaeda fighters from Yemeni territory to Turkey to the Syrian front, which explains the sudden withdrawal of gunmen from Abyan.”
Yemeni authorities were only able to restore order in Zanzibar and Jaar this past June after battles that killed a number of Al-Qaeda fighters.
AlAlam describes al-Fadhli as “one of the elders of the tribe of Abyan and former leader of al-Qaeda.” Invalid Link Removed, Yemen has denounced al-Fadhli as “one the country’s most dangerous terrorists.”
However, Invalid Link Removed, the Yemeni government is suspected by many to be cultivating jihadi activity by tolerating the presence of Al-Qaeda within its borders.
The Nation’s Invalid Link Removed that “Since the mujahideen war against the Soviets in Afghanistan in the 1980s and continuing after 9/11, Saleh has famously milked the threat of Al Qaeda and other militants to leverage counterterrorism funding and weapons from the United States and Saudi Arabia, to bolster his power within the country and to neutralize opponents.”
Al-Fadhli has attempted to distance himself from claims that the group he spearheads is affiliated with Al-Qaeda, in one You Tube video flying a U.S. flag over his compound while playing the national anthem. However, al-Fadhli fought with the Mujahideen alongside Osama Bin Laden against the Soviets in Afghanistan. At the very least, he has been a useful servant of U.S. geopolitical objectives for decades.
In 2009, leader of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula Nasir Abdul Kareem al-Wahayshi (a.k.a. Abu Basir) released an audiotape Invalid Link Removed. Syrian jihad strategist Abu Musa’ab al-Suri also revealed in his book that al-Fadhli was “chosen and trained by Bin Laden to practice jihad in Yemen.”
The agreement to send militants from Yemen into Syria to aid the west’s hegemonic agenda to topple President Bashar Al-Assad again illustrates how Al-Qaeda is a geopolitical pawn habitually called upon by the military-industrial complex to achieve regime change in the Middle East and North Africa.
President of Italy’s Supreme Court to Refer 9/11 Crimes To International Criminal Court
Invalid Link Removed
Sept 10, 2012
Ferdinando Imposimato is the honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy, and former Senior Investigative Judge, Italy.
Imposimato presided over several terrorism-related cases, including the kidnapping and ultimate assassination of President Aldo Moro, the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II, other political assassinations and kidnapping cases and several cases against the Mafia. He is a former Senator who served on the Anti-Mafia Commission in three administrations.
Invalid Link Removed
Imposimato is also a former legal consultant to the United Nations regarding institution of laws to control drug trafficking.
This week, Judge Imposimato Invalid Link Removed in writing that 9/11 was just like the “strategy of tension” carried out in Italy.
Specifically, the former Italian Prime Minister, Italian judges, and the Invalid Link Removed admit that Invalid Link Removed.
As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: Invalid Link Removed (and see Invalid Link Removed)(Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign had joined NATO before the bombings occurred).
And watch Invalid Link Removed:
Operation Gladio [BBC Timewatch, 1992] State-Sponsored Terrorism in Europe Originally aired on BBC2 in 1992, Operation Gladio reveals Gladio, the secret state-sponsored terror network operating in Europe. This BBC series is about a far-right secret army, operated by the CIA and MI6 through NATO, which killed hundreds of innocent Europeans and attempted to blame the deaths on Baader Meinhof, Red Brigades and other left wing groups.
Known as stay-behinds these armies were given access to military equipment which was supposed to be used for sabotage after a Soviet invasion. Instead it was used in massacres across mainland Europe as part of a CIA Strategy of Tension. Gladio killing sprees in Belgium and Italy were carried out for the purpose of frightening the national political classes into adopting U.S. policies.
Judge Imposimato writes that 9/11 was the exact same type of attack: an act of Invalid Link Removed.
Judge Imposimato announced that he is going to recommend that the International Criminal Court hold a criminal trial into 9/11.
Imposimato noted that the International Criminal Court was set up to protect the world from criminal acts of war, and that it is the perfect judicial body to hear such a case.
Numerous High-Level Legal Scholars Agree That Additional Action Is Necessary
Imposimato is not the only legal scholar to call for prosecutions and/or further investigations into 9/11. Many other high-level legal jurists, professors and trial lawyers have said the same thing. See Invalid Link Removed andInvalid Link Removed.
Note: Judge Imposimato is a member of Lawyers for 9/11 Truth and a panelist on the Toronto Hearings.
Thanks Obama – The Terrorists You Used To Topple Regimes Are Now Attacking Our Embassies
Michael Snyder Invalid Link Removed
Sept 13, 2012
Many of us tried to warn Barack Obama that using militants from al-Qaeda and other terrorist organizations to overthrow governments in the Middle East would not end well.
Invalid Link Removed
The Obama administration has been so determined to get rid of some of these dictators in the Middle East that they have not even really stopped to think about who would be replacing them. Our leaders assured us that those opposed to Mubarak and Gaddafi were “freedom fighters” that just wanted “liberty” and “democracy” in those countries. Well, of course it turns out that the folks that took control of both Egypt and Libya bear no resemblance to George Washington whatsoever. They have simply replaced one form of tyranny with an even worse form of tyranny. Sadly, the last couple of days have been a huge wake up call for all of us. Radical Islamic militants stormed the U.S.
embassy in Cairo, Egypt and replaced the American flag with the al-Qaeda flag. In Benghazi, Libya the U.S. consulate was attacked by a crowd equipped with guns, homemade bombs and rocket-propelled grenades. They torched the consulate, looted it, and killed the U.S. ambassador and three other U.S. officials. Apparently they are not as grateful for our help in “liberating” their homelands as the Obama administration thought they would be. Unfortunately, our politicians fundamentally misunderstand what is going on in the Middle East, and this is going to continue to lead to more policy errors.
For years, our politicians told us that “al-Qaeda” was the big enemy in the “War on Terror”.
But then during the “Arab Spring” the U.S. government was openly working with “al-Qaeda” and a bunch of other similar organizations all over the Middle East to overthrow established governments.
To say that our approach to the Middle East has been “inconsistent” would be a massive understatement.
After the protesters stormed the U.S. embassy in Cairo, they made it very clear who they are aligned with. They tore down the U.S. flag and desecrated it, and they put up a black Islamic flag in its place.
So what did the black flag have on it? The following is how Invalid Link Removed described the flag….
The black flag, which hangs atop a ladder inside the compound, is adorned with white characters that read, “There is no God but Allah and Mohammad is his messenger,” an emblem often used in al Qaeda propaganda.
This is very reminiscent of what happened in Libya in the days after the toppling of Gaddafi. At the time, Invalid Link Removed and other
international media organizations posted pictures of the black al-Qaeda flag Invalid Link Removed over the courthouse in Benghazi….
The black flag of Al Qaeda was hoisted in Libya yesterday as Nato formally ended its military campaign.
The standard fluttered from the roof of the courthouse in Benghazi, where the country’s new rulers have imposed sharia law since seizing power.
Today, the new government in Egypt is completely dominated by the Muslim Brotherhood. They hold 47 percent of the seats in parliament and the new president of Egypt belongs to the organization.
So how are they responding to this incident?
Well, they have issued a half-hearted condemnation of the attacks in English, and they have also announced that new protests against the anti-Islam film that originally sparked the violence will be held in Tahrir Square on Friday.
I’m sure that a new round of mass protests will definitely calm everyone down.
Or not.
Hopefully the U.S. embassy in Egypt will have significantly strengthened security by Friday.
In Libya, the U.S. consulate has been essentially destroyed.
You can see pictures of what the U.S. consulate in Benghazi looks like after the attack Invalid Link Removed.
Looters took off with whatever they were able to carry. Reporters saw some people carrying desks, chairs and even washing machines away from the consulate.
The U.S. ambassador, Chris Stevens, was killed along with three other U.S. officials.
You can see a photo of an unconscious Stevens being carried through the streets after the attack Invalid Link Removed.
So who was responsible for the attack?
Once again, it appears to have been Islamic radicals associated with al-Qaeda. The following is from a Invalid Link Removed about this incident….
The attack was believed to have been carried out by Ansar al-Sharia, an al Qaeda-style Sunni Islamist group that has been active in Benghazi, a Libyan security official said. Witnesses said the mob also included tribesmen, militia and other gunmen.
Ansar al-Sharia cars arrived at the start of the protest but left once fighting started, Hamam said. “The protesters were running around the compound just looking for Americans, they just wanted to find an American so they could catch one.”
Most Americans thought that it was a good idea for the Obama administration to back “the rebels” that were fighting to overthrow Gaddafi, but perhaps more people should have been asking what those “rebels” actually stand for.
The following is what former CIA officer Bruce Riedel Invalid Link Removed about the composition of the fighters that were attempting to overthrow Gaddafi….
“There is no question that al-Qaida’s Libyan franchise, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, is a part of the opposition. It has always been Gadhafi’s biggest enemy and its stronghold is Benghazi. What is unclear is how much of the opposition is al-Qaida/Libyan Islamic Fighting Group – 2 percent or 80 percent.”
The leader of the Libyan rebel forces even admitted that some of the very same militants that were shooting at U.S. troops in Iraq were among those that were seeking to “liberate” Libya. The following is from a 2011 article Invalid Link Removed….
Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, has said jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafi’s regime.
You can find much more on the link between al-Qaeda and the rebel forces in Libya Invalid Link Removed.
So we were shooting at them in Iraq but we supplied them with weapons and gave them air support in Libya?
What kind of nonsense is that?
The truth is that the U.S. government has absolutely no idea what it is doing in the Middle East.
And it looks like more trouble is ahead.
There were other anti-U.S. protests Invalid Link Removed on Wednesday.
Sadly, even the top officials in our own government fail to grasp why these militants hate us. In response to the torching of the consulate in Benghazi, Invalid Link Removed asked the following question….
“Today, many Americans are asking, indeed I ask myself … How could this happen in a country we helped liberate in a city we helped save from destruction?”
And of course foreign policy has never been a point of emphasis for Barack Obama.
In fact, it has been reported that he skips Invalid Link Removed of his daily intelligence meetings.
So the blind are leading the blind and we continue to make mistake after mistake in the Middle East.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
