I finished the video, its actually more of a shytshow than anything designed to make her look bad, not that he doesnt has legitimate questions or am I saying he is wrong, nor am I confirming Judy theory is right but she makes some very legitimate points that Jenkins cant answer. I dunno if you asked my first impression back in 2001 when the towers "collapsed" I would have said it look like it pulverized (or a term Judy created for good reason dustification,) Jenkins claims it "collapsed. I dunno you tell me. Ill clip the news from the next morning on the bottom of the post, even they thought the building was pulverized as if evaporated.@ax1 - Since you like youtube video explanations, here is a physicist taking apart Dr Judy Woods' goofy hypothesis about vaporizing the twin towers.
Dr Jenkins posted a full rebuttal paper with sourced references (PDF can be found here... http://911blogger.com/news/2007-02-27/overwhelming-implausibility-using-directed-energy-beams-demolish-world-trade-center-towers)
but I doubt you will ever read through it.
Much easier to just spam the same dopey theories each year on the 9/11 anniversary. Quantity over quality, and all....
I think a better question at this point, is why YOU believe in every conspiracy theory. Not just one, but all. Not just Santa, but the Easter bunny, and tooth fairy too. Using each one as being somehow 'possible' to make all the others possible. In an endless loop.
I don't know about your educational background, but there must be something in there to explain why you are drawn to such nonsense. Maybe you have always thought you were smarter than your college grades showed, and you harbor a psychological need to one day 'prove' you were smarter than them? I think at this point a little introspection is in order....
Looking at it another way, even if somehow one of your conspiracies might be true, it defies all logic and mathematical odds that ALL of them would be true. Our government is too incompetent to pull off even the most simple evacuation of Kabul. But somehow these evil geniuses coordinated a plane hitting the towers, a simultaneous controlled demolition, AND a space death beam vaporizing the pieces before falling... all at the exact same moment!?!??! Wow. Just wow.
Closer to the end it appears even the audience is interested in Judy's theory and speaks out......
----------------------------
Comment from audience: Couldn't there be an answer that they collapsed and were pulverized at the same time? Both things happened?
JW: That's very misleading. ''Collapse".
Security guard enters the room and tells the Greg Jenkins camera crew they must leave.
---------------------------
Then at the end of the video you can see his roll eyes and he had obvious intent with the setup of the platform, it had nothing to do with learning and education but rather than a gotcha moment to make Judy look stupid and discredit her, but she does hold her own fairly well, especially when you read the transcript and take the human emotion out of it.
At the end of the video they like showing some picture, well here are some pictures to try to end this conversation, and to not have legitimate questions as to what happened and why, well there is nothing "kooky" about it, nor does it mean you think the earth is flat and or the Easter bunny works part time as a toothfairy. To not think the building leaned more towards pulverization rather than just a collapse as Jenkins claims is silly.
----------------------------------------------------
Figure 17. The 'snowball' picture referred to in the discussion. Note Banker's Trust, the black building in the foreground, is a 40-story building. The photograph he provided was poorer quality and did not show the detail visible in the color version he inserted into the video. At the end, Greg Jenkins insisted on the return of the photo he provided, as can be seen in the video. Why would he insert a different photo for the audience than the one he showed to Dr. Wood?
Figure 20. What motivates Greg Jenkins to call this a collapse?
What motivates Greg Jenkins to manipulate others into calling this a collapse?
Figure 21. Ground-level view of the enormous quantity of dust wafting skyward. Conventional demolition dust does not do this.
Figure 9(a). (9/11/01) On the afternoon of 9/11/01 the "rubble pile" left from WTC1 is essentially non-existent. WTC7 can be seen in the distance, revealing the photo was taken before 5:20 PM that day.
Figure 9(b). (9/11/01) The "rubble pile" from WTC1 is essentially non-existent. The ambulance is parked at ground level in front of WTC1. WTC6, which had been an eight-story building, towers over the remains of WTC1.
Figure 9(c). (9/13/01) In contrast, the rubble pile for WTC7 appears to be higher. Why does a 47-story building appear to leave a taller rubble pile than either of the two 110-story towers left? WTC5 (9 stories) can be seen in the background on the left.
==================================================
Bonus, finding these video's are getting harder and harder:
ABC NEWS Peter Jennings on 9/11: "Where Did All The Rubble Go?"
Reporter on ground: The reason there is so little rubble that it all fell on the ground and it was pulverized, evaporated.
Link to vimeo video showing ground zero
Last edited: