I am not sure where all the anger comes from - she made a connection that was inaccurate, she has learned and said it may be something else. Her original hypothesis was likely wrong, but if she was right it would have been good for others to know.
I admit that I am originally thought the logic was fallible and maybe even ridiculous initially - but investigating further actually helped me learn a little.
If anything, this thread should show that Reduce XT does what it says and reduces cortisol. People should be happy if they want to stand by the product. The issue is, reduced cortisol isn't always a good thing either.
On the other side, I understand that saying things like "I am a woman and you are a man" or that taking something and attributing something that happens after it to that substance alone is poor logic - but attacking that with more poor logic isn't any better. In this case, there is probably an underlying cause of this issue that the OP is/was unaware of.
Most substances effect men and women the same - protein, carbs, fat, opioids, crack, you name it - mostly have the same effects on people within a variable range. And taking vitamin C and then finding out you have cancer doesn't mean that Vitamin C caused cancer just because your awareness of the two events are linked. But doesn't that mean that a person of intelligence will investigate further?
If someone thinks their house is haunted would you attack them and tell then they are stupid? Or would it be better to figure out why they think that and discover the true cause and show then?
Why all the emotion and lack of thought in this thread? Isn't it worth knowing if this product may have had an effect?
