what is yalls option on dr tony hugh's from enhanced athletes theory on anabolic matrix . I'm curious to see if people have any data they've collected or options based on experience that can prove this accurate or inaccurate ?
He has a you tube video on it. Basically he was comparing sarm stacks compared to AAS stacks. LGD is like DBOL, S4 is the Winstrol, that type of marketing hype. By two guys that are jacked AF, but are using the actual AAS stacks.... lol
oof. I'm personally not a fan of SARMs due to the excessive lack of safety studies. We KNOW AAS work, and we know exactly how they work and the dosages needed for said gains...all while knowing what side effects to expect and how to counter them. The same cannot be said for SARMs
he's comparing the most compatible , but the video was about the different pathways of growth , and says steroids are best and i was wondering about others idea on the different pathways of growth
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.