Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Landis' Backup Drug Test Also Positive

yeahright

Well-known member
Landis' Backup Drug Test Also Positive
By JEROME PUGMIRE, AP Sports Writer


PARIS - Floyd Landis was fired by his team and the Tour de France no longer considered him its champion Saturday after his second doping sample tested positive for higher-than-allowable levels of testosterone.

The samples contained synthetic testosterone, indicating that it came from an outside source.

"I have received a text message from Chatenay-Malabry lab that indicates the 'B' sample of Floyd Landis' urine confirms testosterone was taken in an exogenous way," Pierre Bordry, who heads the French anti-doping council, told The Associated Press shortly after the "B" sample results were released.

Lab head Jacques De Ceaurriz said the isotope testing procedure was "foolproof."

"No error is possible in isotopic readings," he told the AP.

Landis had claimed the testosterone was "natural and produced by my own organism," and once again maintained his innocence.

"I have never taken any banned substance, including testosterone," he said in a statement. "I was the strongest man at the Tour de France, and that is why I am the champion.

"I will fight these charges with the same determination and intensity that I bring to my training and racing. It is now my goal to clear my name and restore what I worked so hard to achieve."

The Swiss-based team Phonak immediately severed ties with Landis, and the UCI said it would ask USA Cycling to open disciplinary proceedings against him.

"Landis will be dismissed without notice for violating the team's internal Code of Ethics," Phonak said in a statement. "Landis will continue to have legal options to contest the findings. However, this will be his personal affair, and the Phonak team will no longer be involved in that."

Tour de France director Christian Prudhomme said Landis no longer was considered champion, but the decision to strip him of his title rests with the International Cycling Union.

"It goes without saying that for us Floyd Landis is no longer the winner of the 2006 Tour de France," Prudhomme told the AP in a telephone interview. "Our determination is even stronger now to fight against doping and to defend this magnificent sport."

Prudhomme said runner-up Oscar Pereiro would likely be the new winner.

"We can't imagine a different outcome," Prudhomme said.

Reached in his hometown of Vigo, Spain, Pereiro saw it that way, too.

"Now I consider myself the winner," he said, while acknowledging that the final decision was up to the UCI and subject to a legal challenge by Landis.

Pereiro said that he regretted not having been able to celebrate a win properly _ in Paris, wearing the winner's yellow jersey, having his photograph taken on the podium.

"I would have liked to have lived that day, it would have been the best day of my life, as a sportsman," he said.

Pereiro added that he felt badly for Landis.

"I consider him my friend, it surprised me and hurt me to hear what had happened to him," he said. "I trust Floyd, but the analysis shows he may have broken a rule. He failed an anti-doping test. If you fail the norms set, then you have to be withdrawn."

If stripped of the title, Landis would become the first winner in the 103-year history of cycling's premier race to lose his Tour crown over doping allegations.

UCI lawyer Philippe Verbiest said Landis would officially remain Tour champion pending the U.S. disciplinary process, which involves a series of steps:

Documentation from the positive tests will be forwarded to the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, which gives the evidence to a review panel. The panel will make a recommendation to USADA, which would decide if a penalty _ likely a two-year ban _ is appropriate. That decision is forwarded to USA Cycling, the UCI and the World Anti-Doping Agency. Landis can accept the decision or begin an appeals process, which can take up to six months.

"Until he is found guilty or admits guilt, he will keep the yellow jersey," he said. "This is normal. You are not sanctioned before you are found guilty."

The results of the second test come nearly two weeks after he stood atop the winner's podium on the Champs-Elysees in the champion's yellow jersey.

Testosterone, a male sex hormone, helps build muscle and improve stamina. The urine tests were done July 20 after Landis' Stage 17 victory during a grueling Alpine leg, when he regained nearly eight minutes against then-leader Pereiro _ and went on to win the three-week race.

The tests turned up a testosterone/epitestosterone ratio of 11:1 _ far in excess of the 4:1 limit.

"It's incredibly disappointing," three-time Tour winner Greg LeMond said by phone from the starting line at the Pan Mass Challenge in Sturbridge, Mass. "I don't think he has much chance at all to try to prove his innocence."

The case is expected to go to the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency; the process could take months, possibly with appeals to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

"It doesn't end here," said Landis' Spanish lawyer, Jose Maria Buxeda. "What matters is the concept. A prohibited substance has been found in the samples, but no immediate sanction comes into effect yet. The rider will defend himself."

Landis, a 30-year-old former mountain biker, says he was tested eight other times during the three-week tour and those results came back negative.

Landis has hired high-profile American lawyer Howard Jacobs, who has represented several athletes in doping cases.

Jacobs plans to go after the UCI for allegedly leaking information regarding the sample testing.

Earlier this week, a New York Times report cited a source from the UCI saying that a second analysis of Landis' "A" sample by carbon isotope ratio testing had detected synthetic testosterone _ meaning it was ingested.

"The offense is complete," World Anti-Doping Agency chairman **** Pound said. "All that remains to be seen is what the sanction is.

"A doping offense occurs when a presence of a prohibited substance is detected in the urine or blood analysis. That's been done," he said.

Since the Phonak team was informed of the positive test on July 27, Landis and his defense team have offered various explanations for the high testosterone reading _ including cortisone shots taken for pain in Landis' degenerating hip; drinking beer and whiskey the night before; thyroid medication; and his natural metabolism.

Another theory _ dehydration _ was rebuffed by anti-doping experts.

"When I heard it was synthetic hormone, it is almost impossible to be caused by natural events. It's kind of a downer," said LeMond, the first American to win the Tour. "I feel for Floyd's family. I hope Floyd will come clean on it and help the sport. We need to figure out how to clean the sport up, and we need the help of Floyd."

In Murrieta, Calif., where Landis lives, an AP reporter was asked by police to leave the gated community when she attempted to approach his house. Several cars were parked in front, and the blinds were drawn.

A man who said he was a friend of the family, but didn't want his name used, answered the phone at the Landis' house and confirmed the cyclist was there.

"We're drinking some coffee, and that's about it," he said.

Despite the latest test results a sign at a nearby freeway exit said, "Welcome Home Floyd Landis, 2006 Tour de France Winner."

In Lancaster County, Pa., where Landis was raised in a conservative Mennonite home, neighbors vowed their support.

"All he has accomplished, he has attained through his hard work and discipline. We are very confident he will prove his innocence. It is very unfortunate that these tests were revealed before he had a chance to do so," said Tammy Martin, a longtime family friend.

Paul and Arlene Landis, who have supported their son since the doping scandal broke, were out of town on a previously scheduled vacation.

A sign posted on their front yard said, "God Bless, Went Camping."

___
Invalid Link Removed

Associated Press Writers Jamey Keaten, Jean-Luc Courthial in Paris, Erica Bulman in Geneva, Allison Hoffman in Murrieta, Calif. and Michael Rubinkam in Ephrata, Pa.; and Sports Writers Vinay Cherwoo in New York and Steve Wilson in London contributed to this report.
 
Damn...when they first announced that he had failed his test I was kind of hoping that it was just due to the ratio of Epitestosterone to Testosterone being off due to something explainable...wonder what he took? It's just kind of weird that there are certainly undetectable ways to cheat in cycling and he apparently chose to use something that he sure to be tested for...:think:

Boss_K said:
I wish the public would realize the truth behind what is going on here.

What do you mean...I might be a little out of the loop here?
 
Boss_K said:
I wish the public would realize the truth behind what is going on here.
What is the truth behind it? it seems to me he is either guilty of doping or the test was tainted/tampered with.
 
Even if he was taking exogenous testosterone he still road
past that finish line first, ahead of all of the other riders who were taking testosterone, igf-1, growth hormone...epo.

unfortunately this means even more bad news for steroids. The entire reason they are banned is because athletes use them for performance enhancement. bodybuilders and those looking to improve health are not taken into the equation when people pass laws meant to curb doping. we are the ones that will recieve the punishment for any new developments against steroid use meant to stop doping, not the athletes.

****
 
BUCKNUTS said:
What is the truth behind it? it seems to me he is either guilty of doping or the test was tainted/tampered with.

I get the feeling the French tampered with it. They're sick of Americans winning their tourney. Landis was tested a number of times during the tour, all negative up until the one in question.
 
Banning the guy won't get him to stop doing 'roids! It also won't set any examples to deter other people from doing it either. The same is true when it comes to the death penalty. If it worked, no one would commit murders but it still happens. Hmm I wonder if the steroids he took resided in his fat cells... and when he burned off the thousands of calories during the race, it got released back into his blood stream?
 
SubliminalX said:
I get the feeling the French tampered with it. They're sick of Americans winning their tourney. Landis was tested a number of times during the tour, all negative up until the one in question.
Damn it! I should have guessed the French were behind this,I hate French people,oh wait I am French scratch that....
 
SubliminalX said:
I get the feeling the French tampered with it. They're sick of Americans winning their tourney. Landis was tested a number of times during the tour, all negative up until the one in question.
Seriously though why would Landis take test when that is so easily detected and there are any number of performance enhancers that cannot be detected? It does seem funny.
 
BUCKNUTS said:
Seriously though why would Landis take test when that is so easily detected and there are any number of performance enhancers that cannot be detected? It does seem funny.

And it's wierd that the first 4 tests were negative, the 5th was positive, then the last 3 were negative. Or something like that. It's just that one sample in the middle. It would make more sense if every sample after the positive one was also positive.
 
BUCKNUTS said:
Seriously though why would Landis take test when that is so easily detected and there are any number of performance enhancers that cannot be detected? It does seem funny.

I agree completely...

SubliminalX said:
And it's wierd that the first 4 tests were negative, the 5th was positive, then the last 3 were negative. Or something like that. It's just that one sample in the middle. It would make more sense if every sample after the positive one was also positive.

I'm pretty sure that two in a row tested positive.
 
stxnas said:
I agree completely...



I'm pretty sure that two in a row tested positive.

Two tests on the same sample. Each sample is split into two (an A and a B) with the B sample only being used for confirmation testing if the A sample detects something.
 
yeahright said:
Two tests on the same sample. Each sample is split into two (an A and a B) with the B sample only being used for confirmation testing if the A sample detects something.

Yeah, I was thinking about that this morning and was coming back to clarify my statement...you beat me to it. Thanks YR.
 
May be he decided to go for broke. At the time, he was quickly approaching the sunset of his career, and he probably figured that it was now or never. What did he got to lose? Nothing ventured nothing gained. Either fade away into sunset :whiner: or, risk it all, roll the dice..:whip: :head: 'It is test right? May be I can just explain my spike in natural test...':think:
 
I heard an interview with the head of America's anti-doping agency and he totally dismissed the possibilty of tampering, because he says samples are not sent to the lab with names but with numbers and lab employees don't even know whose sample it is they are testing.I still think tampering is a possibility as that is not by a long shot fool proof. i can't get past the fact that it was test,if you are some broke **** biker with 50 bucks to your name mabey you use test, but Landis had money behind him and he is not a complete moron so I just can't see the choice of test it makes no sense.
 
BUCKNUTS said:
I heard an interview with the head of America's anti-doping agency and he totally dismissed the possibilty of tampering, because he says samples are not sent to the lab with names but with numbers and lab employees don't even know whose sample it is they are testing.I still think tampering is a possibility as that is not by a long shot fool proof. i can't get past the fact that it was test,if you are some broke **** biker with 50 bucks to your name mabey you use test, but Landis had money behind him and he is not a complete moron so I just can't see the choice of test it makes no sense.
I'm not usually a conspiracy guy, but that bothers me too. That's just asking to get caught. It should be interesting to see what path this story takes.
 
Wouldn't the only thing that could show up like that and then not again in later tests be something like methyl test?? A half-life of a few hours, then gone.

I think tampering with the tests would have been difficult, but crushing up a tab or two of methyl-test and slipping into a water bottle would have been a lot easier. Just a guess.

Other than some aggression, what possible performancing enhancing effect could something like that give anyway? Especially for that type of event.

I definitely think he was somehow set-up, too bad he'll never be able to prove that if that's what happened.
 
Back
Top