The New Product Release Thread

We are known for our flavoring, makes this tough. It's a 25g serving size lol.

Which ingredient(s) are making it tough?

Feel free to send batch failures my way, with a few scoops of lemon line Xtend it'll be fine

^ 2nd dis but with mango :D

Or should I make a thread trashing it first.. so that you will send me it for sure? ;)

That's a pretty big serving size on that pretty interested to see what comes of this
 
Teacrine tastes liked a rotted ahole that had spoiled milk poured in it

Holy hell that sounds NASTY AF!

I am so very thankful for good flavoring O.O I still shudder remembering the orig D-Stunner :X and of course when I first bought bulk cissus and thought I would just dump it in my mouth.. That teacrine sounds like it might be even worse lol
 
Bulk NAC is the worst raw I've use. Smells like skunk and tastes HORRID
 
Think about this, 50mg on a 25,000mg formula has a dramatic impact

That interesting! Lots of pre are using it and they don't taste bad.

Makes me wonder if they actually have theacrine in them. As I do believe you and believe you are actually us theacrine. Soooo what's actually in these preworkout claiming to have it.
 
New Alphamine

Serving Size : 1 Scoop (2.9 g)
Servings Per Container: 84

Serving % DV
Alphamine Proprietary Blend 1,590mg *
L-Leucine, L-Carnitine-L-Tartrate, Choline Bitartrate, L-Theanine, Ferula Asafoetida (seed) Extract (95% Ferulic Acid)

Caffeine Anhydrous 125mg

Invalid Link Removed
 
interested in the anabolic and your testabolan was legit sh1t and your hemavol is a monster, how far are we from the anabolic? id love to try it after i run a sponsored log.

both Dymethazine and Bold300 are in label proofing/approval stage now, then we just need to finish production which takes about 4 weeks for products like these. I'd expect 6-8 weeks (hopefully) before readily available to all
 
both Dymethazine and Bold300 are in label proofing/approval stage now, then we just need to finish production which takes about 4 weeks for products like these. I'd expect 6-8 weeks (hopefully) before readily available to all

Perfect lines up with about the time my log finishes, awesome!
 
coming soon...


Invalid Link Removed

When I was this.... I REALLY expected a Betamine picture to follow. Highly disappointed

ImageUploadedByAnabolicMinds1465312657.425237.jpg
 
I thought the old iForce Bold 200 got banned? And is this DMZ? Or are these totally different compounds but with the same misleading names again?

I know, lets have the exact same argument with the exact same people ad nauseam with the exact same same points brought up by both sides, and the same final conclusion.

Oh joy!


Lets work through your question using the small amount of logic we have at our disposal shall we?


The original Dymethazine (brought to you by iForce Nutrition) contained 2,17-dimethyl-5-androstan-17-ol-3,3'-azine, a dimethylated pro-steroid that is not found in nature, and is banned by both DSHEA and DASCA, and is considered a controlled substance as a result.

Bold200 (note, this label has a 3, not a 2...which makes it Bold300 in case you missed it), contained 1,4-androstadiene-3b,17b-dione which is in fact a banned substance and a controlled substance to boot.


Now you tell me, do you think iForce nutrition is about to sell controlled/illegal substances after their run in with the FDA in 2009?
 
I thought the old iForce Bold 200 got banned? And is this DMZ? Or are these totally different compounds but with the misleading names again?

Bold was banned... I am guessing this is a new compound with some sort of precursor, mimicking Bold 200 like effects.
 
So let's come out with products with the same name as banned products. Clever marketing.

brb, the name of a product directly influences its effectiveness!

no, not the formula. not the individual ingredients. nope. Just the name!


Invalid Link Removed
 
Anyone remember "Halodrol liquigels" or "Halodrol-MT" ?

I, personally, am of the opinion that the product name should be indicative of the ingredients contained within buuuut this is hardly the first time a company has re-formulated a product and kept the original branding for recognition.
 
Anyone remember "Halodrol liquigels" or "Halodrol-MT" ?

I, personally, am of the opinion that the product name should be indicative of the ingredients contained within buuuut this is hardly the first time a company has re-formulated a product and kept the original branding for recognition.

I dont disagree with you...which is why we haven't used these names again until now!

If you simply reuse a product name, but the formula can't even come close to matching the benefits of the original...it's a sham and it will really disenfranchise users, and rightfully so. However, if you're able to offer a product with the same name that offers extremely similar benefits and side effects, than I think it's awesome!
 
I never got a chance to try the original Bold (and then it was gone) so I'm extremely excited about this news.





-Spaz
 
Excited as I will most likely be trying both of these formulas
 
both Dymethazine and Bold300 are in label proofing/approval stage now, then we just need to finish production which takes about 4 weeks for products like these. I'd expect 6-8 weeks (hopefully) before readily available to all

the OG version of these were a tad before my time but remember seeing reviews were wild(good way)
 
New Alphamine

Serving Size : 1 Scoop (2.9 g)
Servings Per Container: 84

Serving % DV
Alphamine Proprietary Blend 1,590mg *
L-Leucine, L-Carnitine-L-Tartrate, Choline Bitartrate, L-Theanine, Ferula Asafoetida (seed) Extract (95% Ferulic Acid)

Caffeine Anhydrous 125mg

Invalid Link Removed

How do you think this is going to compare to current version.
 
Less jitter and stimulant effect

Flavour game up a level but product purpose is now energy over fat loss
 
Back
Top