Strateg0s
Registered User
I wasn't basing my evaluation of M1T on its ability to pack on muscle, but the troubling results of bloodwork (SS, etc.). You are perfectly right that we have no idea of numbers or accurate estimates as to the relative toxicity of the metabolites.Bobo said:Its related to choice and dosage of methyl? How about conversion rate of metabolites and also the number metabolized? Do yo know how potent they are on any of these? No. M4OHN is could have 1 potent metabolite whle M1T could have 10. It could be the complete opposite too. Just because the target hormone isn't "potent" in terms of gains is far from saying its "less toxic". M5AA could be harsher than M1T but since everyone thinks M1T is so "potent" because of the gains they see they assume its the harshest. The point being is that you or anyone on these boards do not know how potent they are because there is zero clinical data. Increasing the substance increases the chances of those metabolites to be toxic. Its ridiculous to tell anyone that stacking them isn't that bad and its only the dosages that are invloved.
Indeed, it is better to err on the side of caution, especially when making general guidelines which anyone can come along and act upon them as though they were indisputable.
Agreed.