New Ar1macare Pro formula Vs. Old Ar1macare Pro

mohit

New member
Guys I am about to start an Andro Cycle soon and was wondering which Ar1macare Pro to use as a support the new formula or the old one.

I know Arimistane is not really effective as an anti estrogen but the new formula is also missing Abieta-8,11,13-trien-18-oic acid and I am not too sure how effective Elimistane Luteolin is as an anti estrogen

I am attaching the supplement facts panel for your reference

would be great if you guys could give your inputs.
 

Attachments

  • ar1macare-pro-label--NEW.jpg
    ar1macare-pro-label--NEW.jpg
    69.2 KB · Views: 805
  • Ar1macareProSupplementFacts---OLD.png
    Ar1macareProSupplementFacts---OLD.png
    178.7 KB · Views: 795
I still have my doubts on the new formula as I feel that the older one was a bit more comprehensive as a cycle support and the new formula is more of a standalone (general use) supplement which people can use even while they are not on a cycle.
 
mohit said:
I still have my doubts on the new formula as I feel that the older one was a bit more comprehensive as a cycle support and the new formula is more of a standalone (general use) supplement which people can use even while they are not on a cycle.
Click to expand...

What specifically do you like better about the older product?
 
mohit said:
Abieta-8,11,13-trien-18-oic acid

Also I am not too sure how effective Elimistane Luteolin is as an anti estrogen
Click to expand...

You could potentially compare the IC50 of both as AI’s. There’s probably more at play then just this, though
 
mohit said:
Abieta-8,11,13-trien-18-oic acid

Also I am not too sure how effective Elimistane Luteolin is as an anti estrogen
Click to expand...

a lot of people bought elimistane when it was on sale, be on the lookout for reviews...should be some coming soon.
 
its just labeled differently but its in there and the new ai is way more promising than the petri dish studied stuff.
 
Olympus Labs said:
its just labeled differently but its in there and the new ai is way more promising than the petri dish studied stuff.
Click to expand...

I can vouch for the new AI...i'm using sup3r pct and am pleasantly surprised by the strength of elimistane!!!
 
thebigt said:
I can vouch for the new AI...i'm using sup3r pct and am pleasantly surprised by the strength of elimistane!!!
Click to expand...

What cycle did you run?

And what do you mean by “strength of Elimistane” sorry I’m asking too many questions as I’m pretty new to all this...
 
mohit said:
Just wondering what is it labelled as.... I can see pine bark extract twice on the facts panel....
Click to expand...

Pine Bark Extract, which probably contains the abieta. PES labeled one of the Erase Pro versions similarly back in the day
 
mohit said:
But it doesn’t make sense....why call Abieta Pine Bark Extract...
Click to expand...

The question I’m assuming you mean to ask is why isn’t OL stating what % abieta is being standardized for in the pine bark extract. I don’t know the answer to that.
 
Olympus Labs said:
because it is a naturally occurring constituent of pine bark extract.
Click to expand...

Are you guys able to tell us the percentage of abieta contained in the pine bark? I’m assuming since other competitors haven’t, there really isn’t a need but would be good to know. NoAddedHmones stated it’s double the dose as before, and originally it was 100mg, but I would figure if you’re using a pine bark that is nearly 100% extracted for abieta then you’d put that on the label.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top