Fair, report back and let us know how you get on
For sure man.
Logically speaking in taking this there is only 3 outcomes;
1. It's highly effective.
2. It's barely effective.
3. It does nothing.
Based on a few factors;
1. Will the dose I take of Geum japonicum yield enough of it's active studied chemicals to that actually make it to my muscles to effect myogenesis sufficiently enough to make a difference?
There are a few animal studies but they are looking at other effects so it's hard to say to what degree it may replicate the cellular studies.
You're right we don't know if they active chemical is orally active or at what dose is needed to reach high enough levels in the bloodstream since those studies were cellular. But the ones that are sound so promising if effective.
Here's one on heart cell regeneration after a heart attack.
Invalid Link Removed 2011 May;39(5):414-9.
[Myocardial regeneration and repair of infarcted heart by a new composition isolated from Geum japonicum].
[Article in Chinese]
Invalid Link Removed1,
Invalid Link Removed,
Invalid Link Removed,
Invalid Link Removed,
Invalid Link Removed,
Invalid Link Removed.
Invalid Link Removed
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
To isolate the cardiogenic fraction, which can enhance cardiogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) from Geum japonicum. The therapeutic effect of the isolated cardiogenic fraction was further tested in a rat myocardial infarction (MI) model.
METHOD:
Bioassay guided fractionation method was used for the isolation of the cardiogenic fraction, named as heart repair fraction (HRF). MI was induced by a permanent ligation of left anterior descending coronary artery. The rats exhibiting similarly decreased values of left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and fraction shortening (LVFS) were used. The rats in test group (n = 10) were subject to HRF treatment (20 mg×kg(-1)×d(-1)) through gastric gavage daily for 4 weeks. Water alone (2 ml/d) was given through gastric gavage to rats in the control group (n = 10). The cardiac function was assessed by echocardiography at different time points. Masson trichrome staining was used for evaluation of the infarct size. Morphological and immunohistochemical studies were performed to investigate the HRF mediated myocardial regeneration.
RESULTS:
LVEF (66.2% ± 6.9%) and LVFS (46.8% ± 5.8%) were significantly increased two weeks post HRF treatment compared with the values (LVEF: 55.7% ± 6.0% and LVFS: 36.4% ± 5.2%) in control rats (all P < 0.01). The improved heart function was further restored 4 weeks post HRF treatment (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the treatment of acute MI with this HRF significantly reduced the infarct size (19.0% ± 6.1%) compared with that (31.1% ± 8.6%) in control rats (P < 0.01). Substantial regeneration of cardiomyocytes in infarcted region of the HRF treated heart was also observed that replaced a considerable part of the infarcted heart tissues resulting in remarkable reduction of the infarct size.
CONCLUSION:
The properties of this HRF isolated from Geum japonicum in stimulating substantial regeneration of myocardium in infarct region with consequently improved cardiac function appear to be new and represent a new approach for the treatment of MI.