Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

ax1 said:
They all lose, the prison industrial complex is supported by both! Not to say I dont think real criminals belong there, thats not my point, lol

I bet you 0.00000034 bitcoins prisoners have a higher vote % actually counted at elections than our own military.
Click to expand...

I bet 90% of criminals vote democratic...
 
bigsmall said:
Your a total moron and not only will he not be impeached - he will get re-elected with more of a landslide than the first time. And then the republicans will get in again and again and again. Better get used to the good life bud.
Click to expand...

I love when people call others a moron, but can't seem to figure out spelling.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Having a job is a good thing. How does that correlate with whether or not Trump is a racist? It doesn't. Trump's own words are a much better indication...here's the cliffs notes version Invalid Link Removed

You're also forgetting to add in that black unemployment is still higher than overall unemployment.
Click to expand...

Here's a ****ing NYT article you posted you ****ing retard
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Stay safe! They're saying it was a kind of meteor called a bolide. They're saying there are no reports of it hitting ground though. Is your second pic showing fire on the ground or is that from the flash?
Click to expand...
No thats fire in a neighborhood...It definetly hit ground
 
]

Aleksandar37 said:
I like to post links with my replies and that was the quickest one. Far stretch to say I ONLY read CNN and NYT which was your claim. Keep spreading lies though.
Click to expand...

It's the two you chose to make your point. Like usual. So you post articles you don't even read then? That's even worse coming from such a highly "educated" person.
 
youngandfree said:
]



It's the two you chose to make your point. Like usual. So you post articles you don't even read then? That's even worse coming from such a highly "educated" person.
Click to expand...

Dude, this is really quite simple. You claimed I ONLY (only being the key word) read CNN and NYT. You chose to make that claim. I told you that you were wrong and you seem to think that means that I don't use links from them and confirm what they say. If you can't comprehend the difference, go upstairs and wake up your mom to explain it to you. I don't have the time or desire.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
You got your explanation and you made your excuse as usual. If it was the black guy, you'd be screaming for impeachment. Just be honest already.

Also, why should Trump at the very least comment?! BECAUSE HE'S THE MOTHER****ING PRESIDENT YOU ****ING RETARD! An entire state under him thought they were under missile attack which is a very real possibility due to his tweeting like a teenage bitch. Whatever happened to taking responsibility and the buck stops here?
Click to expand...

When did I say Trump shouldn't have made a comment about it?
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Dude, this is really quite simple. You claimed I ONLY (only being the key word) read CNN and NYT. You chose to make that claim. I told you that you were wrong and you seem to think that means that I don't use links from them and confirm what they say. If you can't comprehend the difference, go upstairs and wake up your mom to explain it to you. I don't have the time or desire.
Click to expand...

You're the one using them and then saying you don't read them. Not me.
 
youngandfree said:
Invalid Link Removed

Black community support of Trump has doubled.
Click to expand...

Nope. This is not how math works "The report from The Atlantic, a left-leaning publication, states that Trump's support among black men "significantly exceeds his 2016 vote share" at 23%, while his support among black women increased to 11% — an average of 17%"


Here. Let an actual black person explain it to you, Invalid Link Removed


"Kilmeade seemed to think the pollsters surveyed 600,000 black Americans. They didn’t. Further, a Gallup poll shows that Trump’s approval rating among blacks fell 9 points from January to December, going from 15 percent to 6 percent.

This means that Trump’s approval rating among black Americans has actually been cut more than in half."

In half!
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Nope. This is not how math works "The report from The Atlantic, a left-leaning publication, states that Trump's support among black men "significantly exceeds his 2016 vote share" at 23%, while his support among black women increased to 11% — an average of 17%"


Here. Let an actual black person explain it to you, Invalid Link Removed


"Kilmeade seemed to think the pollsters surveyed 600,000 black Americans. They didn’t. Further, a Gallup poll shows that Trump’s approval rating among blacks fell 9 points from January to December, going from 15 percent to 6 percent.

This means that Trump’s approval rating among black Americans has actually been cut more than in half."

In half!
Click to expand...
Exit polls from the 2016 presidential election show that only 4% of black women voted for Trump while 13% of black men voted for him, according to CNN.

Broken down by gender, Trump's support from black women has nearly tripled from 4% to 11%, while his support from black men has nearly doubled from 13% to 23%.

One possible explanation for this increase in support from the black community is the historic low unemployment rate the community is experiencing under the Trump administration which currently sits at 6.8%, the lowest number ever recorded, according to CNBC.

You're right it's not double. It's nearly a tripling of support by black women and almost doubled in men.
 
Invalid Link Removed

So the angry black lady doesn't think they surveyed 600,000 people, so she calls BS. You're right, you win. It was 605,172 people.
 
youngandfree said:
Invalid Link Removed

So the angry black lady doesn't think they surveyed 600,000 people, so she calls BS. You're right, you win. It was 605,172 people.
Click to expand...

605,172 was the TOTAL population surveyed which was then segmented by race, gender, age, etc. The article you posted and where Trump took his data is trying to do their math as if approximately 600,000 (or 605,172) black people took the survey, which is not true.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
605,172 was the TOTAL population surveyed which was then segmented by race, gender, age, etc. The article you posted and where Trump took his data is trying to do their math as if approximately 600,000 (or 605,172) black people took the survey, which is not true.
Click to expand...

If only 1000 of those 605,000 were black, then it would hold the same value as going out and only talking to 1000 black people. As the Post points out, statistically it's no reason to spend the money to talk to more than 1000 people.
 
DemntedCowboy said:
Well I was right there....Soooooo
Click to expand...

another case of 'fake' news? seriously the news is not what it should be, imo.

this should get more coverage than how many scoops of ice cream trump gets, at least that is the way I see it!!!!
 
youngandfree said:
If only 1000 of those 605,000 were black, then it would hold the same value as going out and only talking to 1000 black people. As the Post points out, statistically it's no reason to spend the money to talk to more than 1000 people.
Click to expand...

You're completely missing the point or don't understand how percentages work or the simple math that needs to be done when averaging and comparing percentages. Also, you don't seem to understand how statistics work because your statement is completely wrong. Sample size is a huge contributor to statistical power. To say that an n of 1000 would have the same power as an n of 605,000 is a lie.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
You're completely missing the point or don't understand how percentages work or the simple math that needs to be done when averaging and comparing percentages. Also, you don't seem to understand how statistics work because your statement is completely wrong. Sample size is a huge contributor to statistical power. To say that an n of 1000 would have the same power as an n of 605,000 is a lie.
Click to expand...

in general...polling in and of itself is a lie. I don't think in todays world that a poll could be conducted that isn't biased.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
You're completely missing the point or don't understand how percentages work or the simple math that needs to be done when averaging and comparing percentages. Also, you don't seem to understand how statistics work because your statement is completely wrong. Sample size is a huge contributor to statistical power. To say that an n of 1000 would have the same power as an n of 605,000 is a lie.
Click to expand...

"Over the course of 2017, SurveyMonkey conducted 605,172 interviews of Americans. A quirk of statistical analysis is that the precision of poll results from a survey of 605,000 people vs. only 1,000 people is small; the former has essentially no margin of error, but the latter has a margin of error of only three points. This is why most pollsters don’t bother polling hundreds of thousands of people. Why spend the money when your estimate is good with far fewer people?"

From the wapo article your "root" article comes from. I didn't say it, they did.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
There. Did you not know that unemployment is based off a survey of only about 60,000 households?

All here Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...


all that does is reinforce my statement that ALL polls/surveys are a load of crap....whatever position you agree with you can find a poll/survey to suit your needs.
 
youngandfree said:
"Over the course of 2017, SurveyMonkey conducted 605,172 interviews of Americans. A quirk of statistical analysis is that the precision of poll results from a survey of 605,000 people vs. only 1,000 people is small; the former has essentially no margin of error, but the latter has a margin of error of only three points. This is why most pollsters don’t bother polling hundreds of thousands of people. Why spend the money when your estimate is good with far fewer people?"

From the wapo article your "root" article comes from. I didn't say it, they did.
Click to expand...

Power is basic statistics and I stand by what I said. It's not my opinion; it's math. I could care less what the Washington Post "expert" says.

Two things. First, you're wrong, you've been called out as being wrong, and now you're trying desperately to change the subject away from the stats that you're incorrect about. Second, you're a hypocrite for cherry picking parts of CNN and Washington Post articles, but ignoring the parts of those very same articles that prove you wrong.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
lol
Click to expand...

since you threw those unemployment stats out the window, how about we throw ALL stats out...science has become polluted by bias. I'm not sure any science can be totally trusted not to have an agenda.
 
thebigt said:
since you threw those unemployment stats out the window, how about we throw ALL stats out...science has become polluted by bias. I'm not sure any science can be totally trusted not to have an agenda.
Click to expand...

1) I didn't throw **** out; I pointed out that you posted something based on a survey. You called it bull****, not me. 2) Science doesn't have bias. Politicians and news agencies have bias and twist data to fool voters. 3) I don't recommend going down this road with me
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Power is basic statistics and I stand by what I said. It's not my opinion; it's math. I could care less what the Washington Post "expert" says.

Two things. First, you're wrong, you've been called out as being wrong, and now you're trying desperately to change the subject away from the stats that you're incorrect about. Second, you're a hypocrite for cherry picking parts of CNN and Washington Post articles, but ignoring the parts of those very same articles that prove you wrong.
Click to expand...

Kind of like you being wrong on Durbin starting the whole ****hole mess, or you saying "who reads CNN and NYT" after you posted their articles mere hours earlier. You got called out and just deflect arguing semantics like usual after spreading lies.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
1) I didn't throw **** out; I pointed out that you posted something based on a survey. You called it bull****, not me. 2) Science doesn't have bias. Politicians and news agencies have bias and twist data to fool voters. 3) I don't recommend going down this road with me
Click to expand...

if you had spent as much time being pro-trump as you have anti-trump imagine all the surveys/polls/stats/articles you could have posted...if it is so easy for politicians and news agencies to have bias and twist data then data has become corrupted. what makes you think corporations can't just as easily twist data to meet their ends...as long as humans with agenda's are involved science will be biased and twisted.
 
thebigt said:
if you had spent as much time being pro-trump as you have anti-trump imagine all the surveys/polls/stats/articles you could have posted...if it is so easy for politicians and news agencies to have bias and twist data then data has become corrupted. what makes you think corporations can't just as easily twist data to meet their ends...as long as humans with agenda's are involved science will be biased and twisted.
Click to expand...

The data isn't corrupt; the interpretation is. Last chance
 
Aleksandar37 said:
The data isn't corrupt; the interpretation is. Last chance
Click to expand...

lol...the interpretation can be anything you want it to be-so it is corrupt!!!

data doesn't make itself know on it's own you know......how could anyone trust anything that could be so easily corrupted?
 
thebigt said:
lol...the interpretation can be anything you want it to be-so it is corrupt!!!

data doesn't make itself know on it's own you know......how could anyone trust anything that could be so easily corrupted?
Click to expand...

Says the clueless **** who still believes in fairy tales about some Middle Eastern dude who got nailed to wood two thousands years ago. Just because you choose to blindly believe what you are told, doesn't mean you know science is done. This is the bull**** we're pushing back on because morons who are too STUPID to understand basic concepts in math and science and are too LAZY to put forth the effort to learn, choose instead to attack those of us who have put in the work. You take the easy way out by yelling fake news or saying something is corrupt instead of trying to learn.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Says the clueless **** who still believes in fairy tales about some Middle Eastern dude who got nailed to wood two thousands years ago. Just because you choose to blindly believe what you are told, doesn't mean you know science is done. This is the bull**** we're pushing back on because morons who are too STUPID to understand basic concepts in math and science and are too LAZY to put forth the effort to learn, choose instead to attack those of us who have put in the work. You take the easy way out by yelling fake news or saying something is corrupt instead of trying to learn.
Click to expand...


tell me that science is NOT corruptible...go on I dare you!!!

if something can be corrupted it WILL be corrupted-surely you are willing to accept this...or is that concept over your head.
 
ax1 said:
Oohhhhh so you think I’m a liberal now huh? RRRRRROOOOFFFLLLLLLL

You think I voted for Hitlery and support Barry Soetoro?
Click to expand...
It's was playful buddy. Didn't mean to get you all triggered. Lol


Edit: this was also playful in the attempt to get you even more triggered.
 
LiveToLift said:
It's was playful buddy. Didn't mean to get you all triggered. Lol


Edit: this was also playful in the attempt to get you even more triggered.
Click to expand...

Its all good feel free anytime. I just react funny when people think Im a part of 2 sides of the same coin.

Past 8 years....Ill say "Obama is a shythole," then I get "well Bush and Bush and Bush," and then I have to say "Fuq cokehead Bush."

Now its the same thing when I criticize Dump, its then the counter becomes "well Obama this and Obama that..."

Nothing ever changes, lol
 
ax1 said:
Its all good feel free anytime. I just react funny when people think Im a part of 2 sides of the same coin.

Past 8 years....Ill say "Obama is a shythole," then I get "well Bush and Bush and Bush," and then I have to say "Fuq cokehead Bush."

Now its the same thing when I criticize Dump, its then the counter becomes "well Obama this and Obama that..."

Nothing ever changes, lol
Click to expand...
I hear you fully. I don't put myself in either real category just find myself having more in common with Republicans as I grow older. It's truthfully more of a who's in who's pockets deeper party system than anything always has been.
 
LiveToLift said:
I hear you fully. I don't put myself in either real category just find myself having more in common with Republicans as I grow older. It's truthfully more of a who's in who's pockets deeper party system than anything always has been.
Click to expand...

I can relate to the common problems and solutions with republican voters, they just keep getting duped. I warn them all the time.

I used to be very in line with liberals during the Bush era but then I found out mostly were primarily full of hypocrisy after Obama (who I voted for 1st term) took office and I lost all my respect for most of them.

These days it’s think for thy self, no need to join some political club or organization. Ain’t falling for that anymore although I do support Ron Paul’s campaign for liberty movement and Gerald Celente’s Occupy Peace movement.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top