Steroids at young ages? Possibility of recovery?

BoxingFool01

New member
I can't help but wonder what the usage of AAS/PH/PS do to adolescents. While I was in high school many football players would do D-bols (alone) and test cycles. I highly doubt they had any idea what PCT was. Could it be possible for someone who juiced during their high school years to go back to being 100% natty and still gain (18-25 yr old range?). Or is too late because of external anabolics/androgens?
 
Yeah they will likley still be able to gain muscle naturaly and I've known a few that have done it. I think the most likely thing to happen is stunted bone growth.
 
I juiced for several years as a teen, stopped for a long time and still gained naturally before going back to juice. I never PCT'ed back then, but I pulsed orals to avoid shutdown. Shots can only be done for less than a month and could never be fully exploited. My height did not appear compromised. I'm the taller that my parents and grandparents. Avoid aromatizing and estrogenic androgens and use the lowest possible doses to reduce the risk of height growth suppression. Halo for example shows no signifigant effect on calcium metabolism that would lead to pre-mature closure. Androgens do result in phallic enlargement when taken before the age of 19, but most guys wouldn't complain about that as a side effect. :) Nevertheless, I am sure that I was more conservative and educated about it that most of the other guys on the team that used them, so I don't recommend it unless you really have your info together. Today it would be much safer with all the PCT stuff so easily available, but still a good idea to wait until your 21 if you want to be safest.
 
Thats just going to make teens want to use them more :P

At least halo and methyltest are harder to get your hands on
 
danTman said:
phallic enlargment, and yet they say no chemical/substance/whatever is capable of that...
Click to expand...

It's well documented that androgen results in phallic/clitoral enlargement. It also promotes secondary sex characteristics even into adulthood. But it doesn't result in enlargement in fully grown men. Only in developing young men. I see your only 16, so don't get any crazy ideas!
 
noctorum said:
So, is it true Dr. D? You took them pretty young :P
Click to expand...

Yeah, I got constant confirmation on it too, so it wasn't just wishfull thinking! But at about 19, it stopped growing. It's a good thing too.... (J/J) :D

But after your a full grown adult, it doesn't matter how much test you use, it's a done deal and that's that.
 
I see a new DS product on the horizon, hehe.

As for androgen induced phallic enlargement I don't know how successful that would be. DHT seems to be the key there but it seems past 16 or so you won't gain maybe more than 1/4". Perhaps DrD is blessed with some good genetics.

If I were in that age range I would be more concerned with trying to increase height than anything else as that's obviously nearly impossible to change later on. Since E seems to seal/calcify the growth plates would it be better to use an AI or a SERM? E is supposedly needed for proper bone formation so I guess a SERM would do it. But if it has agonist properties to prevent growth plate calcification then wouldn't it also interfere with bone formation/structure.
 
ersatz said:
E is supposedly needed for proper bone formation so I guess a SERM would do it.
Click to expand...

No! SERM's can act like estro in bones. The SERM Raloxifene, for example, is specifically used for this. It loads calcium and prevents loss. I'd use an AI like letro or steroidal inhibitor.
 
DR.D said:
No! SERM's can act like estro in bones. The SERM Raloxifene, for example, is specifically used for this. It loads calcium and prevents loss. I'd use an AI like letro or steroidal inhibitor.
Click to expand...

Thanks, that's what I suspected. If someone does try this, go with a steroidal AI like aromasin since you'll need to run it for months on end. I believe letro kills your lipids so while aromasin may be significantly more expensive it seems slightly safer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top