Sunder said:At least Pat Arnold looked good in his suit. I'm surprised the media used that picture instead of some "sleezy" type.
If only the "it's legal if it's found in nature" line was true.
I see death in nature all the time....it would be nice to have a discussion about it in the deep woods near a lake with Amy Shipley and Don Catlin...
jjohn said:Read this. Looks like we'll have to order some now before it gets banned!
Invalid Link Removed
JonesersRX7 said:I wouldn't say that suit looked good..... :rofl: serious....
The title of this thread is misleading, they aren't saying AMP is a steroid... the are labeling Geranamine as an amphetamine.
which isnt true eitherJonesersRX7 said:I wouldn't say that suit looked good..... :rofl: serious....
The title of this thread is misleading, they aren't saying AMP is a steroid... the are labeling Geranamine as an amphetamine.
Leggo my Ego said:She wants a penis:good:
the article's reasoning is flawedCDB said:Correct me if I'm wrong, but in this article it seems they are wrong on DSHEA process as well. I thought the burden, at least as originally intended, was on the FDA to show a product is harmful before they can yank it.
.rampage jackson said:...wow that was a totally different topic than advertised. I want my 2 minutes back!
SubliminalX said:Well, I guess it's nice to finally know what's in AMP. I'm on a high right now just from one red pill. :dance:
Interesting. I find them the best stim. I ever used. No overflow, just Really good feeling, no crash also!!CDB said:Generally as a rule with amphetamines, and this is apparently similar, low doses over time are better than concentrated doses. I think the air force uses something similar in go pills or stay awakes, or whatever they're called these days.
CDB said:Generally as a rule with amphetamines, and this is apparently similar, low doses over time are better than concentrated doses. I think the air force uses something similar in go pills or stay awakes, or whatever they're called these days.
I like the fact that caitlin conceedes he hasnt see the studies but concludes that "the stuff is dangerous and should be removed" The studes were done in the 1950's and are available if you know where to look. I guess along with being unscientific in method he is lax on reasearch. His conclusion on norbolethone was bs too, and I bet he knows it. Safety studies done in 1966 concluded the opposite of what caitlin stated. Nice objectivetyCEDeoudes59 said:big difference too...
:burger:
they are seriously targeting pat.
as for shipley, she probably leads a sad sad meaningless life. gets no action, so she's got to ruin the lives of men
jjohn said:I am not complaining...I just love it. As long as it works![]()
I will second this. I know they are being coy for a reason, but I think PA is usually pretty honest. I tend to think the superdrol et al affair was a little irresponsable to say the least.LakeMountD said:Haha then why not use cocaine lol.
I mean don't get me wrong I am all about the supplements out there, I just don't like how the side effects are downplayed. Heck a 15 week cycles of test is safer than a damn 4-5 week moderate dosage cycle of Superdrol these days, yet they are completely played down.
cromwell said:I will second this. I know they are being coy for a reason, but I think PA is usually pretty honest. I tend to think the superdrol et al affair was a little irresponsable to say the least.
Leggo my Ego said:Da-amn!!
DR.D said:I don't lay down the law very often, but sometimes I just can't ignore things.This is one of those times.
DR.D said:You and LMD are both mistaken I'm sorry to say. AMP contains stuff that people don't even know about, thus the nature of the post I deleted earlier, but you didn't bother to listen then either. However, I personally did the alpha testing of superdrol and can testify to it's safety. "Superdrol et al affair"? Am I missing something beside a bunch of bs hype that never gave any bloodwork to prove it?? If superdrol is so bad, where are your numbers to show it? I've been doing this for almost 20 years now and can honestly say that superdrol is one of the nicest orals out there, legal or otherwise. The only thing cleaner is M4OHN from my experience. Hell, I don't even use liver supps with those two compounds! Please get your facts straight guys and don't perpetuate the bs. I only speak the truth here, unless you think you know more about this than I do, but if you really think PA's a "good guy" in all of this you obviously don't know too much bro!
I agree That PA was not being totally honest, in fact he has been ok in terms of supplement marketing, but I am indeed aware of his other escapades but they do not involve the general public. I stand corrected. I am not questioning you or disrespecting you nor did I say that superdrol "was worse" than other orals. Almost all orals by dint of action are somewhat hepatoxic with the possible exceptions of andriol(which is generally not efffective ) the compound you mentioned and possibly primabolan to an extent. There are certainly far worse substances than super.Everyone reacts differently to these compunds to soem degree and bloodwork should always be done, my contention is that Alot of people mistakenly assumed it was a PH and did not take the requisite steps to protect them selves. You could say the same for MIt, I suppose. Granted many of these peole were illinformed and not thinking, which I am not blaming you for. I understand the reason for not being blatant in advertising the nature of the compound, however there was at least some confusion there. I respect you and your knowledge, I am simply trying to explain my intial comment which could have been expressed some what better. It's an odd industry.DR.D said:You and LMD are both mistaken I'm sorry to say. AMP contains stuff that people don't even know about, thus the nature of the post I deleted earlier, but you didn't bother to listen then either. However, I personally did the alpha testing of superdrol and can testify to it's safety. "Superdrol et al affair"? Am I missing something beside a bunch of bs hype that never gave any bloodwork to prove it?? If superdrol is so bad, where are your numbers to show it? I've been doing this for almost 20 years now and can honestly say that superdrol is one of the nicest orals out there, legal or otherwise. The only thing cleaner is M4OHN from my experience. Hell, I don't even use liver supps with those two compounds! Please get your facts straight guys and don't perpetuate the bs. I only speak the truth here, unless you think you know more about this than I do, but if you really think PA's a "good guy" in all of this you obviously don't know too much bro!
LakeMountD said:... I don't care what anyone says they DEFINITELY downplayed the toxicity of superdrol. I don't have any side effects from it as I did with M1T (man did I feel like **** on this stuff), and superdrol put mass on me similar to M1T, yet, they are close to each other on how harsh they are (judging by my bloodwork and many others).