Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

Global warming isn’t too hard to understand. Average global temperature increase over a specific time period.

The end

So it can get 10 degrees colder around 49% of the planet on average. But 10 degrees hotter around 51% of the planet...result; higher average global temperature.

We have no Winter at all in Arizona last 2 years. This year worse than last. It’s crazy and depressing.
 
youngandfree said:
Invalid Link Removed

He told Russia Today we need more transparency with FISA in 2013.
Click to expand...

if shifty had grown up in my old neighborhood he wouldn't have a face---it would have been bitch-slapped off of him....typical California liberal, out of touch with the rest of America!!!
 
youngandfree said:
Invalid Link Removed

More fake news goodness from the media. :)
Click to expand...

They made a mistake and sent out a correction upon realizing they made a mistake. Wow, yeah, they're the devil. Meanwhile, you're tripping over yourself to swallow Trump's **** every time he tweets a lie. Birds of a feather...
 
Aleksandar37 said:
They made a mistake and sent out a correction upon realizing they made a mistake. Wow, yeah, they're the devil. Meanwhile, you're tripping over yourself to swallow Trump's **** every time he tweets a lie. Birds of a feather...
Click to expand...

bullshyt...if it were anti-trump you would be all over it-hypocrite!!!!
 
Aleksandar37 said:
**** off back to the mean streets of Indiana lmfao. I've recently posted articles against Democrats and Republicans. Keep guzzling
Click to expand...

piece of advice-get over the holier than thou act and get over yourself.....
 
youngandfree said:
Invalid Link Removed

2 more leaving.
Click to expand...

Not impressed yet, the FBI is not authorized by the US Constitution, they need to all go and make this illegal department completely obsolete. Unfortunate Dump will continue to violate his oath of office and continue to prop them up one way or another.

As far as the Justice Dept. goes, Sessions needs to smoke some and watch Cheech and Chong rather than Reefer Madness on his vcr. Hopefully he will get enlightened and take refuge at a monastery for the rest of his life.
 
ax1 said:
Not impressed yet, the FBI is not authorized by the US Constitution, they need to all go and make this illegal department completely obsolete. Unfortunate Dump will continue to violate his oath of office and continue to prop them up one way or another.

As far as the Justice Dept. goes, Sessions needs to smoke some and watch Cheech and Chong rather than Reefer Madness on his vcr. Hopefully he will get enlightened and take refuge at a monastery for the rest of his life.
Click to expand...

Cheech and Chong would produce a way better parade than this propaganda one that Trump wants. My money is still on Hicks bringing Trump down.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Cheech and Chong would produce a way better parade than this propaganda one that Trump wants. My money is still on Hicks bringing Trump down.
Click to expand...

Dump could be my hero.

I would love a Military Parade. Announce a 75% budget cut to the entire defense budget. Bring all our troops home from some 70+ countries and 800+ bases, officially end all the unofficial illegal wars and throw a massive parade for all out troops who came home!!! If they wanna roll nukes on the streets so be it, at least I can enjoy the tax dollars that have been raped from the American people watching these shiny nukes that are in control of high tech '70s computers and floppy discs in a nice massive pro-peace non-foreign-interventionist massive parade.

Be my hero Dump, this country is broke and all your wars are illegal and expensive. Lets have the right Military Parade and make America great again!
 
Woody said:
This is the first politically savvy move the Dems have done since before the election, imo. Looks like Dems are finally starting to play dirty and on the Repubs level.
Click to expand...

Finally starting?

R shadiness has always been obvious and blatant.

D shadiness has been behind the scenes and sold to you as the party of integrity.
 
The Dem memo had too much classified into in it per the WH and intelligence agencies that reviewed it. If Schiff wanted all that classified info released, he should have just emailed it to Hillary.

Remember when dems screamed about the Republican memo having classified info and it would be a crisis if it got released? The Republican memo didn't have any. But theirs does and now they are mad that the president is doing the right thing.
 
youngandfree said:
The Dem memo had too much classified into in it per the WH and intelligence agencies that reviewed it. If Schiff wanted all that classified info released, he should have just emailed it to Hillary.

Remember when dems screamed about the Republican memo having classified info and it would be a crisis if it got released? The Republican memo didn't have any. But theirs does and now they are mad that the president is doing the right thing.
Click to expand...

youngandfree said:
That's funny. I needed a good laugh to start my day.
Click to expand...

Wow. The cleverness of the Dem move went right over your head...
 
Dma378 said:
Finally starting?

R shadiness has always been obvious and blatant.

D shadiness has been behind the scenes and sold to you as the party of integrity.
Click to expand...

Oh yeah. No one with any clue can say politicians aren't lying, shady, **** boys.

Dems are just starting to play like Repub. Less behind the scenes and more public setups and traps
 
youngandfree said:
Let's start with the golden shower story.

What in the dossier has actually been proven to be true?
Click to expand...

You keep calling the dossier fake and trying to equate retiring FBI agents as some kind of "proof." Again, name a single thing that has been proven false. Just one. No need to get all defensive at a simple request unless you in fact have absolutely nothing.

About a week or so ago you were claiming that the Nunes memo must be true since those named in it were stating public denials. Why not use the same logic for the dossier? If you really cared about the truth, you wouldn't switch simply because of the party involved.
 
Dma378 said:
Finally starting?

R shadiness has always been obvious and blatant.

D shadiness has been behind the scenes and sold to you as the party of integrity.
Click to expand...

Both have always been obvious. Both claim to be full of integrity. It's up to the individual to choose what they're willing to see.
 
youngandfree said:
Let's start with the golden shower story.

What in the dossier has actually been proven to be true?
Click to expand...

Also, nothing have been proven to be true YET. I continue to say there need to be a proper investigation and a trial if there is sufficient evidence. You want to stop looking because your fuhrer claimed it to be fake.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Both have always been obvious. Both claim to be full of integrity. It's up to the individual to choose what they're willing to see.
Click to expand...

I go back and forth on term limits with Congress. I don't think politician should be a career, but at the same time I don't know about rotating new people constantly. I think it would be harder to be a paid whore with term limits but everyone has a price.
 
Woody said:
I go back and forth on term limits with Congress. I don't think politician should be a career, but at the same time I don't know about rotating new people constantly. I think it would be harder to be a paid whore with term limits but everyone has a price.
Click to expand...

Same here. People would still exploit the hell out of it. Rather than one person, you'd see family legacies over and over. There isn't ever going to be a perfect system, but I'd be for changes to funding.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Same here. People would still exploit the hell out of it. Rather than one person, you'd see family legacies over and over. There isn't ever going to be a perfect system, but I'd be for changes to funding.
Click to expand...

We could start by getting rid of corporate funding
 
Woody said:
We could start by getting rid of corporate funding
Click to expand...

That or just make it all much more transparent. Things like PACs make it too easy to hide the flow of cash. Due to the Sunshine Act, I can look up right now any money that a physician in the US has received and who it came from. There should be the same thing for politicians. Of course, people are so biased that even that probably wouldn't matter...they'd use it to attack rival parties and make excuses for their own.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
You keep calling the dossier fake and trying to equate retiring FBI agents as some kind of "proof." Again, name a single thing that has been proven false. Just one. No need to get all defensive at a simple request unless you in fact have absolutely nothing.

About a week or so ago you were claiming that the Nunes memo must be true since those named in it were stating public denials. Why not use the same logic for the dossier? If you really cared about the truth, you wouldn't switch simply because of the party involved.
Click to expand...

What part of the fake story about Trump hiring Russian prostitutes to piss on the bed that Obama slept in in Russia don't you get? That's in the fake dossier. Again you can't name one thing that's been proven TRUE with it. Just one thing. No need to get defensive at a single request unless you in fact have nothing.
 
youngandfree said:
What part of the fake story about Trump hiring Russian prostitutes to piss on the bed that Obama slept in in Russia don't you get? That's in the fake dossier. Again you can't name one thing that's been proven TRUE with it. Just one thing. No need to get defensive at a single request unless you in fact have nothing.
Click to expand...

I'm not the one saying any of it is true or false. Why would I try and prove any of it true, when I haven't made that assertion? I've said, repeatedly and slow enough for even you to comprehend, that the investigation should be allowed to see if any of it is true or false. You however continue to call it fake, when nothing, including the story about Trump and hookers, has been proven false. Personally I think there are more important parts to focus on, but if that's your thing...
 
Keep telling yourself that. One person named in the dossier that was reported to have met Russians in Prague reports he's never been to Prague.

Invalid Link Removed
 
youngandfree said:
Keep telling yourself that. One person named in the dossier that was reported to have met Russians in Prague reports he's never been to Prague.

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

Keep telling myself what? That guilt or innocence should be based on actual evidence? If Trump's lawyer is claiming this (that's who your "one person" is), then he can testify under oath in a court. BTW, lack of stamps in a passport isn't actually proof of anything. Private jets between countries in the EU don't always get stamps. I don't even get a stamp every time I fly commercial. There's also the matter of the Schengen area...go ahead and google it and tell me you'd still definitely get a stamp going from Italy to Czech Republic.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Keep telling myself what? That guilt or innocence should be based on actual evidence? If Trump's lawyer is claiming this (that's who your "one person" is), then he can testify under oath in a court. BTW, lack of stamps in a passport isn't actually proof of anything. Private jets between countries in the EU don't always get stamps. I don't even get a stamp every time I fly commercial. There's also the matter of the Schengen area...go ahead and google it and tell me you'd still definitely get a stamp going from Italy to Czech Republic.
Click to expand...

Funny you ignore the corroborated part of his alibi of being in the US on a college visit.

"Cohen said that during the time the report places him in Prague, he was actually with his son visiting USC and meeting with the baseball coach. A USC baseball source confirmed Tuesday night that Cohen and his son had visited USC on August 29th. Cohen said that he was in Los Angeles from the 23rd through the 29th of August, and that the rest of the month he was in New York. He said that his only trip to an EU country over the summer had been a vacation to Italy in July. In one instance, the dossier places the alleged Prague travel in "August/September 2016." Cohen said he was in New York for the entire month of September."
 
youngandfree said:
Funny you ignore the corroborated part of his alibi of being in the US on a college visit.

"Cohen said that during the time the report places him in Prague, he was actually with his son visiting USC and meeting with the baseball coach. A USC baseball source confirmed Tuesday night that Cohen and his son had visited USC on August 29th. Cohen said that he was in Los Angeles from the 23rd through the 29th of August, and that the rest of the month he was in New York. He said that his only trip to an EU country over the summer had been a vacation to Italy in July. In one instance, the dossier places the alleged Prague travel in "August/September 2016." Cohen said he was in New York for the entire month of September."
Click to expand...

doesn't prove anything...trump gave the coach $100,000 to lie...right adam schiff?
 
youngandfree said:
Funny you ignore the corroborated part of his alibi of being in the US on a college visit.

"Cohen said that during the time the report places him in Prague, he was actually with his son visiting USC and meeting with the baseball coach. A USC baseball source confirmed Tuesday night that Cohen and his son had visited USC on August 29th. Cohen said that he was in Los Angeles from the 23rd through the 29th of August, and that the rest of the month he was in New York. He said that his only trip to an EU country over the summer had been a vacation to Italy in July. In one instance, the dossier places the alleged Prague travel in "August/September 2016." Cohen said he was in New York for the entire month of September."
Click to expand...

Funny I keep saying this should be decided in a trial, not based on random **** you find on the internet. If he has an alibi and a solid case, get in front of a judge or a grand jury.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Funny I keep saying this should be decided in a trial, not based on random **** you find on the internet. If he has an alibi and a solid case, get in front of a judge or a grand jury.
Click to expand...

You post random BS article from lefty news sites and claim it's truth. I posted an article with a verified corroborated story disproving part of the fake dossier, just like you requested. And all you have is it should be decided in trial. The problem is there won't be a trial because there isn't any criminal wrongdoing.
 
youngandfree said:
You post random BS article from lefty news sites and claim it's truth. I posted an article with a verified corroborated story disproving part of the fake dossier, just like you requested. And all you have is it should be decided in trial. The problem is there won't be a trial because there isn't any criminal wrongdoing.
Click to expand...

So you're not in favor of trials or grand juries to decide if there is enough evidence to go to trial? Wow, yeah, you're quite the patriot. I guess all the FBI agents you have your panties in a bunch sholdn't be investigated either because they claim innocence.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
So you're not in favor of trials or grand juries to decide if there is enough evidence to go to trial? Wow, yeah, you're quite the patriot. I guess all the FBI agents you have your panties in a bunch sholdn't be investigated either because they claim innocence.
Click to expand...

Cohen has no reason to testify to a grand jury or in a trial. You have no point.
 
youngandfree said:
It's exactly how it works. He isn't accused of any crime. Regardless of what some DNC operative writes about him. What crime is he accused of committing?
Click to expand...

Ask an adult how subpoenas work. He hasn't been accused of committting any crime that I'm aware of and I have not said he was. He could be called to testify to the validity of the dossier.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Keep telling myself what? That guilt or innocence should be based on actual evidence? If Trump's lawyer is claiming this (that's who your "one person" is), then he can testify under oath in a court. BTW, lack of stamps in a passport isn't actually proof of anything. Private jets between countries in the EU don't always get stamps. I don't even get a stamp every time I fly commercial. There's also the matter of the Schengen area...go ahead and google it and tell me you'd still definitely get a stamp going from Italy to Czech Republic.
Click to expand...

Innocent until proven guilty means the feds or the state have to prove you did something , not the other way around. You said he can testify in court to prove his innocence. I'm not sure what you think he has to prove he's innocent of, but that implies he did something wrong.
 
youngandfree said:
Innocent until proven guilty means the feds or the state have to prove you did something , not the other way around. You said he can testify in court to prove his innocence. I'm not sure what you think he has to prove he's innocent of, but that implies he did something wrong.
Click to expand...

Yes and they prove that in a trial, not on the internet or through twitter. Do you not understand how a grand jury or a subpoena works? The grand jury decides if there should be a proper trial or not. Is there anything you're actually knowledgeable about? Maybe we can discuss that instead because you're apparently not up to speed on basic parts of our justice system.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top