Donald Trump running for president

AE14 said:
Dude, no disrespect but you are talking about the mans daughter. If you don’t like the president fine, but going after the kids is sad. Did you do that to the Obama girls, Bush girls?
Click to expand...

Misfit28 said:
While I don't necessarily agree with the terms he used to describe Trump's daughter, she is a part of his administration. She's also an adult, which the two previous administration's daughters weren't.
Click to expand...

Regardless, does that merit calling her a whore? Yikes
 
AE14 said:
Dude, no disrespect but you are talking about the mans daughter. If you don’t like the president fine, but going after the kids is sad. Did you do that to the Obama girls, Bush girls?
Click to expand...

They didn't serve in the White House and were minors. It's my belief that he is ****ing his daughter based on the creepy things he has said about her over the years. Have you not heard him talk about her?
 
youngandfree said:
You're only proof is unnamed anonymous sources leaking information to partisan "news" organizations that have been proven to report fake information.
Click to expand...

I haven't claimed they actually did anything illegal. I made a joke about the hypocrisy and you jumped in with Hillary since that seems to be your knee-jerk reaction when somebody criticizes Trump. So again, where's the proof aside from the testimony of somebody you're saying shouldn't be trusted?
 
Aleksandar37 said:
I haven't claimed they actually did anything illegal. I made a joke about the hypocrisy and you jumped in with Hillary since that seems to be your knee-jerk reaction when somebody criticizes Trump. So again, where's the proof aside from the testimony of somebody you're saying shouldn't be trusted?
Click to expand...

If you don't believe the head of the FBI testifying to Congress that they recovered classified emails that Clinton deleted, I can't help you. Comey is a puppet because he layed out all of her illegal activity and still said we aren't recommending further charges because "she didn't mean to do any harm".

Your only game is attack other people arguing semantics. I guess that's what years of college gets you.
 
youngandfree said:
If you don't believe the head of the FBI testifying to Congress that they recovered classified emails that Clinton deleted, I can't help you. Comey is a puppet because he layed out all of her illegal activity and still said we aren't recommending further charges because "she didn't mean to do any harm".

Your only game is attack other people arguing semantics. I guess that's what years of college gets you.
Click to expand...

No, I was able to use logic in grade school, but feel free to keep knocking education. I'm not attacking your semantics at all. However you want to phrase it, you're saying that Comey can't be trusted, yet in the same sentence you're saying his testimony is the only proof you have. That turns into a he said/she said and if you're going to use his job title, then you could easily do the same for her. Why believe the head of the FBI over the Secretary of State if that is all we're going on? If you add in that I was married to a federal prosecutor for 12 years who used FBI agents against me, then no, I sure as hell do not trust anybody from that agency, regardless of where they are on the ladder.
 
Oh good grief....twitter just doubled the chances of WWIV (yes I said 4 as usual) being launched for every tweet :(

Reason being...."in an effort to help users be more expressive."

Well, have fun with that people while humans still exist while our furry friend in the white house plots his next bigger and badder tweet off his private server to the global masses.

Invalid Link Removed
 
Aleksandar37 said:
They didn't serve in the White House and were minors. It's my belief that he is ****ing his daughter based on the creepy things he has said about her over the years. Have you not heard him talk about her?
Click to expand...

So the guys a creep, which I don’t deny, and you go to that? I don’t have he words for you.

I’m out.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
No, I was able to use logic in grade school, but feel free to keep knocking education. I'm not attacking your semantics at all. However you want to phrase it, you're saying that Comey can't be trusted, yet in the same sentence you're saying his testimony is the only proof you have. That turns into a he said/she said and if you're going to use his job title, then you could easily do the same for her. Why believe the head of the FBI over the Secretary of State if that is all we're going on? If you add in that I was married to a federal prosecutor for 12 years who used FBI agents against me, then no, I sure as hell do not trust anybody from that agency, regardless of where they are on the ladder.
Click to expand...

Why believe the FBI over any Clinton, their history of lying and criminal activity.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
They didn't serve in the White House and were minors. It's my belief that he is ****ing his daughter based on the creepy things he has said about her over the years. Have you not heard him talk about her?
Click to expand...

See, you proved my point. You want to hammer everyone on semantics and say I'm connecting dots that don't exist, yet here you are doing the same. Where's your proof that he's ****ing his daughter?
 
ax1 said:
Oh good grief....twitter just doubled the chances of WWIV (yes I said 4 as usual) being launched for every tweet :(

Reason being...."in an effort to help users be more expressive."

Well, have fun with that people while humans still exist while our furry friend in the white house plots his next bigger and badder tweet off his private server to the global masses.

Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...
I saw that. LOL.

Also, he deleted the tweets supporting Luther Strange. LMAO.
 
youngandfree said:
See, you proved my point. You want to hammer everyone on semantics and say I'm connecting dots that don't exist, yet here you are doing the same. Where's your proof that he's ****ing his daughter?
Click to expand...

It's my personal opinion, but feel free to keep avoiding my original question to you with distractions.
 
AE14 said:
So the guys a creep, which I don’t deny, and you go to that? I don’t have he words for you.

I’m out.
Click to expand...

Right, because I'm making a huge leap from this quote “It would be really disappointing — not really — but it would depend on what’s inside the magazine. I don’t think Ivanka would do that, although she does have a very nice figure. I’ve said if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her.”

Or this one "Yeah, she's really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren't happily married and, ya know, her father …"
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Right, because I'm making a huge leap from this quote “It would be really disappointing — not really — but it would depend on what’s inside the magazine. I don’t think Ivanka would do that, although she does have a very nice figure. I’ve said if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her.”

Or this one "Yeah, she's really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren't happily married and, ya know, her father …"
Click to expand...
I somehow forgot about those quotes, maybe I just blocked them out. That's just sick.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
It's my personal opinion, but feel free to keep avoiding my original question to you with distractions.
Click to expand...

It's my personal opinion to believe his tetimony detailing the classified emails they recovered on a deleted server. The evidence of the numerous devices the Clinton crime syndicate destroyed with hammers, and her years of shady activity. It's not a leap to believe she is in fact a criminal.

I can make the same inference without providing proof of my claim, because I learned to use logic in elementary school, much like you.
 
youngandfree said:
It's my personal opinion to believe his tetimony detailing the classified emails they recovered on a deleted server. The evidence of the numerous devices the Clinton crime syndicate destroyed with hammers, and her years of shady activity. It's not a lep to believe she is in fact a criminal.

I can make the same inference without providing proof of my claim, because I learned to use logic in elementary school, much like you.
Click to expand...
Actually, it is a leap. Do you want to do away with due process?
 
Misfit28 said:
Actually, it is a leap. Do you want to do away with due process?
Click to expand...

See you're arguing semantics. I made a statement that I believe Hilary is a crook, and Alex keeps demanding me to provide proof of my statement. I'm pointing out he's making a similar leap without providing any actual proof that Trump ****s his daughter. Different subject matter yes, same logical deductions that he claims allows him to make that statement is the same that I use. But I'm the uneducated rube according to Mr PhD.
 
youngandfree said:
See you're arguing semantics. I made a statement that I believe Hilary is a crook, and Alex keeps demanding me to provide proof of my statement. I'm pointing out he's making a similar leap without providing any actual proof that Trump ****s his daughter. Different subject matter yes, same logical deductions that he claims allows him to make that statement is the same that I use. But I'm the uneducated rube according to Mr PhD.
Click to expand...
I can see that. So in your opinion, she is a criminal. Not actually a criminal in the eyes of the law, though.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Right, because I'm making a huge leap from this quote “It would be really disappointing — not really — but it would depend on what’s inside the magazine. I don’t think Ivanka would do that, although she does have a very nice figure. I’ve said if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her.”

Or this one "Yeah, she's really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren't happily married and, ya know, her father …"
Click to expand...
again, my last comment to you....you called her a whore, which is based on what? Nothing except her dads a toolbag.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Where the proof? You're asking for proof on Trump's whore and her cuckold husband and I'm asking where the proof is on Hillary. You're also going to have to make up your mind if Comey is a puppet or telling the truth. Is his testimony your only "proof"? The word of a guy that you're openly saying can't be trusted? How does that make sense?
Click to expand...

just for context
 
Misfit28 said:
I can see that. So in your opinion, she is a criminal. Not actually a criminal in the eyes of the law, though.
Click to expand...

Donald Trump doesn't **** his daughter in the eyes of the law, but it's ok for Alex to make false allegations without any proof to back it up. That's what his mission in life seems to be is to shut down people that can't back up their claims, as he has stated in so many words in a previous post. There has been evidence found of Clinton's illegal activity. You can't dispute that.
 
youngandfree said:
See you're arguing semantics. I made a statement that I believe Hilary is a crook, and Alex keeps demanding me to provide proof of my statement. I'm pointing out he's making a similar leap without providing any actual proof that Trump ****s his daughter. Different subject matter yes, same logical deductions that he claims allows him to make that statement is the same that I use. But I'm the uneducated rube according to Mr PhD.
Click to expand...

I have no control over you getting offended simply because I'm asking for proof, but feel free to keep attacking education. Also, it's actually Dr PhD. Yes, I'm "attacking" your precious semantics lol
 
youngandfree said:
Donald Trump doesn't **** his daughter in the eyes of the law, but it's ok for Alex to make false allegations without any proof to back it up. That's what his mission in life seems to be is to shut down people that can't back up their claims, as he has stated in so many words in a previous post. There has been evidence found of Clinton's illegal activity. You can't dispute that.
Click to expand...

I stated an opinion. I never said I was taking him to court over it. A whole lot of snowflakes for September!
 
our youngest grandaughter turned 11 months today....and after 3 grandaughters we are expecting our first grandson-coming in February!!!

life is good!!!
 
thebigt said:
our youngest grandaughter turned 11 months today....and after 3 grandaughters we are expecting our first grandson-coming in February!!!

life is good!!!
Click to expand...
Awesome buddy after three daughters I just had my first son last year so I feel you LOL
 
does anyone else find it ironic when they say...'the nfl players and their OWNERS?
 
thebigt said:
does anyone else find it ironic when they say...'the nfl players and their OWNERS?
Click to expand...

Sounds kinda horrible to me. I think the correct way should be the team owners, but they would be more bosses to the players. I hear owners of the players all the time though.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Sounds kinda horrible to me. I think the correct way should be the team owners, but they would be more bosses to the players. I hear owners of the players all the time though.
Click to expand...

lol...sometimes people can't see the forrest through the trees....
 
thebigt said:
our youngest grandaughter turned 11 months today....and after 3 grandaughters we are expecting our first grandson-coming in February!!!

life is good!!!
Click to expand...

Congrats!! That's awesome
 
thebigt said:
does anyone else find it ironic when they say...'the nfl players and their OWNERS?
Click to expand...

The team owner does own the NFL players contract right? And can let them go at their pleasure?

I think all these privileged rich players need to stop bitching and complaining, Im sick of these spoiled brats. Just shut up and play and earn your paychecks which you should have nothing to complain about. Work in a mine, factory, road contruction or on the battlefield? Let me hear you out.
 
ax1 said:
The team owner does own the NFL players contract right? And can let them go at their pleasure?

I think all these privileged rich players need to stop bitching and complaining, Im sick of these spoiled brats. Just shut up and play and earn your paychecks which you should have nothing to complain about. Work in a mine, factory, road contruction or on the battlefield? Let me hear you out.
Click to expand...
You've got a point there.

Sent from my XT1650 using Invalid Link Removed
 
ax1 said:
The team owner does own the NFL players contract right? And can let them go at their pleasure?

I think all these privileged rich players need to stop bitching and complaining, Im sick of these spoiled brats. Just shut up and play and earn your paychecks which you should have nothing to complain about. Work in a mine, factory, road contruction or on the battlefield? Let me hear you out.
Click to expand...

But so does the owner of a Burger King with their employees, no?
 
Misfit28 said:
Then again, maybe they feel like they can raise awareness because of their status and visibility?

Sent from my XT1650 using Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

Maybe raise awareness of real issues such as how the Federal Reserve continuously keeps poor people poor, how US Military Industrial Complex policy murders millions of people around the globe, raise awareness how the War on Drugs needs to end and its one of the primary factors that keeps prisons full of minorities....

Like can I hear real issues? All this kneeling I still dont understand what they are complaining about, they just hate Dump but 50 million people voted for him to say stupid politically incorrect crap. All I mentioned above paragraph are all policies Dump supports and I aint getting awareness from the NFL about real issues that effects billions of people, they just are protesting because Dump said owners should fire them for protesting the flag and they have thin skin and dont have a great understanding of the first amendment and private property rights of the NFL owners.

quick rant lol
 
Aleksandar37 said:
But so does the owner of a Burger King with their employees, no?
Click to expand...

I dont see what the big deal is, its just a word "owner" like I dont know why all the sudden that is an issue. If I worked at Burger King Id just be trying to bust my azz trying to become a manager and earn better pay while going to school to try to make something better out of myself and give out my 2 weeks notice as soon as possible. If they are labeled as my owner I dont think this would come up in my head as an issue to me, this isnt slavery lol.
 
ax1 said:
Maybe raise awareness of real issues such as how the Federal Reserve continuously keeps poor people poor, how US Military Industrial Complex policy murders millions of people around the globe, raise awareness how the War on Drugs needs to end and its one of the primary factors that keeps prisons full of minorities....

Like can I hear real issues? All this kneeling I still dont understand what they are complaining about, they just hate Dump but 50 million people voted for him to say stupid politically incorrect crap. All I mentioned above paragraph are all policies Dump supports and I aint getting awareness from the NFL about real issues that effects billions of people, they just are protesting because Dump said owners should fire them for protesting the flag and they have thin skin and dont have a great understanding of the first amendment and private property rights of the NFL owners.

quick rant lol
Click to expand...

It's not about Trump or at least didn't start that way. They're protesting ongoing racism in America which includes a lot of the issues you listed. And they're not doing it for themselves, but for people who aren't millionares and who people won't listen to. Trump however has made it about himself.
 
ax1 said:
I dont see what the big deal is, its just a word "owner" like I dont know why all the sudden that is an issue. If I worked at Burger King Id just be trying to bust my azz trying to become a manager and earn better pay while going to school to try to make something better out of myself and give out my 2 weeks notice as soon as possible. If they are labeled as my owner I dont think this would come up in my head as an issue to me, this isnt slavery lol.
Click to expand...

I'm not saying I have a problem with the word. I was just trying to clarify why some might. That said, I can see why some, especially black people would find it offensive.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
It's not about Trump or at least didn't start that way. They're protesting ongoing racism in America which includes a lot of the issues you listed. And they're not doing it for themselves, but for people who aren't millionares and who people won't listen to. Trump however has made it about himself.
Click to expand...

Its hard to defend Dump, he certainly isnt adapt to publicly involve himself with societal issues, he just needs to shut the fuq up and make policies that will help people which in of course isnt going to happen in a significant amount.

If this started with Kapernick he didnt really come across with race issues well with me especially with some of the people he is involved with starting with his girlfriend.

I think these issues to me are beyond racism, I would just focus on policies that will benefit individual liberties for all as Americans and not make it about race and peoples skin color, but I guess thats where I dont fit in with this latest race card trend because I just dont relate to it or see it that way, I disagree with it. Not saying there isnt racism but there is alot of hypocrisy and grimy special interests involved including racist groups (some with intent, some not but come across that way) that are feeding this whole movement and making races more divisive as this is going along. I like to focus on people, not skin pigment, doesnt really mean anything to me.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
I'm not saying I have a problem with the word. I was just trying to clarify why some might. That said, I can see why some, especially black people would find it offensive.
Click to expand...

White people have been slaves too, and those in asian countries and middle eastern countries, Europeans.

We all have been on the same boat with our ancestors, this isnt an exclusive club and its not the 1800's America anymore.

I dunno I guess if people want title changes they can do it through their Union's and make it happen if it really bothers them. Doesnt change anything though, I dont think these "owners" were really thinking they own humans to begin with.

If anybody ownes anybody its the US Government who at gunpoint steals the fruit of our earnings against our free will, yet they arent labeled as "owners" but their actions do make them true owners of humans. We are all partially slaves most of our lives. Resist? They take the rest of the rights we have as a human beings. Thats my point, this is a real action rather than a vocabulary word.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
It's not about Trump or at least didn't start that way. They're protesting ongoing racism in America which includes a lot of the issues you listed. And they're not doing it for themselves, but for people who aren't millionares and who people won't listen to. Trump however has made it about himself.
Click to expand...

Now...are most of these people actually bringing up real solutions to these issues for real change? Or are they full of hypocrisy and voted and continue to vote for the likes of Hitlery, pretty much any democrat or republican as the solution who most all really support most of the very same policies that are actually hurting the people they think they are defending about?

I think I know and thats why I cant take most of them seriously. Dump isnt any different than most of the people they support anyways other than twitter. I think they just want someone who acts they way they want with no real change in policy. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top