PES Erase Pro confusion????

Beefeater71

Beefeater71

New member
Why are the ingredients on these 2 bottles of PES Erase Pro slightly different? I'm hoping neither one is a fake. Or maybe one is a newer version once again. I don't want to take my 2nd bottle if it's not the same gear. Can somebody answer?
 

Attachments

  • image-17051683.jpg
    image-17051683.jpg
    528.4 KB · Views: 1,432
the one with the androsta 3,5 -diene-7, 17 -dione is the old version more potent. Which I believe is better. They reformulated it for some reason. PES reformulated all their products after this whole Craze fiasco.
 
I knew the old version was just called "Erase", in which was to some the more potent. But "Erase Pro" is the new formula. I didn't think Erase Pro had an old & newer version??
 
they've even changed the formula of the OG Erase as well. all their new formulas with the 18-oic-acid is supposed to be some new type of DAA according to their reps. there is other forums on here that address the change
 
So does that mean the new Erase Pro isn't really that great?. Frustrating... Have finished the old
Bottle, now to continue with the newer stuff. Maybe not worth finishing the last 4wks.
 
jgaines said:
the one with the androsta 3,5 -diene-7, 17 -dione is the old version more potent. Which I believe is better. They reformulated it for some reason. PES reformulated all their products after this whole Craze fiasco.
Click to expand...

Our reformulations had nothing to do with the issues surrounding Craze and/or Detonate.

OP, the top bottle is our newest version and the bottom one was the previous version. Looking at that particular label, that bottle has been sitting around for awhile, but it is still good to use.
 
The reviews with the old Epro has had nothing but positive results. Why would PES want to change it up in the new one, especially since one Is halfway through the cycle, then having to take one on last 4 wks. which has has very average reviews & isn't as strong.
 
Beefeater71 said:
The reviews with the old Epro has had nothing but positive results. Why would PES want to change it up in the new one, especially since one Is halfway through the cycle, then having to take one on last 4 wks. which has has very average reviews & isn't as strong.
Click to expand...

Many people got joint issues on the old formula, so they reformulated to be easier on joints. Try them both and report back on which one worked better for you, please!!! I just started the old formula EPro and so far have no joint issues with it (a week). If it works amazingly I will probably look around for the old formula. If I get joint issues, I will look into the new one.
 
I'm on week 4 with old Epro. Am having some joint issues, but it's bearable. Would rather a bit of joint discomfort then having to continue 2nd bottle which has a new formula & isn't as potent. Both New & old should be an option on individual.
Will see how new Epro goes on next 4wks.
 
Beefeater71 said:
I'm on week 4 with old Epro. Am having some joint issues, but it's bearable. Would rather a bit of joint discomfort then having to continue 2nd bottle which has a new formula & isn't as potent. Both New & old should be an option on individual.
Will see how new Epro goes on next 4wks.
Click to expand...

Word, thanks a lot and please post your comparison after running the 2nd bottle. You might like the new formula more. If not, plenty of products still use arimistane.
 
jgaines said:
they've even changed the formula of the OG Erase as well. all their new formulas with the 18-oic-acid is supposed to be some new type of DAA according to their reps. there is other forums on here that address the change
Click to expand...


New form of DAA?. This is the first I've heard of that. PES reps can you confirm this?.
 
I'm not sure if it's a new form of DAA(D-aspartic acid), although "DAA" is used as an acronym to describe it I'm thinking that it's a completely different supplement and not in anyway related.
 
T-Bone said:
I'm not sure if it's a new form of DAA(D-aspartic acid), although "DAA" is used as an acronym to describe it I'm thinking that it's a completely different supplement and not in anyway related.
Click to expand...

Ya it's just the same acronym but they are not the same compound.
 
I would like to know who claimed it had a new form of DAA in it? Very interesting how so many people who haven't even tried the new formula are counting it out and claiming its "less potent". Just because it may be stronger with prolonged use and doesn't wreck your joints does not point towards less potency. OP I would give it a serious chance and then decide rather than take a handful of possibly bias reviews decide your plan. Most all the feedback I've seen that wasn't extremely positive ended with the people saying they jumped the gun and now feel either equal or better results than the og.
 
Yeah, i guess 80% of Reviews about New Epro are negative. & it shouldn't be surprising why some people including myself are unsure about the potency. Most have tried it too & said its crap. That's how we make up our mind whether to use it. Reviews can be a useful tool aswell. But having about to try it myself, hopefully I can give it something positive :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top