Guest viewing is limited

Donald Trump running for president

Invalid Link Removed

It clearly says the author MAKES THE PRESUMPTION that Trump was referring to the neighbors who saw a bunch of boxes. I'm sure there were people in San Bernardino that did know about the plan, and they were prosecuted. Remember the friend that bought the rifles? He knew about it and was arrested.
 
Keep copy/pasting and I will keep saying the same **** over and over too

He clearly stated that people with knowledge of SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY should be arrested and punished severely, he wants the laws expanded. WTF does that even mean?

What defines SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY? I live in Brooklyn, I see all sorts of weird $hit that seems normal from day to day.
Click to expand...
 
Gutterpump said:
But much worse lol
Click to expand...

Obama already allows himself to legally detain any American without due process, no lawyer no nothing for any reason he chooses and kill them too so I dunno if Trump will follow that extreme or not.
 
You haven't cited where Trump said what you are claiming. You are just as bad as Mattandyo that claims Dan Patrick was celebrating the killing of gay people, because a tweet with a bible verse went out automatically with no added text to even make an assumption on what he meant.
 
youngandfree said:
You haven't cited where Trump said what you are claiming. You are just as bad as Mattandyo that claims Dan Patrick was celebrating the killing of gay people, because a tweet with a bible verse went out automatically with no added text to even make an assumption on what he meant.
Click to expand...

They say watch what you say.

I say there even no point in doing that anymore.

You can say, "hey how is your mom and dad doing?" And then you get "don't you have any sensitivity towards orphans you child hating racist rapist bigot!"
 
youngandfree said:
You haven't cited where Trump said what you are claiming. You are just as bad as Mattandyo that claims Dan Patrick was celebrating the killing of gay people, because a tweet with a bible verse went out automatically with no added text to even make an assumption on what he meant.
Click to expand...

The title of the damn article is even "Donald Trump: Americans Who Don’t Report Their Suspicious Neighbors Should Be ‘Brought To Justice’"
“These people need to have consequences, big consequences,” Trump said.

Perhaps you're just blind. But he is certainly speaking specifically about "suspicious neighbors" as well as those who definitely knew things.
 
If you wish to have people arrested and put in jail because they saw something which might be deemed 'suspicious' without even knowing for sure what was happening, then you're a ****ing fascist. Plain and simple.
 
Gutterpump I actually am almost legally blind when not wearing contacts or glasses, so I find it offensive when you call someone blind as an insult. You should respect my sensitivity and find other ways to insult people.
I'm gonna have to go find a safe space or something for the time being.
 
Invalid Link Removed

..."has predicted every president correctly since 1992." Will Trump be the outlier or continue the streak?!
 
Gutterpump said:
The title of the damn article is even "Donald Trump: Americans Who Don’t Report Their Suspicious Neighbors Should Be ‘Brought To Justice’"
“These people need to have consequences, big consequences,” Trump said.

Perhaps you're just blind. But he is certainly speaking specifically about "suspicious neighbors" as well as those who definitely knew things.
Click to expand...

I know what the title is. You are quoting a historically liberal nut licking website that wrote a hit piece on Donald Trump. I pulled a section out that shows the AUTHOR ADMITTING to making a presumption about who Trump was talking about. You are the blind one for taking what the Huffpo prints as gospel.

You keep crying and saying you are leaving this thread. When you get called out, you throw a temper tantrum and start personally attacking people, just like a good lib. You are one of the ones that proclaim you have to have an unbiased source or it isn't credible, but I guess that only applies to opinions that differs than yours.
 
BamBam0319 said:
Gutterpump I actually am almost legally blind when not wearing contacts or glasses, so I find it offensive when you call someone blind as an insult. You should respect my sensitivity and find other ways to insult people.
I'm gonna have to go find a safe space or something for the time being.
Click to expand...

Yo mamma's got a safe space for you, right between her thighs.
 
BamBam0319 said:
Gutterpump I actually am almost legally blind when not wearing contacts or glasses, so I find it offensive when you call someone blind as an insult. You should respect my sensitivity and find other ways to insult people.
I'm gonna have to go find a safe space or something for the time being.
Click to expand...

I actually was considered legally blind before I had a life changing surgical procedure, so I find it offensive when you find it offensive when someone calls you blind as an insult. Now I need a safe space but not the same safe space you are in because it wouldn't be safe for me.
 
youngandfree said:
I know what the title is. You are quoting a historically liberal nut licking website that wrote a hit piece on Donald Trump. I pulled a section out that shows the AUTHOR ADMITTING to making a presumption about who Trump was talking about. You are the blind one for taking what the Huffpo prints as gospel.

You keep crying and saying you are leaving this thread. When you get called out, you throw a temper tantrum and start personally attacking people, just like a good lib. You are one of the ones that proclaim you have to have an unbiased source or it isn't credible, but I guess that only applies to opinions that differs than yours.
Click to expand...

I said once that I was leaving, once lol... and honestly this thread is what keeps me coming back to AM :) All I see is you crying in here, day in and day out. Defending your noble Trump.
 
youngandfree said:
Of you actually took the time to read what I posted, instead of being blinded by your ideology, you'd know o posted 2 completely different sections from your article.
Click to expand...

I don't have an ideology. I simply believe in liberty (and am a pragmatist, not an ideologist). Something Trump stands strongly against. Yes I saw both halves, but you were ignoring everything I was saying about suspicion.
 
Gutterpump said:
Yo mamma's got a safe space for you, right between her thighs.
Click to expand...

Ehhhhh maybe you Canucks are into that weird incest stuff but I just can't really find the excitement in it.
 
toddmuelheim said:
I actually was considered legally blind before I had a life changing surgical procedure, so I find it offensive when you find it offensive when someone calls you blind as an insult. Now I need a safe space but not the same safe space you are in because it wouldn't be safe for me.
Click to expand...

Lmao. For real though, I can't legally operate a motorized vehicle without corrective eyewear.
Once I can afford it, I'm going to get lasik.
 
Gutterpump said:
I don't have an ideology. I simply believe in liberty (and am a pragmatist, not an ideologist). Something Trump stands strongly against. Yes I saw both halves, but you were ignoring everything I was saying about suspicion.
Click to expand...

You are confusing the author's opinion and analysis of what Trump said with his actual words and context.
 
youngandfree said:
You are confusing the author's opinion and analysis of what Trump said with his actual words and context.
Click to expand...

On the contrary, I know exactly what Donald Trump has been saying, and this is not the first time he's said this. I am only quoting his own words. We can continue to talk about this for days if you'd like.

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

So he's been saying this now for a while. The only difference now is that he wants to severely punish those who do not report suspicious activity, instead of just saying that we all should be cops, and that we all need to profile.
 
Invalid Link Removed
Hope nobody gets traumatized by my shirt
 
Nah. Kids shouldn't have access to guns. Thats adult's negligence. So take your zing back
 
Gutterpump said:
Nah... As much as I DO like guns, I don't think assault rifles belong in our households.
Click to expand...

I dont see the problem in owning them if you keep them secured in a safe, etc. If you want them, be responsible. Dont be responsible - pay the price (which could be jail + the loss of a loved one). Thats my thought on it.

Although, my viewpoint may be biased because i know the precautions my father took to keep the weapons and ammunition he owns secure in that big ass safe.
 
In NY, you can't rent anything but a hand gun to shoot at ranges, but I have access to the NYPD shooting range, and can shoot anything I please, so I personally have no need for assault weapons. I certainly don't need an assault rifle to protect my home.

In other states, gun ranges are pretty much a free for all, you can shoot anything, almost anywhere. So I don't see the problem. Assault weapons are overkill for personal home defense.
 
jswain34 said:
I dont see the problem in owning them if you keep them secured in a safe, etc. If you want them, be responsible. Dont be responsible - pay the price (which could be jail + the loss of a loved one). Thats my thought on it.

Although, my viewpoint may be biased because i know the precautions my father took to keep the weapons and ammunition he owns secure in that big ass safe.
Click to expand...

2nd Amendment was put in to protect the 1st, no way in hell I support a majority of gun laws. Most people are good, good people with weapons = win.

The education is screwed up, we can teach people not to be afraid of guns and involve all kinds of weapons training starting in elementary school and also training not to be scared of bad people.

Instead the opposite is taught. People are conditioned to be scared. Then if we stick up to bullies we are punished for it. In an educated society when you have hundreds of people in a room with a 1 armed man (well I know it was at least 3) everybody simply will go after him and kick his ass, its the best chance for survival. He cant shoot in all directions. There was a guy who walked into a mall with a bushmaster a few years back and the Best Buy door man ran up to him and tackled him to the ground and it was over after a few shots.
 
Gutterpump said:
In NY, you can't rent anything but a hand gun to shoot at ranges, but I have access to the NYPD shooting range, and can shoot anything I please, so I personally have no need for assault weapons. I certainly don't need an assault rifle to protect my home.

In other states, gun ranges are pretty much a free for all, you can shoot anything, almost anywhere. So I don't see the problem. Assault weapons are overkill for personal home defense.
Click to expand...

Its extremely difficult to get a conceal permit in souther tier NY no matter how clean your record is.

Are you able to get a handgun permit for home in Brooklyn?

Civil Unrest, you never know....look into LA riots how Koreatown was kept safe, assault weapons are best.
 
Gutterpump said:
In NY, you can't rent anything but a hand gun to shoot at ranges, but I have access to the NYPD shooting range, and can shoot anything I please, so I personally have no need for assault weapons. I certainly don't need an assault rifle to protect my home.

In other states, gun ranges are pretty much a free for all, you can shoot anything, almost anywhere. So I don't see the problem. Assault weapons are overkill for personal home defense.
Click to expand...

While i agree there are better options for everyday home defense, you never know man. Id rather have one than be sitting there saying "damn it. I wish the govt didnt take my assault rifle." God forbid (and yes, i realize this is a stretch - but completely possible) what if the US were to get invaded by a foreign enemy? Id personally enjoy being able to protect myself with any means possible.

...or just wait til TWD comes to life. Ill be with my assault rifle burrowed up in my barn taking em out while you run around with your handgun .
 
ax1 said:
Its extremely difficult to get a conceal permit in souther tier NY no matter how clean your record is.

Are you able to get a handgun permit for home in Brooklyn?

Civil Unrest....look into LA how Koreatown was kept safe, assault weapons are best.
Click to expand...

I haven't looked into it. I do have a 100# american bulldog for home protection, deterrence, and fun though. I'm not interested in carrying firearms, I just love the range. I'm extremely lucky to have access to the NYPD range.
 
Matthandyo said:
Invalid Link Removed

Or bronkaid
Click to expand...

Now, im not educated on this specific scenario, can ONE PERSON go to the store and buy multiple ARs in one purchase?

I personally cant see that being the case, but that's why im asking.
 
ax1 said:
2nd Amendment was put in to protect the 1st, no way in hell I support a majority of gun laws. Most people are good, good people with weapons = win.

The education is screwed up, we can teach people not to be afraid of guns and involve all kinds of weapons training starting in elementary school and also training not to be scared of bad people.

Instead the opposite is taught. People are conditioned to be scared. Then if we stick up to bullies we are punished for it. In an educated society when you have hundreds of people in a room with a 1 armed man (well I know it was at least 3) everybody simply will go after him and kick his ass, its the best chance for survival. He cant shoot in all directions. There was a guy who walked into a mall with a bushmaster a few years back and the Best Buy door man ran up to him and tackled him to the ground and it was over after a few shots.
Click to expand...

The patrons should have kicked that bouncer's ass that wouldn't let them go out the back door. 10 on 1 and that door would have been open in no time.
 
jswain34 said:
While i agree there are better options for everyday home defense, you never know man. Id rather have one than be sitting there saying "damn it. I wish the govt didnt take my assault rifle." God forbid (and yes, i realize this is a stretch - but completely possible) what if the US were to get invaded by a foreign enemy? Id personally enjoy being able to protect myself with any means possible.

...or just wait til TWD comes to life. Ill be with my assault rifle burrowed up in my barn taking em out while you run around with your handgun .
Click to expand...

If there is a civil war or unrest and your in trouble government will not be there to help you, you are on your own.

Besides they tell us there are terrorists everywhere right? You cant have it both ways, warn of terrorism and war on self defense. When terrorism strikes cops show up after the crime.
 
ax1 said:
If there is a civil war or unrest and your in trouble government will not be there to help you, you are on your own.

Besides they tell us there are terrorists everywhere right? You cant have it both ways, warn of terrorism and war on self defense. When terrorism strikes cops show up after the crime.
Click to expand...

Exactly why i want my fuggin assault rifle lol
 
jswain34 said:
Now, im not educated on this specific scenario, can ONE PERSON go to the store and buy multiple ARs in one purchase?

I personally cant see that being the case, but that's why im asking.
Click to expand...

Depends on the state. Some states don't allow multiple purchases in same day. Many do. If you can pass the check for one, then ring it up till your broke.

Remember Obama's scheme FAST AND FURIOUS? Because the ATF allowed people to illegally buy guns in southern states, the ATF made a regulation saying the Mexican border states had to report any multiple gun sales of rifles, even if it was a basic 22lr ground hog gun. VA used to be 1 gun purchase per month.

Remember the San Bernardino terrorists? They used guns that were illegal to posess in Cali, because it had "assault weapon features". How much good did that assault weapons ban do?
 
Matthandyo said:
Invalid Link Removed

Or bronkaid
Click to expand...

Thats two boxes in NY per day.

That post makes you think but rather Im thinking how atrocious the war on drugs are, it needs to end. Weapons and bronkaid for life!
 
youngandfree said:
The patrons should have kicked that bouncer's ass that wouldn't let them go out the back door. 10 on 1 and that door would have been open in no time.
Click to expand...

I thought the same thing, Id bash his face in so hard he would need reconstructive surgery, then Id tell people come on lets get the f' out!
 
youngandfree said:
Remember the San Bernardino terrorists? They used guns that were illegal to posess in Cali, because it had "assault weapon features". How much good did that assault weapons ban do?
Click to expand...

They had a police issued stock gun too, mind blown....thanks Obama for calling the standown order on the investigation such as Hitlery did for the Orlando shooter!
 
Gutterpump said:
KICK SOME ASS!!!!! MURRRRRICAAAAA!!!!
Click to expand...

So you would have let some jackass hold the door and not let people out of the gay club you frequent, when there's 3 guys shooting the place up? The problem is every single one of those people that complied with one dude holding the door didn't have enough will to fight for their life. That has nothing to do with Murica. It has to do with people's unwillingness to protect themselves and fight, instead they said Ok let's huddle up in the corner and wait to die.

It's not about how many guns a person owns or anything related to that. You just have to be willing to fight for yourself when the **** hits the fan. It should be an instinct you're born with, but I guess people allow it to be taught out of their mindset.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top