Whisky
Well-known member
I also don’t agree with the philosophy of “you might as well try the hard stuff right out the gate.” Would you suggest this with any other category of drug? To put it in perspective, imagine someone just turned 21 and they’re going out to drink for the first time. Would you say, “forget about lagers and pale ales, you might as well bang shots of bicardi 151, since you goal is to get drunk anyway, and you’re likely going to wake up with a hangover no matter what you choose.” To me, I think it’s sensible to get your feet wet by trying something weaker first, and then you decide whether it’s for you or not. A SARMS cycle will help him make this decision, and if he wants, he can run test and dbol for his second cycle.
Haha, I half agree and half don’t.
Agree shouldn’t run strong compounds like dbol first cycle but do think that pinning test at a moderate level for a decent duration is the smart play.
Imo test is at least tried and tested over many years, the sides and how to manage them are well known, sarms are newer and have less research or knowledge about long term effects.
I guess my view is to run milder compounds first but at proper doses and duration (so at least you get a return for the suppression) to see how your body reacts before you move onto stronger stuff.
Personally I couldn’t face pinning so started with ph’s. If at the time I could handle pinning I would have done test only.