Stacking Methyls: A+B=???

stxnas said:
Anyway, back to topic. I guess the biggest problem is that do we even know what metabolites these products are making?
Click to expand...

I would say no. We lack enough clinical research on these compounds to delineate the exact metabolites they are breaking into.

The oxidative stress involved with various metabolite processing, combined with this unknown factor, are the most pressing issues, IMO.
 
milwood said:
I think the truth of this lies, as was discussed somewhere, in the metabolites produced by each. If superdrol metabolizes into A, B, and C, how are they affecting your liver? If PP metabolizes into B, C, D and E, how would they affect it? And if you had SD and PP in your system (albeit at lower dosages), how would the body handle metabolites A, B (from both), C (from both), D, and E all together? So you see that the potential biochemichal interactions are an unknown, especially as they relate to a combonation of different compounds.
Click to expand...

Exactly.

Things to consider:
1) How do the metabolites of Superdrol effect the metabolism of Pheraplex?
2) What are the toxic metabolites of each? I would think superdrol has different metabolites than pheraplex, since they're two completely different compounds.
 
ImJ2x said:
My argument is that's it's good to break these compounds into as many little metabolites as possible. It seems to me that this would be easier for your liver to process than just a couple big metabolites. (Talk about "layman's terms" lol.)
Click to expand...

No no no no no. You're misunderstanding this.

Metabolites don't mean that the steroid is broken down into smaller parts. A metabolite is simply whatever the steroid becomes after reacting with another compound in your body.
 
thesinner said:
No no no no no. You're misunderstanding this.

Metabolites don't mean that the steroid is broken down into smaller parts. A metabolite is simply whatever the steroid becomes after reacting with another compound in your body.
Click to expand...

Exactly, which entails a greater amount of stress on the liver than cleaving to the methyl.
 
As you can see, J2x is no scientist, lol. That's why you guys need to keep it as simple as possible.
Can I assume that ya'll mostly still think stacking 2 methyls at half strength is a bad idea? Or is it more like you're not sure, so you wanna err on the side of caution?
 
ImJ2x said:
As you can see, J2x is no scientist, lol. That's why you guys need to keep it as simple as possible.
Can I assume that ya'll mostly still think stacking 2 methyls at half strength is a bad idea? Or is it more like you're not sure, so you wanna err on the side of caution?
Click to expand...

I have never held onto a fork and placed it in a socket, so I cannot say from personal experience that such an endeavor is dangerous; rather, I would caution against based on what I know of the possible interactions between the electrical current in the socket, the fork, and my hand.

Feel me?

However, with that being said, the liver is probably the most resilient organ in the body. So long-term damage is improbable, but I personally would not do it. Personally.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top