Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

M-dien vs DMZ

Loneyboy

Banned
Wondering if anyone has any experiences with both and how they compare. M-dien seems very interesting and somewhat similar to DMZ.
 
m-dien is extremely potent most favor it over sd for gains and lower side effects, the glycogen loading isnt as strong as sd which is the king in that aspect. put the hardness is ungodly of m-dien. to give a rough estimate m1t/sd/methyl-d are in a league of their own. methyl-d is a close cousin to the mythical Methyltrienolone. 8-16 mg would be all you need 16 is the upper range for sure.
 
Methyldienolone.

It can't be compared to things like M1T, SD and DMZ... It's really strong compound, yes, but it's also extremely dry and doesn't pull huge amounts of glycogen into your muscles. It's great for strength and cutting/recomping.
 
m-dien is extremely potent most favor it over sd for gains and lower side effects, the glycogen loading isnt as strong as sd which is the king in that aspect. put the hardness is ungodly of m-dien. to give a rough estimate m1t/sd/methyl-d are in a league of their own. methyl-d is a close cousin to the mythical Methyltrienolone. 8-16 mg would be all you need 16 is the upper range for sure.

Sounds pretty sick. How's toxicity, estro sides, prolactin, and lethargy? Also, how long would it typically be ran?
 
Fondly is a strong word. It really wasn't too great and you had to run it at least 16mg per day to get any real results. Pretty mild, but slow steady keep-able gains.
 
Fondly is a strong word. It really wasn't too great and you had to run it at least 16mg per day to get any real results. Pretty mild, but slow steady keep-able gains.

Hmm. Little different than what I've heard, but seems interesting. Would it offer anything more than perhaps DMZ or m-sten?
 
Sounds pretty sick. How's toxicity, estro sides, prolactin, and lethargy? Also, how long would it typically be ran?

It is pretty toxic, there is no estrogen conversion with it, there is a chance for prolactin increases but from what ive seen its minimal, Lethargy seems minimal to non existent. If running test or something that converts to estrogen make sure you run an ai and you shouldnt see and side efects from the methyl-d. I would do 4-6 weeks no more than 6.
 
It is pretty toxic, there is no estrogen conversion with it, there is a chance for prolactin increases but from what ive seen its minimal, Lethargy seems minimal to non existent. If running test or something that converts to estrogen make sure you run an ai and you shouldnt see and side efects from the methyl-d. I would do 4-6 weeks no more than 6.

Awesome information, thank you
 
Awesome information, thank you

Your quite welcome brother, i can go into deeper detail if your curious about anything just lmk.
 
Your quite welcome brother, i can go into deeper detail if your curious about anything just lmk.

Any specific numbers on increase in lifts? It would probably be for a kicker in a test cycle, goals to gain some lean size and as much strength as possible. Any other compound that is far superior for strength gains?
 
Any specific numbers on increase in lifts? It would probably be for a kicker in a test cycle, goals to gain some lean size and as much strength as possible. Any other compound that is far superior for strength gains?

It is very good for strength, No specifics unfortunately everyones body chemistry is different. The only that would be far superior imo would be halotestin. Sd or m1t might treat you better or it might not its tough to say unless you have utilized all those compounds before.
 
Fondly is a strong word. It really wasn't too great and you had to run it at least 16mg per day to get any real results. Pretty mild, but slow steady keep-able gains.

Yep, I've ran it stacked with m1t, and solo.

It's weak sauce.

Pro dienolone is better
 
Back
Top