I don't think that the issue was ignored at all. If anything, I think it was over-sensationalized and blown completely out of proportion by people that were looking to get click bait headlines and views. I think that the reason that it's ignored now is because it should be ignored now because it's irrelevant.
It's irrelevant now for a lot of reasons, but here are the main ones that stand out to me:
- It involved one researcher at one university - Bharat B. Aggarwal at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Texas.
- The researcher had zero connections to the supplement industry.
- The researcher profited zero dollars from the particular studies.
- The researcher is/was an established researcher in the field of cancer research.
- Almost all of the studies in question were related to Curcumin's potential as treatment or as a cancer preventative - a far cry from the joint health and mobility, cardiovascular, and cognitive benefits that people normally would take a product like Elite Curcumin for.
- The researcher was never found guilty of fraud and was not disciplined that I know of by his place of research.
- Very significantly, his place of research was MD Anderson Cancer Center in Texas, one of the leading cancer research facilities in the world; so this was not some shady research facility., this was a worldwide recognized one, which leads back into what I was saying nothing shady having gone on so much as the studies being disregarded for reasons such as just newer stricter standards in publication, etc.
- He is not, never was, and never claimed to be a leading researcher on Curcumin.
- To put this in context, if you removed every single one of his studies that even mentioned Curcumin, it accounts for less than 1% of total Curcumin studies.
- Most importantly, pretty much everything he said in those studies has been re-confirmed and found to be true over and over and over again by researchers all over the world.
Here is one quote resulting from the outcome of this alleged fraud allegation:
"Dr. Aggarwal's was not the only group within MD Anderson that did research on Curcumin.
Also, his findings were no different than any other findings about curcumin in other groups, universities and institutions around the world. He first reported the anti-inflammatory potential of curcumin and this has been reproduced elsewhere."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this post comes off as irritated, I am - but I want to specify that it is not at you, it's at the subject because I hate things to be sensationalized, taken out of context, and people vilified because of accusations &/or agendas.
Therefore, let's dive a little deeper and explore what is so commonly left out of just about everything now days - the context and the truth.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What were these supposed 'alleged fraud' allegations anyway?
This is comically something that people miss about this whole thing - the supposed fraud was image manipulation. Yes, that's right, image manipulation, as in some images in slides appearing to be exaggerated; NOT some nefarious 'fraud' where a study was manipulated or the wrong results were represented.
Important note - context:
Most or maybe all of his studies that were reviewed relating to Curcumin were related to its anti-inflammatory effects and benefits in relation to cancer; which has absolutely nothing to do with why people should be taking Curcumin supplements to begin with.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Again - Important Context:
- Researcher: Dr. Bharat B. Aggarwal (extremely decorated cancer researcher at an esteemed university)
- Type of research: Cancer Research (curcumin's potential benefits in treatment and prevention)
- Location: MD Anderson Cancer Center (world-renowned cancer research center)
Relevance to Elite Curcumin, this thread, and/or Curcumin as a dietary supplement: ZERO.
Dr. Bharat B. Aggarwal - Biography:
The primary interest of my laboratory is in the area of cytokines as regulators of tumor cell growth. The specific aims of our Cytokine Research section are as follows: (a) identification of novel antiproliferative agents that are specific to tumor cells and (b) investigation of mechanisms by which tumor cells develop resistance to cytokines and examination of methods to overcome this resistance.
In collaboration with Human Genome Sciences (Boston, MA), we identified several novel cytokines and cytokine receptors that are members of the TNF and TNF receptor superfamily, respectively. We also discovered that genes regulated by the transcription factor NF-kappaB may play a major role in resistance to apoptosis induced by TNF and certain chemotherapeutic agents. Since NF-kappaB also regulates the genes involved in tumor proliferation and metastasis, we demonstrated that several known anticarcinogenic agents are potent inhibitors of NF-kappaB activation. Our results also indicated that the early steps in the pathway leading to apoptosis and NF-kappaB activation overlap.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of time:
I want to emphasize again that this was nothing recent; this was literally 10 years ago, in 2012 and related to studies done from 1999 to 2009 if I'm not mistaken; years before most of the modern day relevant research was even done on curcumin.
Why is the time period of this significant?
For two reasons:
- Scientifically - this was a period where many journals were reviewing things and taking out many studies; as mentioned above, it had more to do with more strict and stringent guidelines for publication rather than any outright fraud.
- Media sensationalism - their had just been all the hoopla over resveratrol studies having been taken out of context so mainstream media and also some industry news publications were dying to find the next subject to get them more hits and views; so basically, it was hip at that time period to make a big deal about things like this.
^^^^ I think that its unfortunate that people jumped straight to accusing a researcher of 'fraud' literally without acknowledging that the scientific journals that excluded some of the individuals studies themselves stated that it could have been due to the age of the studies and their (the journals) standards for publication had become stricter and more stringent over the years.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
He was also the perfect target because he is/was a legitimate doctor that believed in and had devoted his life to the powers of research and medicine but also believed in the power of natural alternatives to help in addition to medicines and for people that didn't respond to the medicinal approaches or wanted to avoid those. I never read where he ever once said to not take a medicine or treatment regimen, but instead he said he believed in telling people the truth about natural alternatives that could help in addition to those treatments and/or for people that wanted to avoid traditional medicine because of spiritual or lifestyle beliefs.
^^^ Basically a doctor that bucked the trend at the time and said things that made him a target and it seemed to put him in the crosshairs to be nit picked over a lot of things that would otherwise may or may not have been reviewed, but if they were, wouldn't have been considered newsworthy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting (or at least I thought so):
Do you know why this researchers name has gotten brought up again in recent years and why it may sound so familiar?
Because he is a tremendously credentialed researcher and specialist and because of his work on cytokines, his works have been very widely discussed and cited in relation to Covid research.