Donald Trump running for president

Misfit28 said:
And Obamacare won't be repealed....AGAIN.
Click to expand...

Why would republicans upset their lobbyists and wallstreet shareholders? Many of them have had stocks right from the beginning especially Boner....Republicans are all fraud, of course they dont want to repeal Oboboscare, they just want to replace it with Oboboscare with a different line here or there that will benefit the insurance agencies and further rip off the American people.
 
Misfit28 said:
So, has anyone looked into the ramifications of a confrontation with North Korea? It's pretty scary.
Click to expand...

I was watching fox one day and a former high ranking official was saying that we have the capability to disable all electronics, including communications and computers...without direct orders from the fat kid I believe there is no subordinate willing to make a decision....


I haven't seen the guy saying this since then and no one had comments or questions. I think he might have let the cat out of the bag, lol.
 
thebigt said:
I was watching fox one day and a former high ranking official was saying that we have the capability to disable all electronics, including communications and computers...without direct orders from the fat kid I believe there is no subordinate willing to make a decision....


I haven't seen the guy saying this since then and no one had comments or questions. I think he might have let the cat out of the bag, lol.
Click to expand...
Here's the thing:

I think both Trump and Kim are mentally unstable.

If either one of them threatens an attack, what's to stop the launch of nukes from either location in preemptive retaliation?
 
ax1 said:
Why would republicans upset their lobbyists and wallstreet shareholders? Many of them have had stocks right from the beginning especially Boner....Republicans are all fraud, of course they dont want to repeal Oboboscare, they just want to replace it with Oboboscare with a different line here or there that will benefit the insurance agencies and further rip off the American people.
Click to expand...

you notice that the latest republican attempt didn't even repeal the penalty for not having over priced hobocare....both sides want that money!!!

that is the reason hobocare won't be repealed---that damned penalty!!!

follow the money trail......
 
thebigt said:
I was watching fox one day and a former high ranking official was saying that we have the capability to disable all electronics, including communications and computers...without direct orders from the fat kid I believe there is no subordinate willing to make a decision....


I haven't seen the guy saying this since then and no one had comments or questions. I think he might have let the cat out of the bag, lol.
Click to expand...

If they are smart they would battle it out anyways because these generals have nothing to gain from standing down. All they have to do is look at all the other wars in recent history.

If there are ramifications Im worried about are all the millions of innocent people that may die.

I dunno anything for sure though, but I dont think war will happen.
 
Misfit28 said:
Here's the thing:

I think both Trump and Kim are mentally unstable.

If either one of them threatens an attack, what's to stop the launch of nukes from either location in preemptive retaliation?
Click to expand...

My guess is Dump isnt as mentally unstable as the general public led to believe and Kim is far more mentally stable and precise that the general public is led to believe, but.....they are all still mentally unstable, pretty much every one of them in both governments, lol
 
Misfit28 said:
Here's the thing:

I think both Trump and Kim are mentally unstable.

If either one of them threatens an attack, what's to stop the launch of nukes from either location in preemptive retaliation?
Click to expand...

I will answer in the order you asked. trump-mattis....kim-china
 
ax1 said:
If they are smart they would battle it out anyways because these generals have nothing to gain from standing down. All they have to do is look at all the other wars in recent history.

If there are ramifications Im worried about are all the millions of innocent people that may die.

I dunno anything for sure though, but I dont think war will happen.
Click to expand...

what do you think would happen if we were able to kill the fat kid?
 
Misfit28 said:
Let's hope so.
Click to expand...

kim is a pampered, overindulged fat kid...the last thing he wants to do is see himself dead!!!

I seriously believe it isn't as easy as some might think for the president to launch nukes....there have to be 'some' safeguards in place!!!!
 
thebigt said:
kim is a pampered, overindulged fat kid...the last thing he wants to do is see himself dead!!!

I seriously believe it isn't as easy as some might think for the president to launch nukes....there have to be 'some' safeguards in place!!!!
Click to expand...
With all due respect, Trump is also a pampered and overindulged fat dude ;)
 
thebigt said:
kim is a pampered, overindulged fat kid...the last thing he wants to do is see himself dead!!!

I seriously believe it isn't as easy as some might think for the president to launch nukes....there have to be 'some' safeguards in place!!!!
Click to expand...
Oh, and the President always has the nuclear "football" nearby. That contains all the codes and the "menu" to call a variety of different nuclear strikes.
 
Misfit28 said:
Oh, and the President always has the nuclear "football" nearby. That contains all the codes and the "menu" to call a variety of different nuclear strikes.
Click to expand...

do you believe that all the president has to do is say give me that 'football' and start launching nukes?
 
thebigt said:
what do you think would happen if we were able to kill the fat kid?
Click to expand...

Just assasinate him? Probably nothing will change.

Actually Kim has been successfully modernizing his country, building up his cities and infrastructure even will all the extreme sanctions laid on his country. He is anti-war, pro-trade and pro-modernization.

There is nothing to gain from killing him, you may get someone far more backwards again.
 
ax1 said:
Just assasinate him? Probably nothing will change.

Actually Kim has been successfully modernizing his country, building up his cities and infrastructure even will all the extreme sanctions laid on his country. He is anti-war, pro-trade and pro-modernization.

There is nothing to gain from killing him, you may get someone far more backwards again.
Click to expand...

lol...besides things have not gone well in our recent regime changes....I am reminded of the saying 'as bad as things are, they can always be worse'.
 
thebigt said:
lol...besides things have not gone well in our recent regime changes....I am reminded of the saying 'as bad as things are, they can always be worse'.
Click to expand...

Ive said this before, if I was Dump I was just fly over there and make peace with Kim and open up trade with him and you can than negotiate soft diplomacy to help the future of Korea and its people and help modernize them.

It worked with China who had a evil dictator arguably worse than Hitler (70-100 million body count) were a nuclear power and a supposed communist threat, Nixon went there made peace with Mao (during the worst of times the middle of the Cultural Revolution) and decades later although the government is still a bunch of goons and thugs (Hi Jack Cafferty!) its really extremely far better now here than the 70s.
 
thebigt said:
do you believe that all the president has to do is say give me that 'football' and start launching nukes?
Click to expand...

That's why the system is set up the way it is. Strike plans are already set. All he has to do is decide which to use. The joint chiefs would be notified, but it is entirely up to him. The only "safe guard" in place is mutiny. How do I know this as non-military and you don't lol
 
Misfit28 said:
Um yeah. Otherwise, what's the point?
Click to expand...

I googled 'the process' for launching nukes...'some' deliberation and consultation MUST 1st take place, even if only briefly....who knows how it would work out in actuality though since it's never been done.
 
youngandfree said:
Since your implication was in reference to Hilary.
Click to expand...

Then why did you question if advisors had to follow the same codes? (I know the answer to my questions. I just like pointing out that you have no ****ing clue what you're talking about and try to get out of your ignorant statements.)
 
Aleksandar37 said:
That's why the system is set up the way it is. Strike plans are already set. All he has to do is decide which to use. The joint chiefs would be notified, but it is entirely up to him. The only "safe guard" in place is mutiny. How do I know this as non-military and you don't lol
Click to expand...

because this is/was way over my pay grade, they never discussed it with me....like you, all I know is what I have been told---how do we know what the truth is until it has been done.
 
what if there is a congressional 'override' in place that we don't know about?

the damned government lies about so many things that aren't even important that it isn't inconceivable they would not tell us the truth about nukes.
 
thebigt said:
because this is/was way over my pay grade, they never discussed it with me....like you, all I know is what I have been told---how do we know what the truth is until it has been done.
Click to expand...

Hopefully it stays that way!

Also, almost happened here...Invalid Link Removed

And another story related to Nixon of how nobody is allowed to question any of this...Invalid Link Removed
 
thebigt said:
what if there is a congressional 'override' in place that we don't know about?

the damned government lies about so many things that aren't even important that it isn't inconceivable they would not tell us the truth about nukes.
Click to expand...

I know shadow government can pull off C.O.G. which can overthrow the President at any given time they please. "Continuity Of Government."

President is primarily a puppet position, it not the most powerful force in our government.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Then why did you question if advisors had to follow the same codes? (I know the answer to my questions. I just like pointing out that you have no ****ing clue what you're talking about and try to get out of your ignorant statements.)
Click to expand...

I have plenty of ****ing clue, its fun watching you and misfit get all pissed off and lash out.

ETA,
There aren't any accusations of them doing anything illegal, unlike what Clinton did.
 
youngandfree said:
I have plenty of ****ing clue, its fun watching you and misfit get all pissed off and lash out.

ETA,
There aren't any accusations of them doing anything illegal, unlike what Clinton did.
Click to expand...

Then use your clue to please explain clearly what evidence there is against Clinton and what law was broken?
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Then use your clue to please explain clearly what evidence there is against Clinton and what law was broken?
Click to expand...

I have to jump in an repeat, isnt there evidence she obscured justice after being issued a subpoena and she wiped her hard drives?

I would throw all those maggots together in the hole anyways lol
 
Misfit28 said:
Especially since no charges were ever brought. Once again, not agreeing with what she said.
Click to expand...

The actual FBI documents said the "7th floor of shadow government" ran the Hitlery investigation, so we all know why that turned out and how government is above the Constitution.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Then use your clue to please explain clearly what evidence there is against Clinton and what law was broken?
Click to expand...

Deleting classified material is against the law. Puppet Comey testified they recovered numerous deleted emails that contained classified material. Just because the Obama DOJ didn't prosecute, doesn't mean she didn't commit a crime.
 
youngandfree said:
Deleting classified material is against the law. Puppet Comey testified they recovered numerous deleted emails that contained classified material. Just because the Obama DOJ didn't prosecute, doesn't mean she didn't commit a crime.
Click to expand...
Actually, technically it does.
 
youngandfree said:
Deleting classified material is against the law. Puppet Comey testified they recovered numerous deleted emails that contained classified material. Just because the Obama DOJ didn't prosecute, doesn't mean she didn't commit a crime.
Click to expand...

If we did that we would instantly be in the slammer playing soap pickup games in the shower....that aint right!!!!!!
 
Misfit28 said:
Actually, technically it does.
Click to expand...

Prosecutorial discretion to not prosecute a person for a crime they committed doesn't mean that person didn't commit a crime. A quitting someone that was charged with a crime means they were adjudicated to have not committed a crime. Prosecutors all over the country make decisions not to prosecute people for crimes they committed. Puppet Comey layed out the case in testimony why they "decided" not to recommend charges, while detailing g the crimes she committed.
 
youngandfree said:
Prosecutorial discretion to not prosecute a person for a crime they committed doesn't mean that person didn't commit a crime. A quitting someone that was charged with a crime means they were adjudicated to have not committed a crime. Prosecutors all over the country make decisions not to prosecute people for crimes they committed. Puppet Comey layed out the case in testimony why they "decided" not to recommend charges, while detailing g the crimes she committed.
Click to expand...
If you aren't charged and prosecuted, technically you didn't commit a crime in the eyes of the law.
 
youngandfree said:
Prosecutorial discretion to not prosecute a person for a crime they committed doesn't mean that person didn't commit a crime. A quitting someone that was charged with a crime means they were adjudicated to have not committed a crime. Prosecutors all over the country make decisions not to prosecute people for crimes they committed. Puppet Comey layed out the case in testimony why they "decided" not to recommend charges, while detailing g the crimes she committed.
Click to expand...

He didnt say she did or didnt :) But he is right, officially she is innocent of all accusations. until proven otherwise.
 
youngandfree said:
Deleting classified material is against the law. Puppet Comey testified they recovered numerous deleted emails that contained classified material. Just because the Obama DOJ didn't prosecute, doesn't mean she didn't commit a crime.
Click to expand...

Where the proof? You're asking for proof on Trump's whore and her cuckold husband and I'm asking where the proof is on Hillary. You're also going to have to make up your mind if Comey is a puppet or telling the truth. Is his testimony your only "proof"? The word of a guy that you're openly saying can't be trusted? How does that make sense?
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Where the proof? You're asking for proof on Trump's whore and her cuckold husband and I'm asking where the proof is on Hillary. You're also going to have to make up your mind if Comey is a puppet or telling the truth. Is his testimony your only "proof"? The word of a guy that you're openly saying can't be trusted? How does that make sense?
Click to expand...
All I know is there must be a rather large cherry pie somewhere.....
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Where the proof? You're asking for proof on Trump's whore and her cuckold husband and I'm asking where the proof is on Hillary. You're also going to have to make up your mind if Comey is a puppet or telling the truth. Is his testimony your only "proof"? The word of a guy that you're openly saying can't be trusted? How does that make sense?
Click to expand...

You're only proof is unnamed anonymous sources leaking information to partisan "news" organizations that have been proven to report fake information.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
Where the proof? You're asking for proof on Trump's whore and her cuckold husband and I'm asking where the proof is on Hillary. You're also going to have to make up your mind if Comey is a puppet or telling the truth. Is his testimony your only "proof"? The word of a guy that you're openly saying can't be trusted? How does that make sense?
Click to expand...

Dude, no disrespect but you are talking about the mans daughter. If you don’t like the president fine, but going after the kids is sad. Did you do that to the Obama girls, Bush girls?
 
AE14 said:
Dude, no disrespect but you are talking about the mans daughter. If you don’t like the president fine, but going after the kids is sad. Did you do that to the Obama girls, Bush girls?
Click to expand...
While I don't necessarily agree with the terms he used to describe Trump's daughter, she is a part of his administration. She's also an adult, which the two previous administration's daughters weren't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top