Hulk Hogan has small legs

[UberPooper1]

im watching donny deutsch on cnbc and the hulksters legs are pretty small. i bet i could squat more than that guy. they need to get a picture of his legs on that reality show of his. knock some of that ****yness out of that bastard. hulks a douche bag. just thought i would vent

 

[Rodja]

im watching donny deutsch on cnbc and the hulksters legs are pretty small. i bet i could squat more than that guy. they need to get a picture of his legs on that reality show of his. knock some of that ****yness out of that bastard. hulks a douche bag. just thought i would vent

He has had a knee and a hip replacement...lets see how big your legs are after two major reconstructive surgeries.

 

[Beelzebub]

i think hulk hogan is badass. he's like 60 something, isn't he? and like rodja mentioned, he's had some injuries/surgeries in his lifetime too. walk in those shoes before you judge. JMO.

 

[glenihan]

can we get a pic of your wheels?

 

[Mulletsoldier]

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Yeah, man, total twigs...I'm sure your legs are twice that size brah...:blink:

 

[Jayhawkk]

I watched it when he lifted Andre the giant and since I was a kid I don't know if there was anything I missed that made it easier but still...You don't do all those over the head lifts with lil legs. I loved the Hulkster!

 

[t_dot_porkchop]

decent legs, but those are certainly NOT 24" pythons, brothaaaa!!!! lol

 

[bigblank69]

decent legs, but those are certainly NOT 24" pythons, brothaaaa!!!! lol

On a guy who is 5'10, no they are not. On a guy who is 6'6 or 6'7. Yes they probably are

 

[houseman]

On a guy who is 5'10, no they are not. On a guy who is 6'6 or 6'7. Yes they probably are

On someone that tall, it would make them SMALLER - not bigger!

 

[jarhead]

On someone that tall, it would make them SMALLER - not bigger!

No, I think they would just APPEAR to be smaller(it's more stretched out), but tape wise would still be big. Just like an 18" arm on a guy 5'6" would look bigger than it is, being on a more compact, shorter frame. Now this is getting confusing.

 

[bigblank69]

No, I think they would just APPEAR to be smaller(it's more stretched out), but tape wise would still be big. Just like an 18" arm on a guy 5'6" would look bigger than it is, being on a more compact, shorter frame. Now this is getting confusing.

Your correct, For example I have 21" arms, but I'm 6'3, so my arms in a photo look big, but when compared to a photo of a 5'7 bodybuilder with 21" arms, my arms look tiny.