Tbol only cycle?

Dchristo

Member
Okay so my shipment that included my test and arimidex got seized. I've been waiting for 3 months for a seizure letter in order to get my order re-shipped. As it hasn't come yet, and I'm tired of waiting and don't wanna risk ordering more and have that seized as well, I was thinkin of a turanabol only cycle.

I have 200 10mg tabs of tbol
50 20mg tags of nolva
100 10mg tabs of clomid
A friend also gave me two vials of tren A(finaplix) but I'm not gonna touch that s*** ha ha

Was thinkin I'd start off 40mg a day and bump up if needed.
I would run it for 6 weeks and would run milk thistle during and a standard PCT of nolva 40/40/20/20.

I have run 2 prohormone cycles, but this will be my first AAS cycle.
What do you guys think? Would it be just a waste of some good stuff without the test, or would I be able to gain some decent size and strength from a tbol cycle? I'm in a rut, just wanna see the scale go up and push more weight ya know?

5'11
187lbs
bf<10%

Thanks for any advise
 
Running with Test would only make it better, obviously, but that doesn't mean you wouldn't have a good cycle without it. I've never ran it myself, but there are lots of reports online from people who have run solo turinabol cycles and liked it. When it comes to orals, I think it's better to start on the higher end of the dosage and taper down if necessary and the sides should subside pretty quick. So, I'd say just start at 50mg/day. You have enough to run that amount for 40 days, which is about the length you were looking to run anyway.

That said, if I had Tren Ace on hand I'd run that in a heartbeat. Grab some Dbol and you're all set to run a really sweet cycle. The advice to "always run Tren with a higher dose of Test" is just bro-lore in my opinion. More accurately, you just need an aromatizing compound to provide some estrogen and Dbol would be fine. Maybe you could run the Tren on your next cycle, I don't see Turinabol adding much benefit to a Tren cycle.

Speaking of estrogen, that would be my biggest concern if I were going to run a turinabol-only cycle since . Do you have any hCG on hand? It aromatizes and it will also keep your balls full sized.
 
GnastyMcNasty said:
Why don't you see turinabol adding much benefit to a tren cycle?
Click to expand...
Not the best choice of words, but definitely Tren + Turinabol wouldn't be a first choice if you're looking for synergistic compounds. Tren + Dianabol, on the other hand, go AWESOME together. The main component that is lacking from a Tren + Turinabol cycle would be estrogen. If you included some Test, or at least some hCG, that would be a different story.
 
Libertarian said:
Not the best choice of words, but definitely Tren + Turinabol wouldn't be a first choice if you're looking for synergistic compounds. Tren + Dianabol, on the other hand, go AWESOME together. The main component that is lacking from a Tren + Turinabol cycle would be estrogen. If you included some Test, or at least some hCG, that would be a different story.
Click to expand...

Completly Agree

I woudlnt Run Tbol by itself. Honestly i think Dbol, Tbol, Anadrol are only good for Kickstarts in my opinion. I would def add test to keep the gains. ANd yes HCG would be a bonusssss
 
Libertarian said:
Not the best choice of words, but definitely Tren + Turinabol wouldn't be a first choice if you're looking for synergistic compounds. Tren + Dianabol, on the other hand, go AWESOME together. The main component that is lacking from a Tren + Turinabol cycle would be estrogen. If you included some Test, or at least some hCG, that would be a different story.
Click to expand...

im confused.. why would u need estrogen for this cycle? how would this benefit the cycle.. just for libdio boost and gains or what?
 
yea but i've crushed my estrogen with AI's and suppressive, non-aromatizing PH's and not noticed any decrease in gains... It's true but moreso on paper than in practice IME. That said if you want to run tren ace then you had better be on some test anyway, but why not make that a separate cycle?

Nothing wrong at all with Tbol only, the way you are going to run it looks fine.

Look at it like this, what wouldn't be better if you added in test and dbol? lol
 
I've never ran trebolone. I have ran tbol, and it's great.

hd/pro dienolone is a good cut/recomp stack.

from what I know about trenbolone and turinabol, I'd think these two stacked would be even better for a 6 week recomp cycle, with less chance of estrogenic side effects caused from any interaction the tren may have on the progestin receptor.

but tbol only cycle is good to, I ran it with var when I used it.
 
I've considered running Tbol stacked with M1D.

I mean, LG pimped the crap out of M1D, might as well see how it works in practice in a AAS stack. I think it'd be a great recomp. Or methyltrienolone with lots of LIV-52 + M1D.
 
i laugh how many times i see dbol discourage dbol or tbol only cycles , but then see people encouraging m1,4add or hdrol cycles...

You can probably get a good 10-12lbs off the tbol, your not throwing it away, and it doesnt sound like your ordering more test... =] simply math.
 
Tyler3295 said:
Tbol only is fine? Is any oral only cycle really fine? Not intending to knock you or anything, but let's try to give better advice. :fing02:
Click to expand...

Are you new to this website? More people run oral-only cycles than not, by a huge margin too. Obviously adding test is only going to improve a cycle, but it's far from necessary.
 
deadaim said:
i laugh how many times i see dbol discourage dbol or tbol only cycles , but then see people encouraging m1,4add or hdrol cycles...

You can probably get a good 10-12lbs off the tbol, your not throwing it away, and it doesnt sound like your ordering more test... =] simply math.
Click to expand...

I actually never encourage running a cycle that can shut down your natty test (like tbol only) without a test base. :)

UnrealMachine said:
Are you new to this website? More people run oral-only cycles than not, by a huge margin too. Obviously adding test is only going to improve a cycle, but it's far from necessary.
Click to expand...

I will admit, I am on like 5 different forusm and this is the only one where people actually encourage oral only cycles. Oral only (IMO) may be okay for some PHs, but not really for AAS.

I just hate when people are too scared to pin so they try to get big off of oral AAS only and ruin their liver and lipid profile.
 
I don't think oral-only cycles are "encouraged" so much as injectables are not mentioned because most people here don't have AAS sources. But anyway, there's no difference between an oral "PH" and oral AAS.

They're both oral steroids and should be treated the same. Legality doesn't really mean anything. Anyway some oral steroids benefit more from a test base than others, I think A) orals that cause huge fast gains that need a base to continue on to keep more of those gains and B) orals that kill your libido. But people here have demonstrated that excellent gains can be made and kept off of oral-only cycles. Test and other injectables will only help but the idea that you need a test base is a very rigid way of thinking propagated by the AAS sites.

Hey though I do agree about people being scared to pin, that's stupid, if they have a source then doing AAS and making more comprehensive cycles with injectables is going to benefit them a lot more. But sometimes it's not just fear of pins, it's fear of being caught with injectables, it's money, it's the lack of a reliable source, there's a lot of reasons.

It's stupid but I blame the government's laws for forcing so many people to tank down oral stack after oral stack at their body's expense when the safer injectables are criminalized.

Anyway you gotta admit some orals can function fine without test. Like Tbol.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top