Enigma76 said:Lemme guess...AICAR? Goin for the whole AMPK thing here right?
HairyLarry35 said:I'm really suprised that people aren't kickin' the door down to get this product. I would have thought the applicant pool would be at least twice the size of the handful that applied so far!![]()
Any news on potential testers? I think the only one that I've seen you accept is Jminis (minus those who may have been PMed.) I'm really looking forward to these logs and how it affects people with different goals in mind.
HL
USPLabs said:We are turning off the fat cell anabolism and increasing muscle cell anabolism while promoting fat oxidation with a compound proven to lower LDL! Wow...Does if get any better?
Bold Statement. I hope you are right. I am skeptical but I have an open mind and shall watch the testing closely. Good Luck!USPLabs said:30 days to test the best supplement on the market.
sly said:Bold Statement. I hope you are right. I am skeptical but I have an open mind and shall watch the testing closely. Good Luck!
sly said:Bold Statement. I hope you are right. I am skeptical but I have an open mind and shall watch the testing closely. Good Luck!
USPLabs said:IF its ALCAR, you can stone me twice!
Enigma76 said:No, AICAR...5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-d-ribofuranoside
USPLabs said:Rules!
We begin testing in 12 days.
First and foremost, You HAVE TO UNDERSTAND YOUR DIET!!!!!
--You must stop all current supplements
--You can not be on a keto diet
We are looking specifically different prototypes.
1. Clean Bulking
2. dieting on a low carb diet but weight loss has stopped
3. Dieting on a moderate carb diet
Lets begin!
HairyLarry35 said:I think this is a good journal supporting this supp and what Enigma is talking about. Now THIS makes it appealing!!![]()
Invalid Link Removed
Which basically means:
"AICAR increased glucose transport activity by approximately 2.4-fold (P < 0.05 vs. control) in the red gastrocnemius from obese rats, whereas insulin had no effect. In summary, acute infusion of AICAR in an insulin-resistant rat model activates skeletal muscle AMPK [?] and increases glucose transport activity in red gastrocnemius muscle while suppressing endogenous glucose production and lipolysis."
Yeahhhhhhhhhhh boyyyy!!
:bow28:
HairyLarry35 said:I think this is a good journal supporting this supp and what Enigma is talking about. Now THIS makes it appealing!!![]()
HairyLarry35 said:BTW Cordeen, check the links to your logs... I checked them out and none of them would open for me. Maybe it's the browser I'm using, but I don't know.
Enigma76 said:Assuming I'm right...
Wow, I tried to read that. Some of those guys are way to smart!rippedforce63 said:Invalid Link Removed
For anyone whos interested this thread was started by Nandi over at m&m.
USPLabs said:AM,
USPLabs is testing a NEW compound. The HUMAN and animal research has blown our MINDS! USPLabs is known from innovation, but this compound will shine a bigger spot light on USPLabs.
THere should be a feel effect with this SINGLE compound. The published research does not note a PUMP or muscle fullness in the conclusion.lol
This Compound out performed Metformin! This was a 6 month study! Those who understand metformin will state that Metformin also increases glucose update to fat cells. A very bad bad thing for us that want to get HUGE and LEAN!
In Summary this compound based on HUMAN and Animal research will:
--Enhanced glucose uptake in to skeletal muscle tissue only (not in adipose).
--Inhibition of lipogenesis
--Increase in lipid oxidation
--Improved blood lipids
HUMAN DOUBLE BLIND PLACEBO CONTROLLED STUDY HAS PROVEN THIS.
Robboe said:This is not a brand new idea, just fyi. It depends when we can run a special, and how well priced it would be.
rippedforce63 said:Invalid Link Removed
For anyone whos interested this thread was started by Nandi over at m&m.
rippedforce63 said:I thinks it a little more than speculation, I consider myself a pretty smart person when it comes to anatomy and biology, but some of the guys over there probably crap out smarter **** then me.
rippedforce63 said:Yeah I see what you are saying, its just that its kind of hard to find studies that are based soley on compounds and their effects on the bodybuilder/athlete probably because of the amount of money it takes to fund such studies.
rippedforce63 said:Well all of this is just speculation till USPlabs divulges anymore info.
rippedforce63 said:I thinks it a little more than speculation, I consider myself a pretty smart person when it comes to anatomy and biology, but some of the guys over there probably crap out smarter **** then me.