Guest viewing limit reached
  • You have reached the maximum number of guest views allowed
  • Please register below to remove this limitation

Donald Trump running for president

youngandfree said:
The President can declassified information at his discretion, according to your Wapo article, thereby not breaking any laws.

Try again.
Click to expand...

You notice that no one from the WH is responding to his major league efff up today. They don't know what to do because the guy is so freaking stupid lol
 
youngandfree said:
Secondarily, ISIS plans to make laptop bombs were made pretty public 2 months ago when laptops were banned from carry on luggage on airplanes. I'm sure the Russians were reading news articles back then.
Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

people seem to forget that it was a RUSSIAN plane that they believe was brought down by a onboard laptop!!!
 
jswain34 said:
I actually had my laptop checked when going through security at Manchester Airport in NH about a month ago. Thought it was weird at the time but id much rather them be safe rather than have something horrendous happen.
Click to expand...

How is that going to keep you safe when they are clogging up the security lines with ridiculous security measures when some terrorist can simply blow up the masses of people inside the airport?
 
ax1 said:
How is that going to keep you safe when they are clogging up the security lines with ridiculous security measures when some terrorist can simply blow up the masses of people inside the airport?
Click to expand...

Id rather them check my laptop and have these security measures than have 0 security measures and let whoever bring whatever they want on any airplane. I get your point, there are more people in airports than a single airplane, but i dont see how having 0 security to board a plane could be a good thing. Also, usually the majority of people in an airport are on the OTHER side of the security checkpoint. So, once again, it makes sense to have one. If they have intel saying ISIS is going to make bombs out of laptops, then by all means take my laptop out and check it. It takes all of about 5 minutes and could save hundreds.
 
jswain34 said:
Id rather them check my laptop and have these security measures than have 0 security measures and let whoever bring whatever they want on any airplane. I get your point, there are more people in airports than a single airplane, but i dont see how having 0 security to board a plane could be a good thing. Also, usually the majority of people in an airport are on the OTHER side of the security checkpoint. So, once again, it makes sense to have one. If they have intel saying ISIS is going to make bombs out of laptops, then by all means take my laptop out and check it. It takes all of about 5 minutes and could save hundreds.
Click to expand...

What is the intel? All I've seen is USA Today reports. Why is the general public so easily swayed by bs? You need the NSA to keep you safe...you need the Patriot Act to keep you safe...you need the military to keep you safe. All bs and all so easily accepted.
 
jameschoi said:
You notice that no one from the WH is responding to his major league efff up today. They don't know what to do because the guy is so freaking stupid lol
Click to expand...

Invalid Link Removed

Everyone in the meeting says it didn't happen the way the unnamed former employees said it did.
 
Aleksandar37 said:
What is the intel? All I've seen is USA Today reports. Why is the general public so easily swayed by bs? You need the NSA to keep you safe...you need the Patriot Act to keep you safe...you need the military to keep you safe. All bs and all so easily accepted.
Click to expand...

I don't know about the intel, that isnt the point of my post though. Notice I wrote "IF they have intel".

I dont NEED them to keep me safe, but some people DO. Some people dont have the capacity to fend for their own lives, and a lot of people that do wouldnt help others if they were in need. What is the problem with them checking your laptop lol? When one dude brings some sort of explosive on a plane and blows people up you same people will bitch about the fact that no one checked them. Do we just bitch about everything nowadays?
 
jswain34 said:
Id rather them check my laptop and have these security measures than have 0 security measures and let whoever bring whatever they want on any airplane. I get your point, there are more people in airports than a single airplane, but i dont see how having 0 security to board a plane could be a good thing. Also, usually the majority of people in an airport are on the OTHER side of the security checkpoint. So, once again, it makes sense to have one. If they have intel saying ISIS is going to make bombs out of laptops, then by all means take my laptop out and check it. It takes all of about 5 minutes and could save hundreds.
Click to expand...

Thats fair enough. I can go along with some security as long as security doesnt involve having your privates fondled and groped and having controversial body scanners that may or may not put peoples health at risks. I dont mind having my laptop checked (not my data, ) metal detectors, basic pat downs....having some of our troops walking around with giant guns at a high risk area, etc.....Again, I have to remind you hundreds of people are stuck on line and its easy to blow them all up anyways. Security needs to be reformed and they need to stop hiring slimy Wallmart employees as TSA agents to molest children.
 
jswain34 said:
I don't know about the intel, that isnt the point of my post though. Notice I wrote "IF they have intel".

I dont NEED them to keep me safe, but some people DO. Some people dont have the capacity to fend for their own lives, and a lot of people that do wouldnt help others if they were in need. What is the problem with them checking your laptop lol? When one dude brings some sort of explosive on a plane and blows people up you same people will bitch about the fact that no one checked them. Do we just bitch about everything nowadays?
Click to expand...

The problem is that they've given you nothing but lies to invade your privacy and you not only fell for it, you're here defending it for them. How has the NSA or the Patriot Act or Homeland Security made us safer? The right to privacy has always been a huge part of what made the US different. We've been taught about those "scary" communist countries that ask to see your papers or can come into your home whenever they want, but here we are having our laptops and phones inspected by minimum wage ****heads at the TSA because we've been told of some mystery threat.
 
Bro, they literally scan your laptop with this wand for like 3 minutes lol. They aren't ravaging through the files on your computer.

And id appreciate it if you'd stop putting words in my mouth. Ive been talking about one thing this entire time and that has been the scanning of laptops for explosives.
 
jswain34 said:
Bro, they literally scan your laptop with this wand for like 3 minutes lol. They aren't ravaging through the files on your computer.

And id appreciate it if you'd stop putting words in my mouth. Ive been talking about one thing this entire time and that has been the scanning of laptops for explosives.
Click to expand...

So what's the limit? That's not the line TSA is now stopping at, so tell me then what you think the limit should be.
 
jswain34 said:
Bro, they literally scan your laptop with this wand for like 3 minutes lol. They aren't ravaging through the files on your computer.

And id appreciate it if you'd stop putting words in my mouth. Ive been talking about one thing this entire time and that has been the scanning of laptops for explosives.
Click to expand...

And yes, they are going through computer files and cell phones.
 
an interesting rumor being floated about a dead dnc guy named seth rich.
 
Misfit28 said:
Be rumors, you mean conspiracy theories?
Click to expand...

lol...probably, but it would be funny as hell if it wasn't even the Russians who hacked the dnc---c'mon, even you have to see the humor in that!!!
 
I have Trump impeached on July 4th and a special waiver by congress to have Arnold take over the presidency until 2020. Can you believe a guy like Comey is going to take down Trump. There is a God.


Invalid Link Removed
 
jameschoi said:
I have Trump impeached on July 4th and a special waiver by congress to have Arnold take over the presidency until 2020. Can you believe a guy like Comey is going to take down Trump. There is a God.


Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

in the words of stevie tyler and aerosmith...DREAM ON
 
jameschoi said:
I have Trump impeached on July 4th and a special waiver by congress to have Arnold take over the presidency until 2020. Can you believe a guy like Comey is going to take down Trump. There is a God.


Invalid Link Removed
Click to expand...

You've seen the maid he knocked up right? You want that kind of judgement in charge of the country?
 
jameschoi said:
My new top 3:
The Rock
John Stewart
Stephen Colbert
Click to expand...
Haha. In all seriousness, Mark Cuban, who entertained the thought of running or being a VP, could have been all the things people liked about the idea of Trump (billionaire "non-Politician" who speaks his mind) without many of the negatives. He described himself as slightly libertarian leaning, but still with some social safety nets.
 
muscleupcrohn said:
Haha. In all seriousness, Mark Cuban, who entertained the thought of running or being a VP, could have been all the things people liked about the idea of Trump (billionaire "non-Politician" who speaks his mind) without many of the negatives. He described himself as slightly libertarian leaning, but still with some social safety nets.
Click to expand...

lol...if you think trump has a big ego!!!!

that guy scares the crap out of me....trump seems humble in comparison.
 
muscleupcrohn said:
Haha. In all seriousness, Mark Cuban, who entertained the thought of running or being a VP, could have been all the things people liked about the idea of Trump (billionaire "non-Politician" who speaks his mind) without many of the negatives. He described himself as slightly libertarian leaning, but still with some social safety nets.
Click to expand...

From triumph to tragedy. Trump is totally written off of any chance of winning. Hillary has it in the bag and Trump ends up winning. Now Trump will have to pick a new FBI director who in the end is going to take him down.
 
thebigt said:
lol...if you think trump has a big ego!!!!

that guy scares the crap out of me....trump seems humble in comparison.
Click to expand...
All these people have astronomical egos, that pretty much comes with the territory at this point. At the least, it seems, from what I've heard/read, that Cuban is an intelligent guy who can work with and listen to others, and doesn't stick his foot in his mouth (or on Twitter) as much as Trump.
 
jameschoi said:
From triumph to tragedy. Trump is totally written off of any chance of winning. Hillary has it in the bag and Trump ends up winning. Now Trump will have to pick a new FBI director who in the end is going to take him down.
Click to expand...

are you trying out a new stand up comedy routine?

dude you are cracking me up:toofunny:
 
thebigt said:
are you trying out a new stand up comedy routine?

dude you are cracking me up:toofunny:
Click to expand...
I've been hearing that the President is going to be impeached for 8+ years now, from both sides, so I don't really even take it seriously anymore. You've heard about the boy who cried wolf; in politics it's the loser (on either side) who cried Impeach.
 
thebigt said:
lol...if you think trump has a big ego!!!!

that guy scares the crap out of me....trump seems humble in comparison.
Click to expand...

I would prefer someone who at least acts with more professionalism in that position, but really all I care about is policy. The nicest "acting" people are often behind closed doors the worst filth on earth.
 
ax1 said:
I would prefer someone who at least acts with more professionalism in that position, but really all I care about is policy. The nicest "acting" people are often behind closed doors the worst filth on earth.
Click to expand...

are you kidding me...that guy is tooo freaking arrogant-you give him that kind of power and he is off the scale...i'm telling you that guy is trouble with a capital T.
 
thebigt said:
are you kidding me...that guy is tooo freaking arrogant-you give him that kind of power and he is off the scale...i'm telling you that guy is trouble with a capital T.
Click to expand...

Oh I didnt mean I prefer mark cuban but rather in anyone in that position in general...I dunno much about Cuban outside of basketball and the show but Ill note down that warning lol
 
muscleupcrohn said:
See my previous post. Regardless, isn't Pence exponentially more conservative than Trump? I've heard that he's basically "insurance" against Trump being killed/etc, since liberals REALLY wouldn't want him being the POTUS.
Click to expand...
Honestly though, has any President since Nixon done something like what Trump has allegedly done in recent memory?
 
Misfit28 said:
Honestly though, has any President since Nixon done something like what Trump has allegedly done in recent memory?
Click to expand...

You mean tell your foreign friends warning of terrorist attacks? Or firing the FBI director like Clinton did in the 90s?
 
Misfit28 said:
No.

Impeding an FBI investigation by firing the FBI director.
Click to expand...

Hey, he got it easy...Im not sure Dump has assassinated anyone yet like Obama, Bush, Clinton..etc....

Personally I would just fire the entire FBI, federal police forces should not exist and the FBI is already corrupt beyond belief.
 
Misfit28 said:
No.

Impeding an FBI investigation by firing the FBI director.
Click to expand...

the comparison to Nixon is obscure...#1. a crime had been proven. #2. Archibald cox was a independent special prosecutor.

trump has not been accused of any crime, and has often been said, 1st you need to have a crime to prosecute.

#3. the director of the fbi doesn't investigate anything, he is an administrator...the investigation will continue no matter who is director.

#4....everything anti-trump is being leaked---commonsense should tell you that if they truly had any dirt on trump we would have heard about it by now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
thebigt said:
the comparison to Nixon is obscure...#1. a crime had been proven. #2. Archibald cox was a independent special prosecutor.

trump has not been accused of any crime, and has often been said, 1st you need to have a crime to prosecute.

#3. the director of the fbi doesn't investigate anything, he is an administrator...the investigation will continue no matter who is director.

#4....everything anti-trump is being leaked---commonsense should tell you that if they truly had any dirt on trump we would have heard about it by now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
He asked the FBI director to stop an investigation.

Just because the crime hasn't been proven doesn't mean there isn't a crime.
 
Misfit28 said:
He asked the FBI director to stop an investigation.

Just because the crime hasn't been proven doesn't mean there isn't a crime.
Click to expand...

I haven't heard this about asking comey to stop the investigation....It's my understanding that if trump had asked comey to stop the investigation that comey was required by law to report this to his boss the asst attorney general immediately!!!

there hasn't even been an accusation of a crime...
 
Misfit28 said:
He asked the FBI director to stop an investigation.

Just because the crime hasn't been proven doesn't mean there isn't a crime.
Click to expand...

You cant argue that its a good point its obstruction of justice if true, but what bothers me is the same hypocrites making this an issue didnt consider wiping out hard drives after a subpoena obstruction of justice. Ive been seeing nothing but hypocrisy all over the media, from politicians and these phony azz puppets on television.
 
Misfit28 said:
He asked the FBI director to stop an investigation.

Just because the crime hasn't been proven doesn't mean there isn't a crime.
Click to expand...

has comey said this-no.
has anyone seen this memo-no
it was supposedly from February...and as the democrats are fond of saying---the timing doesn't pass the smell test...

under the law comey is in violation if this really happened and he didn't immediately report it to the proper authorities--primarily his boss the asst AG
 
thebigt said:
has comey said this-no.
has anyone seen this memo-no
it was supposedly from February...and as the democrats are fond of saying---the timing doesn't pass the smell test...

under the law comey is in violation if this really happened and he didn't immediately report it to the proper authorities--primarily his boss the asst AG
Click to expand...
I guess we'll see.

It's just something every day with this slimy ass administration.
 
thebigt said:
has comey said this-no.
has anyone seen this memo-no
it was supposedly from February...and as the democrats are fond of saying---the timing doesn't pass the smell test...

under the law comey is in violation if this really happened and he didn't immediately report it to the proper authorities--primarily his boss the asst AG
Click to expand...

I bet it was Obama who wrote that memo ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top