M-1-T half life

MrTrap said:

...
But I thought MT was pretty crappy? Is MT as anabolic as test? It looks like you compared M-1-T to test enan in your earlier post.

Traps
Click to expand...
17a-methyl testosterone is very anabolic but considered a pretty useless agent due to the potency of the metabolites. It will aromatize into 17a-methyl estradiol which is about 100 times as potent as estradiol. So, the time it spends as methyl test it is VERY anabolic but as soon as it aromatizes it is VERY estrogenic.

Is methyl test as anabolic as test base? Yes...but as soon as it aromatizes you better have some anti-e's on hand.

With M-1-T there is no aromatization so the issues with methyl estradiol are eliminated...it maintains all the anabolic properties with none of the bloat.

Chemo
 
Chemo,
If M-1-t is a much better anabolic steroid vs m-test (1255% better) then why is it only 200% better than test prop? m-test must be a pretty hopeless anabolic steroid used primarily for it androgenic strength enhancing effects.

Also the Vida numbers have significant variation, m1-t is only 50% as anabolic and 25% as androgenic as test prop ref-46 but the same ref no. in 1-test Vida comparison gives 200%/100%. Its confusing.
 
Each of those values comes from a different study and were the results of that particular experiement. The bad thing is that there are no sandard doses. For example, it does not say 200% as anabolic of "X" mg test prop. There is great variation with dose comparison and hence the data.

Chemo
 
Don't forget, ratios and comparisons sometimes mean jack **** in the real world. ;)
 
So then its unfair to just say that it 200%/30% anabolic/androgenic as test prop? without knowing the dosage and other study parameters? Also its like choosing the best number and ignoring the rest.

Looking at methyl primos data, it has a slightly better profile - 200%/<15% and it has the same ref-100.
 
Yeah...but that is methyl primo...

Just the 1-methylation makes it orally active let alone the 17-methylation. 17-Methyl primo is some potent ****!

Chemo
 
receptors

"Once again, an individual opinion based on your research. I agree that FOR ME 5 mg ED would yield less gains but then again my receptors are not as fresh as the average prohormone user.

Chemo"

Is there anything other than time that can help "freshen the receptors?

Would it help to use M1T for a cycle, then 1T for the next cycle, then 4AD, then back to M1T?

Are "fresh receptors" just an "urban legend" or is this scientifically proven?
 
Today, I got real sleepy at work all day long.

Whatever may be going on is very subtle and strictly pure lean mass. It has to be since I am not blowing up.

Other than that, I am still waiting...

Someone please tell me, why the sleepiness? All potent androgens STIMULATE the central nervous system. WTF?

It the Methyl 1Test causing insulin resistance?

I wonder how it affects IGF1 systemically and locally.

Input, please...

Clarity
 
Re: receptors

kimo_brah said:

Are "fresh receptors" just an "urban legend" or is this scientifically proven?
Click to expand...

I tend to believe that the idea behind receptors is rather open to debate, and I feel that much of it is blow out of proportion and not as limiting as many believe. I know some will disagree.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top