other question about tren

[gino333]

other question...

A friend of mine is thinking about runs one of this cycles, what option would be better for lean gains for him?

500 sustanon + 400 primobolan + anavar (last 4 weeks)

or

500 sustanon + 300 parabolin + wins(last 4 weeks)

What kind of results could he got for 2 different option? I mean strenght, size, vascular look, etc...

 

[nosnmiveins]

the first cycle will be much milder in terms of sides, but results would be awesome if a strict diet is utlized.

both cycles would yield similar in results, but the 2nd cycle would probably have more sides considering theres tren in it

 

[gino333]

ok, with right diet of course.

would be better in lean gains terms?...similar also?

 

[nosnmiveins]

im not going to sit here and tell u u will gain 15lbs of solid muscle. i know absolutely nothing about u, ur training or ur diet.

just run either one, they will both result in lean muscle gains

 

[EasyEJL]

The biggest question is "would either the primo or parabolin be real" because they are among the 2 most likely to be fake or some other compound. So even evaluating the difference in gains is hard cause you may very well get some other compound. Overall i'd guess the parabolin if real would yield more strength gains, and possibly a little more mass

 

[gino333]

Good point EasyEJL, primo is real 100% sure I get it from pharma in Spain. Regarding parabolin I´m not pretty sure really.

 

[gino333]

im not going to sit here and tell u u will gain 15lbs of solid muscle. i know absolutely nothing about u, ur training or ur diet.

just run either one, they will both result in lean muscle gains

Yeah bro, I know... I don´t expect you give me how will be my gains .

 

[gino333]

So even evaluating the difference in gains is hard cause you may very well get some other compound. Overall i'd guess the parabolin if real would yield more strength gains, and possibly a little more mass

this kind of aswer I expected.


thanks guys!