The references had zero to do with the point being made. You should not cite evidence not pertaining to that point as it is not credible. Saying that using sugar over a complex carbohydrate is not warranted after performance then citing 2 studies which have nothing to do with that argument is a fallacy. Calling someone out on it isnt in bad taste, but it did leave me scratchig my head.
Yet his point was actually correct. If you want relevant studies they are available. Calling someone out with "lol" after your statements seems disingenuous.
Most people do not check references; I always do. if it came across as mocking that wasnt the intention, just the interpretation.
Making statements with "lol" at the end of them tends to be mocking in this scenario...then he's told he's just doing it to argue....when all he was trying to do is help in the most detailed way he could...which is what I ask of him.
Also the argument isnt semantics; again thats not what I was refering to. We had our terminology confused and so the point was moot.
If you were confused that is fine...but several people told him he was wrong.
Recovery is different to muscle growth as you can have recovery without growth. I took repair as recovery as the OP already specified growth. Simple mistake. He hasnt clarified so the argument continues.
PWO in the last 15 years of forums has almost always been post workout....and he wanted to know what carb source was best for repair and gains...which by definition is most certainly...post workout. So the answer would be....it doesn't matter...focus on amino's.