Siznoyton said:Yes, mg. for mg. it is most certainly stronger than M1T.
This is one step away from Cheque Drops.
Klaus said:The potency of M-TRN appears to be greater than M1T based on anecdotal evidence. I will argue, however, that the toxicity of M-TRN is no where near M1T. If needles frightened me, I would have purchased a truckload of this compound. Being that I'm a firm supporter of depot administration however, I opted to pass on M-TRN.
snakebyte05 said:3clipse are you basing the toxity off of ryansm's bloodwork? Just wondering if it is all based on his or if there are others blood work as well.
3clipseGT said:One step away from Cheque drops in what aspect? Toxicity? Strong , fast acting compound? Strength increases are crazy, toxicity is lesser then SD or M1T. So if ur linking cheque drops and M-tren togethor for toxicity, ur wrong my friend. Not being blatant or an ass, just saying. Now if its about strength, ive never tried cheque drops, but for strength, wow is all i can say for M-tren. Great great stuff!
Siznoyton said:The question was "stronger," and that's what I replied about.
As Klaus mentioned, it is indeed stronger.
In terms of active dosing for major strength gains, it is one step from Cheque Drops. Is there anything else oral that is so potent? I wasn't making any claims about toxicity. The Methoxy group is very different than the methyl group on methyl-trn.
IMO, M1T is more like a shitty D-Bol crossed with Halo (not chemically, of course), whereas M-TRN is like Miberlone without the toxicity.
I have 3 bottles of MTRN, and look forward to it with 4AD or test base trans. Only thing I pin is HCG.
Someone should start a thread about M-TRN, the way we have a "Superdrol Primer" thread, etc., to compile user data.
ChildrenX said:Posted this at a forum and bigcat replied with his thoughts
--------
Bigcat
--------
"You heard that from a Methoxy-TRN ad didn't you ? Yeah, its about a 2000 times stronger progestin".
"No seriously, if you want to bone up on this in a little more scientific way, I can recommend two studies by Ojasoo and Raynaud, "Unique congeners for receptor studies" and 'Correspondence factor analysis of steroid libraries".
"It's a relatively weak androgen since it has no free 17b-oH group, that group is covered by a methyl group, yielding the aforementioned 17b-methoxy group.
Now, you may or may not know that 4,9,11 trien steroids are very ambiguous ligands. The 17b-OH's of that group are strong androgens, but even stronger progestins. By changing the 17b-OH to 17b-methoxy, you drastically increase progestagenic potency and specificity.
To make a long story short, this stuff is an extremely potent progestin, with very low anabolic activity. I'd sincerely recommend staying away from it. It should make for a great contraceptive though".
That was his thoughts
I was under the impression that it was 2000X stronger than MethylTest and will give you the best gains with proper diet evn better than M1T.
Siznoyton said:In terms of active dosing for major strength gains, it is one step from Cheque Drops. Is there anything else oral that is so potent?
3clipseGT said:Big Cat also said SD sucked and that it wasnt very anabolic. Look how many people liked that compound? I think he just goes by what a compound looks like and possible studies and thats it.