Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

after 30 years the democrats are turning on bill Clinton...wait, what...I smell a rat, something aint right here!!!
 
thebigt said:
after 30 years the democrats are turning on bill Clinton...wait, what...I smell a rat, something aint right here!!!
Click to expand...

With all the sex scandles out I thought his past out of court settlements would be all over CiaNN and they would also finally allow his abandoned son to speak out in mainstream by now.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Who's son?
Click to expand...

Bill Clintons son, Danney Williams.

He wants a DNA test too, but he cant even talk to Billy.

Im not authenticating this is true, but I throughly listened to his interviews and speeches when this was going last year, long story but it’s certainly interesting, and he hasn’t gotten any injunctions for doing what he has been doing.
 
I was a kid during Watergate and 1st voted in 76...in all that time I've never seen democrats eat their own, they stick together no matter what...

this tells me one thing-the democrats have rock solid evidence against trump...they have one or probably more than one woman/women in the wings with either pictures, video or recording of trump being inappropriate, most likely very inappropriate...this is the only explanation I can come up with!!!


the apparent eagerness of the democrats to turn on clinton and franken is just for show---hey republicans look at us...and then they drop the bombshell on trump!!!

I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if Clinton and franken are in on this charade!!!


my prediction is trump has little time left as president.....
 
ax1 said:
Bill Clintons son, Danney Williams.

He wants a DNA test too, but he cant even talk to Billy.

Im not authenticating this is true, but I throughly listened to his interviews and speeches when this was going last year, long story but it’s certainly interesting, and he hasn’t gotten any injunctions for doing what he has been doing.
Click to expand...
This is who possibly may be Clinton's son.Invalid Link Removed
 
Lets get that **** on Maury
 
Good news, looks like CiaNN, MSadisM and Crox w/ its parent companies are allowed to buy your local paper, radio and local broadcast stations. Thanks Dump!!!!!!! America is now great again!!

Shockingly this story has no connections to sex scandals as of yet.

Invalid Link Removed
 
ax1 said:
Good news, looks like CiaNN, MSadisM and Crox w/ its parent companies are allowed to buy your local paper, radio and local broadcast stations. Thanks Dump!!!!!!! America is now great again!!

Shockingly this story has no connections to sex scandals as of yet.

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

Or they can finally show how they're already all working together. That includes Breitbart and infowars ;)
 
And Trump continues to stay silent on pedophile Moore, but tweets about Al Franken. Apparently Trump is against grabbing breasts, but ***** is ok. ****ing hypocrite.
 
ax1 said:
Some follow ups
Click to expand...
Nicely put, I like the way you think. And yes it will definitely be interesting to see what happens over the next three and a half years. It will truly show whether or not he is a loaner trying to fix things like JFK ( in the sense of corruption) or whether or not he is just another Pawn playing to the American people. Also I thought you might like this video, I found it very interesting after our last back and forth I went and dug for some of the info that I was thinking of when it came to JFK and LBJ and yes LBJ was a piece of **** but again if you think about it self-preservation is human nature so maybe you ought to think about running for office. Although I take it you're probably not someone who would want to be in the spotlight ever. Either way check out this video, I think you'll find it very interesting even though it's quite long.

Invalid Link Removed
 
Aleksandar37 said:
If you're only giving me the choice between honest hostility and the possibility that our President has another country's interest in mind over our own, then I have to choose the hostility/war option. I don't believe it has to only be those two though, but am answering your question.
Click to expand...

Is it possible that he's actually looking out for our country by keeping good relations rather than having another country's interests above our own? Could it possibly be a form of deception to keep things peaceful? As a cold war / hostility option would recruit basically any able-bodied male under the age of 40 to go fight whether or not they believe in the cause or not, religion, Etc. Just a thought.
 
muscleupcrohn said:
What reason do you have to believe that Trump has Russia’s best interest in mind over that of the US? I️ could perhaps see an argument for a leader, Trump in this case, serving their personal best interest first and foremost, but why Russia’s? Does Trump have something to gain by favoring Russia over the US? If so, what? If not, why then would he do it? Also, surely you know that Trump can’t “hand over the US to Russia.” There’s a thing called the Constitution that prevents that sort of thing. I️ would honestly like to know your logic here. It seems like people think it’s inherently bad if we get along with Russia. I️ just don’t see how that is the case. US and Russia surely can coexist.
Click to expand...
What he said
 
muscleupcrohn said:
I️ would have preferred him to Trump. I️ don’t know if he’ll do well though; it seems possible that if Trump doesn’t do well or doesn’t have a decent approval rating at the end of his term that people won’t want another “billionaire political outsider” as President. Personally, I’d consider voting for him. I️ recall him saying that he’s libertarian-leaning, but wants a bit more “social safety nets” than most libertarians typically do. I️ can live with that, and it sounds like a lot of people probably could get behind it if they actually thought about it.
Click to expand...
Asking for independent thought is asking for a lot from the American public. They are so used to being spoon-fed that no matter how reasonable or far-fetched the information may seem they won't listen unless it's given to them on a silver platter by a good-looking man and woman. If the Elephant Man Came on TV with nothing but the truth the American public would just look and say wow what a bunch of bullsh1t.
 
thebigt said:
I was a kid during Watergate and 1st voted in 76...in all that time I've never seen democrats eat their own, they stick together no matter what...

this tells me one thing-the democrats have rock solid evidence against trump...they have one or probably more than one woman/women in the wings with either pictures, video or recording of trump being inappropriate, most likely very inappropriate...this is the only explanation I can come up with!!!


the apparent eagerness of the democrats to turn on clinton and franken is just for show---hey republicans look at us...and then they drop the bombshell on trump!!!

I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if Clinton and franken are in on this charade!!!


my prediction is trump has little time left as president.....
Click to expand...
Presidents have been cheating since the Inception of the president. Just because he has been inappropriate with women his entire life and admitted to doing so doesn't mean he will be thrown out of office. The impeachment process is very hard and the people to do so probably won't just because he happened to do the one thing that makes humans humans, have sex. And he's already owned up to so much that I doubt he would have a problem owning up to other allegations. If Clinton wasn't impeached with all his crooked natured politics and messing around with women that Hillary knew about then I doubt Trump is going to be impeached for doing the same. He never claimed to be a saint. He actually admits to his faults which will probably work for him just like it did for Clinton. Because then the general public can say oh he's human and he owned up to it so we will forgive him. Don't underestimate the ignorance of the public and the heavily influenced media.
 
If anyone ITT has not had a chance to read on Net Neutrality and why the FCC should not kill it in December, I highly encourage you do this now.

We will soon be potentially charged by our ISPs to browse sites they want revenue from. Be it Netflix (on top of the monthly rates), facebook, YouTube, twitter etc

Get on this and stop it from happening!
 
Invalid Link Removed

Use the above link to send faxes to your reps. The site is also useful for anything like this, not just Net Neutrality
 
Jiigzz said:
If anyone ITT has not had a chance to read on Net Neutrality and why the FCC should not kill it in December, I highly encourage you do this now.

We will soon be potentially charged by our ISPs to browse sites they want revenue from. Be it Netflix (on top of the monthly rates), facebook, YouTube, twitter etc

Get on this and stop it from happening!
Click to expand...

That’s a concern for me as well.

My understanding was that it also allows isp to slow bandwidth of smaller companies/website hurting the big’s competition, am I right?
 
chemjr said:
Presidents have been cheating since the Inception of the president. Just because he has been inappropriate with women his entire life and admitted to doing so doesn't mean he will be thrown out of office. The impeachment process is very hard and the people to do so probably won't just because he happened to do the one thing that makes humans humans, have sex. And he's already owned up to so much that I doubt he would have a problem owning up to other allegations. If Clinton wasn't impeached with all his crooked natured politics and messing around with women that Hillary knew about then I doubt Trump is going to be impeached for doing the same. He never claimed to be a saint. He actually admits to his faults which will probably work for him just like it did for Clinton. Because then the general public can say oh he's human and he owned up to it so we will forgive him. Don't underestimate the ignorance of the public and the heavily influenced media.
Click to expand...

in the current climate bill Clinton would have been impeached. it was the feminazis who saved Clinton, they won't be there for trump!!!
 
ax1 said:
That’s a concern for me as well.

My understanding was that it also allows isp to slow bandwidth of smaller companies/website hurting the big’s competition, am I right?
Click to expand...
Absolutely. They can also charge you anything they like just to visit sites that are against their agenda.

It only affects the US, but this is as corrupt as it gets
 
Jiigzz said:
If anyone ITT has not had a chance to read on Net Neutrality and why the FCC should not kill it in December, I highly encourage you do this now.

We will soon be potentially charged by our ISPs to browse sites they want revenue from. Be it Netflix (on top of the monthly rates), facebook, YouTube, twitter etc

Get on this and stop it from happening!
Click to expand...

I'm not sure why anyone in their right mind would be okay with this. Thank you for the link, that is awesome.
 
Jiigzz said:
If anyone ITT has not had a chance to read on Net Neutrality and why the FCC should not kill it in December, I highly encourage you do this now.

We will soon be potentially charged by our ISPs to browse sites they want revenue from. Be it Netflix (on top of the monthly rates), facebook, YouTube, twitter etc

Get on this and stop it from happening!
Click to expand...

I have written my congress representatives via the "Resist Bot". Pretty cool, man. Thanks for the link.
 
Awesome stuff guys, spread the word as well. Net Neutrality has always defined internet usage, and it makes things fair for everyone.

With it killed, ISPs can throttle bandwidth to any site they deem fit if not entirely restrict access. Those are extremes, but also perfectly reasonable.

Unfortunately the stage where the public had any say has either passed, or never happened. Contacting / spamming representatives is all we have left. Even the largest adult site is getting behind trying to stop it being killed.
 
Jiigzz said:
Awesome stuff guys, spread the word as well. Net Neutrality has always defined internet usage, and it makes things fair for everyone.

With it killed, ISPs can throttle bandwidth to any site they deem fit if not entirely restrict access. Those are extremes, but also perfectly reasonable.

Unfortunately the stage where the public had any say has either passed, or never happened. Contacting / spamming representatives is all we have left. Even the largest adult site is getting behind trying to stop it being killed.
Click to expand...

I shared the link on my Facebook, first post I have made in years. Lol

I know Apple and Google are behind Net Neutrality, and if that doesn't tell you that killing it is an awful idea, then there's no hope for you.
 
chemjr said:
Is it possible that he's actually looking out for our country by keeping good relations rather than having another country's interests above our own? Could it possibly be a form of deception to keep things peaceful? As a cold war / hostility option would recruit basically any able-bodied male under the age of 40 to go fight whether or not they believe in the cause or not, religion, Etc. Just a thought.
Click to expand...

Why are you assuming the draft would be used in a new cold war when it wasn't in the last?
 
WTF UFO's wanting to take a wiff out of Nevada's toxic chem trails, wow.

All these aliens need now is some spicy sex scandals.



Invalid Link Removed
 
Aleksandar37 said:
They do sell water at Whole Foods ;)
Click to expand...

I started looking into this, and I see. I always has the thought (without looking into it) that chemtrails were both vapor and a mix of the exhaust from planes. I imagined in some way the molecules there would be mixed together I guess Im wrong. Now for chem-trails, thats another issue but I guess it has nothing to do with puffy white clouds emitted by jets by planes that aliens happen to love so much.
 
ax1 said:
I started looking into this, and I see. I always has the thought (without looking into it) that chemtrails were both vapor and a mix of the exhaust from planes. I imagined in some way the molecules there would be mixed together I guess Im wrong. Now for chem-trails, thats another issue but I guess it has nothing to do with puffy white clouds emitted by jets by planes that aliens happen to love so much.
Click to expand...

a whole lot of theories about chem trails....
 
ax1 said:
I started looking into this, and I see. I always has the thought (without looking into it) that chemtrails were both vapor and a mix of the exhaust from planes. I imagined in some way the molecules there would be mixed together I guess Im wrong. Now for chem-trails, thats another issue but I guess it has nothing to do with puffy white clouds emitted by jets by planes that aliens happen to love so much.
Click to expand...

It's condensation, which is why they call them contrails. It's mostly water with some impurities from the exhaust and it freezes. Chemtrails is a made up conspiracy term for contrails.
 
And now the Trump administration is taking Israel's side against Palestine. Yeah, this is so different from everyone before him (sarcasm)
 
Aleksandar37 said:
And now the Trump administration is taking Israel's side against Palestine. Yeah, this is so different from everyone before him (sarcasm)
Click to expand...

looks like Israel and Saudi arabia are forging ties....this is different.

as to palestine, are we talking Palestinian authority or hamas?
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Why are you assuming the draft would be used in a new cold war when it wasn't in the last?
Click to expand...
Not what I was driving towards but to answer your question- because the "last" cold war era* was truly a was against Russia which is where the conversation was headed iirc, and that would take every able bodied male if we actually went to war with Russia. Back then things were a lot different then over there (and here.)

Will that suffice?
 
chemjr said:
Not what I was driving towards but to answer your question- because the "last" cold war era* was truly a was against Russia which is where the conversation was headed iirc, and that would take every able bodied male if we actually went to war with Russia. Back then things were a lot different then over there (and here.)

Will that suffice?
Click to expand...

You have to make a distinction between "Soviet union" and "Russia" -two different animals.
 
thebigt said:
I see...looks like trump is using the embassy as leverage....the Palestine/Israel dispute has gone on my entire life, I am for anything that results in meaningful talks.
Click to expand...

Not really what is happening at all. The PLO has been working for peace for years now and want the international criminal court to prosecute Israel for their occupation. Trump is a puppet doing Israel's dirty work just like everybody before him and is threatening to close the embassy as retaliation. Wonder when he'll actually get around to that whole America first thing.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Not really what is happening at all. The PLO has been working for peace for years now and want the international criminal court to prosecute Israel for their occupation. Trump is a puppet doing Israel's dirty work just like everybody before him and is threatening to close the embassy as retaliation. Wonder when he'll actually get around to that whole America first thing.
Click to expand...

lol...the plo working for peace...tell me you are drunk!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top