So any product that essentially promotes a destroying of fat cells is automatically bunk? They can only "shrink" them and would that shriking be temporary, ie while using the product or will it be permanent(as long as there is a proper diet)?
This is true within reason. However, due to the fact that bodybuilders fluctuate in bodyweight so rapidly throughout their lives, it is [highly unlikely but] possible for apoptosis to occur in adipocytes. To date, the phenomenon has only been observed in individuals undergoing treatment for pathologies (i.e. breast cancer) or in cases of starvation (which induces apoptosis signaling).
The reality is that most adipocytes are permanent unless lost through basic metabolism. The triglyceride content of the adipocytes is what dictates how fat an individual is. Someone who was previously fat but lost tons of weight will still retain most/all of the adipocytes, but the cells will be "deflated." The issue was never the amount of adipocytes, but rather the problems associated with loss of lipids from within the adipocyte over the course of weight loss. For instance, these "deflated" fat cells create strong para/endocrine signals that stimulate appetite (this is one reason why people who were once fat and then lose weight are postulated to put the fat back on so easily; prior insulin resistance followed by high insulin sensitivity due to a heavy cut is also responsible [see reverse dieting]).
This also explains why patients that undergo liposuction and then ditch healthy pre-surgery diet end up retaining the fat again... but it ends up in differently places. Women who have liposuction done of their stomachs and then months/years later begin to reaccumulate their fat do so in their hips, butt, etc (wherever they DIDN'T have the procedure) because the fat cells are no longer where they used to be prior to liposuction. Gotta find a new home![]()
Right. It's an amazing adaptation when you think about it, as it foregoes the energetic costs of adipogenesis. Too bad there's no shortage of food in modern society
coop you bring up a good point about starvation signaling.. my question is if starvation leads to ketosis does the body only fracture the fatcells that are ingested or in the case of starvation itll be forced to fracture body fat as i understand it?
Now, if you want to fracture and kill fat cells non-invasively, you can look into Zeltiq (sp?) cryolipolysis.
Br
mr.cooper69 said:This is true within reason. However, due to the fact that bodybuilders fluctuate in bodyweight so rapidly throughout their lives, it is [highly unlikely but] possible for apoptosis to occur in adipocytes. To date, the phenomenon has only been observed in individuals undergoing treatment for pathologies (i.e. breast cancer) or in cases of starvation (which induces apoptosis signaling).
The reality is that most adipocytes are permanent unless lost through basic metabolism. The triglyceride content of the adipocytes is what dictates how fat an individual is. Someone who was previously fat but lost tons of weight will still retain most/all of the adipocytes, but the cells will be "deflated." The issue was never the amount of adipocytes, but rather the problems associated with loss of lipids from within the adipocyte over the course of weight loss. For instance, these "deflated" fat cells create strong para/endocrine signals that stimulate appetite (this is one reason why people who were once fat and then lose weight are postulated to put the fat back on so easily; prior insulin resistance followed by high insulin sensitivity due to a heavy cut is also responsible [see reverse dieting]).
That crap reminds me of the non-invasive Zerona laser which was the hottest procedre in 2010+2011 until everyone realized it was one more bunk-azz ineffective scam like all the other BS modalities.
Liposuction, Diet or forget it
Everything is a scam along with 99% of the BS-supps out there too
help me follow what your saying here... please.. if fat cells are not fractured or otherwise changed why do ketones only offer up 7 calories as opposed to 9 for a regular g of fat? if i am to go with what your saying then ketogenisis is not really doing what all the reading ive read says?
again my question is in relation to ketogenic dieting. not starvation in general. wich is what i think your more talking about??