Str3ngth or Secretabridge

Jackedjack

Well-known member
I'm not planning on using these in the near future, but I would like go know which is the better laxogenin product as both Olympus labs and LGI seem to be respectable, trustworthy companies?
 
I used the secretabridge for two months. Put on a little size and strength. Toward the end I added in clear muscle and follidrone so it got hard to tell how good it worked then.
 
I would generally assume they are both being supplied by the same source and that the quality/non-quality of the ingredient is similar between products

Given a lack of new scientific evidence about laxogenin, and a lack of recent supply-side hype about laxogenin, and that both companies selling it are small market prohormone companies it seems unlikely that they are driving sales of the ingredient enough to have multiple suppliers sourcing it.
 
I would generally assume they are both being supplied by the same source and that the quality/non-quality of the ingredient is similar between products

Given a lack of new scientific evidence about laxogenin, and a lack of recent supply-side hype about laxogenin, and that both companies selling it are small market prohormone companies it seems unlikely that they are driving sales of the ingredient enough to have multiple suppliers sourcing it.
nice intellectual assessment, but not sure how it translates to reality
I have no idea if these two companies mentioned utilize same source for laxo, but fwiw there are a couple sources of this stuff around - and then the guys who are trying to make it in their own labs by (possibly) throwing a hodge-podge of compounds together and calling it laxogenin
the true compound is very expensive to acquire, and I would guess that eventually, as this stuff becomes more popular and more companies look to utilize it, you will certainly see a discrepancy between quality/results among the various laxo products, imo
 
nice intellectual assessment, but not sure how it translates to reality
fwiw, there are a couple sources of this stuff around - and then the guys who are trying to make it in their own labs by (possibly) throwing a hodge-podge of compounds together and calling it laxogenin
the true compound is very expensive to acquire, and I would guess that eventually, as this stuff becomes more popular and more companies look to utilize it, you will certainly see a discrepancy between quality/results among the various laxo products, imo

That's sort of the opposite of what I'd want to hear as a consumer.

If an ingredient that showed promise but had severe supply issues in the past started showing up again, I'd really like to believe it's because a supplier somewhere has established a steady high quality supply of the ingredient, not because we're gettin bathtub meth...er...laxogenin.
 
blackstone Labs just released one called Anogenin.. It's ridiculously expensive though
 
understood - but, when have the segments of raws and sourcing in this industry ever been influenced and shaped by simple consumer demand and appeasement?
:D

Fair. But I think what would really help us out as consumers (at least on this forum) would be a third-party chemical analysis. And not one provided by OL, BSL or LGI.
 
To be completely transparent, the current purity of laxogenin on the market is around 85-90% which is quite good, we are working with one of our main suppliers on custom producing a 99% pure version of laxogenin and maintaing the same price point. We will also be releasing DERMASTRENGTH which is a transdermal version of STR3NGTH.

I have a feeling and this is already proving to be true that laxogenin will once again find its place in the current market, it's got a wide array of benefits and uses. On top of that the demand is certainly there.
 
To be completely transparent, the current purity of laxogenin on the market is around 85-90% which is quite good, we are working with one of our main suppliers on custom producing a 99% pure version of laxogenin and maintaing the same price point. We will also be releasing DERMASTRENGTH which is a transdermal version of STR3NGTH.

I have a feeling and this is already proving to be true that laxogenin will once again find its place in the current market, it's got a wide array of benefits and uses. On top of that the demand is certainly there.

ETA?
 
To be completely transparent, the current purity of laxogenin on the market is around 85-90% which is quite good, we are working with one of our main suppliers on custom producing a 99% pure version of laxogenin and maintaing the same price point. We will also be releasing DERMASTRENGTH which is a transdermal version of STR3NGTH.

I have a feeling and this is already proving to be true that laxogenin will once again find its place in the current market, it's got a wide array of benefits and uses. On top of that the demand is certainly there.

Is it true that 8-12 weeks of continuous use is necessary to see any results?
 
Is it true that 8-12 weeks of continuous use is necessary to see any results?

Feedback is very limited on AM but heres one review on the product:

5/5

i`m almost finishing my second bottle of str3ngth . doing anywhere between 4/6 caps a day.i will get 2-3 more bottles just to make a good assessment , but so far i can honestly say this for sure:it has done a superb job with my joints/tendons/ligaments. it has worked far superior than any other cissus product, or any joint oriented supplement and i have tried plenty.I HAD BURSITIS ON MY LEFT WRIST SO BAD I COULD NOT USE IT TO STEER THE DRIVING WHEEL , 7-10 days into str3ngth IT STARTED TO GO AWAY .
for me it has become a STAPLE as a joint product by far.whenever i have cash i will purchase it solely for this objective.musclebuilding wise i can`t say for sure how much it helped because i am just getting back to where i used to be
 
Care to put an app in for DermaSTRENGHT?
looks like a damn solid product, and I appreciate the thought ed!
I could try it and let you know what I think, but I would not be able to do an ongoing log on it -- you know how we roll over here at FINAFLEX, no logs on any products but our own (company policy) ;)
 
looks like a damn solid product, and I appreciate the thought ed!
I could try it and let you know what I think, but I would not be able to do an ongoing log on it -- you know how we roll over here at FINAFLEX, no logs on any products but our own (company policy) ;)

I know the policy, and respect that.

Maybe we can work something out. I know you would give an honest review and show what it can do.
 
Back
Top