Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Tips on a test base.

FF1313

New member
Starting a new cycle soon. Will be running LGD with MK-6711. Will also have OL amiracare pro and eliminate for on cycle protection. With LGD being suppressive, I was wondering if I should include a test base. Any recommendations on a certain type of any at all.

LGD:
4/4/8/8/8/8/12/12

MK-6711
10/10/10/10/20/20/20/20

Amiracare pro and eliminate I will follow usage on label.
 
Epiandro, dermacrine
It's MK-677 btw.
 
Do you have a PCT set up?
 
Do you have a PCT set up?

I hope so :)

Andro the giant, Dermacrine, or androvar would all be sufficient options for a base. If I had to choose one it would be giant.
 
Admin please move to Anabolics :biggthumpup:


Newbies can't figure out what section to post in... :pat:
 
Admin please move to Anabolics :biggthumpup:


Newbies can't figure out what section to post in... :pat:

On mobile and totally missed it as well lol
 
vujade is the Section Police lol
 
The only true test base out there is 4-ANDRO. It converts to testosterone in a 2 step method.

Here are some numbers which show its conversion potential:


When 4-ANDRO first converts, it leaves us with Androstenediol and Androstenedione, which exert hormonal and anabolic benefits of their own. From their however, they convert to testosterone at a rate of approximately 6-10%.
For end users, this means they can expect the following amount of PURE testosterone in their system when using 4-ANDRO:

Reccomended Serving(3-6 tablets/day)
3 tablets/day = 225mg dosage
90% bioavailability x225mg = 202.5mg Androstenediol + Androstenedione in blood stream
202.5mg x 6-10% (conversion rate to testosterone) = 12.15mg-20.2mg active testosterone in the blood

6 tablets/day = 450mg dosage
90% bioavailability x 450mg = 405mg Androstenediol + Androstenedione in blood stream
405mg x 6-10%(conversion rate to testosterone) = 24.3mg-40.5mg active testosterone in the blood

When compared to Testosterone Enthanate which is 70% Testosterone(30% of weight is accounted for by the Enthanate ester) on a weekly basis, the comparison is as such:
Testosterone Enthanate @ 245mg(171.5mg active)/week(Study 1) = 24.5mg active testosterone per day
4-ANDRO @225mg/day = 12.15mg-20.2mg active testosterone per day
4-ANDRO @ 450mg/day =24.3-40.5mg active testosterone per day
 
vujade is the Section Police lol

It just seem like new people can never figure out that PH/DS/AAS/SARMS are not supplements
and always seems to post these kinds of threads in the Supplement Section.

Admin usually moves these threads to the right section even if no one brings it to his attention.

Case in point, this thread is now in Anabolics :)
 
It just seem like new people can never figure out that PH/DS/AAS/SARMS are not supplements
and always seems to post these kinds of threads in the Supplement Section.

Admin usually moves these threads to the right section even if no one brings it to his attention.

Case in point, this thread is now in Anabolics :)

I like having the separation as well. Definitely helps keep the discussion more on point here
 
It just seem like new people can never figure out that PH/DS/AAS/SARMS are not supplements
and always seems to post these kinds of threads in the Supplement Section.

Admin usually moves these threads to the right section even if no one brings it to his attention.

Case in point, this thread is now in Anabolics :)

I'm guessing maybe because the Anabolics section is hidden in the "Anti-aging" forum?
I know it took me a minute to find it
 
I'm guessing maybe because the Anabolics section is hidden in the "Anti-aging" forum?
I know it took me a minute to find it

dont stress it. every forum has different rules/ways to act, and who out there honestly reads every line of directions on every website they go to? 0.0001%? LOL


You're in the right spot now, so you're good to go!
 
Epiandro is a great compound, but it doesn't convert to testosterone, and cannot be a test base by any definition
 
It just seem like new people can never figure out that PH/DS/AAS/SARMS are not supplements
and always seems to post these kinds of threads in the Supplement Section.

Admin usually moves these threads to the right section even if no one brings it to his attention.

Case in point, this thread is now in Anabolics :)

I wasn't saying it's a bad thing lol, just that you're always the one I see pointing it out
 
Epiandro is a great compound, but it doesn't convert to testosterone, and cannot be a test base by any definition

True, but it definitely helps offset lethargy which is the big reason most people add a "test base."
 
True, but it definitely helps offset lethargy which is the big reason most people add a "test base."

true, it can help ameliorate negative aspect of a cycle, but when you can use 4-ANDRO in it's place, I don't see the reasoning if the only goal is a "test base".

The compound is a very effective one, but doesn't meet the "test base" qualification IMO
 
help ameliorate negative aspect of a cycle

This is how we use the term "test base" it has nothing to do with whether a compounds target hormone is testosterone or not.
 
This is how we use the term "test base" it has nothing to do with whether a compounds target hormone is testosterone or not.

you may use that term, but it doesn't make it correct.

Test base = exactly that. Basing you cycle on testosterone. DHT =/= testosterone.


That's like me saying "my friends and I call fiats mercedes, so they're the same thing". No. Test = testosterone, and there is no test base besides testosterone.
 
you may use that term, but it doesn't make it correct.

Test base = exactly that. Basing you cycle on testosterone. DHT =/= testosterone.


That's like me saying "my friends and I call fiats mercedes, so they're the same thing". No. Test = testosterone, and there is no test base besides testosterone.

I'm not saying it's right but that's how almost all the members of this forum use the term test base. Just giving you a heads up since we are buddies ;)
 
I didn't take your post offensively, I just dislike seeing terms being improperly used, even if it is by the masses. If people want to say epiandro is good for eliminating lethargy while on PH's, I'll all for it. By call a spade a spade.
 
true, it can help ameliorate negative aspect of a cycle, but when you can use 4-ANDRO in it's place, I don't see the reasoning if the only goal is a "test base".

The compound is a very effective one, but doesn't meet the "test base" qualification IMO

I agree that the way people use the term is incorrect. I just like Epiandro for its ability to negate the side effects of a cycle. Lethargy, libido, etc.
Not to mention the huge strength increases, decreased water retention, and other effects it gives. It's well on its way to being one of my favorite compounds. I'm logging IML's version of it right now. I've broken several PRs in the past week, and today is the end of week 2.
Never tried any other andro though so I can't speak to their benefits.
 
when you're ready to compare, let me know. Epiandro 50 with cyclosome technology is whats up...id be happy to get you a cycle if you would keep a log :)
 
when you're ready to compare, let me know. Epiandro 50 with cyclosome technology is whats up...id be happy to get you a cycle if you would keep a log :)

Yeah I'm at 200mg/day of IML Epiandro, which I believe has some kind of ester? It's got bermagottin and piperine in it as well. I would be interested in trying the Epiandro with cyclosome to compare! I have Alpha Gainz's Alpha Stano in line but I can always put that off.
 
you may use that term, but it doesn't make it correct.

Test base = exactly that. Basing you cycle on testosterone. DHT =/= testosterone.


That's like me saying "my friends and I call fiats mercedes, so they're the same thing". No. Test = testosterone, and there is no test base besides testosterone.

Actually, it does make it correct. Quotations around a singular word or small phrase (such as 'Test' base or "Test base") are often used to allow an author to use a word or phrase out of context or with an implied meaning that may be different than the actual or literal meaning.

Invalid Link Removed

Test base = Testosterone (or could loosely mean something that converts to Test)
"Test" base = any compound that can alleviate the symptoms of low Testosterone while not actually being or readily converting to Test.


OP - I ran LGD and I found it to be dry and it made my joints click a bit. I would suggest a base that can aromatize a bit. Dermacrine or 4-DHEA would be your best bets. I would personally choose Dermacrine.
 
^made me lol
 
Actually, it does make it correct. Quotations around a singular word or small phrase (such as 'Test' base or "Test base") are often used to allow an author to use a word or phrase out of context or with an implied meaning that may be different than the actual or literal meaning.

Invalid Link Removed

Test base = Testosterone (or could loosely mean something that converts to Test)
"Test" base = any compound that can alleviate the symptoms of low Testosterone while not actually being or readily converting to Test.


OP - I ran LGD and I found it to be dry and it made my joints click a bit. I would suggest a base that can aromatize a bit. Dermacrine or 4-DHEA would be your best bets. I would personally choose Dermacrine.

Dermacrine is my go to base on sarm cycles as well, mild but still very effective.
 
considering a "base" is regarded as an injectable(ie test is best, so use some test with every cycle!) there can be no other base. I don't care how many quotes or other forms of punctuation you use to describe it. the fact we're arguing about this is ridiculous.

you base any cycle around testosterone.


you don't say "i'm running deca with a dbol base". makes no sense.
 
I'm running MK 677 with a test trest Epiandro base
 
dude you cant one up me here. I'm currently running protein on a dihydrogen monoxide base

Srs? That's intense bro. Most I've ever done is proteins with an amino acid base. Amplified with CHOs.
 
when you're ready to compare, let me know. Epiandro 50 with cyclosome technology is whats up...id be happy to get you a cycle if you would keep a log :)

Is the cyclosome technology only used by hi tech owned brands or others as well? Haven't really researched it.
 
Is the cyclosome technology only used by hi tech owned brands or others as well? Haven't really researched it.

It is a patented delivery system, so only only companies which license its use from HiTech are capable of having it. The technology itself is impossible to duplicate without the proper machinery(HiTech got theirs by buying an entire pharmaceutical company for them!) so unless we license it to them, and thereby manufacture the product for them, it aint Cyclosome

edit: I made a lengthy post discussing the differences of current delivery systems a few weeks back. if you'd like a link or me to repost, I'd be more than happy to help out
 
Is the cyclosome technology only used by hi tech owned brands or others as well? Haven't really researched it.
Its very similar to lyposomes that were used by primordial back in the day. Cyclodextrins are carb based where lyposomes are fat based but they do the same thing. Hopefully this gives you something to compare to.
 
Its very similar to lyposomes that were used by primordial back in the day. Cyclodextrins are carb based where lyposomes are fat based but they do the same thing. Hopefully this gives you something to compare to.

this is not correct.

Cyclosome is much more than just cyclodextrins or liposomes, but a perfect blend between the two. have you done any research on the technology itself, or even read my write ups on it?

Olympus is getting a pretty nice SEDDS delivery system from HiTech
 
here is my original post for more info:


I have been talking a lot about delivery systems as of late, so I wanted to try and help explain what I've been talking about. The info below is something I put together this week to help explain the differences between what will undoubtedly become the two most popular ones out there. I want to make this thread as much about discussion of delivery systems as possible, and NOT discuss specific companies/manufacturers so we can have a legit discussion, and talk about the positives and negatives of delivery systems as a whole.

This discussion will be centered specifically around the 1-DHEA style products currently available, however I'd love to discuss any and all compounds being utilized.











Why use a delivery system?

Delivery system technologies are used primarily for two distinct purposes:

1. Blood hormone levels – The key to hormones is to getting them into your bloodstream where they can interact with androgen receptors. The higher you can get your blood hormone levels, the better results you can theoretically get while on cycle. To put this into perspective, imagine you are consuming a hormone at the rate of 100mg/day. If you can get 25% of this hormone into your blood stream, you will have 25mg of the compound able to produce its anabolic and muscle growing benefits for you. The remaining 75% will offer you no added benefit. This means that by increasing the rate at which the hormone can enter your blood stream, the higher the total amount of hormone you have to exert its power in your body.
2. Mitigating unwanted/undesirable effects – This issue encompasses two major issues.

The first issue is the same for all hormones. The higher the dose taken the more potential for side effects. For example, if the same compound is being used (as described above) at a rate of 100mg/day, it will yield 25mg of the active hormone. Now, the other 75mg will not be able to impact the body for anabolic purposes, but it still impacts the body in ways such as liver toxicity. This means that for every 100mg you ingest, 25% if going to its intended “good” purpose, and 75% is going to unwanted “bad” result.

The second issue is specific to DHEA and its various anabolic isomers. DHEA converts to numerous different hormones, some of which are beneficial (anabolic), and some of which are not (estrogenic). Studies have shown that when specific DHEA dosage thresholds are broken, virtually all DHEA taken beyond that amount converts to the negative/estrogenic hormones. This means that by utilizing a lower overall dose that offers a higher bioavailability you are able to reap much larger benefits, while reducing or completely eliminating unwanted estrogenic conversion.



No Delivery System

When 1-DHEA and 4-DHEA products first hit the market, they were sold by themselves without any delivery system, just the hormone in a capsule. Despite using no delivery system, it is worthy to note that users experienced significant results, as backed by clinical studies performed at West Texas A&M University.
The various forms of DHEA being discussed follow similar absorption and bioavailability of traditional DHEA. Studies which look to discern the potencies of DHEA have found it to be absorbed at a very low rate when taken orally. For example:

Invalid Link Removed


As this study shows, when you consume DHEA and its various isomers(like 1-DHEA or 4-DHEA) you’re left with around a 3%-6% rate of bioavailability(underlined in red above).
To put this into perspective, if you were taking the manufacturers recommended daily dosing of 330mg/day of 1-DHEA, your body would be absorbing only 9.9-19.8mg of the active hormone itself! And even at these low doses the results seen were impressive, including significant gains in lean mass, reductions in fat, and strength.
In addition to the low blood hormone levels which are offered from having no delivery system, this issue is also coupled with the fact that the small % of conversion to active hormones leaves a high % of the compound left over that has no pathway left to convert besides estrogenic hormones(unwanted). One example of these unwanted side effects can be seen in the lowering of LDL or “good cholesterol” in the Texas A&M study.

What does all of this mean? Simply put, if you’re consuming 1-DHEA or 4-DHEA without a delivery system included in its formulation, you can expect extremely low conversion of the compounds into their target hormones(1-testosterone and testosterone), and a highly level of conversion into unwanted estrogenic hormones. This means you can get solid cycle results, but must deal with some potential negatives.





SEDDS Delivery System

SEDDS or “Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery Systems” is a new delivery system which is just about to hit the dietary supplement market. This method of delivery system claims to work as a result of: “SEDDS possess potential to improve oral bioavailability in poorly water soluble drugs. Following their oral administration, these systems rapidly disperse in gastrointestinal fluids, yielding micro- or nano-emulsions containing the solubilized drug. Micro/non-emulsified drug can easily be absorbed through lymphatic pathways, bypassing the hepatic first-pass effect, owing to their miniscule globule size” (National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research).
SEDDS delivery vastly improves the effects from 1-DHEA and 4-DHEA by increasing overall bioavailability up to 9x greater than non-delivery system administration. This claim can be seen below:


Invalid Link Removed

Source: Invalid Link Removed

This study showed that when using a hormone (in this case progesterone) SEDDS offers up to 9x greater bioavailability when compared to no delivery system. This means that while no delivery system offers 3-6% bioavailability, SEDDS offers up to 9x that, or a 27-54% bioavailability. Keep in mind however that the higher end of this bioavailability spectrum is highly unlikely for the average user as it assumes perfect conversions in the body, something which never happens in vivo quite the same as it does in vitro. That being said, SEDDS offers a VAST improvement from traditional dosing of these compounds, and users can expect far greater results, fewer side effects, and less overall HPTA shutdown when using the SEDDS delivery method over no delivery method.
In short, SEDDS provides a much higher rate of bioavailability, lesser chance for estrogenic conversion, and a much more effective cycle.






Cyclosome™ Delivery System/Phytosome Delivery System
Cyclosome™ delivery system is the first completely pharmaceutical grade delivery system utilized in dietary supplements. Originally designed by Indena® under the name Phytosome®, Cyclosome™ utilizes identical technology to increase the bioavailability and intensity of 1-DHEA and 4-DHEA.
For quick reference, this video briefly explains how the technology works:

[video=youtube;extbuY3CvCk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=extbuY3CvCk[/video]​


Studies on humans (not rats, rabbits, pigs, dogs, or anything else), have shown Cyclosome™ technology to enhance bioavailability 29xhigher than non-delivery system methods, bringing with it a minimum of 90% bioavailability (Source: Invalid Link Removed)

In a comparative study in humans(16), analyzing the absorption of curcumin Phytosome® (Meriva®) and curcumin the overall curcuminoid absorption was about 29-fold higher for Meriva® compared to the unformulated curcuminoid mixture, while a 50 to 60 fold higher absorption has been shown for demethoxycurcumin (DMC) and bisdemethoxycurcumin (BDMC). Furthermore also the absorption was faster with Meriva® the with the unformulated curcumin.

Invalid Link Removed

This type of delivery system showcases what is currently known as the most effective way of increasing bioavailability for compounds such as 1-DHEA and 4-DHEA. This means much more potent and anabolic cycles, little to no estrogenic side effects, and minimal HPTA suppression.




How do the 3 types perform when compared using identical doses?​

To help you determine which delivery system (or lack thereof) is best for you in your search for the best cycle possible, here is a quick and easy guide. No delivery system will be abbreviated using “NDS”, SEDDS will be abbreviated as “SED”, and Cyclosome™ technology will be abbreviated as “CST”.
100mg/day dosing:
NDS x 100mg (3-6% bioavailability) = 3-6mg 1-DHEA/4-DHEA in the blood
SED x 100mg (3-6% bioavailability) x 9 = 27-54mg 1-DHEA/4-DHEA in the blood
CST x 100mg (3-6% bioavailability) x >90% bioavailability = greater than 90mg 1-DHEA/4-DHEA in the blood

To understand which delivery system is best for you, it’s crucial that you understand how the product you’re planning on purchasing is dosed, as this varies greatly from manufacturer to manufacturer. For example, if one product gives you 60srv of 50mg capsules, versus 60srv of 100mg capsules, this may play a role in how you decide which is the better overall value.
 
Fo sho. I googled it after and saw the company. Appreciate it
 
this is not correct.

Cyclosome is much more than just cyclodextrins or liposomes, but a perfect blend between the two. have you done any research on the technology itself, or even read my write ups on it?

Olympus is getting a pretty nice SEDDS delivery system from HiTech

I thought we were calling a spade a spade? It's all the exact same concept, to skip the first pass of the liver.
 
I thought we were calling a spade a spade? It's all the exact same concept, to skip the first pass of the liver.

cyclodextin = 1 form
liposomal = 1 form
cyclosome = 1 form

there are unique structural differences between the 3. To call cyclosome "just like cyclodextrin" or "just like liposomal" is simply incorrect, and I will gladly keep correcting any inconsistencies.


edit: to further this, to say its all the same concept, to skip the first pass of the liver is akin to saying "space travel and the high jump are basically the same...to get as high up in the air as you can go!"...when they're obviously mutually exclusive.
 
Would prime Andro quad be a reasonable test base? I have been reading up on it. It does not convert to estrogen . Boosts strength and libido. Which is why I would need a test boost. For this cycle of LGD and MK
 
if there is no conversion to estrogen, it is not a test base. If you're simply concerned about libido, than it may work fine.


if looking for a true test base, 4-ANDRO would be your ticket
 
Back
Top