Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

PCT test and estro levels

lennoxchi

lennoxchi

Well-known member
does anyone have a link to a reliable study or documentation from a creditable source that will explaine EXACTLY where test and estro levels are?
 
lennoxchi said:
does anyone have a link to a reliable study or documentation from a creditable source that will explaine EXACTLY where test and estro levels are?
Click to expand...
Read what you wrote. Does it make sense to you?

What is it you are looking to find out?
 
B5150 said:
Read what you wrote. Does it make sense to you?

What is it you are looking to find out?
Click to expand...
to me or the "committee" in my head? (joking) i post here while i'm at work and in a rush sometimes....ok when i come off a cycle, lets say an SD cycle (for example) my natural test is most likely shut down (or suppressed) my estrogen levels are high due to the fact that my body thinks it has a lot of test there (which is BS, cause it's just the SD, correct?) so when i come off cycle and into PCT my natural test is in the toilet (which that needs to be brought up ASAP, to keep my gains) and my estro really doesn't need to be that high (so lowering that is a good idea, LOWERING IT not killing it entirely). i have heard that when you come off cycle, there is some "good" estro that you still want to have around? now introducing a SERM (which i always do) in layman's terms, puts a coating around the estro causing no binding to the receptor, keeping it "alive" but pretty much nonfunctional, for the most part. so if my SERM is doing all that, then adding an AI to the mix would seem, stupid. Over kill, no? so what i was looking for, is a creditable source, Doctors or scientist's studies of test and estro levels being monitored, ie if someone was to take blood and so on after i just finished a cycle, to see where my test levels and all other levels are at. there is a lot of talk about levels being here and there since i became a member here, and kind of want to know a bit more about this, because so far (for me) it's only been "here-say", you know, one person repeating what they were told, which is fine...if the first person to start it had good info. i'm, not saying any of this is wrong or right, but that's my point, i don't really know where this info came from originally. make sense? if not,i have to involve the "commitee"...:thumbsup:
 
lennoxchi said:
to me or the "committee" in my head? (joking) i post here while i'm at work and in a rush sometimes....ok when i come off a cycle, lets say an SD cycle (for example) my natural test is most likely shut down (or suppressed) my estrogen levels are high due to the fact that my body thinks it has a lot of test there (which is BS, cause it's just the SD, correct?) so when i come off cycle and into PCT my natural test is in the toilet (which that needs to be brought up ASAP, to keep my gains) and my estro really doesn't need to be that high (so lowering that is a good idea, LOWERING IT not killing it entirely). i have heard that when you come off cycle, there is some "good" estro that you still want to have around? now introducing a SERM (which i always do) in layman's terms, puts a coating around the estro causing no binding to the receptor, keeping it "alive" but pretty much nonfunctional, for the most part. so if my SERM is doing all that, then adding an AI to the mix would seem, stupid. Over kill, no? so what i was looking for, is a creditable source, Doctors or scientist's studies of test and estro levels being monitored, ie if someone was to take blood and so on after i just finished a cycle, to see where my test levels and all other levels are at. there is a lot of talk about levels being here and there since i became a member here, and kind of want to know a bit more about this, because so far (for me) it's only been "here-say", you know, one person repeating what they were told, which is fine...if the first person to start it had good info. i'm, not saying any of this is wrong or right, but that's my point, i don't really know where this info came from originally. make sense? if not,i have to involve the "commitee"...:thumbsup:
Click to expand...
I understand better what you are saying.

I am no endocrinologist or steroid expert - but I would not subscribe to using an AI during PCT for a few reasons.

After superdrol your lipids are already in the dumps. An AI (anastrozole or letrozole) is not going to help your lipids restore.

An AI is an aromatize inhibitor. You may have elevated estrogen levels but what is there that you want to inhibit the aromatizing of...?

A SERM is lipid friendly and stimulates the HPTA. IMHO - both things that you desire after a superdrol cycle. Additionaly a post cycle is intended to re-establish homoestacis (balance) and annihilating estrogen does not achieve that.

People want to use an AI to inversely elevate tetsosterone? Again, homoestacis, not more manipulating. IMHO a good SERM protocol is all that is needed to achieve homoestacis.

Like I mentioned I am not an endocrinologist nor am I handing out advice or prescribing you any protocol. JMHO's

You could get your own bloodwork done and find out how your body responds to either or both protocols. As far as studies...do a google or pubmed.

An article - Invalid Link Removed
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top