Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Sarms- Any Feed Back?

I did a whole log on osta rx and S4... Helped to fix my tendonitis, had good gains and very few sides. I'm now back where I was a few years ago in good shape, if all goes well I'll likely run this combo again in the future.

Invalid Link Removed
 
mtinsideout said:
I did a whole log on osta rx and S4... Helped to fix my tendonitis, had good gains and very few sides. I'm now back where I was a few years ago in good shape, if all goes well I'll likely run this combo again in the future.

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

I want to try it.
 
Did osta rx as well, complemented oral cycle, leaned out a little. It's very subtle, but effective; mildly suppressive tho at full dosage. Bloodwork I saw was suppressive around 100ng/dL at 6 weeks in of osta rx 3 caps daily solo run.

Here's a basic write-up on it;
Invalid Link Removed

I like the IML version better cuz they have a prop blend to boost libido in there as well. Decent supp, in a way I would put it in the same category as NO2 boosters and Creatine. Mild overall benefit, lean mass gains generally, diet-dependant
 
biggiesmallz said:
Did osta rx as well, complemented oral cycle, leaned out a little. It's very subtle, but effective; mildly suppressive tho at full dosage. Bloodwork I saw was suppressive around 100ng/dL at 6 weeks in of osta rx 3 caps daily solo run.

Here's a basic write-up on it;
Invalid Link Removed

I like the IML version better cuz they have a prop blend to boost libido in there as well. Decent supp, in a way I would put it in the same category as NO2 boosters and Creatine. Mild overall benefit, lean mass gains generally, diet-dependant
Click to expand...

I want to try them but I have been burned so many times lately by products that claim they will do the world and do little.
Im almost in week 2 of post PCT and my libido sucks. Bulbine and DAA havent helped me.
 
Sarms for my personally = little to next to little nothing way many better options all over the place
 
I like using ostarine for muscle and strength preservation starting week 3 of pct.
I usually end up making small strength gains as well, running only 20mg/day.
 
I used S4 when the stuff kinda just came out. It was ok... I'll never use again, didn't do too much for myself
 
I ran Oxta Rx Solo had some amazing gains in endurance. That's what I really noticed, no strength gains or anything else. I seem to remember being able to run up and down stairs and just not get winded at all. IronMag labs though, not so sure about. Price was always going rapidly up and down. Purchased a bottle at around $60, then all of a sudden the price went up to $100 a bottle only a few weeks later. Some people say it shuts you down, some people say it doesn't. Also read of people have side effects of Night blindness. So I didn't bother using it again. SARMS I believe are just too new and I think they need to be studied more before they can be considered safe.
 
It's suppressive, but it won't shut you down like a full-blown hormonal anabolic. (unless you just run it for months and months) So maybe a small mini-PCT after the cycle would be a good idea just to bring test levels back up a little... like 2 weeks of a SERM should be plenty, or even just some DAA
 
My friend is going to run Osta Rx by IronMag Labs on a cut/recomp, 4 caps a day for 45 days. I read up on it for him and came upon a website all about SARMS called sarms101.com, there is great info on there you should check it out.
 
biggiesmallz said:
It's suppressive, but it won't shut you down like a full-blown hormonal anabolic. (unless you just run it for months and months) So maybe a small mini-PCT after the cycle would be a good idea just to bring test levels back up a little... like 2 weeks of a SERM should be plenty, or even just some DAA
Click to expand...

Given some of the blood work I have seen I would recommend a full pct or blood work. This stuff seems to be all over the map when it comes to suppression one guy will hardly have any where another seems to go down in the 100-200 ng/dl range.

It might be a case of mislabeling from research sites or something "I am not trying to suggest this please don't get offended people" I am just reaching for any guess as this variation seems so large.
 
harbonah said:
Given some of the blood work I have seen I would recommend a full pct or blood work. This stuff seems to be all over the map when it comes to suppression one guy will hardly have any where another seems to go down in the 100-200 ng/dl range.

It might be a case of mislabeling from research sites or something "I am not trying to suggest this please don't get offended people" I am just reaching for any guess as this variation seems so large.
Click to expand...


And this is one of the reasons I'm not bothering with SARMS anymore.
 
harbonah said:
Given some of the blood work I have seen I would recommend a full pct or blood work. This stuff seems to be all over the map when it comes to suppression one guy will hardly have any where another seems to go down in the 100-200 ng/dl range.

It might be a case of mislabeling from research sites or something "I am not trying to suggest this please don't get offended people" I am just reaching for any guess as this variation seems so large.
Click to expand...
I've only seen one real case with bloodwork, so you may very well be right. Tho keep in mind the case with bloodwork I've seen was a solo run. it's very likely that with multiple compounds, bloodwork would be all over the place (in the case of coupling it with orals)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top