Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Top Government Insider: Bin Laden Died In 2001, 9/11 A False Flag

HondaV65 said:
Molten metal? Sure - some metal burns at a low temperature - are you denying that? I don't know what the melting point of aluminum is but there was a lot of it in the building - I would guess it's fairly low - much lower than steel anyway.

That doesn't mean the structural beams "melted" there was all kinds of metal in that building dude. Of course - some metal did melt - but none that were responsible for the stuctural integrity of the building.
Click to expand...

[TABLE="class: contentpaneopen"]
[TR]
[TD="class: contentheading, width: 100%"]Invalid Link Removed [/TD]
[TD="class: buttonheading, width: 100%, align: right"] Invalid Link Removed [/TD]
[TD="class: buttonheading, width: 100%, align: right"] Invalid Link Removed [/TD]
[TD="class: buttonheading, width: 100%, align: right"] Invalid Link Removed [/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[TABLE="class: contentpaneopen"]
[TR]
[TD] Written by Richard Gage, AIA, Andrea Dreger & Gregg Roberts [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="class: createdate"] Tuesday, 24 August 2010 15:31 [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]


Extremely high temperatures were evident before and during the destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers and at Ground Zero. Seven minutes before the destruction of the South Tower, a Invalid Link Removed appeared, accompanied by several smaller flows, as Invalid Link Removed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The material’s glowing color showed that its Invalid Link Removed was close to “white hot” at the very beginning of the flow and “yellow-orange” further down. Iron-rich spheres in the WTC dust are additional proof of temperatures above the melting point of iron. Pyroclastic-like, rapidly Invalid Link Removed after the destruction of the Towers can also be explained only by the expansion of hot gases.
[TABLE="width: 210, align: right"]
[TR]
[TD="align: left"]Invalid Link Removed An excavating machine at Ground Zero lifts debris dripping with molten metal[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
The high-temperature phenomena at Ground Zero are documented by various sources:
Bechtel engineers, responsible for safety at Ground Zero, wrote in the Invalid Link Removed: “The debris pile at Ground Zero was always tremendously hot. Thermal measurements taken by helicopter each day showed underground temperatures ranging from 400ºF to more than 2,800ºF.”
The fact that high-temperature phenomena were an important issue at Ground Zero is underscored by the Invalid Link Removed acquired: images by Invalid Link Removed, Invalid Link Removed, Invalid Link Removed, Invalid Link Removed/U.S. Army, and at least 25 images by Invalid Link Removed, taken between Sept. 16 and Oct. 25. In addition, temperature measurements by helicopter were Invalid Link Removed, and the firefighters used Invalid Link Removed too.
Many witnesses, including rescue personnel and firefighters working on the piles, described the phenomenon of “molten steel.” Terms used in Invalid Link Removed are, for example, “molten steel,” beams “dripping from molten steel,” “molten steel … like you’re in a foundry. Like lava, from a volcano.” A Invalid Link Removed taken on September 27 by a Ground Zero worker shows an excavating machine lifting debris from the WTC wreckage dripping yellow/orange molten metal.
WTC clean-up workers and 9/11 artifacts architect Bart Voorsanger, in the PBS video “Invalid Link RemovedInvalid Link Removed,” described what must have been several tons of “fused element of steel ... molten steel and concrete and all of these things …all fused by the heat,” weighing several tons each. These foreign objects came to be known as “meteorites.”
Invalid Link Removed
The heat at Ground Zero was not only extreme, it was also persistent, as proven not only by witness statements and a photograph by Invalid Link Removed of orange-red glowing steel as late as October 21, but also by thermal images taken by Invalid Link Removed and Invalid Link Removed satellites. The EarthData thermal images also show that the “hot spots” remained at the same locations. The phenomenon did not “move” across the site, like one would expect from fire as it consumes the fuel available in any one location.
University of California professor Invalid Link Removed, the first structural engineer given access to the WTC steel at Fresh Kills Landfill notes, “I saw melting of girders at the World Trade Center.” Astaneh also “describes the connections [between supporting columns] as being Invalid Link Removed: ‘If you remember the Salvador Dalí paintings with the clocks that are kind of melted – it’s kind of like that. That could only happen if you get steel yellow hot or white hot – perhaps around 2,000 degrees.’”.
Iron workers at the site Invalid Link Removed that huge columns that were Invalid Link Removed into horseshoe shapes - without the flanges showing any cracks or Invalid Link Removed. They cited, "It takes thousands of degrees to bend steel like this".
FEMA documents in their Invalid Link Removed of its May 2002 WTC Building Performance Assessment Team study, for sample 1, “evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting.” A “sulfur-rich liquid” containing “primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur” “penetrated” into the steel.
The extremely high temperatures contradict the official story. Office and hydrocarbon fires burning in open air (~500° to 1,500° F) cannot reach temperatures in the range that iron or structural steel melts (2,700° F). This was even acknowledged by NIST’s Co-Project Leader, John Gross, in the same public talk where he stated regarding the phenomena of molten steel, “Invalid Link Removed” Yet there is abundant proof of the molten metal, which Invalid Link Removed reveal to be iron, in the debris piles. Furthermore, NIST itself performed Invalid Link Removed to establish the temperatures reached by the WTC office fires. The temperatures established are far below the temperatures required to produce all of the above phenomena – which occurred both before and during the destruction and at Ground Zero.
The steel problem was “solved” by NIST by Invalid Link Removed most of the steel from being systematically examined for failure modes and heat excursions. The steel collected by the Port Authority, which has been stored in Hangar 17 at JFK Airport, was not included in the investigation except for 12 pieces. Of the 236 pieces that NIST possessed, many were excluded based on the circular argument that only columns from impact and fire floors were of interest in the investigation. Thus, NIST avoided having to discuss 51 of its 55 core columns. Sample 1 from FEMA’s Appendix C was also excluded.
In addition, NIST developed a Invalid Link Removed of “visual examination” that it then substituted in place of the systematically used tool. NIST’s “paint cracking” method has the following “advantages”: paint cracks can be produced not only by high temperature excursions, but also by “corrosion”/ “environmental degradation” and by plastic deformation; many columns had no paint left for examination, Moreover, by relying on a method that requires microscopic examination, NIST was able to ignore pieces that were obviously heat-affected but had come from non-fire floors. A contractor’s report that employed common visual examination was “reviewed”: NIST contrasted the contractor’s results with their newly developed method and their fire exposure observations, and by employing again a circular argument. NIST’s steel “examination” shows that its “working hypothesis” was in fact its premise, and that NIST gone to great lengths to maintain this premise.
Invalid Link Removed
Some want to cite “natural thermite reactions” for the high-temperature phenomena: airplane aluminum must have reacted with rust. This possibility can be ruled out based on the findings of a Invalid Link Removed that was conducted in 2002 at the Colorado School of Mines for the Minerals Management Service. Officially, the study, whose lead author is a close research associate of T. W. Siewert of NIST, is about thermite-sparking in offshore environments. But due to a Invalid Link Removed the question about the feasibility of natural thermite reactions in the WTC is answered too. The authors established the ignition temperatures for rust, dehydrated rust and iron-oxide-based thermite reactions. The necessary temperatures are so high that one can conclude that thermite reactions between airplane aluminum and rust (some rust was on beams according to documents), dehydrated rust (rust dehydrates in fire) or iron oxide (iron oxide was part of the primary paint) were not feasible in the WTC. Also tested was what happens when aluminum impacts rust at very high velocity, so, interestingly, even the possibility that the impacting airplanes caused natural thermite reactions can be ruled out.
The overwhelming evidence of these extremely high temperatures, which normal office fires and jet fuel cannot produce, cries out for a new investigation. The hypothesis of explosive controlled demolition must be examined and, if confirmed, followed wherever it leads, so that Americans can know for sure what was the real cause of the catastrophic loss of life at the WTC on 9/11 and the identities of everyone who was responsible for it.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 
ax1 said:
Bush Caught Lying About September 11th

Click to expand...

Do you think anyone is actually clicking on these videos?

We all know that Alex Jones takes **** out of context, edits video, and uses half-truths to espouse his tin foil coke-head theories on 9-11.

But you'll never escape the fact that you don't have one shred of physical evidence and each time you guys think you've found some - it's completely debunked by thinking individuals.

What does it feel like to surrender your soul and independent thought to Alex Jones?

Tell me something about that
 
Sources related to exceptionally high temperatures, and/or to persistent heat at
Ground Zero
Disinformation regarding the phenomena of “molten steel”/ exceptionally high
temperatures/ persistent heat at Ground Zero;
Pre-collapse pressure pulses
A. Dreger
Overview
The official account of 9-11 does not give a sound explanation of where any extremely hot
material in the WTC collapse piles could have come from, nor does it give a sound
explanation for the unusually persistent heat at Ground Zero. Numerous misleading and
misinforming statements are disseminated to conceal this dilemma of the official account.

Invalid Link Removed
 
Images of the World Trade Center Site Show Thermal Hot Spots on September 16 and 23, 2001.
Invalid Link Removed
 
[h=2]Engineer Sees Evidence of Extreme Temperatures in WTC Steel[/h] Submitted by Invalid Link Removed on Mon, 02/25/2008 - 2:31pm

  • Invalid Link Removed
A structural engineer who was a member of the team assembled by the American Society of Civil Engineers to investigate the World Trade Center site after 9/11 has described numerous phenomena indicating extremely high temperatures suffered by the WTC structural steel. This appears to be further evidence that high-temperature explosives, such as thermate, were used to bring down the towers.
Dr. Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl is a professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of California at Berkeley, who specializes in studying structural damage done by earthquakes and terrorist bombings. He flew to New York on September 19, 2001 to conduct a two-week reconnaissance of the collapsed towers, hoping to gain an understanding of how they'd come down. He was able to examine numerous pieces of steel taken from Ground Zero. [1]
He said the towers were exceptionally well designed and built, describing the WTC as "the best-designed building I have ever seen." [2] Yet the structural steel had suffered unusual warping and other major damage:

  • Astaneh-Asl said that steel flanges "had been reduced from an inch thick to paper thin." [3]
  • At a recycling center in New Jersey, he saw 10-ton steel beams from the towers that "looked like giant sticks of twisted licorice." [4] He showed the San Francisco Chronicle a "banana-shaped, rust-colored piece of steel" that had somehow "twisted like toffee during the terrorist attack." [5]
  • He noted the way steel from the WTC had bent at several connection points that had joined the floors to the vertical columns. He described the connections as being smoothly warped, saying, "If you remember the Salvador Dali paintings with the clocks that are kind of melted--it's kind of like that." He added, "That could only happen if you get steel yellow hot or white hot--perhaps around 2,000 degrees." [6]
  • In an interview in 2007, Astaneh-Asl recalled, "I saw melting of girders in [the] World Trade Center." [7]
  • He found a foot-long twisted shard of steel that was "like a piece of bread, but it was high-strength steel." He commented, "I haven't seen anything like this [before]." [8]
  • He came across "severely scorched [steel] members from 40 or so floors below the points of impact [by the planes]." [9]
  • The fireproofing that had been used to protect the WTC steel also showed evidence of extreme conditions. In some places it had "melted into a glassy residue." [10]
  • Astaneh-Asl saw a charred I-beam from WTC Building 7--a 47-story skyscraper that collapsed late in the afternoon of 9/11, even though no plane hit it. "The beam, so named because its cross-section looks like a capital I, had clearly endured searing temperatures. Parts of the flat top of the I, once five-eighths of an inch thick, had vaporized." [11]
These observations indicate that the World Trade Center steel was subjected to very high temperatures. Yet, while postulating that the towers collapsed due to fire (and without the use of explosives), even Thomas Eagar--an engineering professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology--admitted, "The temperature of the fire at the WTC was not unusual, and it was most definitely not capable of melting steel." [12] One must conclude that the phenomena observed by Astaneh-Asl are therefore highly suspicious.
It may well have been because it offered such revealing clues that the remaining structural steel from the World Trade Center was so rapidly destroyed, being shipped abroad as scrap to be melted down and recycled. CBS News described: "The [cleanup] operation--which began days after the collapse, okayed by then-New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani--goes on 24 hours a day, seven days a week. As a result, Astaneh has almost certainly missed seeing crucial pieces before they were cut up and sent overseas." [13] As the New York Times reported, the steel scrap was worth "only a few million dollars, a tiny fraction of the billions of dollars the cleanup" was going to cost. Yet the knowledge that could have been gained from it "could save lives in a future disaster." [14]
NOTES
[1] Invalid Link Removed; Invalid Link Removed; Invalid Link Removed.
[2] Invalid Link Removed.
[3] Invalid Link Removed
[4] Invalid Link Removed
[5] Invalid Link Removed
[6] Invalid Link Removed
[7] Invalid Link Removed.
[8] Invalid Link Removed.
[9] Invalid Link Removed.
[10] Invalid Link Removed
[11] Ibid.
[12] Invalid Link Removed.
[13] Invalid Link Removed
[14] Invalid Link Removed
 
Again ... blather on with your pathetic and disproven "Thermite" hysteria.

Go back a couple of pages - I posted a link with the proof. Irrefutable evidence with mathematical formulas outlining how the Thermite residue was found on the site.

But you continue to cite your little "faux" studies funded by Alex Jones and the Socialist movment.

Good Job - you're playing your Kim Jun Il role quite well.
 
So I have evidence including from NASA of extreme heat and molten steel by firefighters + more, yet our government denies it.

Eyes Wide Shut: Gross Negligence with NIST Denial of Molten Metal on 9/11 - AE911Truth.org


John Gross, lead structural engineer of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) denies the vast witnessed and documented evidence of molten metal found at all 3 World Trade Center towers destroyed on 9/11. Examine the evidence at Invalid Link Removed
 
ax1 said:
[h=2]Engineer Sees Evidence of Extreme Temperatures in WTC Steel[/h]
Click to expand...

Really? LOL - yeah it was pretty damn hot in there wasn't it? That kind of happens when a 747 loaded with fuel crashes into your water cooler at the office.

LOL
 
Fetzer on 9-11

Those who were overwhelmed by the events of 9/11 may be overwhelmed again to discover that the government's official account cannot be sustained. Here, a philosopher of science explains that the plane crashes causing fires causing steel to melt and floors to collapse violates laws of physics and engineering and cannot possibly be correct. The collapse of the Twin Towers displays all of the characteristics of controlled demolitions, including the near gravity speed at which they fell, their symmetrical collapse into their own footprints, and their conversion of concrete into very fine dust. The offical account does not even address the collapse of WTC7 nor adequately explain the Pentagon attack. The government's own "conspiracy theory" about 9/11 cannot possibly be true.

 
ax1 said:
So I have evidence including from NASA of extreme heat and molten steel by firefighters + more, yet our government denies it.

[/url]
Click to expand...

Because you haven't posted any evidence ... only observations from a few people. And no - the government doesn't say that no metal melted in the WTC's. They only claim that the structural load bearing metallic beams didn't melt. We DO know that the WTC's were constructed of just about every kind of metal imaginable - including, in some electrical components - GOLD. Lead is a metal - I can melt it with my lighter. So yeah - there was plenty of metal melting in the WTC - but none of it that was holding the building up.

That metal didn't melt - it lost it's structural integrity due to extreme heat and the building collapsed.

You guys ...
 
Id like to remind you about the secondary explosions inside the lobby and sub-basement at the world trade center?

Let these firefighters tell you then in this recently unclassified video that has been withheld by the government.



More of our heroes speaking out, more bombs in lobby



Carpenter from trade center witness of explosions in lobby speaking out on his hospital bed



Bomb in lobby, the lobby was totally gone...."bomb hit the lobby first"



Not enough to convince you of the sub-basement explosions? Want more witnesses?



9/11: WTC sub-level explosions Multiple accounts



9/11 Port Authority cop heard explosion before WTC collapse



9/11 Cop says numerous secondary explosions heard in WTC

 
HondaV65 said:
That metal didn't melt - it lost it's structural integrity due to extreme heat and the building collapsed.

You guys ...
Click to expand...

Oh really....you were there werent you? and these Firefighters didnt see jack

9/11: Molten Metal at Ground Zero

 
HondaV65 said:
That metal didn't melt - it lost it's structural integrity due to extreme heat and the building collapsed.

You guys ...
Click to expand...

The steel was molten like Lava

9/11: Molten Metal at Ground Zero

 
You want to keep stating there was no molten steel?

9/11: Molten Metal at Ground Zero

 
1 more time...you say there is no molten steel, but these firefighters may slightly disagree with you

9/11: Molten Metal at Ground Zero

 
State of Denial: The 9/11 Festival of War

Andrew McKillop
September 13, 2011

Ceremonies in the USA, Europe and in other regions and countries where 9/11 business is taken seriously have, with time, shifted focus. The annual show of gravitas and determination to fight and win the War on Terror, cranked up on back of the New York and Washington attacks of September 2001, has a new objective: deflecting, parrying and diluting a scary future.

FESTIVAL OF WAR

Trends forecasters will all tell you that future look bad and the economy looks even worse. But George W. Bush and Barack Obama still stand together, united to fight evil, with a show of force at Ground Zero. As anyone can guess, putting white ribbons in the hair of US schoolchildren is more newsworthy(and cheaper) than treating cancer victims from the tens of thousands of tons of asbestos, insecticides and dioxin that spewed out as the Twin Towers, and building WTC 7(untouched by any airplane) dramatically crashed to the ground in seconds.

Public solidarity and national pride are important at this dangerous time, hence, 9/11 festivities have been internationalized with an attempt is being made- like attempts in Europe and Japan, to import the US Halloween-style festival and to capitalize on its commercial spin-offs. For the 9/11 ‘festival of hope’, the goal is justifying the military invasions and occupations of both Afghanistan and Iraq. This new war festival however generates nothing in revenues and costs vast sums of public cash on an unwinnable war – an exact remake of the Soviet Union’s lost war in Afghanistan – proving that other people can be just as stupid as the Soviets.

Never mind the blowback of pure hatred against the west that the 9/11 farce generates right across the Muslim world and south Asia. What counts is the official, reassuring and idiot-friendly version of “what really happened” in New York and Washington in Sept 2001. This is now a mass market comfort theme, belted out by all mainstream media and is a precious link with a receding and different past.

FEAR OF THE FUTURE

In September 2011 the US political, corporate and media elites and their European fellow travellers- call them running dogs or yippy poodles, have saturated world media with all-day-long special reports on the Atrocity of the Century. Time is also shrewdly allocated for marginalizing skeptics, or “truthers”. Shame on you, if you don’t believe.

The real focus has changed however:

9/11 is now a strange mixture of alternate reality and new religion.

9/11 is now the official way to forget the present and future of debts, deficits, unemployment and economic crises – if only for an excruciatingly long weekend.

For the American economy – and most other developed economies, from the European Union to Japan – the real crisis is the amount of money paid to commercial bankers and insurers over the last four years. What happened to it? Will Greece collapse, taking Europe’s banks with it, like a collapsing Twin Tower as the fires of its sovereign debt light the higher floors of the Tower of Doom?

For American banks, filings to the US Securities and Exchange Commission show that the bailout sums handed to them by G W Bush and Barry Obama now stands, in September 2011, at an astounding $2 200 billion, or $2.2 trillion, racked up in a little more than 4 years. European commercial banks have received less well-defined, better hidden bailouts from public funds, but likely amounts to September 2011 are probably $ 1.75 trillion; Japan’s ruined banks have received more than $ 750 billion.

Still, all the banks will require more, a lot more. This is because, like the 9/11 fantasy, the show has to go on. The serial rout of banks and their related and dependent insurance companies, brokers and investment houses will continue. Extrapolating over the coming decade and only for the USA, the total amounts to be taken by the financial sector, led by the banks, will approach over $5 trillion.

Yet, no European, Japanese or American political decider, either in power or in opposition, so terribly and publicly concerned about 9/11 once a year, shows any sign of being willing to cut future debt-driven bailouts for private banks. This will inevitably produce further and deeper government deficits.

This stubborn refusal to face reality can be compared with the child-like official belief the Twin Towers and WTC 7 fell down almost instantly due to burning jet fuel and “all by themselves”. Ignoring reality and denying the future, the critical banking crisis is also another whipped-dog attempt to not admit failure and muddle through another day. Doing this, increasingly surely, the ultimate economic catastrophe becomes possible: the collapse of all world moneys, the complete implosion of the global economy. Real war would almost certainly follow – not playacting with bearded hermits in Afghan caves and drone attacks on Yemenite brigands, Pakistani goatherders and bandits – but even the playact War on Terror does not come cheap.

WAR AND DEBT

For the USA, the ultimate big spender on supposedly small surgical conflicts and humanitarian interventions “over the horizon”, the amounts spent are relatively well known: probable US war spending in the 10 years since 2001 totals between $ 2.2 and $ 2.8 trillion – much less than the banks have been able to siphon, in the last 3 years.

The ugly truth of this matter is that none of this cash can be invested in protecting US jobs, building roads, schools, factories, hospitals, offices, public transport or any other long-term projects. Public cash is showered on the financial, defense sectors, and overseas contracts creating a few high cost jobs but in general this money is directly transferred from spending in the real economy, to the shadow economy of bank executives, employees and shareholders, off-shore holding companies and our clean fingernailed Indiana Jones heroes killing villagers and rendering taxi drivers somewhere over the horizon.

While the bank executives come out as big winners, this is not at all the case for bank employees faced with recurring and massive redundancy programs, nor for bank shareholders, or the average grunt soldier. Real bank and finance sector share values in the USA, Europe and Japan are again in free fall, tumbling in unison, by 33 percent to more than 65 percent in the 5 weeks from August 1st, 2011 to the present.

More transfers – politely called “bank recapitalization” – will soon be needed. These transfers represent a cunning tax on everyone else, whether private citizen and consumers or economically active entities.

Most incredibly, these are rich rewards for those “players” who helped cause, and then intensify today’s financial and economic troubles that affect all countries of the developed world. This tiny percentage (well below 5 percent) of all persons and all economic entities in the affected countries is the only class that is not suffering from the crisis they have caused – and in many cases the perpetrators of the crime are massively benefiting from the aggravation of the global crisis.

Their operating mode and methods can seem puzzling in many respects. Combining some aspects of classic and crude Ponzi chain letter scams, with large and sophisticated compensation schemes for their partners (notably in the insurance sector), masking the risks of supposedly low-probability, high-impact “Black Swan” events with complex multi-stage financial instruments, these inveterate but losing gamblers have only one backstop.

At all times they count on implicit public guarantees. When things get worse, they ask for more.

The military and security services, whether the US Army or the new Afghan Army supposedly loyal to Hamid Karzai, whether the USA’s FBI and CIA or France’s DGSE and the UK’s MI5 and MI6 are all similar in the dependence on the public purse. When things get worse – they also ask for more. Using the financial analogy of leverage rather than skills, of pouring oil on fires already burning, then demanding public money to quench the fires and calm the rout, the defence and security establishment has only mimicked the blackmailing scam of failed financial gamblers.

RISK AND REWARD

As we know, the corporate kleptocracy which operates the world’s biggest banks and insurance companies has a simple strategy: privatize the profits and offload the losses to anybody else, meaning governments and taxpayers. Simply because of this, all central banks and monetary authorities have no choice at all but to keep interest rates at artificially low levels. Both publicly, and secretly they give loans at extreme low rates of interest to the banks, like obedient poodles.

The defense and security mafias, establishment or sector operates a strategy of self preservation and profiteering that is also simple. Without war, it cannot continue to grow, but war is no longer possible with new, potential, and very dangerous enemies such as China and India, and other large well-armed nations – able to hit back devastatingly hard. War must now be targeted at small countries with small armies – and of course no nuclear weapons. The search for enemies is also brought back home, inside the home countries of this evil doctrine, creating the police state at war with its own population.

Since 2001, the search for, and manufacture of new enemies has been crowned with success. The reward for the defence and security elites is immense: although well behind the grab made by the banking elites, the equivalent of around 2.5 trillion dollars has been spent by the US alone in a single decade on fantasist and unreal enemies, without ever facing any armed forces able to hit back with deadly force. What could be more courageous and progressive?

For the banking and financial mafia, like the defense and security establishment, the risk of massive or total loss was always hidden, always denied. But with another hollow celebration of the 9/11 farce, and another intensification of the European and US banking and debt crises, the potential for total loss on all fronts rises, yet again. For private bankers and insurers, brokers and exchange operators who systematically lied about the risks of their 24/7 gambling spree, and the defense and security mafia who promote the lie about 9/11 and the risk of “asymmetric” wars – we have moved so close to the precipice that denying this reality is harder and harder, each and every day.

As Barack Obama said on Sunday September 11, 2011: “God is our refuge”.

Andrew McKillop is guest writer and energy markets analyst with more than 30 years experience in the energy, economic and finance domains. He trained at London UK’s University College, and has extensive experience in energy policy, project administration, including the development and financing of alternate energy, including projects for OPEC and the EU.
 
CIA Threatens 9/11 Researchers After Discovery Of Cover Up Details

Revealing identities of analysts involved could end in federal prosecution
Steve Watson
Sept 13, 2011


The CIA has issued legal threats against two film producers who have discovered intimate details of a cover up regarding the intelligence agency and two of the purported 9/11 hijackers.
Ray Nowosielski and John Duffy, the producers of the popular 9/11 documentary ’9/11 Press for Truth’, were contacted by the CIA last week on September 8th regarding extensive research, interviews and findings that have led them to discover the identities of two key CIA analysts who were instrumental in the conspiracy.
The film’s producers initially only referred to the CIA analysts by their first names, but expressed their intention to later reveal their full identities in a forthcoming “investigative podcast”, which seemingly prompted the agency to step in.
“While producing our investigative podcast “Who Is Rich Blee?,” intended to be released on Sunday, our team managed to deduce the likely identities of two CIA employees at the heart of a notorious failure in the run up to the September 11th tragedy.” Invalid Link Removedon the producer’s website, which was offline for most of yesterday.
“On Thursday, we submitted our script to CIA along with a request to interview the two employees,” the statement continues. “We wanted to be fair in giving them a chance to tell their sides of the story. Instead, the Agency sent us a message threatening that if we went forward with the names included in the piece that it would be a potential violation of federal criminal law.”

Duffy and Nowosielski also interviewed former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke, who told them on the record that he has intelligence that three former top CIA officials – George Tenet, Cofer Black and Richard Blee – knowingly withheld key information on the alleged hijackers from the White House, the FBI, Immigration and the State and Defense Departments. Video Below VVV

Interview with former head of Counter-terrorism Security Group Richard Clarke
Who Is Rich Blee?



The information dovetails with findings from 2002, Invalid Link Removed, that the known terrorists were being closely tracked by the CIA as they moved inside and outside the US, and that the agency did not inform INS, which could have turned them away at the border, nor did they notify the FBI.
The two recently detailed some of their findings in an interview with former FBI translator turned whistleblower, Sibel Edmonds. Invalid Link Removed [1:08:53]
Duffy and Nowosielski are said to be working with legal advisors and considering their position.
“We have done nothing wrong.” Their website states. “The CIA have now put us in a position where we must choose between participating in their decade-long protection of these individuals at the expense of public safety or possibly facing prosecution. We are weighing our options and deciding what is right and best for all concerned. We will release our decision and some version of the investigative podcast in the coming days.”
 
9-11 Troofers are so silly.

They want you to believe that THOUSANDS of people, within our government, were involved in the coordinated destruction of both World Trade Center Towers, World Trade Center Building #7, the airline collision into the Pentagon - and the airline crash in Pennsylvania.

THOUSANDS OF CONSPIRATORS ... that's what it would have taken. From the President all the way down. NORAD Command and Control. The FAA. The US Air Force. The CIA and FBI. The FDNY and NYPD. Air Traffic Controllers. The Department of Transportation. Some "black ops" demolition crew ... who thought ... "Gee, let's also detonate a bomb in the basements of these buildings after we crash a plane into the top floors.

That is ONLY the people who would have to be involved to carry this out. But wait ... 9-11 Conspirators will tell you - that more Conspirators were required to "cover up" the Conspiracy. People like the Hearst Publishing Corporation (who own Popular Mechanics - a publication which "troofers" don't like because it debunked their claims completely and made them look like fools). The 9-11 Commission. Basically every single journalist in the main stream media - since I can't name a single conventional journalist working for CNN, FOX, NBC, ABC, CBS - who supports the "troofer" claims. In fact - across the spectrum - liberal and conservative journalists agree that the troofers are full of ****.

President Barack Obama - a man who's really no pawn of the military industrial complex - agrees that it was Al Quaida acting alone - there was no government conspiracy. When Glen Beck pointed out that Van Jones, a Presidential advisor, had signed a "troofer petition" ... Barack Obama FIRED Van Jones. So even Barack Obama - who blames George Bush for everything including bad weather - won't stomach a man in his administration who blames Bush for 9-11.

Let's also not forget Haliburton! They had to have been involved.

And lastly ... Every President of the United States for the last 21 years would have to be a conspirator in this.

LOL - THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE - and yet ...

Not one smoking gun. Not one shred of physical evidence. Not one person coming forward to say ... "Yeah, we did it - I was a part of it - and this is who told me to do it".

NOT ONE. Okay ... let me qualify that ... Because we do have video of Osama Bin Laden saying exactly that - that he did it, how he did, and how proud he was of it.

The Troofers are LIARS ... and pyscopathic ones to match. They'll tell you in one breath that they don't trust the government. Universally these people are Alex Jones supporters - a paranoid schizophrenic who sees a conspiracy behind every single action. If a cat crosses the road - he can connect that to a "one world government" somehow. Well, it's been a great business for Alex Jones - he's a rich man - and keeps getting richer thanks to his troofers.

So yeah - they tell you in one breath that they don't like the government - nor trust the government. Then they tell you ... "Hey, we just want an honest investigation."

Done by whom? The US government?

No - they want an "independent" investigation. Who then, in a Democracy - decides who does this "investigation" if not the government? What the Troofers want - is another controversy - even if you gave them another investigation - they would just label it a part of the "conspiracy". In fact - the only investigation they'll accept is one that is controlled by Alex Jones ... of course!

Next we have "Troofers" lying through their teeth by omitting key information and taking statements out of context. They'll show you a video of a Firefighter saying ... "I heard explosions - they sounded like BOMBS!!" ... and then they cut the video right there ... omitting the Fireman's next sentence ... "I think it was the Rivets popping and the building giving way!"

They do this on EVERY video. Every "statement". When "Sliverstein" mentioned "pulling" WTC-7 - they'll tell you that he was talking about WTC-7's controlled demolition - even though Silverstein is alive today and vehemently states that he was talking about "pulling" firemen out of the building after it was determined the building was about to collapse from structural failure - not bombs.

So, when Silverstein says this - what do the "troofers" do? They dismiss his clarification and tell you he's NOW a part of the Conspiracy! LOL
 
Keep studying your Army Field manual on how to stage false flag terrorist attacks. I know exactly what your doing here.

The document, which is official US Special Forces policy, directly advocates training paramilitaries, pervasive surveillance, censorship, press control, restrictions on labor unions & political parties, suspending habeas corpus, warrantless searches, detainment without charge, bribery, employing terrorists, false flag operations, concealing human rights abuses from journalists, and extensive use of "psychological operations" (propaganda) to make these and other "population & resource control" measures palatable.

[h=1]US Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Operations, FM 3-05.202, Feb 2007[/h]


Invalid Link Removed
 
Now back to the story with President Bush's Counter Terrorism chief

CIA Threatens 9/11 Researchers After Discovery Of Cover Up Details

Revealing identities of analysts involved could end in federal prosecution
Steve Watson
Sept 13, 2011


The CIA has issued legal threats against two film producers who have discovered intimate details of a cover up regarding the intelligence agency and two of the purported 9/11 hijackers.
Ray Nowosielski and John Duffy, the producers of the popular 9/11 documentary ’9/11 Press for Truth’, were contacted by the CIA last week on September 8th regarding extensive research, interviews and findings that have led them to discover the identities of two key CIA analysts who were instrumental in the conspiracy.
The film’s producers initially only referred to the CIA analysts by their first names, but expressed their intention to later reveal their full identities in a forthcoming “investigative podcast”, which seemingly prompted the agency to step in.
“While producing our investigative podcast “Who Is Rich Blee?,” intended to be released on Sunday, our team managed to deduce the likely identities of two CIA employees at the heart of a notorious failure in the run up to the September 11th tragedy.” Invalid Link Removedon the producer’s website, which was offline for most of yesterday.
“On Thursday, we submitted our script to CIA along with a request to interview the two employees,” the statement continues. “We wanted to be fair in giving them a chance to tell their sides of the story. Instead, the Agency sent us a message threatening that if we went forward with the names included in the piece that it would be a potential violation of federal criminal law.”

Duffy and Nowosielski also interviewed former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke, who told them on the record that he has intelligence that three former top CIA officials – George Tenet, Cofer Black and Richard Blee – knowingly withheld key information on the alleged hijackers from the White House, the FBI, Immigration and the State and Defense Departments. Video Below VVV

Interview with former head of Counter-terrorism Security Group Richard Clarke
Who Is Rich Blee?



The information dovetails with findings from 2002, Invalid Link Removed, that the known terrorists were being closely tracked by the CIA as they moved inside and outside the US, and that the agency did not inform INS, which could have turned them away at the border, nor did they notify the FBI.
The two recently detailed some of their findings in an interview with former FBI translator turned whistleblower, Sibel Edmonds. Invalid Link Removed [1:08:53]
Duffy and Nowosielski are said to be working with legal advisors and considering their position.
“We have done nothing wrong.” Their website states. “The CIA have now put us in a position where we must choose between participating in their decade-long protection of these individuals at the expense of public safety or possibly facing prosecution. We are weighing our options and deciding what is right and best for all concerned. We will release our decision and some version of the investigative podcast in the coming days.”
 
EXPLOSIONS ...

Yeah ... people heard explosions during the attacks. Troofers point to this as conclusive evidence of controlled demolition by super-secret sinister forces.

LOL.

Who knows what a bomb sounds like? Can you tell the difference between an explosion in a large electrical transformer from one caused by a bomb based on sound alone? No? Neither can I. In fact, many people at the WTC's that day will tell you that the "jumpers" hitting the ground that day sounded like "explosions". They certainly did - these bodies were hitting aluminum awnings - as well as vehicles ... at terminal velocity.

But - in a building that's just been hit by a 747 - explosions aren't some strange occurance.

But to troofers - they are evidence that there was controlled demolition - and that demolition took place in the basements of the towers.

First of all - watch the video ... You can see the towers come down from the top down ... each floor pancaking onto the floor below it - all the way down.

Bombs in basements cause buildings to collapse from the bottom up - completely different from what ALL of the video of the collapses (both of them) shows.

But the real evidence ... is in the survivors.

Yeah - Troofers like to talk to survivors and get their stories. However, UNIVERSALLY - every survivor they talk to was someone who got out of the building before they collapsed.

They don't like to talk about the 16 people in Stairwell B of the North Tower - who were in the tower WHEN IT COLLAPSED and had to be "dug out" of the rubble of the WTC.

These survivors were spread out in the stairwell from the 1st Floor to the 22nd. So most of them were CLOSER to the basement (where the troofers say the bombs exploded) than they were to the actual fires in the uppers floors. So troofers want you to believe - that the only people who survived the actual collapse are the people who were closest to the basement - which is where they say the bombs went off? Please - this doesn't compute.

But in reality - the troofers don't want you to know about those survivors - indeed, they don't even talk about those suvivors because those survivors also tell a UNIVERSAL STORY on how the towers collapsed. They all describe the building coming down from the top down ... not the bottom up. They all describe the sound of each upper floor collapsing onto the floor below it - each time making an extremely lound and explosive "thud" ... "thud, thud, thud, thud, thud" ... they will all tell you this.

Which is why the Alex Jones Troofers don't mention the survivors of the actual collapse.

But they DO like to quote scared firemen (with a bit of video editing). They do like to quote civilians who were there and escaped before the collapse - as if an office workder knows what a bomb sounds like.

That's their "authoritative" evidence. Out of context quotes from first responders, and "expert testimony" from office secretaries.

LOL
 
Keep studying your Army Field manual on how to stage false flag terrorist attacks. I know exactly what your doing here.

The document, which is official US Special Forces policy, directly advocates training paramilitaries, pervasive surveillance, censorship, press control, restrictions on labor unions & political parties, suspending habeas corpus, warrantless searches, detainment without charge, bribery, employing terrorists, false flag operations, concealing human rights abuses from journalists, and extensive use of "psychological operations" (propaganda) to make these and other "population & resource control" measures palatable.

US Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Operations, FM 3-05.202, Feb 2007

US Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Operations, FM 3-05.202, Feb 2007 - Wikileaks



Interview with former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke at the time of 9/11, who told says on the record that he has intelligence that three former top CIA officials – George Tenet, Cofer Black and Richard Blee – knowingly withheld key information on the alleged hijackers from the White House, the FBI, Immigration and the State and Defense Departments. Video Below VVV

Interview with former head of Counter-terrorism Security Group Richard Clarke
Who Is Rich Blee?


Id like to remind you about the secondary explosions inside the lobby and sub-basement at the world trade center?

Let these firefighters tell you then in this recently unclassified video that has been withheld by the government.



More of our heroes speaking out, more bombs in lobby



Carpenter from trade center witness of explosions in lobby speaking out on his hospital bed



Bomb in lobby, the lobby was totally gone...."bomb hit the lobby first"



Not enough to convince you of the sub-basement explosions? Want more witnesses?



9/11: WTC sub-level explosions Multiple accounts



9/11 Port Authority cop heard explosion before WTC collapse



9/11 Cop says numerous secondary explosions heard in WTC

 
DEBUNKED - CONTROLLED DEMOLITON NOT POSSIBLE ...

[video=youtube;tacYjsS-g6k]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tacYjsS-g6k[/video]
 
HondaV65 said:


Which is why the Alex Jones Troofers don't mention the survivors of the actual collapse.
Click to expand...

Survivors of the actual collapse, and your not one of them

Id like to remind you about the secondary explosions inside the lobby and sub-basement at the world trade center?

Let these firefighters tell you then in this recently unclassified video that has been withheld by the government.



More of our heroes speaking out, more bombs in lobby



Carpenter from trade center witness of explosions in lobby speaking out on his hospital bed



Bomb in lobby, the lobby was totally gone...."bomb hit the lobby first"



Not enough to convince you of the sub-basement explosions? Want more witnesses?



9/11: WTC sub-level explosions Multiple accounts



9/11 Port Authority cop heard explosion before WTC collapse



9/11 Cop says numerous secondary explosions heard in WTC

 
DEBUNKED - HOW THE WTC'S COLLAPSED ...

[video=youtube;bMZ-nkYr46w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bMZ-nkYr46w[/video]
 
Keep studying your Army Field manual on how to stage false flag terrorist attacks. I know exactly what your doing here.

The document, which is official US Special Forces policy, directly advocates training paramilitaries, pervasive surveillance, censorship, press control, restrictions on labor unions & political parties, suspending habeas corpus, warrantless searches, detainment without charge, bribery, employing terrorists, false flag operations, concealing human rights abuses from journalists, and extensive use of "psychological operations" (propaganda) to make these and other "population & resource control" measures palatable.

[/I][h=1]US Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Operations, FM 3-05.202, Feb 2007[/h]


Invalid Link Removed
 
DEBUNKED - EYEWITNESSES TO THE PENTAGON ATTACK.

[video=youtube;t1wQ2BJsgx0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1wQ2BJsgx0[/video]
 
[/I][h=1]US Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Operations, FM 3-05.202, Feb 2007[/h]


Invalid Link Removed
 
DEBUNKED - NO FREEFALL SPEED ...

[video=youtube;qLShZOvxVe4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLShZOvxVe4[/video]
 
Keep studying your Army Field manual on how to stage false flag terrorist attacks. I know exactly what your doing here.

The document, which is official US Special Forces policy, directly advocates training paramilitaries, pervasive surveillance, censorship, press control, restrictions on labor unions & political parties, suspending habeas corpus, warrantless searches, detainment without charge, bribery, employing terrorists, false flag operations, concealing human rights abuses from journalists, and extensive use of "psychological operations" (propaganda) to make these and other "population & resource control" measures palatable.

[/I]US Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Operations, FM 3-05.202, Feb 2007




Invalid Link Removed
 
Interview with former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke at the time of 9/11, who told says on the record that he has intelligence that three former top CIA officials – George Tenet, Cofer Black and Richard Blee – knowingly withheld key information on the alleged hijackers from the White House, the FBI, Immigration and the State and Defense Departments. Video Below VVV

Interview with former head of Counter-terrorism Security Group Richard Clarke
Who Is Rich Blee?
 
Its to late, I know your game, and I know why your here.

DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies and their contractors only to protect
technical or operational information from automatic dissemination under the International Exchange Program or by other
means. This determination was made on 15 December 2006. Other requests for this document must be referred to
Commander, United States Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School, ATTN: AOJK-DTD-SF, Fort Bragg,
NC 28310-5000.
DESTRUCTION NOTICE: Destroy by any method that will prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the
document.

Keep studying your Army Field manual on how to stage false flag terrorist attacks. I know exactly what your doing here.

Keep studying your Army Field manual on how to stage false flag terrorist attacks. I know exactly what your doing here.

The document, which is official US Special Forces policy, directly advocates training paramilitaries, pervasive surveillance, censorship, press control, restrictions on labor unions & political parties, suspending habeas corpus, warrantless searches, detainment without charge, bribery, employing terrorists, false flag operations, concealing human rights abuses from journalists, and extensive use of "psychological operations" (propaganda) to make these and other "population & resource control" measures palatable.

US Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Operations, FM 3-05.202, Feb 2007




Invalid Link Removed
 
DEBUNKED: THERMITE CHEMICAL SIGNATURES ...

[video=youtube;OWpC_1WP8do]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OWpC_1WP8do[/video]
 
Flashback: U.S. Counterinsurgency Manual Leaked, Calls for False Flag Operations, Suspension of Human Rights

JJulian Assange
Invalid Link Removed
Monday June 15, 2008
Editor’s note: Most of the tactics described below are now being implemented and used in the United States against the American people.
Wikileaks has released a sensitive Invalid Link Removed. The manual, Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures for Special Forces (1994, 2004), may be critically described as “what we learned about running death squads and propping up corrupt government in Latin America and how to apply it to other places”. Its contents are both history defining for Latin America and, given the continued role of US Special Forces in the suppression of insurgencies, including in Iraq and Afghanistan, history making.
[TABLE="align: right"]
[TR]
[TD]Invalid Link Removed[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 16"][/TD]
[TD="width: 400"]Invalid Link Removed[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="width: 16"] [/TD]
[TD="class: photo-caption, width: 400, align: left"]Counterinsurgency tactics now used in Afghanistan and Iraq were first field tested in Vietnam and Latin America. [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
The leaked manual, which has been verified with military sources, is the official US Special Forces doctrine for Foreign Internal Defense or FID.
FID operations are designed to prop up a “friendly” government facing a popular revolution or guerilla insurgency. FID interventions are often covert or quasi-covert due to the unpopular nature of the governments being supported (”In formulating a realistic policy for the use of advisors, the commander must carefully gauge the psychological climate of the HN [Host Nation] and the United States.”)
The manual directly advocates training paramilitaries, pervasive surveillance, censorship, press control and restrictions on labor unions & political parties. It directly advocates warrantless searches, detainment without charge and (under varying circumstances) the suspension of habeas corpus. It directly advocates employing terrorists or prosecuting individuals for terrorism who are not terrorists, running false flag operations and concealing human rights abuses from journalists. And it repeatedly advocates the use of subterfuge and “psychological operations” (propaganda) to make these and other “population & resource control” measures more palatable.
The content has been particularly informed by the long United States involvement in El Salvador.
In 2005 a number of credible media reports suggested the Pentagon was intensely debating “the Salvador option” for Iraq.Invalid Link Removed. According to the New York Times Magazine:
The template for Iraq today is not Vietnam, with which it has often been compared, but El Salvador, where a right-wing government backed by the United States fought a leftist insurgency in a 12-year war beginning in 1980. The cost was high — more than 70,000 people were killed, most of them civilians, in a country with a population of just six million. Most of the killing and torturing was done by the army and the right-wing death squads affiliated with it. According to an Amnesty International report in 2001, violations committed by the army and associated groups included ‘‘extrajudicial executions, other unlawful killings, ‘disappearances’ and torture. . . . Whole villages were targeted by the armed forces and their inhabitants massacred.’’ As part of President Reagan’s policy of supporting anti-Communist forces, hundreds of millions of dollars in United States aid was funneled to the Salvadoran Army, and a team of 55 Special Forces advisers, led for several years by Jim Steele, trained front-line battalions that were accused of significant human rights abuses.
​
From the Invalid Link Removed site:
DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Distribution authorized to U.S. Government agencies and their contractors only to protect technical or operational information from automatic dissemination under the International Exchange Program or by other means. This determination was made on 5 December 2003. Other requests for this document must be referred to Commander, United States Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School, ATTN: AOJK-DTD-SFD, Fort Bragg, North Carolina 28310-5000.
Destruction Notice: Destroy by any method that must prevent disclosure of contents or reconstruction of the document.


The document, which is official US Special Forces policy, directly advocates training paramilitaries, pervasive surveillance, censorship, press control, restrictions on labor unions & political parties, suspending habeas corpus, warrantless searches, detainment without charge, bribery, employing terrorists, false flag operations, concealing human rights abuses from journalists, and extensive use of "psychological operations" (propaganda) to make these and other "population & resource control" measures palatable.

US Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Operations, FM 3-05.202, Feb 2007


Invalid Link Removed
 
DEBUNKED - MOLTEN METAL EXPLAINED ...

[video=youtube;DhHzMttUKO0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhHzMttUKO0[/video]
 
Keep studying your playbook, I know your game plan

PSYOP [Psychological Operations] are essential to the success of PRC [Population & Resources Control]. For maximum effectiveness, a strong psychological operations effort is directed toward the families of the insurgents and their popular support base. The PSYOP aspect of the PRC program tries to make the imposition of control more palatable to the people by relating the necessity of controls to their safety and well-being. PSYOP efforts also try to create a favorable national or local government image and counter the effects of the insurgent propaganda effort.
Control Measures
SF [US Special Forces] can advise and assist HN [Host Nation] forces in developing and implementing control measures. Among these measures are the following:

  • Security Forces. Police and other security forces use PRC [Population & Resources Control] measures to deprive the insurgent of support and to identify and locate members of his infrastructure. Appropriate PSYOP [Psychological Operations] help make these measures more acceptable to the population by explaining their need. The government informs the population that the PRC measures may cause an inconvenience but are necessary due to the actions of the insurgents.
  • Restrictions. Rights on the legality of detention or imprisonment of personnel (for example, habeas corpus) may be temporarily suspended. This measure must be taken as a last resort, since it may provide the insurgents with an effective propaganda theme. PRC [Population & Resources Control] measures can also include curfews or blackouts, travel restrictions, and restricted residential areas such as protected villages or resettlement areas. Registration and pass systems and control of sensitive items (resources control) and critical supplies such as weapons, food, and fuel are other PRC measures. Checkpoints, searches, roadblocks; surveillance, censorship, and press control; and restriction of activity that applies to selected groups (labor unions, political groups and the like) are further PRC measures.
[...]
Legal Considerations. All restrictions, controls, and DA measures must be governed by the legality of these methods and their impact on the populace. In countries where government authorities do not have wide latitude in controlling the population, special or emergency legislation must be enacted. This emergency legislation may include a form of martial law permitting government forces to search without warrant, to detain without bringing formal charges, and to execute other similar actions.
[...]
Psychological Operations
PSYOP can support the mission by discrediting the insurgent forces to neutral groups, creating dissension among the insurgents themselves, and supporting defector programs. Divisive programs create dissension, disorganization, low morale, subversion, and defection within the insurgent forces. Also important are national programs to win insurgents over to the government side with offers of amnesty and rewards. Motives for surrendering can range from personal rivalries and bitterness to disillusionment and discouragement. Pressure from the security forces has persuasive power.
[...]
Intelligence personnel must consider the parameters within which a revolutionary movement operates. Frequently, they establish a centralized intelligence processing center to collect and coordinate the amount of information required to make long-range intelligence estimates. Long-range intelligence focuses on the stable factors existing in an insurgency. For example, various demographic factors (ethnic, racial, social, economic, religious, and political characteristics of the area in which the underground movement takes places) are useful in identifying the members of the underground. Information about the underground organization at national, district, and local level is basic in FID [Foreign Internal Defense] and/or IDAD operations. Collection of specific short-range intelligence about the rapidly changing variables of a local situation is critical. Intelligence personnel must gather information on members of the underground, their movements, and their methods. Biographies and photos of suspected underground members, detailed information on their homes, families, education, work history, and associates are important features of short-range intelligence.
Destroying its tactical units is not enough to defeat the enemy. The insurgent’s underground cells or infrastructure must be neutralized first because the infrastructure is his main source of tactical intelligence and political control. Eliminating the infrastructure within an area achieves two goals: it ensures the government’s control of the area, and it cuts off the enemy’s main source of intelligence. An intelligence and operations command center (IOCC) is needed at district or province level. This organization becomes the nerve center for operations against the insurgent infrastructure. Information on insurgent infrastructure targets should come from such sources as the national police and other established intelligence nets and agents and individuals (informants).
The highly specialized and sensitive nature of clandestine intelligence collection demands specially selected and highly trained agents. Information from clandestine sources is often highly sensitive and requires tight control to protect the source. However, tactical information upon which a combat response can be taken should be passed to the appropriate tactical level.
The spotting, assessment, and recruitment of an agent is not a haphazard process regardless of the type agent being sought. During the assessment phase, the case officer determines the individual’s degree of intelligence, access to target, available or necessary cover, and motivation. He initiates the recruitment and coding action only after he determines the individual has the necessary attributes to fulfill the needs.
All agents are closely observed and those that are not reliable are relieved. A few well-targeted, reliable agents are better and more economical than a large number of poor ones.
 
TROOFER CLAIMS DEBUNKED IN UNDER ONE MINUTE!

[video=youtube;Jb-OFhxvEo8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jb-OFhxvEo8[/video]
 
TROOFER LIES EXPOSED ... COLUMNS WERE CUT - NOT BY THERMITE!

[video=youtube;ySHgiUxnLC0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySHgiUxnLC0[/video]
 
PSYOP [Psychological Operations] are essential to the success of PRC [Population & Resources Control]. For maximum effectiveness, a strong psychological operations effort is directed toward the families of the insurgents and their popular support base. The PSYOP aspect of the PRC program tries to make the imposition of control more palatable to the people by relating the necessity of controls to their safety and well-being. PSYOP efforts also try to create a favorable national or local government image and counter the effects of the insurgent propaganda effort.
Control Measures
SF [US Special Forces] can advise and assist HN [Host Nation] forces in developing and implementing control measures. Among these measures are the following:

  • Security Forces. Police and other security forces use PRC [Population & Resources Control] measures to deprive the insurgent of support and to identify and locate members of his infrastructure. Appropriate PSYOP [Psychological Operations] help make these measures more acceptable to the population by explaining their need. The government informs the population that the PRC measures may cause an inconvenience but are necessary due to the actions of the insurgents.
  • Restrictions. Rights on the legality of detention or imprisonment of personnel (for example, habeas corpus) may be temporarily suspended. This measure must be taken as a last resort, since it may provide the insurgents with an effective propaganda theme. PRC [Population & Resources Control] measures can also include curfews or blackouts, travel restrictions, and restricted residential areas such as protected villages or resettlement areas. Registration and pass systems and control of sensitive items (resources control) and critical supplies such as weapons, food, and fuel are other PRC measures. Checkpoints, searches, roadblocks; surveillance, censorship, and press control; and restriction of activity that applies to selected groups (labor unions, political groups and the like) are further PRC measures.
[...]
Legal Considerations. All restrictions, controls, and DA measures must be governed by the legality of these methods and their impact on the populace. In countries where government authorities do not have wide latitude in controlling the population, special or emergency legislation must be enacted. This emergency legislation may include a form of martial law permitting government forces to search without warrant, to detain without bringing formal charges, and to execute other similar actions.
[...]
Psychological Operations
PSYOP can support the mission by discrediting the insurgent forces to neutral groups, creating dissension among the insurgents themselves, and supporting defector programs. Divisive programs create dissension, disorganization, low morale, subversion, and defection within the insurgent forces. Also important are national programs to win insurgents over to the government side with offers of amnesty and rewards. Motives for surrendering can range from personal rivalries and bitterness to disillusionment and discouragement. Pressure from the security forces has persuasive power.
[...]
Intelligence personnel must consider the parameters within which a revolutionary movement operates. Frequently, they establish a centralized intelligence processing center to collect and coordinate the amount of information required to make long-range intelligence estimates. Long-range intelligence focuses on the stable factors existing in an insurgency. For example, various demographic factors (ethnic, racial, social, economic, religious, and political characteristics of the area in which the underground movement takes places) are useful in identifying the members of the underground. Information about the underground organization at national, district, and local level is basic in FID [Foreign Internal Defense] and/or IDAD operations. Collection of specific short-range intelligence about the rapidly changing variables of a local situation is critical. Intelligence personnel must gather information on members of the underground, their movements, and their methods. Biographies and photos of suspected underground members, detailed information on their homes, families, education, work history, and associates are important features of short-range intelligence.
Destroying its tactical units is not enough to defeat the enemy. The insurgent’s underground cells or infrastructure must be neutralized first because the infrastructure is his main source of tactical intelligence and political control. Eliminating the infrastructure within an area achieves two goals: it ensures the government’s control of the area, and it cuts off the enemy’s main source of intelligence. An intelligence and operations command center (IOCC) is needed at district or province level. This organization becomes the nerve center for operations against the insurgent infrastructure. Information on insurgent infrastructure targets should come from such sources as the national police and other established intelligence nets and agents and individuals (informants).
The highly specialized and sensitive nature of clandestine intelligence collection demands specially selected and highly trained agents. Information from clandestine sources is often highly sensitive and requires tight control to protect the source. However, tactical information upon which a combat response can be taken should be passed to the appropriate tactical level.
The spotting, assessment, and recruitment of an agent is not a haphazard process regardless of the type agent being sought. During the assessment phase, the case officer determines the individual’s degree of intelligence, access to target, available or necessary cover, and motivation. He initiates the recruitment and coding action only after he determines the individual has the necessary attributes to fulfill the needs.
All agents are closely observed and those that are not reliable are relieved. A few well-targeted, reliable agents are better and more economical than a large number of poor ones.
 
Lol unreal. Cant believe this is still going on
 
WTC 7 CHANDLER THEORIES DEBUNKED!

[video=youtube;1rhY9c_iemA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rhY9c_iemA[/video]
 
Interview with former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke at the time of 9/11, who told says on the record that he has intelligence that three former top CIA officials – George Tenet, Cofer Black and Richard Blee – knowingly withheld key information on the alleged hijackers from the White House, the FBI, Immigration and the State and Defense Departments. Video Below VVV

Interview with former head of Counter-terrorism Security Group Richard Clarke
Who Is Rich Blee?
 
"I WAS A DELUDED TROOFER ... HILARIOUS"

[video=youtube;UULUQfEQFuU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UULUQfEQFuU[/video]
 
fightbackhxc said:
Lol unreal. Cant believe this is still going on
Click to expand...

He is mad because I exposed him as a Psych-Ops operative. No human can be so extreme, he gets paid to do this.

Psychological Operations
PSYOP can support the mission by discrediting the insurgent forces to neutral groups, creating dissension among the insurgents themselves, and supporting defector programs. Divisive programs create dissension, disorganization, low morale, subversion, and defection within the insurgent forces. Also important are national programs to win insurgents over to the government side with offers of amnesty and rewards. Motives for surrendering can range from personal rivalries and bitterness to disillusionment and discouragement. Pressure from the security forces has persuasive power.
[...]
Intelligence personnel must consider the parameters within which a revolutionary movement operates. Frequently, they establish a centralized intelligence processing center to collect and coordinate the amount of information required to make long-range intelligence estimates. Long-range intelligence focuses on the stable factors existing in an insurgency. For example, various demographic factors (ethnic, racial, social, economic, religious, and political characteristics of the area in which the underground movement takes places) are useful in identifying the members of the underground. Information about the underground organization at national, district, and local level is basic in FID [Foreign Internal Defense] and/or IDAD operations. Collection of specific short-range intelligence about the rapidly changing variables of a local situation is critical. Intelligence personnel must gather information on members of the underground, their movements, and their methods. Biographies and photos of suspected underground members, detailed information on their homes, families, education, work history, and associates are important features of short-range intelligence.
Destroying its tactical units is not enough to defeat the enemy. The insurgent’s underground cells or infrastructure must be neutralized first because the infrastructure is his main source of tactical intelligence and political control. Eliminating the infrastructure within an area achieves two goals: it ensures the government’s control of the area, and it cuts off the enemy’s main source of intelligence. An intelligence and operations command center (IOCC) is needed at district or province level. This organization becomes the nerve center for operations against the insurgent infrastructure. Information on insurgent infrastructure targets should come from such sources as the national police and other established intelligence nets and agents and individuals (informants).
The highly specialized and sensitive nature of clandestine intelligence collection demands specially selected and highly trained agents. Information from clandestine sources is often highly sensitive and requires tight control to protect the source. However, tactical information upon which a combat response can be taken should be passed to the appropriate tactical level.
The spotting, assessment, and recruitment of an agent is not a haphazard process regardless of the type agent being sought. During the assessment phase, the case officer determines the individual’s degree of intelligence, access to target, available or necessary cover, and motivation. He initiates the recruitment and coding action only after he determines the individual has the necessary attributes to fulfill the needs.
All agents are closely observed and those that are not reliable are relieved. A few well-targeted, reliable agents are better and more economical than a large number of poor ones.
 
DEBUNKED - FIRST TIME IN HISTORY CLAIM ...


[video=youtube;_MRSr1MnFuk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MRSr1MnFuk[/video]
 
Interview with former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke at the time of 9/11, who told says on the record that he has intelligence that three former top CIA officials – George Tenet, Cofer Black and Richard Blee – knowingly withheld key information on the alleged hijackers from the White House, the FBI, Immigration and the State and Defense Departments. Video Below VVV

Interview with former head of Counter-terrorism Security Group Richard Clarke
Who Is Rich Blee?


Keep studying your Army Field manual on how to stage false flag terrorist attacks. I know exactly what your doing here.

The document, which is official US Special Forces policy, directly advocates training paramilitaries, pervasive surveillance, censorship, press control, restrictions on labor unions & political parties, suspending habeas corpus, warrantless searches, detainment without charge, bribery, employing terrorists, false flag operations, concealing human rights abuses from journalists, and extensive use of "psychological operations" (propaganda) to make these and other "population & resource control" measures palatable.

US Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Operations, FM 3-05.202, Feb 2007


Invalid Link Removed
 
9-11 TROOFERS - A GOOD LOOK AT THE LIARS ...

[video=youtube;Zs5jWvu4tR8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zs5jWvu4tR8[/video]
 
ax1 said:
He is mad because I exposed him as a Psych-Ops operative. No human can be so extreme, he gets paid to do this.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't go that far haha, he is just trollin
 
Interview with former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke at the time of 9/11, who told says on the record that he has intelligence that three former top CIA officials – George Tenet, Cofer Black and Richard Blee – knowingly withheld key information on the alleged hijackers from the White House, the FBI, Immigration and the State and Defense Departments. Video Below VVV

Interview with former head of Counter-terrorism Security Group Richard Clarke
Who Is Rich Blee?


Keep studying your Army Field manual on how to stage false flag terrorist attacks. I know exactly what your doing here.

The document, which is official US Special Forces policy, directly advocates training paramilitaries, pervasive surveillance, censorship, press control, restrictions on labor unions & political parties, suspending habeas corpus, warrantless searches, detainment without charge, bribery, employing terrorists, false flag operations, concealing human rights abuses from journalists, and extensive use of "psychological operations" (propaganda) to make these and other "population & resource control" measures palatable.

US Special Forces Foreign Internal Defense Operations, FM 3-05.202, Feb 2007


Invalid Link Removed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top