Donald Trump running for president

[Jiigzz]

Truth ^^^^^ And imagine if Russia started a Military Alliance with Venezuela, made promises and agreements to never to expand west/north and made a international agreement to keep peace. Then, a few years later Columbia joins up...tempers flair but we move on. Then little Central American countries leaders feel "threatened" by the US "Government (after all, we have a big history of illegally overthrowing dictators and installing corrupt puppets in that region) so they sign up all the way up to Guatamala. Year later, Mexico says, Fuq it, we want to be part of Team Russia and sign up with a military alliance with them, then the US government goes apeshyt crazy and decides to invade to overthrow the Mexican government and install a puppet of their own choosing in order to protect the National Security interests of the US border and inland.

Russia bad
USA good

LMFAO with all the double standards!

Anyways I havent done this in a very long time, but you have just earned a rare gold star for your excellent post today!

Since its gay pride for an entire month you get the rainbow colors in the backdrop too.

View attachment 217673

Diplomacy is a chess game.

I disagree.

1) Putin moved into Syria because Obama was weak. Putin moved into Crimea because Obama was weak. And after 4 years of NOT invading anyone while Trump was President, Putin move into Ukraine again because Biden was weak. There is a clear pattern there for anyone paying attention. Democrats are meek and weak and very predictable. Your own abject fear of a Russian nuclear response says it all. WHY wasn't Russia worrying about a US response when they invaded Ukraine?? Why is the western world the only ones worrying about how Russia will respond to anything we do??

M.A.D. is only relevant if the Russian homeland was threatened. It DOES NOT apply to Russia invading its neighbors and the free world pushing back. We could technically have US ground and air troops in Ukraine as the request of the Ukrainian government defending Ukrainian territory and it would not mean nuclear war with Russia. If Russia didn't want to be in a fight with US troops in Ukraine they could easily return to their own country. M.A.D. is only applicable as a response to a nuclear launch and no one honestly thinks Russia is willing to be the first one to launch and end all life on earth when they invade a neighbor and get pushed back with conventional arms. Putin WANTS you to think that, and fear him, and this is exactly why he steamrolls over liberals worldwide.

Why is it that we are always worried how Russia will respond, and they never sit around hand wringing about how we will respond???? Yeah... exactly.

2) OPEC is apparently near full capacity already. Biden is groveling for them to increase production and they are telling him there isn't much more they can do. Biden is also begging Iran and Venezuela. Biden is crawling all over the world begging for more oil production. Biden is ALSO releasing a million barrels per day from the US strategic oil reserves for the 6 months prior to the election trying to lower gas prices (and who is supposed to refill our war reserves later, and at what cost????)

The US could easily ramp up its drilling and production of oil and gas (heck we could be building nuclear power plants, too) but Biden refuses to do this because (Per Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg) “We … need to make sure we’re not galloping after permanent solutions to immediate short-term problems.” Meaning Biden doesn't want to solve the problem with more oil and gas, which we COULD DO, but would rather suffer in what he sees as the short term on a singular course towards the only long term solution he is willing to consider or accept, and that is a complete transformation of the US economy away from fossil fuels. This is a CHOICE that Biden made. A blunder that is his alone. And in November the American people are going to weigh in on that decision.

Germany and the other woke green energy cultists are feeling the same pains, and are going to freeze their asses-off in winter. Good luck. We'll be too busy righting our own ship to help. Sorry.

Poptart didn't invade under Trump because they were friends lol. Trump spoke highly of Putin. He didn't do it because he was "afraid of Trump" lol.

You do realise they've literally threatened nuclear war if Western powers intervene, right? How does MAD only apply if the Russian homeland is threatened when they are literally saying they will deploy nuclear weapons if the west intervenes directly at all? There is literally a video of the Russian foreign minister saying the threat of nuclear war is real if the west intervenes: Invalid Link Removed

You're also wrong about OPEC, the member countries are refusing to increase supply - they're not near maximal production at all. Just in the last 10 days they agreed to a small output boost, but they have capacity to increase it further but are outright refusing.

 

[Jiigzz]

I disagree.

1) Putin moved into Syria because Obama was weak. Putin moved into Crimea because Obama was weak. And after 4 years of NOT invading anyone while Trump was President, Putin move into Ukraine again because Biden was weak. There is a clear pattern there for anyone paying attention. Democrats are meek and weak and very predictable. Your own abject fear of a Russian nuclear response says it all. WHY wasn't Russia worrying about a US response when they invaded Ukraine?? Why is the western world the only ones worrying about how Russia will respond to anything we do??

M.A.D. is only relevant if the Russian homeland was threatened. It DOES NOT apply to Russia invading its neighbors and the free world pushing back. We could technically have US ground and air troops in Ukraine as the request of the Ukrainian government defending Ukrainian territory and it would not mean nuclear war with Russia. If Russia didn't want to be in a fight with US troops in Ukraine they could easily return to their own country. M.A.D. is only applicable as a response to a nuclear launch and no one honestly thinks Russia is willing to be the first one to launch and end all life on earth when they invade a neighbor and get pushed back with conventional arms. Putin WANTS you to think that, and fear him, and this is exactly why he steamrolls over liberals worldwide.

Why is it that we are always worried how Russia will respond, and they never sit around hand wringing about how we will respond???? Yeah... exactly.

2) OPEC is apparently near full capacity already. Biden is groveling for them to increase production and they are telling him there isn't much more they can do. Biden is also begging Iran and Venezuela. Biden is crawling all over the world begging for more oil production. Biden is ALSO releasing a million barrels per day from the US strategic oil reserves for the 6 months prior to the election trying to lower gas prices (and who is supposed to refill our war reserves later, and at what cost????)

The US could easily ramp up its drilling and production of oil and gas (heck we could be building nuclear power plants, too) but Biden refuses to do this because (Per Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg) “We … need to make sure we’re not galloping after permanent solutions to immediate short-term problems.” Meaning Biden doesn't want to solve the problem with more oil and gas, which we COULD DO, but would rather suffer in what he sees as the short term on a singular course towards the only long term solution he is willing to consider or accept, and that is a complete transformation of the US economy away from fossil fuels. This is a CHOICE that Biden made. A blunder that is his alone. And in November the American people are going to weigh in on that decision.

Germany and the other woke green energy cultists are feeling the same pains, and are going to freeze their asses-off in winter. Good luck. We'll be too busy righting our own ship to help. Sorry.

Here is another video of Russia threatening "universal nuclear war" if the west enters Ukraine:

Invalid Link Removed

 

[ax1]

Poptart didn't invade under Trump because they were friends lol. Trump spoke highly of Putin. He didn't do it because he was "afraid of Trump" lol.

You do realise they've literally threatened nuclear war if Western powers intervene, right? How does MAD only apply if the Russian homeland is threatened when they are literally saying they will deploy nuclear weapons if the west intervenes directly at all?

You're also wrong about OPEC, the member countries are refusing to increase supply - they're not near maximal production at all. Just in the last 10 days they agreed to a small output boost, but they have capacity to increase it further but are outright refusing.

Thats why I disagree with this whole "weak" part, Groper Joe has for a half a century been very provocative with many sovereign nations all across the globe, supported invasions and destroyed more than a handful of countries. Bareback Obobo was under his wings, destroyed Lybia, Syria, prolonged the afghan and Iraq wars.

They are 100% totally Military Industrial Complex and far from weak. I mean, he has the the most powerful military in world history behind his back, and now its run by a bunch of trannies, hahahaa

Groper is actually on record back in the 90s saying any expansion of NATO would provoke Russia to be hostile, that was before the Baltic's even joined NATO. If he was really weak, he never would have promoted Ukraine's regime change back when he was with Obobo, thats why Russia took Crimea, and you cant blame them for taking it. He never would have promoted another NATO country to expand on Russia's border if he was weak, he knew the consequences and wanted it. Thats why Russia invaded, he knew they would and he truly didnt give a flying fuq. He's not weak, he just knows how to make his inner circle surrounding the Pentagon billions of dollars and empower his globalists agenda.

 

[BamBam54]

Here is another video of Russia threatening "universal nuclear war" if the west enters Ukraine:

Invalid Link Removed

Yeah, Russia "threatened". Look how scared you are. It worked perfectly. You've seen how crappy they performed in battle, and yet you somehow think we should be more scared of them, then they should be scared of us? Wow!

And don't let the MSM con you about the Trump/Putin dynamics. Twice Putin tried to test Trump on the battlefield. First with ground forces (Russian mercenaries) pushing across the Euphretes River towards our forces and Team Trump killed apx 200. How many Russians did your hero Obama kill with his silly red lines? LOL

Invalid Link Removed

The second time Putin was embarrassed by Trump launching missiles into Syria (supposedly under the protection of Russia) and finally threatened to shoot them down. Trump sent a mocking Twitter post and dared Putin to try, and sent another barrage of missiles.

Guess what Jiiggz.... no nuclear war. The bully Putin met his match. You can come out from hiding now.

 

[Jiigzz]

Yeah, Russia "threatened". Look how scared you are. It worked perfectly. You've seen how crappy they performed in battle, and yet you somehow think we should be more scared of them, then they should be scared of us? Wow!

And don't let the MSM con you about the Trump/Putin dynamics. Twice Putin tried to test Trump on the battlefield. First with ground forces (Russian mercenaries) pushing across the Euphretes River towards our forces and Team Trump killed apx 200. How many Russians did your hero Obama kill with his silly red lines? LOL

Invalid Link Removed

The second time Putin was embarrassed by Trump launching missiles into Syria (supposedly under the protection of Russia) and finally threatened to shoot them down. Trump sent a mocking Twitter post and dared Putin to try, and sent another barrage of missiles.

View attachment 217722

Guess what Jiiggz.... no nuclear war. The bully Putin met his match. You can come out from hiding now.

Russia might have weak forces, but their nuclear weapons arsenal is nothing to scoff at. A person might not be able to fist fight, but the second they pull out a firearm them not being able to fist fight is irrelevant.

Syria wasn't ex-soviet union territory. Why would Putin want a nuclear war over a place of dirt somewhere in the middle east? Putin believes Ukraine to be a rightful part of Russia, and I'm willing to bet he is much more willing to extend himself to prove as much. If you're wondering who I believe when it comes to whether or not they would use nuclear weapons, do I believe a random internet person who believes they won't, or a statement from Russia themselves saying they would? I'm more inclined to believe the latter.

Your post still deflects from your original comment that Russia wouldn't use nuclear weapons unless there was a threat on their soil directly. If your only counter argument is that "they haven't yet" it's because NATO hasn't entered into the Ukraine directly yet.

Shooting down missiles isn't still actively moving troops into a country Russia is telling NATO not to enter. Not even remotely the same thing. Russia wants Ukraine, it didn't want Syria

 

[Jiigzz]

On Truth Social, I may have sort of hinted at the notion that we should be organizing an actual insurrection or coup.

It was my first post, and I’m not sure if people trusted my intentions or who I was. Haha!

Oh well.,

No matter how anonymous you think you are, just be mindful everything is monitored

 

[BamBam54]

Russia might have weak forces, but their nuclear weapons arsenal is nothing to scoff at. A person might not be able to fist fight, but the second they pull out a firearm them not being able to fist fight is irrelevant.

Syria wasn't ex-soviet union territory. Why would Putin want a nuclear war over a place of dirt somewhere in the middle east? Putin believes Ukraine to be a rightful part of Russia, and I'm willing to bet he is much more willing to extend himself to prove as much. If you're wondering who I believe when it comes to whether or not they would use nuclear weapons, do I believe a random internet person who believes they won't, or a statement from Russia themselves saying they would? I'm more inclined to believe the latter.

Your post still deflects from your original comment that Russia wouldn't use nuclear weapons unless there was a threat on their soil directly. If your only counter argument is that "they haven't yet" it's because NATO hasn't entered into the Ukraine directly yet.

Shooting down missiles isn't still actively moving troops into a country Russia is telling NATO not to enter. Not even remotely the same thing. Russia wants Ukraine, it didn't want Syria

You really do fit the classic role of the weak and meek enemy Putin craves!! FIRST - I say again the entire point of "bluffing" is to make your adversary THINK you will do something that you have no intention of doing. SECOND - Where in those two videos you posted does Putin say anything about attacking the West if we support Ukraine with air or ground forces? Is there a time stamp you can reference?? The first video says nothing of the kind. The second video has text claiming it comes from some TV commentator, and a lowly colonel opining that to win the war against Ukraine they will have to use tactical nukes and then leading to full nuclear war. THAT reference had nothing to do with US forces in theater, but rather expressing that they can't hope to win against Ukraine without them. In which case, would the free world allow Putin to utterly destroy the people of Ukraine with nukes? Putin is counting on your weak knees as a step towards kneeling before him. Perhaps you best pucker up, then!!

 

[BamBam54]

You're also wrong about OPEC, the member countries are refusing to increase supply - they're not near maximal production at all. Just in the last 10 days they agreed to a small output boost, but they have capacity to increase it further but are outright refusing.

Says here that OPEC has removed all of their covid production cuts for July and August, and only two or three OPEC members have any additional capacity at all, and Saudi Arabia the largest has at most 1 million barrels a day of extra capacity.

Invalid Link Removed

And I already told you that the US is dumping an extra 1 million barrels a day right now from our emergency strategic reserves which should show you that (1) the 1 million barrels a day Saudi could produce makes almost no difference at all and (2) we shouldn't be releasing our emergency strategic reserve at all with war raging in Europe. If we stopped (like we should) and the Saudis went full force, we would be exactly where we are now. And then what??? The world buys more from Russia again?... ooops, that is what's funding the Russian war effort.

Nowhere do I hear anyone saying release the US oil/gas giants to go 100% on US production. Nope. The libs want green energy or nothing. And this winter the world will experience what 'nothing' feels like!!! Biden is clueless and Butigeg is pretending to ride a bicycle to work. Heck, the polar bears we are pretending to save are probably Russian. LOL

AND if the woke greenies get their way and we magically power the world with solar we will only be further under the thumb of China for its essential solar metals, the same way the world is currently reliant and desperate for Russian oil. Fools, the lot of 'em. Let it burn....

 

[ax1]

View attachment 217722

Guess what Jiiggz.... no nuclear war. The bully Putin met his match. You can come out from hiding now.

This tweet is nothing to cheer about. Syria was illegally invaded by US and NATO, US policy has left that country in ruins. Russia was actually there legally, they were invited by the Syrian Government. Launching missiles into Syria proved and solved nothing other than a few more measly bucks for the contractors to replace those missiles with stolen American taxpayer money.

But Assad killing innocent civilians as (and no, lmfao cant believe people really think it was Assad that drop the Saudi chems on people!) collateral damage=bad and evil, but the US/NATO killing innocent Syrian civilians with their carpet love bombs=freedom.

Our Founding Fathers would have condemned and arrested Dump for not ending the illegal un-Constitutional foreign entanglement his predecessor left him with.

 

[ax1]

"Ukraine cannot turn the tide in this war without western weapons and fast."

-Zolensky

America, dont be selfish and think about gas, milk, eggs and hot dogs, its time to take out your checkbooks and send more money to help solve more international crisis's that we created. LMFAO, keep the checkbook, they will just tax your bank accounts by printing more money out of thin air!!!!

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed

 

[Jiigzz]

Says here that OPEC has removed all of their covid production cuts for July and August, and only two or three OPEC members have any additional capacity at all, and Saudi Arabia the largest has at most 1 million barrels a day of extra capacity.

Invalid Link Removed

And I already told you that the US is dumping an extra 1 million barrels a day right now from our emergency strategic reserves which should show you that (1) the 1 million barrels a day Saudi could produce makes almost no difference at all and (2) we shouldn't be releasing our emergency strategic reserve at all with war raging in Europe. If we stopped (like we should) and the Saudis went full force, we would be exactly where we are now. And then what??? The world buys more from Russia again?... ooops, that is what's funding the Russian war effort.

Nowhere do I hear anyone saying release the US oil/gas giants to go 100% on US production. Nope. The libs want green energy or nothing. And this winter the world will experience what 'nothing' feels like!!! Biden is clueless and Butigeg is pretending to ride a bicycle to work. Heck, the polar bears we are pretending to save are probably Russian. LOL

AND if the woke greenies get their way and we magically power the world with solar we will only be further under the thumb of China for its essential solar metals, the same way the world is currently reliant and desperate for Russian oil. Fools, the lot of 'em. Let it burn....

It literally says this in the article you quoted:

Saudi Arabia, the kingpin in OPEC and the world’s second-largest oil producer, has about a million barrels per day of extra production capacity, but doesn’t want to use all of it, said Sankey.

Not to mention the other narratives on it: Invalid Link Removed

 

[Jiigzz]

You really do fit the classic role of the weak and meek enemy Putin craves!! FIRST - I say again the entire point of "bluffing" is to make your adversary THINK you will do something that you have no intention of doing. SECOND - Where in those two videos you posted does Putin say anything about attacking the West if we support Ukraine with air or ground forces? Is there a time stamp you can reference?? The first video says nothing of the kind. The second video has text claiming it comes from some TV commentator, and a lowly colonel opining that to win the war against Ukraine they will have to use tactical nukes and then leading to full nuclear war. THAT reference had nothing to do with US forces in theater, but rather expressing that they can't hope to win against Ukraine without them. In which case, would the free world allow Putin to utterly destroy the people of Ukraine with nukes? Putin is counting on your weak knees as a step towards kneeling before him. Perhaps you best pucker up, then!!

Heck, easy to be gung-ho when you aren't calling the shots though, eh?

Reality is, they have the capacity to do it and the US has no reason to get involved with a non-allied nation. The US only cares about Ukraine because Russia's influence would grow back to Soviet Era levels if Ukraine fell. Russia would control a lot more energy resources and staple food sources like wheat and grain. That's the ONLY reason the US cares, and they play it all under the guise of "freedom".

If the US cared about sovereignty, why the actual f*** did they invade sovereign nations after 9/11? The reality is they don't give a ****, they just care about having a powerful adversary and are sad they aren't the only nation invading nations.

The "lowly colonel" was talking about using nukes if NATO intervened, not because they were losing against Ukraine.

Why? Because [a collective] Nato decision will mean a de facto declaration of war on Russia. To win this war, whether we like it or not, we will have to use tactical nuclear weapons in the theatre of operations."

Colonel Knutov said this would entail the "use of powerful strategic nuclear weapons" which he said "means universal nuclear war.

It's also funny you criticise the Russian troops as being weak, when you achieved what exactly after 20 years in Afghanistan and nearly the same in Iraq?

Reality is, if you're against the invasion of Ukraine, then you are a hypocrite if you weren't also opposed to the wars in Syria and Iraq. But nope, people like to think the US is the hero

 

[rob112]

“We supply the weapons, you supply the bodies”-Americas “pro-Ukraine” policy

 

[Power-Lift]

"Joe Biden" HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

"Libtardz" HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

 

[BamBam54]

It literally says this in the article you quoted:

Saudi Arabia, the kingpin in OPEC and the world’s second-largest oil producer, has about a million barrels per day of extra production capacity, but doesn’t want to use all of it, said Sankey.

Not to mention the other narratives on it: Invalid Link Removed

Jiigz -- I am trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, but your reading comprehension has me concerned.

I literally SAID the Saudi's have another 1 million barrels per day of capacity (it was typed, you can't miss it!) and then you restate the same thing as if I never said it at all?!?!? What's with you?

And then somehow you ignored everything I said thereafter. To repeat... the US is ALREADY adding an extra 1 million barrels per day, by draining down our emergency strategic reserve. Biden is recklessly doing that as a political stunt to lower gas prices prior to the election. We need to immediately stop draining down our strategic reserves (-1 million barrels per day) and even if the Saudis went to absolute full capacity (+1 million barrels per day) we are exactly where we are now. Western nations are too dependent on foreign oil coming from dictators, mullahs, and madmen. The US could remedy this problem by going full bore increasing US production, but we won't because of the cult of green wokeness.... and apparently sh1tty reading and math skills on the far left.

Summer electric shortages are already being predicted (brownouts and rolling blackouts) for the US. And the Biden administration is knowingly and deliberately letting it happen in desperate pursuit of a long term climate goal. The US is going to feel the consequences of this stupidity, Europe is going to suffer even worse, and no one knows what's going to happen in New Zealand because its an irrelevant little island and no one really cares.

 

[BamBam54]

Heck, easy to be gung-ho when you aren't calling the shots though, eh?

Reality is, they have the capacity to do it and the US has no reason to get involved with a non-allied nation. The US only cares about Ukraine because Russia's influence would grow back to Soviet Era levels if Ukraine fell. Russia would control a lot more energy resources and staple food sources like wheat and grain. That's the ONLY reason the US cares, and they play it all under the guise of "freedom".

If the US cared about sovereignty, why the actual f*** did they invade sovereign nations after 9/11? The reality is they don't give a ****, they just care about having a powerful adversary and are sad they aren't the only nation invading nations.

The "lowly colonel" was talking about using nukes if NATO intervened, not because they were losing against Ukraine.

Why? Because [a collective] Nato decision will mean a de facto declaration of war on Russia. To win this war, whether we like it or not, we will have to use tactical nuclear weapons in the theatre of operations."

Colonel Knutov said this would entail the "use of powerful strategic nuclear weapons" which he said "means universal nuclear war.

It's also funny you criticise the Russian troops as being weak, when you achieved what exactly after 20 years in Afghanistan and nearly the same in Iraq?

Reality is, if you're against the invasion of Ukraine, then you are a hypocrite if you weren't also opposed to the wars in Syria and Iraq. But nope, people like to think the US is the hero

Jiiigz - its easy to be "gung-ho" because I am a US Marine and its literally our motto.

You accidentally identified yet another problem with Ukraine falling back under total Russian control - global wheat and grain supply. As if you don't already see the problem with Western Nations being too dependent on Russian gas and oil... you would allow them more control over world food supplies too?!?!??

Your fears about a Russian nuclear response come from a Russian TV show and a lowly Colonel nobody ever heard of. Wouldn't you say Russian controlled state TV is a propaganda source? Exactly. Russia is struggling to defeat Ukraine and needs to bluff using nukes to try and break western support. Don't fall for it. Putin is counting on your fear to achieve his goals. And his goals are contrary to the greater good of the free world. Sitting back and letting individual free nations fall to armored invasions by dictators is how Hitler initiated WWII.

If you were REALLY worried about nuclear war, and not just liberal talking points, you would be screaming to stop Biden from guaranteeing the Iranians a nuke in what... 5 more years?

And it you really doubted Trump's ability to stand up to dictators, and not just liberal talking points, you would remember that Trump was the guy who finally stood up to North Korea. When little Kim flexed his nuclear button Trump laughed and said we have one too, and its much bigger. And suddenly little Kim was less aggressive and willing to talk for a couple of years. Until Biden wrecks that too. LOL

But I am sure you'd rather go back to the days of your hero Obama, traveling around the world on the US apology tour, bowing to other world leaders. Weakness falls to strength. And the world has plenty of violent dictators who present a real and present danger. Hence the 9/11 attacks and the ISIS takeover of a large swath of the middle east, and the subsequent US military responses to each. War is hell... but the alternative is likely worse.

Just remember - what happens in Ukraine today is the precursor for what is about to happen to Taiwan. And the world is even more dependent on the Chinese economy and manufacturing to ever stand up to them in the same way... and they know it. By design.

 

[Ricky10]

Invalid Link Removed

 

[ax1]

Jiigz -- I am trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, but your reading comprehension has me concerned.

I literally SAID the Saudi's have another 1 million barrels per day of capacity (it was typed, you can't miss it!) and then you restate the same thing as if I never said it at all?!?!? What's with you?

View attachment 217749

And then somehow you ignored everything I said thereafter. To repeat... the US is ALREADY adding an extra 1 million barrels per day, by draining down our emergency strategic reserve. Biden is recklessly doing that as a political stunt to lower gas prices prior to the election. We need to immediately stop draining down our strategic reserves (-1 million barrels per day) and even if the Saudis went to absolute full capacity (+1 million barrels per day) we are exactly where we are now. Western nations are too dependent on foreign oil coming from dictators, mullahs, and madmen. The US could remedy this problem by going full bore increasing US production, but we won't because of the cult of green wokeness.... and apparently sh1tty reading and math skills on the far left.

Summer electric shortages are already being predicted (brownouts and rolling blackouts) for the US. And the Biden administration is knowingly and deliberately letting it happen in desperate pursuit of a long term climate goal. The US is going to feel the consequences of this stupidity, Europe is going to suffer even worse, and no one knows what's going to happen in New Zealand because its an irrelevant little island and no one really cares.

Whats wrong with you and all these little distractions, arent you watching the 1/6 hearings? That day was the worst catastrophe since the Titanic, or maybe more recently since that girl wrote that horrible book about Hugh Hefner.

I kid I kid

 

[Ricky10]

No matter how anonymous you think you are, just be mindful everything is monitored

Agreed. But for me, speaking my mind takes precedence over anonymity. If they want to hunt me down and take me out, I would be totally cool with that. Hell, I would even coordinate a time and place that would make it convenient for both of us.

 

[Ricky10]

Where the hell is everyone streaming 2,000 mules from?

 

[Jiigzz]

Agreed. But for me, speaking my mind takes precedence over anonymity. If they want to hunt me down and take me out, I would be totally cool with that. Hell, I would even coordinate a time and place that would make it convenient for both of us.

I don't think they'd take you out, I just reckon they'd pull your life out from underneath you. If you're that committed to the cause then all the more power to you, but it was more a reminder than anything

 

[Ricky10]

I don't think they'd take you out, I just reckon they'd pull your life out from underneath you. If you're that committed to the cause then all the more power to you, but it was more a reminder than anything

Well, someone did break my passenger side car window while it was sitting in my driveway just over a week ago. Let me tell ya, I was not impressed.

Nonetheless, I may just have a few tricks up my sleeve! I just don’t know what they are yet..

 

[Jiigzz]

Jiiigz - its easy to be "gung-ho" because I am a US Marine and its literally our motto.

You accidentally identified yet another problem with Ukraine falling back under total Russian control - global wheat and grain supply. As if you don't already see the problem with Western Nations being too dependent on Russian gas and oil... you would allow them more control over world food supplies too?!?!??

Your fears about a Russian nuclear response come from a Russian TV show and a lowly Colonel nobody ever heard of. Wouldn't you say Russian controlled state TV is a propaganda source? Exactly. Russia is struggling to defeat Ukraine and needs to bluff using nukes to try and break western support. Don't fall for it. Putin is counting on your fear to achieve his goals. And his goals are contrary to the greater good of the free world. Sitting back and letting individual free nations fall to armored invasions by dictators is how Hitler initiated WWII.

If you were REALLY worried about nuclear war, and not just liberal talking points, you would be screaming to stop Biden from guaranteeing the Iranians a nuke in what... 5 more years?

And it you really doubted Trump's ability to stand up to dictators, and not just liberal talking points, you would remember that Trump was the guy who finally stood up to North Korea. When little Kim flexed his nuclear button Trump laughed and said we have one too, and its much bigger. And suddenly little Kim was less aggressive and willing to talk for a couple of years. Until Biden wrecks that too. LOL

But I am sure you'd rather go back to the days of your hero Obama, traveling around the world on the US apology tour, bowing to other world leaders. Weakness falls to strength. And the world has plenty of violent dictators who present a real and present danger. Hence the 9/11 attacks and the ISIS takeover of a large swath of the middle east, and the subsequent US military responses to each. War is hell... but the alternative is likely worse.

Just remember - what happens in Ukraine today is the precursor for what is about to happen to Taiwan. And the world is even more dependent on the Chinese economy and manufacturing to ever stand up to them in the same way... and they know it. By design.

Russia wants to control wheat, the US wants to control oil; but why do we convey one as oppression and the other as freedom? Both are oppressive.

The US has involved itself directly and indirectly in conflicts for decades, trying to undermine whoever they perceive as threats to global dominance, and yet we are still surprised when people of those nations seek retaliation?

The US literally overthrew the democratically elected Guatamalian president and instilled an authoritarian ruler over f***ing fruit prices because a US company was upset they couldn't exploit workers any longer under their rule. So the CIA funded a coup to reverse labour laws so people from Guatamala could be exploited for US companies gains lol. All under the guise of freedom. The same rhetorics the govt used to persuade the public that invading Iraq was a great idea

To make it worse, after the US f***s those countries up, they refuse to help resettle asylum seekers because "they cost too much". Oh really? And yet the Trillions spent on warheads that destroyed their nation and economy didn't?

 

[ax1]

Russia wants to control wheat, the US wants to control oil; but why do we convey one as oppression and the other as freedom? Both are oppressive.

The US has involved itself directly and indirectly in conflicts for decades, trying to undermine whoever they perceive as threats to global dominance, and yet we are still surprised when people of those nations seek retaliation?

The US literally overthrew the democratically elected Guatamalian president and instilled an authoritarian ruler over f***ing fruit prices because a US company was upset they couldn't exploit workers any longer under their rule. So the CIA funded a coup to reverse labour laws so people from Guatamala could be exploited for US companies gains lol. All under the guise of freedom. The same rhetorics the govt used to persuade the public that invading Iraq was a great idea

To make it worse, after the US f***s those countries up, they refuse to help resettle asylum seekers because "they cost too much". Oh really? And yet the Trillions spent on warheads that destroyed their nation and economy didn't?

Your on a roll!

 

[ax1]

LMFAO!!!! Take the shot and stop the spread Fauci tested positive for the CCP-Virus, LMFFAAAOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!

Invalid Link Removed

 

[Beau]

That kid looks familiar. I've seen his picture someplace before.

 

[ax1]

That kid looks familiar. I've seen his picture someplace before.

Arnold Jackson (Gary Coleman) from one of my favorite 80s shows, Different Strokes.

 

[BamBam54]

Arnold Jackson (Gary Coleman) from one of my favorite 80s shows, Different Strokes.

@ax1 -I think Beau meant in his account profile pic. The little picture beside his name in the post you just answered.... also Gary Coleman.

And yet another example why your detailed research skills into conspiracy and political matters is questionable. LOL

 

[ax1]

@ax1 -I think Beau meant in his account profile pic. The little picture beside his name in the post you just answered.... also Gary Coleman.

And yet another example why your detailed research skills into conspiracy and political matters is questionable. LOL

LMFAO! I have noticed his profile picture many times before!

I think thie CIA had been pushing fused microwave sonic particle beams and somehow found a breach in my Cotsco branded reinforced heavy duty aluminum layered basement bunker. Ill get back on Home Advisor and file a complaint along with a bad review to that contractor, I am now thinking he was compromised by the deep state.

 

[BamBam54]

Russia wants to control wheat, the US wants to control oil; but why do we convey one as oppression and the other as freedom? Both are oppressive.

Who says the US wants to control oil? Biden doesn't even want to have oil or gas (or coal) at all. Hence the global energy crisis.
I believe its more accurate to say the US and other Western countries just want enough oil to continue to operate as freedom loving nations. Ukraine wanted the same thing... until Russia came in with 150,000 armed forces to take it away. THAT sounds rather oppressive, if you actually cared.

It turns out that Western nations are really going to struggle to survive without Russian oil. Too bad a friendly ally with plenty underground doesn't have the political will to dig it up and share. That would be US, if it wasn't for woke greenies.

Imagine the same thing with global food shortages when an aggressive dictatorship like Russia gains more control over global wheat and grains. I guess you will find out soon enough. Too bad a friendly ally with plenty of crops doesn't have the political will to encourage more farming to share. We are going to be burning our corn for more ethanol fuel. Maybe ask Biden to initiate a Farmers Pride month.

To make it worse, after the US f***s those countries up, they refuse to help resettle asylum seekers because "they cost too much". Oh really? And yet the Trillions spent on warheads that destroyed their nation and economy didn't?

Did we overthrow Guatemala with warheads?? No. Is Russia in the process of overthrowing Ukraine with warheads? Yes. If you really cared, you might want to do something about it. Except a little island full of liberals doesn't maintain the capacity to do much about anything, anywhere. Which kind of points to the direction every overly woke nation is heading under liberal/socialist leadership. Including US.

The thing you don't see through liberal blinders is that we DO let 1 million immigrants enter the US every year to join our society legally. We just have a problem with a couple million more jumping the river and inviting themselves. Imagine a few million Chinese landing on New Zealand shores uninvited. Just wait... it shouldn't be much longer. Sometime after Taiwan falls. When that finally happens, who are you gonna call for help?????

I recall Trump telling Germany they could be in for big trouble if they became too dependent on Russia oil/gas. Ohhhhh, that silly mean orange man, ignore him. Germany suddenly needs to invest more in their NATO funding to help prevent major war overtaking all of Europe.... the mean orange man said that too. LOLOLLLLLOOLLLL

Apparently you reap what you sow.
Except for wheat in Ukraine.
Russia is just going to take that by force.
Because the rest of the world was acting too pussified to stop them.

 

[ax1]

Imagine the same thing with global food shortages when an aggressive dictatorship like Russia gains more control over global wheat and grains. I guess you will find out soon enough. Too bad a friendly ally with plenty of crops doesn't have the political will to encourage more farming to share. We are going to be burning our corn for more ethanol fuel. Maybe ask Biden to initiate a Farmers Pride month.

Its really simple, stop treating Russia as a terrorist organization break international deals not to expand NATO and militarizing their border countries provoking them to invade to protect their own national security interests and pick up the phone and trade with them. Problem solved.

Republicrats and Demicans are all just isolationists.

 

[ax1]

I recall Trump telling Germany they could be in for big trouble if they became too dependent on Russia oil/gas. Ohhhhh, that silly mean orange man, ignore him. Germany suddenly needs to invest more in their NATO funding to help prevent major war overtaking all of Europe.... the mean orange man said that too. LOLOLLLLLOOLLLL

The proper thing to have warned Germany is to stop their promotion of expansion past Russia's red line and promote another NATO country to expand on their border. There would never have been a oil/gas crisis and Ukraine never would have been invaded.

Russia never had any interest if overtaking all of Europe. Those are the facts. Germany has no-one to blame but themselves and their provokative war mongering policies. They have killed more innocent civilians invading sovereign nations in the past 20 years and their government has no ethical credibility to call Russia out and provoke them for no reason other than war is good for the banks.

 

[BamBam54]

Its really simple, stop treating Russia as a terrorist organization break international deals not to expand NATO and militarizing their border countries provoking them to invade to protect their own national security interests and pick up the phone and trade with them. Problem solved.

Republicrats and Demicans are all just isolationists.

I am all for Russia not invading Ukraine.
I am all for Putin not reassembling the old soviet union empire by force.

Biden should have nixed this early. Same for that brain damaged McCain who pushed early and hard for Ukraine to be in NATO. Biden could have stopped all this before it happened by saying clearly that Ukraine will never be in NATO and talking directly with Putin on the hot line. But Biden can't speak without a teleprompter, and can barely walk up a flight of steps.

However, I am all for testing your theory. Offer Russia an exit strategy. Promise no Ukraine in NATO and no NATO weapons ever positioned in Ukraine.... on the deal that Russia leave all Ukraine territory including Crimea.

But Putin will never take that deal. He is going to take Ukraine by force. Moldova next. Then Kazakhstan. Biden looks feeble.... and dangerous nations are going to take advantage of this while we are dumping our strategic oil reserves and marching in Pride month celebrations.

And I think that reality is staring you right in the face, like a mini Gary Coleman.

 

[ax1]

I am all for Russia not invading Ukraine.
I am all for Putin not reassembling the old soviet union empire by force.

Biden should have nixed this early. Same for that brain damaged McCain who pushed early and hard for Ukraine to be in NATO. Biden could have stopped all this before it happened by saying clearly that Ukraine will never be in NATO and talking directly with Putin on the hot line. But Biden can't speak without a teleprompter, and can barely walk up a flight of steps.

However, I am all for testing your theory. Offer Russia an exit strategy. Promise no Ukraine in NATO and no NATO weapons ever positioned in Ukraine.... on the deal that Russia leave all Ukraine territory including Crimea.

But Putin will never take that deal. He is going to take Ukraine by force. Moldova next. Then Kazakhstan. Biden looks feeble.... and dangerous nations are going to take advantage of this while we are dumping our strategic oil reserves and marching in Pride month celebrations.

And I think that reality is staring you right in the face, like a mini Gary Coleman.

The difference between what we understand is, you think Biden made a mistake pushing for expansion of NATO, and I know Biden knew exactly what he was getting into and he wanted the war, as after all he has been a pro war time politician for half a century.

Im not sure what exit strategy would work to end the conflict at this point, especially with Putin not getting some of that eastern part of Ukraine out of it. A clear de-escalation and prevention of WWIII would certainly include ending the NATO expansion. Why would Putin take a deal with the West when they are clearly not to be trusted, I dont trust shyt they say, why should Putin? lol Not that I trust Putin either but the West has no ethical integrity and already have backstabbed Russia on more than a handful of occasions when it comes to NATO expansion and militarizing their eastern side.

Look at this point if he wants Maldova and Kazakstan I dont think I give a crap anymore. Its none of our business, our freedoms and liberties are being stripped right here at home meanwhile D.C. and the Military Industrial Complex has what they want, more wars, more money and more power. Once Ukraine is settled, Im very confident D.C. and their lobbiests would love to sell Maldova and Kazakstan billions of dollars in more weapons at the expense of stolen US taxpayer money.

 

[BamBam54]

The difference between what we understand is, you think Biden made a mistake pushing for expansion of NATO, and I know Biden knew exactly what he was getting into and he wanted the war, as after all he has been a pro war time politician for half a century.

Im not sure what exit strategy would work to end the conflict at this point, especially with Putin not getting some of that eastern part of Ukraine out of it. A clear de-escalation and prevention of WWIII would certainly include ending the NATO expansion. Why would Putin take a deal with the West when they are clearly not to be trusted, I dont trust shyt they say, why should Putin? lol Not that I trust Putin either but the West has no ethical integrity and already have backstabbed Russia on more than a handful of occasions when it comes to NATO expansion and militarizing their eastern side.

Look at this point if he wants Maldova and Kazakstan I dont think I give a crap anymore. Its none of our business, our freedoms and liberties are being stripped right here at home meanwhile D.C. and the Military Industrial Complex has what they want, more wars, more money and more power. Once Ukraine is settled, Im very confident D.C. and their lobbiests would love to sell Maldova and Kazakstan billions of dollars in more weapons at the expense of stolen US taxpayer money.

Libertarian conspiracy rants aside.... there is no amount of hash brownies to fly a time machine back to before it happened. Obama let them take Crimea, and Biden let them roll 150,000 troops towards Kiev.

It's ON now...

Whatever double secret space laser master plan you think is driving it (or not) the people of Ukraine seem determined to fight for every inch of their land. And the free nations of the world are arming the Ukrainian resistance. And Putin shows no sign of relenting.

Global oil and food shortages to follow.

The "never should have done this" party has a chance to run for offices in November. Maybe mail in a few million extra ballots.... that seems popular.

The Biden people 'took' office and now they have to try and perform as leaders of the free world. Lets see how Biden, Kamala, Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, Waters, AOC, Swalwell, Kinzinger, Raskin, Hirono, etc handle a real crisis when they are done with endless Trump hearings. LOL Grab some marshmallows for the inevitable fire

 

[ax1]

Libertarian conspiracy rants aside.... there is no amount of hash brownies to fly a time machine back to before it happened. Obama let them take Crimea, and Biden let them roll 150,000 troops towards Kiev.

No, he didnt let them take Crimea, Obobo and NATO illegally overthrew the Ukrainian government and installed their own puppet provoking Russia to take Crimea for their own National Security issues.

Biden wanted them to roll 150,000 troops towards Kiev, do you have any idea how many billions of dollars his lobbyiests and contractors have a stake? Oh, and wait until Habliburton and other corporations goes over there and gets the contracts to rebuild whats left of Ukraine when all is said and done. Then off to the next boogyman and start a new war.

Whatever double secret space laser master plan you think is driving it (or not) the people of Ukraine seem determined to fight for every inch of their land.

And I vow to protect ever penny of our tax dollars and if they are going to be stolen from us at least keep that money here to help Americans. Ukrainians are free to do whatever the fuq they want, which is bullcrap since millions of them ran away from Ukraine and many of them caught up in the middle are being slaughtered.

There are no difference between Republicarats and Demicans, whether is Iraq, Ukraine, etc.....they all take turns picking and choosings which wars to start, they are mostly all funded by the same lobbyests and the fact is we had Republicrats for decades war mongering Russia including Dump militarizing a border country of Russia's and we even had Republicrats in Kiev promising everything Groper Joe has accomplished.

 

[BamBam54]

No, he didnt let them take Crimea, Obobo and NATO illegally overthrew the Ukrainian government and installed their own puppet provoking Russia to take Crimea for their own National Security issues.

Biden wanted them to roll 150,000 troops towards Kiev, do you have any idea how many billions of dollars his lobbyiests and contractors have a stake? Oh, and wait until Habliburton and other corporations goes over there and gets the contracts to rebuild whats left of Ukraine when all is said and done. Then off to the next boogyman and start a new war.



And I vow to protect ever penny of our tax dollars and if they are going to be stolen from us at least keep that money here to help Americans. Ukrainians are free to do whatever the fuq they want, which is bullcrap since millions of them ran away from Ukraine and many of them caught up in the middle are being slaughtered.

There are no difference between Republicarats and Demicans, whether is Iraq, Ukraine, etc.....they all take turns picking and choosings which wars to start, they are mostly all funded by the same lobbyests and the fact is we had Republicrats for decades war mongering Russia including Dump militarizing a border country of Russia's and we even had Republicrats in Kiev promising everything Groper Joe has accomplished.

Sorry, all I heard was.....

Invalid Link Removed

 

[ax1]

Sorry, all I heard was.....

Invalid Link Removed

Nice job Joe!

 

[Jiigzz]

No, he didnt let them take Crimea, Obobo and NATO illegally overthrew the Ukrainian government and installed their own puppet provoking Russia to take Crimea for their own National Security issues.

Biden wanted them to roll 150,000 troops towards Kiev, do you have any idea how many billions of dollars his lobbyiests and contractors have a stake? Oh, and wait until Habliburton and other corporations goes over there and gets the contracts to rebuild whats left of Ukraine when all is said and done. Then off to the next boogyman and start a new war.



And I vow to protect ever penny of our tax dollars and if they are going to be stolen from us at least keep that money here to help Americans. Ukrainians are free to do whatever the fuq they want, which is bullcrap since millions of them ran away from Ukraine and many of them caught up in the middle are being slaughtered.

There are no difference between Republicarats and Demicans, whether is Iraq, Ukraine, etc.....they all take turns picking and choosings which wars to start, they are mostly all funded by the same lobbyests and the fact is we had Republicrats for decades war mongering Russia including Dump militarizing a border country of Russia's and we even had Republicrats in Kiev promising everything Groper Joe has accomplished.

War is good for the US economy - it is literally the reason it became a superpower. But remember kids, because Halliburton or Boeing are making billions in war profits, we can expect those to trickle down back to the rest of the population any day now....

I mean, it definitely will trickle down, right? And it definitely won't just make the CEOs richer this time around, right?

 

[xR1pp3Rx]

democrats coined the term. there is no such thing as a real trickle down economics theory. its just more gas lighting from the left as usual.

 

[ax1]

War is good for the US economy - it is literally the reason it became a superpower. But remember kids, because Halliburton or Boeing are making billions in war profits, we can expect those to trickle down back to the rest of the population any day now....

I mean, it definitely will trickle down, right? And it definitely won't just make the CEOs richer this time around, right?

We havent won a war since WWII, yet we have the most powerful military from here to Pluto. Winning wars is bad for business. I guarantee you there will be a new conflict as soon as blowing up bombs in Ukraine becomes less profitable or the occupation/resource return ratio isnt worth it. As long as people keep voting in Republicrats and Demicans, the corruption of the Military Industrial Complex will continue to thrive, there are no differences in their policies.

Invalid Link Removed

Various format ebook download for free: Invalid Link Removed

 

[rob112]

Russia wants to control wheat, the US wants to control oil; but why do we convey one as oppression and the other as freedom? Both are oppressive.

The US has involved itself directly and indirectly in conflicts for decades, trying to undermine whoever they perceive as threats to global dominance, and yet we are still surprised when people of those nations seek retaliation?

The US literally overthrew the democratically elected Guatamalian president and instilled an authoritarian ruler over f***ing fruit prices because a US company was upset they couldn't exploit workers any longer under their rule. So the CIA funded a coup to reverse labour laws so people from Guatamala could be exploited for US companies gains lol. All under the guise of freedom. The same rhetorics the govt used to persuade the public that invading Iraq was a great idea

To make it worse, after the US f***s those countries up, they refuse to help resettle asylum seekers because "they cost too much". Oh really? And yet the Trillions spent on warheads that destroyed their nation and economy didn't?

Much of the world does not take the US or the west’s pretend moral high ground seriously. We are mad at Russia for for threatening democracy as we link up and sell weapons to the undemocratic Saudis who have killed something like 400,000 people in Yemen. We invade Iraq which has literally zero chance of taking the US and pretend to be upset when Russia feels threatened by NATO surrounding them. A group led by a country with 800 military bases, constantly bombing countries we are not at war with, a country that toppled many governments by force or covertly…and it is a country that promised not to expand NATO after the Soviet fall. We pretend targeting whistle blowers is bad as Assange rots and Snowden is in hiding. You could go on and on with these examples. Much of the world is aware of these examples. Seems mostly westerners that are not.

Side note we also promised China to take no parts in their civil war. We are breaking those promises as well.

I want to qualify this by saying I love American ideals, but I find our federal government to be irredeemably corrupt.

TLDR I agree with you

 

[rob112]

War is good for the US economy - it is literally the reason it became a superpower. But remember kids, because Halliburton or Boeing are making billions in war profits, we can expect those to trickle down back to the rest of the population any day now....

I mean, it definitely will trickle down, right? And it definitely won't just make the CEOs richer this time around, right?

We are at a point where literally every large corporation is working with the state and has a safe guard via inflationary Keynesian trash economic policies. Our whole economic policy is based on a ridiculous idea of having just the right amount of inflation will create infinite growth. It’s preposterous.

 

[Power-Lift]

Wow what a fuckkingg moron...

Invalid Link Removed

 

[ax1]

Much of the world does not take the US or the west’s pretend moral high ground seriously. We are mad at Russia for for threatening democracy as we link up and sell weapons to the undemocratic Saudis who have killed something like 400,000 people in Yemen. We invade Iraq which has literally zero chance of taking the US and pretend to be upset when Russia feels threatened by NATO surrounding them. A group led by a country with 800 military bases, constantly bombing countries we are not at war with, a country that toppled many governments by force or covertly…and it is a country that promised not to expand NATO after the Soviet fall. We pretend targeting whistle blowers is bad as Assange rots and Snowden is in hiding. You could go on and on with these examples. Much of the world is aware of these examples. Seems mostly westerners that are not.

Side note we also promised China to take no parts in their civil war. We are breaking those promises as well.

I want to qualify this by saying I love American ideals, but I find our federal government to be irredeemably corrupt.

TLDR I agree with you

Damn, cant believe not only am I handing out a 2nd gold start this month, you are the first ever to earn not more than 1 but 2 for 1 post!

My saying always is, you dont have to love your government to love your country and our US Constitution! Apparently the Fed hates our natural rights, but we we warned about that 246 years ago.

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed

 

[rob112]

Damn, cant believe not only am I handing out a 2nd gold start this month, you are the first ever to earn not more than 1 but 2 for 1 post!

My saying always is, you dont have to love your government to love your country and our US Constitution! Apparently the Fed hates our natural rights, but we we warned about that 246 years ago.

Invalid Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed

Yea people don’t seem to get the constitution is a restraint on the government and not the citizenry. It is also apparent the government breaks those restraints all the time.

Thanks homie

 

[Jiigzz]

Wow what a fuckkingg moron...

Invalid Link Removed

Woww, what a fu**ing moron..

The kidney has an important place in the heart? Jesussssssss.

But for real, we all know Biden has a speech impediment and makes gaffes like every other human on earth.

"I don't exercise because the heart is like a battery"

But yet we praise Trump and criticise Biden. Seems strange to me

Invalid Link Removed

 

[Jiigzz]

Much of the world does not take the US or the west’s pretend moral high ground seriously. We are mad at Russia for for threatening democracy as we link up and sell weapons to the undemocratic Saudis who have killed something like 400,000 people in Yemen. We invade Iraq which has literally zero chance of taking the US and pretend to be upset when Russia feels threatened by NATO surrounding them. A group led by a country with 800 military bases, constantly bombing countries we are not at war with, a country that toppled many governments by force or covertly…and it is a country that promised not to expand NATO after the Soviet fall. We pretend targeting whistle blowers is bad as Assange rots and Snowden is in hiding. You could go on and on with these examples. Much of the world is aware of these examples. Seems mostly westerners that are not.

Side note we also promised China to take no parts in their civil war. We are breaking those promises as well.

I want to qualify this by saying I love American ideals, but I find our federal government to be irredeemably corrupt.

TLDR I agree with you

Damn, this basically sums up everything i've been trying to say.

And that last sentence is key and absolutely spot on

 

[Jiigzz]

Inb4: "his company, his rules" despite the same people saying "Twitter banned me on their platform for my free speech!!!!!"
Invalid Link Removed

 

[Jiigzz]

democrats coined the term. there is no such thing as a real trickle down economics theory. its just more gas lighting from the left as usual.

Supply side economics was used under Nixon and it absolutely is a real economic theory. The actual term "trickle down" was coined by a comedian as a joke to the concept.

So if Will Rogers was a Dem who coined the term, it was to mock Republican presidents from using supply side economics to destroy the economy.

The reality is, instead of increased profits trickling down, the profits simply lined CEO's pockets. Before supply side economics kicked in, most of the weath in the US was held by the middle class, now it is held at the top. The result is what you see now; an absolutely f**ked middle class