Thats Dr. Judy Woods and former professor in mechanical engineering and an expert on stress analysis, structural mechanics and other things.@ax1
you ever hear of judy woods-she has a book named 'where did the towers go'--google it, i think you will find it interesting
Yes, we went through that before in these pages. The burned cars on FDR have been investigated and explained. A space death ray remains ridiculous as any kind of explanation for 9/11.....and its certainly possible that death ray tech was used to some extent that day.
Not necessarily even need to be in space but I’d be shocked if we haven’t had that tech up there since the late 70s. It’s not ridiculous at all, you really think nukes is the best we got? We are always 30-50 years or more ahead in tech than is fed for public knowledge. This tech was developed by Tesla in the early 1900s.Yes, we went through that before in these pages. The burned cars on FDR have been investigated and explained. A space death ray remains ridiculous as any kind of explanation for 9/11.
Moronic flat earth stuff.
Sorry.
This is just to show some of the "directed energy" weapon systems publicly known today but not commonly talked about, and notice the part where it said "cold war origins".....Im just trying to say we have alot of interesting tech, and what we dont know about who knows, and we cant say exactly what was used on 9/11, space or not, something strange certainly happened and it couldnt have been for no reason.Yes, we went through that before in these pages. The burned cars on FDR have been investigated and explained. A space death ray remains ridiculous as any kind of explanation for 9/11.
Moronic flat earth stuff.
Sorry.
One thing I may never have mentioned was on 9/11 we had Hurricane Erin....now, hurricanes do often swing back around when hitting the upper half of the Norther Hemisphere, but this is a rather dramatic turn, and normally they will float out towards Iceland but its still fighting to head north.@ax1
you ever hear of judy woods-she has a book named 'where did the towers go'--google it, i think you will find it interesting
Real microwave weapons existing to scramble drone electronics or give people headaches here on earth is a FAAAAAAR cry from imagined space based weapons used to blast cars on the FDR on 9/11. That would be like saying we have round dinner plates here on earth, so its 'possible' that the earth could be similarly flat as seen from space.Not necessarily even need to be in space but I’d be shocked if we haven’t had that tech up there since the late 70s. It’s not ridiculous at all, you really think nukes is the best we got? We are always 30-50 years or more ahead in tech than is fed for public knowledge. This tech was developed by Tesla in the early 1900s.
I remember getting same reactions getting when talking about these types of weapons being used in humans, and not long ago the US government publicly investigated their use on our diplomats and embassy workers.
Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers (Published 2018)
Doctors and scientists say microwave strikes may have caused sonic delusions and very real brain damage among embassy staff and family members.www.nytimes.com
Report Points to Microwave ‘Attack’ as Likely Source of Mystery Illnesses That Hit Diplomats and Spies (Published 2020)
A government-commissioned report provides the most definitive explanation yet for “Havana syndrome,” which struck scores of American employees, first in Cuba and then in China, Russia and other countries.www.nytimes.com
dr judy woods was the guest on coast to coast am last night...one of the most interesting guests on that show in quite some time.One thing I may never have mentioned was on 9/11 we had Hurricane Erin....now, hurricanes do often swing back around when hitting the upper half of the Norther Hemisphere, but this is a rather dramatic turn, and normally they will float out towards Iceland but its still fighting to head north.
Now everyone needs to make out what they want to make out with it but this all happened on 9/11-9/12
Below courtesy of Dr. Judy Woods
You can see the plume of material rising from the WTC.
View attachment 208397
After doing a bit of damage in Bermuda, it moved North West, heading for the NY / NJ coast... On 12th Sept, it made 135 degree turn...
View attachment 208393
Dry thunder reported at all 3 NYC airports
View attachment 208396
Weather reported on 9/11, reporting rain and thunder at JFK airport.They don't mention wind direction or that the wind shifted direction by 180°.
View attachment 208395
Erin was barely discussed on the morning of 9/11 - even though it had been approaching the coast for 4 days!
View attachment 208398
I think she is the real deal, not that we necessarily need to conclude on her findings.dr judy woods was the guest on coast to coast am last night...one of the most interesting guests on that show in quite some time.
Im just using that as an example, Ive talked about that stuff 15 years ago and I would get similar reactions.Real microwave weapons existing to scramble drone electronics or give people headaches here on earth is a FAAAAAAR cry from imagined space based weapons used to blast cars on the FDR on 9/11. That would be like saying we have round dinner plates here on earth, so its 'possible' that the earth could be similarly flat as seen from space.
Especially when we KNOW a massive 737 plane hit the tower with a giant fireball explosion.... and we KNOW the story about fried cars on the FDR is poorly researched internet drivel (undated in your posting. Later investigation showed the photo/story was on 9/12, where damaged cars were towed after 9/11)
*SDI was created by U.S. President Ronald Reagan on March 23, 1983.1 It is thought that SDI may have been first dubbed "Star Wars" by opponent Dr. Carol Rosin, a consultant and former spokeswoman for Wernher von Braun. However, Missile Defense Agency (MDA) historians attribute the term to a Washington Post article published March 24, 1983, the day after the Star Wars speech, which quoted Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy describing the proposal as "reckless Star Wars schemes."2 Before it was named the "Star Wars Program (SDI) in 1983, it was the Advanced Space Programs Development.3 12/12/10 -- Dr. Judy Wood |
1Strategic Defense Initiative, Wikipedia, 2Sharon Watkins Lang. SMDC/ASTRAT Historical Office. "Where Do We Get Star Wars?", The Eagle. March 2007. 3 Robert M. Bowman, former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations. |
Kabul evac was designed to be a mess. So yes, the evil geniuses are tricking you without you knowing it. It’s very obvious there was a ton of shady **** with 9/11. I tend to think it was a more traditional demolition but wouldn’t put it past them if there were other mechanisms involved.@ax1 - Since you like youtube video explanations, here is a physicist taking apart Dr Judy Woods' goofy hypothesis about vaporizing the twin towers.
Dr Jenkins posted a full rebuttal paper with sourced references (PDF can be found here... http://911blogger.com/news/2007-02-27/overwhelming-implausibility-using-directed-energy-beams-demolish-world-trade-center-towers)
but I doubt you will ever read through it.
Much easier to just spam the same dopey theories each year on the 9/11 anniversary. Quantity over quality, and all....
I think a better question at this point, is why YOU believe in every conspiracy theory. Not just one, but all. Not just Santa, but the Easter bunny, and tooth fairy too. Using each one as being somehow 'possible' to make all the others possible. In an endless loop.
I don't know about your educational background, but there must be something in there to explain why you are drawn to such nonsense. Maybe you have always thought you were smarter than your college grades showed, and you harbor a psychological need to one day 'prove' you were smarter than them? I think at this point a little introspection is in order....
Looking at it another way, even if somehow one of your conspiracies might be true, it defies all logic and mathematical odds that ALL of them would be true. Our government is too incompetent to pull off even the most simple evacuation of Kabul. But somehow these evil geniuses coordinated a plane hitting the towers, a simultaneous controlled demolition, AND a space death beam vaporizing the pieces before falling... all at the exact same moment!?!??! Wow. Just wow.
I never claimed I believe every conspiracy theory nor have I claimed I concluded Judy Woods theory, I even posted last night that we dont necessarily have to conclude with her theories...I even stated last night it doesnt even necessarily need to be spaced based weapons (although I do think its absolutely ridiculous imo that we dont have death ray tech on satellites) but we have so many countless anomalies we should consider the alternative, what is suppressed from mainstream media because we do know as a fact we have been lied to about many things about 9/11 all across the board. I do conclude that there is alot about 9/11 that has been covered up and not publicly known.I think a better question at this point, is why YOU believe in every conspiracy theory. Not just one, but all. Not just Santa, but the Easter bunny, and tooth fairy too. Using each one as being somehow 'possible' to make all the others possible. In an endless loop.
There is alot of Black and Dark Ops tech that Dr. Judy Wood and Dr. Greg Jenkins and most other mainstream scientists can only theorize about (both trying to prove and disprove) but a few in the inner circle with some hardcore NDAs already have their hands on.Kabul evac was designed to be a mess. So yes, the evil geniuses are tricking you without you knowing it. It’s very obvious there was a ton of shady **** with 9/11. I tend to think it was a more traditional demolition but wouldn’t put it past them if there were other mechanisms involved.
Have you looked into HAARP?
Here is the thing and why I feel you are dead wrong to discredit death ray tech and more specifically how it was used on 9/11.But any reasonable scientific analysis shows that there was NO particle beam deployed to vaporized large chunks of the twin towers on 9/11. Period.
Ohhhhh, bummer. Norm had a one of a kind delivery. He'd tell those meandering story jokes that seemingly went nowhere until the hysterical ending!Norm MacDonald died of cancer today, he was 61. I thought he was hysterically funny. Deadpan delivery breaks me up.
Note to self - This is not a dress rehearsal, this is your life.
Michael Moore is scum"My Pet Goat" - Fahrenheit 9/11 | Michael Moore
Im still working through this, not sure where the title of "destroyed" earned its merit...it does come out different when you start reading the transcript instead being fed the emotion of tone in the video as Greg does look better (camera angles, lighting, etc..) on video (think JFK vs Nixon debate video vs, audio) and it was designed as such and he is clearly prepared on the offensive prior to the interview with written stats and notes that would have been impossible for her to prepare for and make her look weaker.@ax1 - Since you like youtube video explanations, here is a physicist taking apart Dr Judy Woods' goofy hypothesis about vaporizing the twin towers.
Dr Jenkins posted a full rebuttal paper with sourced references (PDF can be found here... http://911blogger.com/news/2007-02-27/overwhelming-implausibility-using-directed-energy-beams-demolish-world-trade-center-towers)
but I doubt you will ever read through it.
Much easier to just spam the same dopey theories each year on the 9/11 anniversary. Quantity over quality, and all....
I think a better question at this point, is why YOU believe in every conspiracy theory. Not just one, but all. Not just Santa, but the Easter bunny, and tooth fairy too. Using each one as being somehow 'possible' to make all the others possible. In an endless loop.
I don't know about your educational background, but there must be something in there to explain why you are drawn to such nonsense. Maybe you have always thought you were smarter than your college grades showed, and you harbor a psychological need to one day 'prove' you were smarter than them? I think at this point a little introspection is in order....
Looking at it another way, even if somehow one of your conspiracies might be true, it defies all logic and mathematical odds that ALL of them would be true. Our government is too incompetent to pull off even the most simple evacuation of Kabul. But somehow these evil geniuses coordinated a plane hitting the towers, a simultaneous controlled demolition, AND a space death beam vaporizing the pieces before falling... all at the exact same moment!?!??! Wow. Just wow.
He is, and Im no fan of him but I call everything as I see it, and that scum called out Satan and showed the world who Bush really was....well I myself take it many steps further but he was trying hahhahaaMichael Moore is scum
can't believe he is attacking bush-gw has become one of 'THEM'Michael Moore is scum
Bush is a living Satan, and now CiaNN is propping him up even promoting his father.can't believe he is attacking bush-gw has become one of 'THEM'
but yeah, moore is for sure scum!!!
I saw this. Fcuking gross!!!!!Bush is a living Satan, and now CiaNN is propping him up even promoting his father.
Bush was just linking the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and linking them to January 6th the other day, Come on man!
I didn't name the video, but you can see Judy flailing around wacky theories and hypothetical musings as if fact... and Greg is giving a reasoned scientific response in rebuttal.Im still working through this, not sure where the title of "destroyed" earned its merit...it does come out different when you start reading the transcript instead being fed the emotion of tone in the video as Greg does look better (camera angles, lighting, etc..) on video (think JFK vs Nixon debate video vs, audio) and it was designed as such and he is clearly prepared on the offensive prior to the interview with written stats and notes that would have been impossible for her to prepare for and make her look weaker.
Also, Id be careful with Dr. Greg, smart as hell but he is affiliated with the NSA (has had some of his research funded by them,) one of the least trusted organizations when it comes to anything 9/11 so he has as much biased interest to be a debunker and Judy has supporting the truth movement.
Im halfway through the video and working back and forth with the transcript, its really entertaining.
Im not saying Dr. Judy is absolutely right with her theories but Im not convinced we reached flat earth level material, not based off this video claiming he "destroyed her," not at all.
I was looking at some of the paper earlier Im multitasking alot, I mean we dont know what type of weaponry exists in black ops so as far as Im concerned measuring what is not known and only from the perspective of what is known can only be taken from a grain of salt. We dont know what we are really dealing with for sure, and Judy made that clear, its more about the crime scene first and you have to figure out the cause later, but you know somethings dont add up. Thats what an investigation entails.Ondo
I didn't name the video, but you can see Judy flailing around wacky theories and hypothetical musings as if fact... and Greg is giving a reasoned scientific response in rebuttal.
For example - Judy saying how paper didn't get burned like microwave weapons, or a microwave oven. And Greg saying it's simply because paper doesn't contain water upon which microwave reacts.
See? You can take an ordinary scientific phenomenon and a kook can use this to claim an invisible space death ray. Don't be a kook.
But the youtube exchange was just a taste. The complete thorough response, with footnotes etc, is in Jenkins full paper (I provided the link earlier)
The shortest response is that yeah, we may have limited particle beam weapons. But figure the energy it takes to destroy 1 brick, and then you quickly see it is 100% totally ridiculous to ever suggest anyone could "dustify" 80% of the two tallest buildings in the world.
And then when you realize Judy came up with this dopey theory by comparing to the short hollow Kingdome stadium (for mass, ground impact, etc) and some aerial photos of rubble.... the whole thing becomes a laughable joke of Bigfoot science. And anyone who repeats it is gullible and/or moronic.
PS - you posted a bunch, but nothing at all about your educational background to perhaps understand your reading and reasoning ability??
Im not with those people nor do I condone breaking into that building in the first place, but Im personally offended as an American the constant link of Dump supporters with "terrorism" and "extremism" when the overwhelming majority of people there including those that broke in were good kind people, and perhaps a bunch made a mistake and got caught up in the moment of human psychology. And none of this would have happened if they listened to people calling for more secure elections for decades.I saw this. Fcuking gross!!!!!
Ben Rich-lockheed martin skunk works...'Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do'I was looking at some of the paper earlier Im multitasking alot, I mean we dont know what type of weaponry exists in black ops so as far as Im concerned measuring what is not known and only from the perspective of what is known can only be taken from a grain of salt. We dont know what we are really dealing with for sure, and Judy made that clear, its more about the crime scene first and you have to figure out the cause later, but you know somethings dont add up. Thats what an investigation entails.
I personally think if they used any type of higher tech that it was in combination of a weakened state with the plane crash of course, the explosives that clearly blasted as the towers collapses (the projectile fireballs were clearly seen some stories below the collapse point on the way down,) nano thermite...which are things we can prove more so than invisible tech, but if the tech was used it was used as an aid to the catastrophe. I dunno thats what I already speculated before I ever even heard of Judy Wood but I was aware of high end black ops futuristic tech years before that.
I dont think this is an issue of me being an idiot or educational background, I do have a college degree and I’m fine forming my own judgment and opinions, but this is more rather your not as open minded as alot of people Ive come across in the real world here, but I dont mean that in a derogatory way I was there once too.
Im gonna look him up and Ha! Ive been saying 30-50 years, he met me right at half way!! Whats amazing is there are things we dont even need to imagine and already know, but somehow Im witnessing how many in the general public is somehow falling 30-50 years backwards.Ben Rich-lockheed martin skunk works...'Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do'
Rich also said black projects were 40 years ahead of anything the public was aware of.
A couple of parts from an article, interesting:Ben Rich-lockheed martin skunk works...'Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do'
Rich also said black projects were 40 years ahead of anything the public was aware of.