onebabooze808
Banned
- Awards
- 0
I noticed the 2 formulas r completely different. Whats the difference between the two and what r the pros/cons for both? Which would u recommend?
May want to check the PES subforum. I believe Cooper did a write up upon its release.Does anyone have access to the studies that indicate dehydroabetic acid is a viable AI. Ive been researching AI's for a decade now and IM always interested in new studies. Maybe a PES rep can help or anyone if you know which studies there are. I dont mind if its just abstracts I have access to most places I would need to get the full texts. I wonder how strong it is compared to something like exemestane for example?
New Erase/Erase Pro contains this as the main active: http://anabolicminds.com/forum/pes/239618-abieta-8-11-a.htmlI noticed the 2 formulas r completely different. Whats the difference between the two and what r the pros/cons for both? Which would u recommend?
Is this for a solo run or as part of a PCTI noticed the 2 formulas r completely different. Whats the difference between the two and what r the pros/cons for both? Which would u recommend?
Thanx! So pretty much the old formula is better for drying u out then and the new ones better for fatloss?Is this for a solo run or as part of a PCT
Speaking solely from experience having used both for 8-week runs now, I and many others will note that the original formula is noticed working faster, because it should dry you out, this is ideal at the end of a cut to really bring out definition and also assist with final bits of stubborn fat loss.
The new formula was received with a lot of skepticism because this quick drying effect isn't noticed, and some users seemed to think this meant it was less effective. Not the case of course, the formula was changed and so has the effects in turn. I found less drying out with the new formula although this means less joint discomfort which was an issue noted by some with the original.
Over the course of my 8 weeks what I did notice was improved fat-loss, particularly from my stubborn areas (abdominals, love handles) without adding cardio I managed to shed weight in those areas that had previously been much more stubborn. Of course this was alongside a strict diet (slight deficit) and weight training.
Overall I think the new formulation is better to help you achieve your goals and aid the process where the original may shine more when you are already very lean and want to make that dry aesthetic difference.
Hope that helps!
Somewhat, yes. The new one should also be better on your joints, and will result in more noticeable results. The new version has novel ingredients and is a worthy successor to the previous version.Thanx! So pretty much the old formula is better for drying u out then and the new ones better for fatloss?
No problem at all man. Let us know if you have any other questions.Thanx brah
ShootsNo problem at all man. Let us know if you have any other questions.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Erase Pro+ vs old erase pro? | Supplements | 3 | ||
USA Selling PES: Alphamine, Erase Pro (old), ABE (old) | Supplement Auction | 4 | ||
Hardening/Drying supplement just like the old Erase Pro? | Supplements | 31 | ||
erase pro old formula expiring on 15/02 | PES | 2 | ||
Old Erase Pro Question | PES | 3 |