Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

First Time Using SERM Questions

mattingly

New member
Half way through 8 weeks of Furaguno @ 150mg ed and just started 4 weeks of Epistane @ 30mg ed, and have Nolva, Inhibit-e, and CEL PCT Assist available for PCT. This will be my first time using a SERM, and was wondering what combo would work best, what dosing, and when should I introduce each into my PCT.


TIA.......
 
Looks like I'll be running Nolva inverse to the Inhibit-e, with Nolva @ 20-20-10-10 and Inhibit-e @ 25-25-50-50-25 and the PCT Assist throughout.

Thanks for the suggestions.
 
I think you should run the inhibit-e 50-50-25-25, or 25-50-50-25
Ive never seen it ran for 5 weeks or ran at a low dose for 2 weeks then increased then tapered. Hopefully someone with more experience can chime in, Geek possibly? (mixed up names ):frustrate
 
From my research the inhibit e should be ran inverse to the Nolva then droped down like you said you were going to run in your second post.
 
mjswss57 said:
From my research the inhibit e should be ran inverse to the Nolva then droped down like you said you were going to run in your second post.
Click to expand...


Thanks. I've also heard of people running it ramped up to the max recommended dose of 75 mg ed by weeks 3-4 and then tapering down to 50 then 25 mg, but 75 mg of ATD has pretty much eliminated my libido in the past and I'm thinking that estrogen issues would be minimal from the Furaguno and Epistane.
 
nolva 40/20/20/10 and pct assist would suffice. liver assist xt / reduce xt could also be useful in there
 
GeekPoop said:
nolva 40/20/20/10 and pct assist would suffice. liver assist xt / reduce xt could also be useful in there
Click to expand...

Do you think the Inhibit-e should be left out because of how mild the cycle is?

Would you include it with the Nolva if it was PCT for a Phera, M1, or S Drol cycle?
 
mattingly said:
Do you think the Inhibit-e should be left out because of how mild the cycle is?

Would you include it with the Nolva if it was PCT for a Phera, M1, or S Drol cycle?
Click to expand...
No, I suggest dropping the Inhibit cuz your running a serm.

Id still leave the Inhibit out as long as youre running a serm.
 
GeekPoop said:
No, I suggest dropping the Inhibit cuz your running a serm.

Id still leave the Inhibit out as long as youre running a serm.
Click to expand...

I had read a pretty extensive thread about running ATD inverse to your SERM.

Do you think it's not necessary or overkill on the estrogen removal?
 
jherman08 said:
Keep in mind Geek works for the company that makes inhibit-e, so if hes not suggesting you take it i'd listen to him.
Click to expand...

I completely understand, it's just that I started out with the idea that the Nolva would replace the Inhibit-e, then read dozens of pages where it was recommended to run a SERM inverse to an ATD product like Inhibit-e or Rebound XT.

Now hearing that the Nolva should replace the ATD has me curious if all the info about running a SERM + ATD was just incorrect, a different opinion on PCT, or something else.
 
same here, read around here and realized inhibit-e wasnt really necessary unless no serm was ran, as well as running it with/after a serm may increase chances of rebound gyno.
 
mattingly said:
I had read a pretty extensive thread about running ATD inverse to your SERM.

Do you think it's not necessary or overkill on the estrogen removal?
Click to expand...
Yeah theres graphs and people say as you lower the serm, raise the AI. I just dont really see a reason when youre running a serm tho.

I ran an uh... "bigger" cycle and I experiemtned with nolva and clomi for pct and never ramped my ai up, it was the same dose for 4+ months. This was a script AI but still an ai.

You could add it in I suppose but I usually just reccomend 1 or the other
 
jherman08 said:
same here, read around here and realized inhibit-e wasnt really necessary unless no serm was ran, as well as running it with/after a serm may increase chances of rebound gyno.
Click to expand...
agreed good point here.

not bashing or anything but OP no reason to over thinkg / complicate PCT. I try to keep it simple cuz over 2-3 years of experimenting on myself I found out the simplier it is, the better it works.
 
GeekPoop said:
agreed good point here.

not bashing or anything but OP no reason to over thinkg / complicate PCT. I try to keep it simple cuz over 2-3 years of experimenting on myself I found out the simplier it is, the better it works.
Click to expand...

No, not taking it as bashing at all....... I appreciate you guys taking the time to go through all this with me. Looks like I'll be sticking with the Nolva and leaving out the Inhibit-e.

Thanks
 
mattingly said:
No, not taking it as bashing at all....... I appreciate you guys taking the time to go through all this with me. Looks like I'll be sticking with the Nolva and leaving out the Inhibit-e.

Thanks
Click to expand...
sounds good bud!

A lot of people take my posts the wrong way, hard to express yourself with just texts. :raincloud:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top